Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : bacardiancoke (22)  

Feedback:   All (35)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (15)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (27)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-35 of 35 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass
Reply of Denner's Reply

I see what you are getting at, and it did take me a while to come to my decision to give RealSexPass such a low rating.

I respect that there are a couple of things you enjoyed, and there are the collectables, but do you really think that it is worth so much for only a few things?

It has been asked what I would rate it if it were half the price....... my answer was that it would be 70+.

But for the price that I paid, I am NOT getting value for money, and that is what prompted me to be so critical......... I paid a lot for it, I expect a lot from it, and I'm simply not getting what I paid for, and that is the basis of my score.

07-25-09  04:36pm

Visit Real Sex Pass

Real Sex Pass

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large collection of models
- Good niche content
- Real feel
Cons: - PRICE
- Quality of many videos (see more in the "bottom line")
- Poor quality of sites
- Too busy trying to sell you other content rather than focusing on improving their own
- The "bonus" content is a nonsense, it is a cheap advert.
- Production quality
- Attention to detail (none)
Bottom Line: OK, so it looked expensive when I saw it, but I reasoned in my own mind that as the sites have been up for a while then there'd be a lot of content.

But I found there to not be a huge amount of content......... let's put this into context, I'm a member of MetArt, and there appears to be at least 4 updates per day, you'd be lucky to see that in a week here. And that is when my doubts began to settle in. And then I went through the sites individually and content.

They focus on the reality of the situations, which is good. They fail to plan, not so good.

I appreciate and accept that "reality" porn hsould be a little more raw than fully scripted, but the works of the people behind these sites has gone to show that the whole lure of reality porn is completely lost if you fail to plan a single part of an event other than the event itself. I'm completely insulted at the thought of being charged so much for such poorly organised, shot and edited footage. It smacks of being shot from the point of view of a pretty creepy voyeuristic pervert. Yes, those of us who buy this content tend to be voyeuristic perverts anyway, but at least in the real world we could make a better job of it.

As a Brit, I'm always glad to have the opportunity to get British porn (it would appear that the Americans and Eastern Europeans currently have the market cornered) but this site goes to show exactly WHY the Brits don't have any porn on the world stage (only a few big name stars who fled the UK to find competent production teams.)

And the more I watch I begin to realise that unless you don't have an accent, british porn stars should not be allowed to talk.

Bottom line? Bitterly, sorely disappointed and ripped off.

For all that I hoped it would be, it turned out to be poorly organised, poorly shot, appallingly edited and abysmally displayed.

The score may seem a little harsh, but I'm basing it very much on the price I was charged for access.

For the quality of the content, it isn't worth half the price that I paid. IF the price was much lower, then the content review would remain the same although the score would be higher.

My advice, spend your hard earned cash better somewhere else.

07-24-09  08:41am

Replies (5)
Visit Real Squirt

Real Squirt

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Does exactly what it says on the tin
- Enjoyable content
- Natural feel (the performers are relaxed in what they are doing and look like they want to be doing it)
- Variety of locations, additional characters and situations.
Cons: - Although Kream (central star) is very sexy and good at her work, it would be nice to others play a central role.
Bottom Line: I should point out that this site is part of the "Pornstar Network" so there are currently (Feb '09) many more sites to cater for other tastes that you have free access to.

But, I've focused only on the site to which I subscribed.

Overall, it is a solid site. Fairly easy navigation, good content and hits the mark.

Of course, there is perhaps more that can be done (name a site where there isn't more work to be done!!!!) and in the case of Real Squirt it centres around Kream.

As sexy a lady as she is, it would be nice to see more from others as well.

Bottom line? Not bad, not bad at all.

02-21-09  08:42am

Replies (1)
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I think that the poll is interested, but fatally flawed as the answers don't cover enough of the options.

If the site has a good review, then sure I'll consider it, but for $35 or more p.m. it would have to be more than just reviews that'd do it for me.

Quality of content
Quantity of content

To name but a few of the things that I'd be demanding in return for my hard earned cash

02-21-09  08:10am

Visit British Doggers

British Doggers

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Features outdoor activities.
Cons: - Non exclusive content
- "British" is inaccurate in nearly all sets.
- It isn't actually about dogging!!!!
- I don't expect a site to which I am giving money to have ads!
- They are recycling their own content from 4 years ago.
- Poor pic and vid quality.
- Appaling site layout and navigation.
Bottom Line: Before now I have been able to offer a fairly balanced view of porn sites and have points of merit as well as critique. With British Doggers though, disappointed doesn't even begin to describe my experience.

So, I'll start with the positives. It is a site that features outdoor activities of others.

Previously being a member of this site, I decided to pay it a re-visit to see what the modern content looks like.

And......... it's exactly the same content that I saw 4 years ago recycled.

It is not actually about dogging (I would recommend that the site creators take a look at just what dogging is, or look to Killergram for tips.)

