Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Toadsith (48)  

Feedback:   All (501)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (24)  |   Replies (453)

Other:   Replies Received (265)  |   Trust Ratings (48)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 453 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Yes they could. True Crypt only makes it near impossible to access the data, protecting the drive from destruction would be best done by storing it in a lockable fire safe. You can use True Crypt to make the drive look empty. It is called a "hidden volume", basically you have a secret format underneath the format, it hides in the empty space on the drive. As long as you don't fill the drive up, the hidden data is safe. It is a pretty impressive program.

10-16-12  03:35am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm the only person that uses my rig, why bother having to enter a password every time I log in or install something?

10-15-12  05:08am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It seems a rather small percentage of female stars actually enjoy it, so it would be better if it wasn't so expected of them. Lets bring anal back to being a rare bird rather than a common pigeon. I think we'll all appreciate it more.

10-05-12  12:59am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

6.5% Free, a.k.a. 114.9 GB Free out of 1774 GB Total.

In short: I need to do some house cleaning.


10-03-12  11:17am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I'll take the position if I at least get authority over the Porn Users Army, Navy & Air Force. I'm not sure what that would mean, but I'm pretty sure it would constitute some sort of invasion force... Excellent...

09-27-12  07:11pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If their tour has broken images, it shows a carelessness toward their business in one of the most crucial aspects of their business (attracting new customers) so I expect that the same carelessness will carry over to other parts of their business, like regular updates, support, et cetera. Just like how you can judge a Brick & Mortar store's quality with a quick look at the cleanliness / quality of their bathroom (note: this doesn't apply to businesses that are owned by non-Westerners), you can judge the quality of a porn site by the time and thought put into their tour pages.

09-27-12  12:17am

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer to pick my own as I can make it ridiculously secure if I so wish.

09-25-12  12:47am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Requires a starlet who truly loves to tease. (Vanessa Leon comes to mind as a good example.) Otherwise it is very boring.

09-19-12  01:16am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Incision marks and unusual pulling / warping of the skin when unsupported make boob jobs usually pretty easy to recognize.

Small boob jobs (A cup) or boob jobs done on naturally large breasts can be difficult notice.


09-17-12  02:27am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yup. For many, many years.

09-11-12  10:04am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I like all natural or light makeup, as in makeup designed to improve appearances while not drawing attention to the fact that makeup is being worn.

That said, there is always the one exception. I like highly saturated lipstick, go figure.


09-09-12  10:12am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

Face is most important, then bone structure, then body-fat/athleticism, then fashion, then "specific body parts" - as in "which is best?". Voice & performance take time to appreciate, so those come last. The others take milliseconds to analyze, so they be first. I find good fashion can really help but not hugely hinder if the person wearing it is quite attractive. If they aren't, well then, fashion can make all the difference, in either direction.

09-03-12  01:27am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I don't mind streaming only sites, but pay-per-minute or pay-per-view sites, while having a massive selection, are mostly a rip-off due to competition like Videobox. The only time they are good value is if you wanted to see a very particular scene or movie and didn't or couldn't buy the DVD of it - or only wanted to watch it once and the VOD is therefore cheaper.

09-01-12  02:36pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of marcdc1's Poll

Have and will again. Though I do love it when they put subtitles in - so few sites do that, but it is really appreciated! No dubbing, I hate when Hollywood does it, so I don't expect it in my porn either.

08-28-12  09:40am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

I don't know many people that haven't subscribed to videobox at one point or another. I know about 5 people that collect many 100s of gigs of porn, though only has broken the terabyte category.

08-20-12  01:06am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Oh, I burn it.

Burn it all.

That's why I buy Ikea; it is cheap enough that I don't really mind.


08-19-12  02:02am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

I would choose cunnilingus, but honestly there is somewhat of a dearth of attractive male talent so the fact of the matter is I'd rather look at their penis than their face most of the time. There are exceptions of course, Eastern European porn has been getting some new male talent in their videos lately that actually seem to be under the age of 40 and have been chosen not just for the size of their member. In American porn, James Dean pops to mind. So, due to the restrictions of this survey, I have to choose fellatio, but in an ideal world I'd probably choose cunnilingus.

Sometimes it also just depends on the preferences of the day as well.


08-17-12  08:57am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I never demanded one, but CCBill once gave me one on their own due to an inaccessible site. So that was kinda nifty.

08-14-12  06:59pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of tangub's Reply

My thoughts exactly. I've been looking for a site that provides good glamour photography for Black women for a very long time. ATK Exotics tries, but it really is trying to keep that Amateur appeal. I want Hegre Art and MET-Art style photography brought to black models, but so far basically nobody is doing it. Hegre has exactly one black model.

Latin models are lacking coverage as well. At least there are some options for Asian models, though still not as thoroughly covered as European & American models are.


08-10-12  07:25pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It really does depend on the model in specific for me. Some women really move well and present well despite being technically obese - most would describe them as voluptuous. If a model's fat pattern goes toward the hour-glass shape and pronounced bust, then obesity can really be a strength for her.

I would say most BBW sites unfortunately aren't hugely picky, so it isn't a genre I browse all that often.


08-08-12  10:43am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

I know you asked "who really cares?" but I figured I'd note that Peaches is just a smidge over 5'10" (178cm). If she is exactly 178cm, then she actually is 5' 10-393/5000" (5'10.0786").



Sorry, I was bored.


08-06-12  07:06pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I generally assume models are pretty small, between 5'1" (155cm) and 5'7" (170cm), but every once in a while I've been shocked to find out just how tall a model actually was. For example, Angel Long, as her name suggests, really is a whopping 6' (182cm) tall!

08-06-12  12:38pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

Had it said all that, then the answer for me would have been: "Nope, not a prob."

08-02-12  08:04pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I think it would be mighty hypocritical of me to be as interested in porn as I am and then to turn around and condemn someone for performing in that industry - past or present.

That said, the vast majority of porn stars tend to have some rather significant issues. Sometimes its just simple emotional imbalances, which doesn't bother me much and sometimes can be very entertaining, but other times it is significant psychiatric problems and/or deficiencies (i.e. stupidity, to put it bluntly). I think Jim Powers once described most of the girls he worked with as "broken toys" and unable to hold down fast-food jobs. I know a few people that have tried to find a relationship through strip clubs and many have succeeded in dating strippers, but it basically always went a bit tits up, if you will. At least in the U.S., girls willing to enter such a taboo industry tend to generally not be quite right, sadly. That said, the old adage is that your girlfriend can be Hot, Intelligent, or Emotionally Stable - choose two. I'm willing to forgo emotional stability to a large extent.


08-02-12  12:20pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I generally find the pornstars that I like seem to have trouble connecting with the camera as they would if they were simply interacting directly with their costar. On the other hand, some stars really take to it and the video can be extremely immersive. In those few cases I keep the video around.

I must say that I am entertained and amused by the rare POV movies that feature a female star as the viewer's body.


07-31-12  11:33am


Shown : 26-50 of 453 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.99 seconds.