Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Monahan (42)  

Feedback:   All (1456)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (95)  |   Replies (1337)

Other:   Replies Received (658)  |   Trust Ratings (55)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1337 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Divinx's Reply

OK, now I understand what that "credits" stuff is that appeared on the screen.

I signed up last night and my first impression is that they did a nice job with the site improvements. I first went to one of my favorites (Mandy Dee) and downloaded a 2011 video that was sized 720. It was very sharp and totally satisfactory, so may be back as a regular subscriber,

Thanks again for your review. I'll write one myself once I've gotten used to it.


03-05-15  11:28am

Reply
2
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review

Great review, WG.

I was subscribed back when they had the "loyalty" program (incremental site additions to the basic subscription every month as you stayed on as a subscriber). They even guaranteed permanent continued access provided I stayed subscribed continuously. I topped out but was always very satisfied with the content and quality (I'm a video guy with only a passing interest in photos).

Then they said "fuck you" to those of us who trusted them to honor their "guarantee" and went ahead and split into two sites and forced me to go with the 21Sextreme site, so I lost access to the basic 21Sextury sites. I bitched a lot but got nowhere so, rather than signing up for the 21Sextury site and starting anew with the loyalty program, I decided to walk away.

It's been about three years since they pulled the shitty marketing crap (they've actually split sites again) but I still miss their content. Now with the TBP discount price of $15 for just 21Sextury, and because of your review, I'm set to try again and see what's new. I'm hoping that some of my favorite videos are still available (this time I'll download them) and that the new stuff added over the many months I've been away will convince me I'm doing the right thing.

Thanks again for your review.


03-04-15  08:19pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Agree with Jay.

The sites that charge more than $30 are myopic or clumsy. Many (most?) porn fans will hit that barrier and simply move on rather than taking a shot fro a month.

Yes, I paid big bucks for my porn back in the day, but that's when the market was restricted by local laws.

BTW, I've signed up for 2 big bucks sites and was very disappointed by the content.


03-04-15  02:24pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Not for me. One give away at how crappy they are is where the $1 auto-renews at a higher price than the regular recurring monthly price.

03-01-15  12:57pm

Reply
5
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(3)
Reply of Pyrenees's Review

Their business practices also suck. Refer to the comments and earlier reviews.

50 is too high a score for this once terrific, but no longer, site. (Yes, I know that we cannot score any site lower than 50, but in this case I wish we could.


02-26-15  11:10pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

This poll was posted just a few days ago. Why is it being repeated?

02-26-15  11:05pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Denner's Reply

Ditto what Denner said. Plus, three other reasons.
1. Booting up requires a password on my computer so if something happens (home break-in, etc.), my stuff is difficult to access by a bad guy/gal.
2. Closing down lets me make sure all applications and all files have been closed and it clears cache.
3. I have a loaded 17" laptop that the mfr says has a 6 hour battery. If we have a power outage when my computer is left idle for a long period of time, I won't be able to access anything.

One other thing. My computer tech guy says that, when a computer is idle but still running, critical parts continue to operate which can cause unnecessary wear and tear on things like the hard drive.


02-22-15  12:38pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

Don't like videos of blow jobs. Most of them spend far too much time on the guy's schlong and far too little time on the babe's body parts. I've got a mirror so if a schlong is what I want to see, I can check out my own. (Needless to say, if it's my schlong that's getting the hummer, that's another story!

02-20-15  09:44pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

All the above.

Some are very responsive and respond quickly, others never reply at all and still others send a canned reply that doesn't answer the issue.

A big uptick to the good folks at DDF Network. They are superb.


02-16-15  02:21pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Originally, when I first ran into them on Naughty America, I thought they were content. Turns out that NA shared my credit card info with the sites and I wound up getting billed full bore prices for those sites.

I successfully had the charges reversed, but that's when I cancelled NA for good and have never gone back.

Rather than answering "hate" I answered "dislike" because, unlike what happened with NA, which I consider to be a fraudulent activity, now that I know the rules, I just find them annoying.


02-12-15  02:00pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Having been stung by promises that DRM would not cause me any personal problems with downloads, which turned out to be downright lies, Most such situations lock you out of your downloads if you aren't a continuing member of the site even if the liars say otherwise.

I will no longer join any sites with DRM. Period. There is no alternative that I would ever consider.


02-01-15  04:02pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Well, on second thought, it does matter. It means that I won't be successful when I propose marriage to the model.

01-29-15  05:27pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

I've dropped a few because they went a little porky (Carmella Bing and Lisa sparxxx, for example).

