Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit abbywinters

abbywinters (0)

Newbie
95*
EmptySky (1) 04-01-10  10:03pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Others have noted AbbyWinters presents happy, perky amateurs. It's pricey, but I only want solo images anyway, so it works for me. The quirky user-generated lists are hilarious: "Bombones!" is tremendous. I can't remember laughing on a porn site before.

I write erotica: for me, AbbyWinters shows me genuine women, the sort of women I write for. I admire the obvious care they put into their photography, if only to avoid the wretched coke whores and degraded Russian girls, it's worth the money.

Most "amateur" work is wanna-be pro stuff, shot in bad light, with ugly models. AW strikes a happy medium, nice girls,
Cons: This is my second trip through AbbyWinters. They need to shake things up in the photography department, it's the same sequence over and over. The directors and shooters need to think through their approach: too often I think they're shooting for themselves.

And some of the stripping is wretched. Too much filler, the same shot over and over, the girl balks, you know she's balking, a few timid shots of her bum and the set ends. Christ, I shoot about ten images for every one I keep. I think too often they dump the camera into the bucket and up it goes to the site. I don't pay to see old knickers, Abby.
Bottom Line: For all the negative things I've said, AW is still the best in its genre. But again, it really is time for a shakeup. The possibilities of friendly, naked girls next door aren't being properly explored. I'm of half a mind to write some blocking myself, just to see if they'll take me seriously. I think they just might.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Cybertoad (102) Ive always had a soft place umm a hard place for this site :-)
04-01-10  11:03pm

Reply To Message

2

Capn (28) Having been a member there a few times, I understand your frustration.

IMO it does need to get out of its rut a bit.

What I found particularly frustrating is the poor 'artsy' high contrast lighting of most of the sets. Often it is so extreme as to lose the detail.

On the issue of striptease, there is a thread I posted in the forum which makes interesting reading.

Cap'n. :0)

04-02-10  03:33am

Reply To Message

3

messmer (137) I agree with all your cons, therefore cannot understand the extremely high rating. I am fond of AW, it was the first site I subscribed to, but wouldn't go back until they change their style.
04-02-10  08:37am

Reply To Message

4

RagingBuddhist (63) I agree with messmer - a site with wretched material, repetitive content, and that admittedly needs shaking up, doesn't warrant a 95. They may be best in their genre or niche, but that's a sad commentary on the state of porn these days. I was also a big AW fan and, like messmer, I'm not going back til I see some of the changes they said were in the works last year. From what I've seen on the forums, it's still pretty boring.
04-02-10  09:32am

Reply To Message

5

uscue (39) REPLY TO #4 - RagingBuddhist :

Problem is, as long as people keep giving them these high reviews, they won't change a thing. They can read the negative feedback, but at the end of the day a high score means X many more people will signup after visiting these review sites. With that being the case, there's no reason to change anything -- it's easy to keep doing things they way you do them.

For a site the size of Abby Winters with what I believe is an active owner, people need to stop overlooking the blatant flaws and give scores that reflect the current state of the website. 95 is way to high for what everyone seems to agree is a stale pattern. If their average starts to dip and dip and dip, then they'll wake up and see that continued bad review will equal loss of sales.

04-05-10  10:35am

Reply To Message

6

abbywinters (27)
Webmaster
thanks for the feedback. We're working on a few things to mix some stuff up a bit, so hopefully, your third time thru, you'll see some changes.
05-09-10  10:44pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.