It is recycling content from the turn of the century (and some looks like it is from before.)

The bottom line - it is the first site that I have ever subscribed to where I have cancelled my subscription on the same evening.

This content was fresh in 2004 - maybe it is time that British Doggers closed its doors for good?

If you are looking for dogging in the meantime then I'd recommend that you look elsewhere, you won't find it here.

02-17-09  07:19am

Replies (0)
Visit Met Art

Met Art

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extensive collection of sets
- Excellent video quality
- Good choice of pic quality (recent galleries 36 MP+)
- Good range of photographers
- Excellent quality of models (although everybody will have their favourite.)
- Simple navigation
- No DRM
- Good search function
- Good download speed
- Sticks to its principles
Cons: - Model bios could be a little more detailed
- Perhaps the general theme of the videos could move away from the shoot environment?
- Larger sets are repetitive (almost identical pics one after the other)
- Splitting a single shoot over 3 or more sets is a bit of a con.
Bottom Line: Will it get your dick hard? Well, if you are a red-blooded hetero man (or bi/gay woman) who appreciates the beauty of teen glamour modelling, then YES, it will.

Will you be cracking one off to it? Well, if you are of a very limited sexual experience, maybe, otherwise no.

Art is the best way of describing it. As a site it really does celebrate beauty of the female form (although in a very biased way) and you will spend a lot time simply staring (and probably wishing that you had these girl's number!!!!!)

You will come away with a renewed perspective of how beautiful women are.

Be warned though, if you are looking for something to wank off to, you are in the wrong place!

01-16-09  03:21am

Replies (1)
Visit POV Fantasy

POV Fantasy

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Does what it says on the tin
- Good general quality of models
- No time wasted in pointless interviews
- Part of a larger collection of sites
- DRM Free
- Fairly good download speeds
- .zip pic downloads
Cons: - Navigation pretty poor
- Pic sets are an after thought
- Infrequent updates
- Tempters for "Non- Exclusive" sites
Bottom Line: Considering the price (discount through TBP) perhaps I shouldn't have expected so much?

Whilst the site is exactly what it says it is and does achieve its aim in a roundabout way, it could be more.

The average update is weekly (though the saying does go that you get what you pay for.)

The navigation is basic but workable, the site is let down in the end by content (few updates) and treating the pic galleries as an afterthought (although if vidcaps are available these tend to be very good)

01-16-09  03:12am

Replies (0)
Visit 5-Guy Cream Pie

5-Guy Cream Pie

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Easy Navigation
- Wide Range of video scenes
- Access to 9 other sites
- Good quality videos
- Good range of models
- Appears to be exclusive content
- No DRM
Cons: - Few pic galleries
- Pic galleries don't have enough "money shot" content, they try to be met art with the model!!!
- Older videos split into 2 parts
- Newer Videos have interviews with all actors
Bottom Line: It is definately a niche area and to an extent well worth an investment.

But, for a professional site the scenes look too amateur. And this isn't in a good way, they just look poorly organised.

As for the interviews, perhaps these could be consigned to another part of the site..... I'm not that bothered about what the women do etc and I couldn't give a shit about what the men are upto!

It has the potential to be a good, if not great site, but they really need to look at how they organise their shoots (positions, better camera operators etc) because until then it will just carry on looking like a student party shot by the geek who's dad gave him a camcorder for Christmas.

01-16-09  02:13am

Replies (0)
Visit Killer Gram

Killer Gram

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality videos
- Features several under-utilised niches
- Gives names of models
- Regular updates
Cons: - No model bios
- None-exclusive content
- Picture collections poor
- Navigation can be confusing
Bottom Line: The Killergram collection aims squarely at British niche porn.

It achieves what it sets out to do (entertain and titillate) with a collection ranging from that most British of pastimes, dogging through hard-fi, cream pies, street hookers and good ol' glory holes.

This site has it all for many of your perversions out there. And let's face it, there's no more dirty a slut than a British one!!!!

Bottom line - highly recommended. There are aspects to improve upon, but not bad, not bad at all

09-29-08  11:16am

Replies (0)
Visit Amateur Sex Outdoors

Amateur Sex Outdoors

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - fairly extensive level of content
- good video quality
- easy to navigate
- .zip download pic sets
- good download rate
Cons: - non-exclusive content
- extensive duplication across sister sites
- pic sets are more solo models (perhaps rename amateur exhibitionism outdoors)
- no real effort made in site structure (generic and faceless)
- comes across as Met Art's poor cousin!
Bottom Line: As a niche site it caters fairly well to outdoor sex, if that's your thing.

Nearly all vids are hardcore action, and of a good quality. But the content is not exclusive, and this fast becomes apparant if you have had memberships to other sites.

The webmasters also copy and at times recycle content to make things appear fresh, which is pretty insulting.

All in all, not bad, but certainly nothing special.

07-08-08  01:20am

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-35 of 35 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.04 seconds.