I've also lost interest when a sexy, all natural gorgeous doll decides to visit a surgeon to do some aftermarket boob adjustments (Jana Foxy...aka Jana Jordan).

OK, I'll admit I've also occasionally slowed up a bit when a babe gets older but I don't really care if she marries (except I get a tad jealous).

Not on the list is when a babe stays on the job while preggers. I know there are many who like pregnant babes, but I'd rather wait until they're back in normal shape. (Haley Cummings was gorgeous before and after her pregnancy and I'm still a big fan...but I didn't care to see her continue to work while she was in the later stages of her pregnancy.

Also not on the list is excessive body art added after the babe starts in porn. Gianna Michaels is an exception. Don't like her tats at all but I'm in total awe of her fantastic orbs and how well she shows them off.

Finally, although rare, I've dropped a few (very few) who became drug addled and it shows in their face and speech.


01-27-15  11:01pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When I see a site with a great review on PU I check it out on TBP and the preview site. If it still looks like a keeper, I tag it for my favorites list and let it sit.

When I get bored with a site I'm currently subscribed to, I'll drop it then check my favorites list for a new one.

If I get an email deal on a "favorite" site, I may jump at it.


01-25-15  12:31pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

These days I seldom sign up with a site unless it has a TBP/PU discount.

That said, I've found some sites that I wasn't expecting very much from that really surprised me how good they really were. To that extent it will affect my review just because I had a chance to experience the site.


01-12-15  01:01pm

Reply
16
Visit VIPissy

VIPissy
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

You said, "Newer scenes also offer a few options that may be of interest to some members. They have ‘bonus clips’ of a trailer, a cut with close ups and a wide angle cut. This may not be of much value to all members but it certainly shows the site’s attention to detail that they’d make three full-length videos of the same scene available. (I sampled a few of these and can say that there isn’t really much of a difference between the primary scene and the wide angle cut.)"

This is a great idea that I would like to see replicated in other sites. More than once I've seen close-up material that excludes some body parts that I would have enjoyed seeing.

One example is how on a basic fuck scene the camera is fixed on the guys tool as he's porking some babe with unwelcome closeups of his hairy asshole. You get an occasional glimpse of the babe's pussy as it's getting the workout. What would be great is to see a long shot of that same scene where the babe's boobs were flopping vigorously and we can see her face and its reaction to the action.


01-09-15  10:59am

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Copy that.

01-04-15  10:27pm

Reply
18
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of benmar51's Reply

Unlike others, Brazzers seems to be straight shooters. Another site I joined offered a good price that was "lifetime" and required that I pay a monthly (low) rate to stay with the site.

Then, a year or two later they decided to split the site into two sites and "allowed" me to stay with just one of the two sites under the deal. Then, later, they split again and again offered the deal only with one of the three sites.

My experience with Brazzers (and with MetArt) are the exact opposite. Both are open and honest with their customers which, as demonstrated by the continued success of both sites, is sincerely appreciated.


01-04-15  11:00am

Reply
19
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(3)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I'm a 10 year continuous member from way back with the one update per day, through an update every 4+ hours to the 5 at a time daily updates.

I'm OK with the ratio of crapola to good stuff because there have been a few crappy updates with some really good stuff hidden away in them. For example a few weeks ago there was a really crummy video that had a pre-enhancement Venus Knight video where she "outnastied" her nastiest later stuff.

I just wish they would improve their accuracy in model identification, but that's a subject for another comment.


12-30-14  11:53am

Reply
20
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of EverNight's Review

Good review because it says what I also think. I dropped Brazzers after a long spell and joined Bang Bros, primarily because BZ has far too many babes with breasts distorted by lousy silicone "enhancements."

12-30-14  11:41am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

Totally agree with Jay. Artsy fartsy camerawork and unnecessarily dark venues really piss me off when I want to check out the babe's basic assets.

Of the choices listed, I picked shower scenes just because they are seldom very erotic but it was a close call. Just show me PTA* in quality lighting and I'm a happy camper.

*PTA=pussy, tits & ass.


12-26-14  04:49pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I usually regret having too many subscribed sites because there's so many babes, so little time. Sure wish I had this problem with real life babes! ;->

12-24-14  10:57pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

And what about Saturnalia? Seems like a gang bang under the mistletoe would be a very appropriate way for pagans to celebrate the Winter Solstice.

12-21-14  05:12pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I'm OK with it but I don't understand why Hannukah isn't represented.

What I find really offensive are scenes when nuns are doing it with priests.


12-21-14  09:41am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Ditto. No interest at all.

12-17-14  09:21pm


Shown : 1-25 of 1337 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.93 seconds.