Just wanted to let you know that Private is at present offering a 2 days trial, but it only allows you to view and download 5 episodes of your choice. It also reminds you continually (and annoyingly) that you can access everything by upgrading.
Those that rip off whole sites, know well how to get the movies, no matter what the site owner may try against it. So they are not going to chase away pirates, but are chasing away potential paying customers.
I took the trial, which is a full one. Quite satisfied.
Later on I noticed the content seems to come from the "Private Gold" series of films, and can be found on the Private site itself. Now, if the video quality there is as good, I cannot say. I really liked the way it is presented in Magik Sex, with very good navigation. Also, seems to be updating regularly.
I suffered their nasty practices myself. Seems like some cookie retained my credit card info, and upon entering a site, just clicking on an image would suscribe me to it, WITHOUT ASKING FIRST.
Even worse, there are clones, and you can get suscribed to both clones.
Even worse, depending on how you got there, you'll have also a different route out of the whole mess. Each clone can have its own way.
I got the content I wanted, managed to cancel with pain and efforts, and when surfing for porn I immediately close any page that reminds me of Bangbros -just in case.
Compare this with Reality Kings. Looks like they also have some cookie, because they offer me resuscribing to its sites when I enter any of them. But they offer a limited preview, and do not suscribe you without asking you first -so far, at least...
I think saying "it's a scam" is too much, though certainly the company uses some practices which are confusing in the best of cases.
Time ago, when there were less sites, you would only get access to some of them upon suscription, and had to wait months before accessing some sites. Which sites yes, and which sites no? Well, it all depended on the site through which you suscribed -the thing was confusing, to say the least.
Then they grew to a lot of sites, and divided into two networks, 21sextury and 21sextreme. Some of the sites are exclusive to 1 of the networks, while others are shared. For instance, you can get Teen Bitch Club with any of the networks. But if you join to Teen Bitch Club directly, then you get 21Sextury not 21Sextreme.
To add to the confusion, eggyfish statement is true (or at least was at the time I was a member): "The home page focuses on what you dont have, rather than what you do." That is, when you enter the membership area you have joined to, you'll see many scenes which are not available through your network, but are on the other network. They are advertisements, teasers.
I woukd say it's confusing, perhaps somewhat frustrating, but not really a scam once you understand the whole idea. The problem is they never explained the idea in the first place.
I also found it very difficult to unsuscribe. And when I eventually thought that I got it, I received an email asking me why I was unsuscribing. I did not reply (why should I?)... and my subscription was renewed. It took me several emails more to unsuscribe.
You do not get the same navigation choices if you enter a site through Fame Digital, than by going directly to the site.
For instance, if you enter a site through Fame Digital, and go to DVDs section, you can make use of a list of DVDs and a list of categories, but if you enter the site directly, and go to the DVDs section, you get a list of DVDs, a list of series, and a list of pornstars.
Looks like it shares a great part of its content with Lane Sisters, and follows the same design. So you should have almost no photos, but search by tags, several downloading options, and a limited bunch of pornstars, that perform on many videos. I liked the Lane Sisters, they are hot and amusing.
As you say, it is "a typical porn network", because it's as XXX as any.
BUT, it's not so typical after all, because of a couple of factors (besides the peculiar emo/gothic/tattoed/heavy metal niches it covers).
First of all, some of the performers are well known in mainstream porn (Coco Velvet, Dana DeArmond, Regan Reese, for instance), but others are newcomers, some of which may have jumped to mainstream porn, but not all. And some are just "photo starlets".
Also, the performers themselves are part of the community, comment on each other, have their friends and favorites. The thing is they really seem to know each other very well, and have a pretty funny time doing all this. Actually, there uses to be a lot of humour put into the scenes.
And the end result is that they do not look like "I am doing this only for the money, but I'm bored", but rather, "Oh my god, I love it". And I love them because of that.
Besides that, I appreciate the fact that they have trailers for every scene. It makes it a lot easier to find the content of your choice.
The photos, on the other hand... oh, well, I suscribe rearadmiral's complains.
Nevertheless, there is also bisexual or heterosexual content in all of the gay sites, so even if you only want heterosexual content, don't forget to take a look also to the gay sites.
The site has an unusual characteristic: few models, with lots of scenes from each model. I can recognize many a canadian model, so I guess it's a canadian company.
I like canadians a lot, and specially many of the models you can find here, so it's great to find 5-10 scenes of one of these girls. Besides, you may find another 5-10 scenes of the same girl through the rest of the sites, the gay ones.
So this is what you should consider first, before suscribing to this site: do you like models such as Coco Velvet, Kelly Summers, India Summer, Ruby Knox, Madison Mason o Reena Sky? Because you are going to find LOTS of scenes from these girls. If you like them, this is your opportunity. Otherwise, if you are looking for many girls with just one or two scenes for each, you should look elsewhere. I happen to like those particular girls a lot, so for me the site is great.
And I like specially the kind of action you find here. For some reason, these gays treat women much better than most of the bullying male porn performers which abound in other sites.
Navigation is perhaps my main complaint for most (almost all) sites.
Usually, the free tour has good photos and video samples; members' area only some ridiculous thumbnails.
If the tour itself has no video samples, they are making a big mistake. Many of us shall not pay the cake without previously tasting it somehow.
But in this particular case, if you know the network, you already know the kind of russian teen videos to expect. In practice, you can hardly differentiate between the sites. Same girls, same production.
Inside you will get to see all of over 5000+ hot movies. This is a real treat and we are sending this to you direct because of you past membership to a simular site you enjoyed with us."
I have substituted xxx for the actual username and password
It is only a couple of paragraphs below that you can read,
"By clicking the link above you will be the lucky person to view instantly 5000+ movies for two days for FREE!
After the 2 days you will continue to recieve full membership recurring at $39.95 each 30 days."
Although the link looks like just "http://www.adultmovieclub.com", the actual URL contains additional data, so that the very moment you click on the link you are supposed to have accepted the 2-days free trial, which recurs as a full membership.
It would not be rare that you click the link to the site, without noticing the actual URL, without having read the whole email, and unconscious that it means entering into a suscription you did not want to pay for.
I remember the navigation of photos was cumbersome, but I do not remember anything special about the D/L speed, so we should assume it was not bad... (what I remember is the site was only streaming at first, but fortunately they soon changed to offering downloads also).
I cannot remember about the model indexes, either, but.. I would swear there wasn't anything useful at all. Models were european (with very few exceptions, like the canadian model Cherry Potter, appearing as Veronica), usually not the best known european models, but hot indeed.
Some of the sites are undistinguishable in practice (I mean, it all ends up in the same couch), while some are characteristic (HardcoreStripClub, or MyVIPOrgy for instance).
I was a member of the network not long ago. It was completely "Made in Holland", but Teenage Group Sex now seems to have content made in Russia. Obviously, UK Roadtrips has british stuff.
Now, Old Farts Young Tarts is a site with many models and many updates (The Best Porn review says 263+ videos), while the rest of the sites have much less content (for instance, The Best Porn says only 25+ videos for Public Place Pussy). So the rest of the sites do not have many models, and they use to appear in 2 or 3 sites.
Thus, the assertion "a site with just a couple of models who go through each site" does not really reflect well the situation.
That you have to login often within the same session, has nothing to do with browser, or it would happen for every site. But it's something I've suffered with other sites managed by the same billing service.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.