Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : uscue (39)  

Feedback:   All (250)  |   Reviews (26)  |   Comments (45)  |   Replies (179)

Other:   Replies Received (133)  |   Trust Ratings (32)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 250 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Doesn't matter to me unless the hair color "defines" the model. Like Cherry Poppens should never be anything other than a redhead.

05-19-09  06:43am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I thought the question was worded funny. It took me a while to realize what it was actually asking! Didn't know if it meant when you last visited the website you are reviewing/commenting on.

04-27-09  10:22am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

A 100Gig Western Digital drive broke about 6 months ago...As I unplugged it, the (whatever you call it) that you plug from the computer into the drive actually broke back into the drive. That's the best I can explain it. The drive is still intact, just can't plug it into anything. WD doesn't do repairs and said I'd have to take it somewhere...where I was quoted about $600. Not worth it even though I had a good maybe 70 gigs on there

04-16-09  11:41am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

I'm actually lower than I thought I'd be at 79. I started off with a few high scores...since then I've become a better reviewer. A couple of piss-poor sites helped offset those initial high offerings I had.

03-16-09  08:33am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Bisexual...I hear a lot of women in the industry are. The real question is are they when they start out (which I think is a small number) or do they start to like women after shooting all these GG/BGG scenes.

02-19-09  10:52am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Poll

Same video quality at smaller video sizes. The good networks now run average 400MB a full video. Find some technology to keep sharp quality and cut down the file size.

Outtakes I like too


01-14-09  08:23am

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Normally only one at a time but I'm currently a member of:

Brazzers
Bang Bros
Videobox

Brazzers and Videobox end soon and I'm thinking about trying something new or going back to something else I haven't joined in a long time.


01-06-09  11:02am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not normally into the pictures anymore, but if I look at a gallery I will skip to the middle to where it "gets good" as far as what I like to see in photosets. Tend to skip the intro, oral stuff. A fan of riding

10-20-08  02:00pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Does that mean the first three aren't naked then since you say fully naked fat chick at the end.

09-04-08  04:22am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No. I'm not a gangbang fan unless it's more girls than guys but when I do look at scenes like that it's the fantasy of a group of men having their way (with mutual consent of course). Kind of like the cheerleader gets with the football team kind of thing.

08-05-08  09:33am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I like the nipples when they get pregnant. I thought Kayla Marie and Ruth Blackwell looked just as hot (or hotter) in their pregnant scenes. I actually liked Ruth better in her pregnant scenes because her breasts got 10x better.

07-31-08  01:23pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Toadsith's Poll

Models (porn stars) that I have a lot of get their own folder. Websites I've joined/downloaded TGP have their own folder (unless the content includes a previously mentioned Model in which case it goes in hers). Then there's also folders by categories like asian, black, mature, *fat*, midget, videos (like random videobox videos i wanted to download) and even a "random" category for short clips.

Gotta know where to find your porn man.


02-04-08  06:44pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of TheViking's Poll

My only problem is in their service. I like Epoch (Paycom) because you can truly search for sites and the different prices on their website. CCBill says they have a search feature but no matter what you type, you get this list of 300 sites to sort through and never find the one you're looking for. How hard is it to copy Paycom's model?

12-05-07  04:32am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of DivBZero's Poll

I prefer Paycom. Their customer support and site search features are lightyears ahead of CCBill. But I will also join CCBill sites but that's about it for high priced sites. Lower priced sites (19.99 or less), then I can experiment.

08-13-07  08:00pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Reply

I don't agree that reasons should be moderated...other users can look at the reasons and judge for themselves if they think it was warranted enough of a reason or not. There should just be mandotory "no" reasons to help out the users being rated.

07-14-07  02:31pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

Like earlier, I think that a "Yes" trust rating is fine as is...if someone trusts you then you don't need much more reason. If there's a "No" trust rating, they should be required to fill out a comment telling why, but the author of the comment (and the rating itself) could still be anonymous. You don't need to know who rated/gave you a comment, users would probably just like to know why they received a certain rating/comment to help them in their later reviews.

06-25-07  12:44pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Reply

I'm still in favor of a mandatory anonymous comment if someone votes "no" on your trust rating. This helps users understand the community and what it is that makes people not trust their reviews so they can improve in the future.

Maybe it's also because I've received two "No's" recently without having written a review in the past month. I have no idea why I have no's, and therefore I can't fix it with my next reviews.


06-23-07  06:33am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I like the daily polls because if I have nothing to do during the day I can just pop on to here and answer a poll or two that I missed. Polls are fun, bottom line

04-22-07  08:41am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only sites I joined without trying the trial first were Brazilian Facials and Cathys Cravings. Both sites were excellent and I think they would do even more business if they offered a two-day, full access trial, although Cathy's website is cheap enough to not need one. But Brazilian Facials is still pretty much unknown and could do better if they let people sample it first. Trials are the easiest way to determine if to join a site - I've decided against really bad sites after sampling the area and stayed on others (videobox, bangbros) for over four months thanks to a trial.

04-22-07  08:33am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

DRM protection or stream-only websites. I don't see the point in joining a stream-only site

04-22-07  08:29am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of PinkPanther's Poll

It seems that alot of things can be taken to make the trust meter better for the whole. I don't think it should be limited to members with a certain number of points (maybe at least 1 rating posted though), but I also favor an anonymous comment section that a user has to madatorily fill out for a "no" vote. This is so that the users learn what about their reviews caused someone to be skeptical, and also ensures that people who vote "no" contribute to the community by their input.

The main reason why there should be an anonymous comment section is to help keep the community active. If a user gets six no votes without knowing why, that could discourage them from participating in the site if they begin to think that what they say isn't worth anything. However, useful comments for "no" votes are a way to keep them interested in posting rather than feeling too personal.


04-07-07  11:58am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Oasis's News

Sounds good! I was a member a while ago but unfortunatly haven't been a member for about a year now. Seems to be about time to catch up on my favorite Arizona woman again

04-01-07  09:19pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

DRM

04-01-07  09:15pm

Reply
49
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Problem is, as long as people keep giving them these high reviews, they won't change a thing. They can read the negative feedback, but at the end of the day a high score means X many more people will signup after visiting these review sites. With that being the case, there's no reason to change anything -- it's easy to keep doing things they way you do them.

For a site the size of Abby Winters with what I believe is an active owner, people need to stop overlooking the blatant flaws and give scores that reflect the current state of the website. 95 is way to high for what everyone seems to agree is a stale pattern. If their average starts to dip and dip and dip, then they'll wake up and see that continued bad review will equal loss of sales.


04-05-10  10:35am

Comment
50
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

What's with the useless newbie reviews

I'm starting to think AW has passed its peak, is slowly on the decline and thus is trying to drum up business by third-partying all these reviews they have on PU. First sign of a true problem is breaking up the site and making people pay three prices for what used to be one. Most other places are adding to the networks (with additional sites at no cost), not taking away (with additional cost at no extra sites).

That coupled with the most random, 93+ rated reviews that show up here every few months from a "new user" - just enough time in between reviews to not be suspicious - makes me not want to join. One thing you notice being a member here for a long time is that everyone doesn't all agree one way or another about a "name" site (popular sites). But apparently they do about Abby Winters

04-30-09  11:53am

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-50 of 250 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.28 seconds.