You do not get the same navigation choices if you enter a site through Fame Digital, than by going directly to the site.
For instance, if you enter a site through Fame Digital, and go to DVDs section, you can make use of a list of DVDs and a list of categories, but if you enter the site directly, and go to the DVDs section, you get a list of DVDs, a list of series, and a list of pornstars.
Looks like it shares a great part of its content with Lane Sisters, and follows the same design. So you should have almost no photos, but search by tags, several downloading options, and a limited bunch of pornstars, that perform on many videos. I liked the Lane Sisters, they are hot and amusing.
As you say, it is "a typical porn network", because it's as XXX as any.
BUT, it's not so typical after all, because of a couple of factors (besides the peculiar emo/gothic/tattoed/heavy metal niches it covers).
First of all, some of the performers are well known in mainstream porn (Coco Velvet, Dana DeArmond, Regan Reese, for instance), but others are newcomers, some of which may have jumped to mainstream porn, but not all. And some are just "photo starlets".
Also, the performers themselves are part of the community, comment on each other, have their friends and favorites. The thing is they really seem to know each other very well, and have a pretty funny time doing all this. Actually, there uses to be a lot of humour put into the scenes.
And the end result is that they do not look like "I am doing this only for the money, but I'm bored", but rather, "Oh my god, I love it". And I love them because of that.
Besides that, I appreciate the fact that they have trailers for every scene. It makes it a lot easier to find the content of your choice.
The photos, on the other hand... oh, well, I suscribe rearadmiral's complains.
Nevertheless, there is also bisexual or heterosexual content in all of the gay sites, so even if you only want heterosexual content, don't forget to take a look also to the gay sites.
The site has an unusual characteristic: few models, with lots of scenes from each model. I can recognize many a canadian model, so I guess it's a canadian company.
I like canadians a lot, and specially many of the models you can find here, so it's great to find 5-10 scenes of one of these girls. Besides, you may find another 5-10 scenes of the same girl through the rest of the sites, the gay ones.
So this is what you should consider first, before suscribing to this site: do you like models such as Coco Velvet, Kelly Summers, India Summer, Ruby Knox, Madison Mason o Reena Sky? Because you are going to find LOTS of scenes from these girls. If you like them, this is your opportunity. Otherwise, if you are looking for many girls with just one or two scenes for each, you should look elsewhere. I happen to like those particular girls a lot, so for me the site is great.
And I like specially the kind of action you find here. For some reason, these gays treat women much better than most of the bullying male porn performers which abound in other sites.
Navigation is perhaps my main complaint for most (almost all) sites.
Usually, the free tour has good photos and video samples; members' area only some ridiculous thumbnails.
If the tour itself has no video samples, they are making a big mistake. Many of us shall not pay the cake without previously tasting it somehow.
But in this particular case, if you know the network, you already know the kind of russian teen videos to expect. In practice, you can hardly differentiate between the sites. Same girls, same production.
Inside you will get to see all of over 5000+ hot movies. This is a real treat and we are sending this to you direct because of you past membership to a simular site you enjoyed with us."
I have substituted xxx for the actual username and password
It is only a couple of paragraphs below that you can read,
"By clicking the link above you will be the lucky person to view instantly 5000+ movies for two days for FREE!
After the 2 days you will continue to recieve full membership recurring at $39.95 each 30 days."
Although the link looks like just "http://www.adultmovieclub.com", the actual URL contains additional data, so that the very moment you click on the link you are supposed to have accepted the 2-days free trial, which recurs as a full membership.
It would not be rare that you click the link to the site, without noticing the actual URL, without having read the whole email, and unconscious that it means entering into a suscription you did not want to pay for.
I remember the navigation of photos was cumbersome, but I do not remember anything special about the D/L speed, so we should assume it was not bad... (what I remember is the site was only streaming at first, but fortunately they soon changed to offering downloads also).
I cannot remember about the model indexes, either, but.. I would swear there wasn't anything useful at all. Models were european (with very few exceptions, like the canadian model Cherry Potter, appearing as Veronica), usually not the best known european models, but hot indeed.
Some of the sites are undistinguishable in practice (I mean, it all ends up in the same couch), while some are characteristic (HardcoreStripClub, or MyVIPOrgy for instance).
I was a member of the network not long ago. It was completely "Made in Holland", but Teenage Group Sex now seems to have content made in Russia. Obviously, UK Roadtrips has british stuff.
Now, Old Farts Young Tarts is a site with many models and many updates (The Best Porn review says 263+ videos), while the rest of the sites have much less content (for instance, The Best Porn says only 25+ videos for Public Place Pussy). So the rest of the sites do not have many models, and they use to appear in 2 or 3 sites.
Thus, the assertion "a site with just a couple of models who go through each site" does not really reflect well the situation.
That you have to login often within the same session, has nothing to do with browser, or it would happen for every site. But it's something I've suffered with other sites managed by the same billing service.
I read all that is said against the site, but the content is hot, so I have tried it.
Now, beware of prechecked cross-sells.
AND, BEWARE OF THE PAGE THAT OPENS RIGHT AFTER YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE SUSCRIPTION PROCESS.
It includes deceving links that can suscribe you to don't know where, don't know how. It is SO FRAUDULENT, that one of the links is hidden, written in a white font, so you cannot read it, but if you happen just to click in that part of the page, you are supposed to have asked for an additional suscription. I casually discovered it because if you select the text of the page, which changes the foreground and background colors, then the hidden link becomes visible. Amazing.
What do I mean by a spycam version? Same content filmed by a fixed camera (supposedly a spycam); in other words, from a different and permanent angle, and with less quality.
The difference between Massage Girls (or Happy Ending Spycam), and Fucked Hard 18 (or Massage Room Seduction) would be that the first one features girls giving a massage, whereas in the second the man gives the massage. In the end, it's the same for all of them: suck and fuck.
No striptease here, and actually very little dance. I mean, they move the hips a bit while pressing the toy against their crotch. In some of the clips, they surrender under the urge to come, sit or lay on the floor, and just go on with the buildup of the climax with no further dance. You can already see this in the trailer.
The same company has several other sites (Shiny dolls, Dancerbating, Spandex slut) with basically 3 or 4 models, and you rarely see the bare pussy. Indeed, wearing a tight spandex o latex while they masturbate to orgasm, is part of the fetish. Usually, by using a Hitachi wand, or at times by humping.
The action is hot, the girls too. Some of the orgasms are terrific. If you like that (I do), don't miss these sites. Otherwise, if you are looking for nude babes, don't even spend your thoughts with them.
The site is not what it used to be -don't let it fool you
Once upon a time, there was a site, PrivateGwen.com, where a pretty and sexy blonde had photos and videos to download. Not that it was the best of sites, but well... the girl herself could justify a subscription to the site.
But nowadays, you happen to suscribe to a forum with some hard to find photos of Gwen. The videos of old have vanished, and it doesn't seem to ever actualize content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.