Latex Sex Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Fetish Bunker (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fetish Bunker has high quality photosets with resolutions up to 800x1200 pixels and a small collection of videos. Their main focus is on latex catsuits, but different outfits are also widely represented (like masks, high heels, skirts, dresses etc.). Both studio and outdoor shoots are presented masterly concerning lighting and image definition. The current size of their galleries is 4800 pics in 96 sets. Their main models (Helly, Christy and Tash) are very appealing and sexy. It must be emphasized that the creative handling of the latex fetish is very refreshing and energetic here since it is a site operated by private fetishistic people as their hobby. |
| Cons: |
By far the biggest con is the user interface of their site. It relies heavily on Flash animations and is quite a pain in the ass. Every picture of a gallery first opens in a small preview window where you can "scan" it with a second small preview window like a magnifier. The original picture opens in a pop up window if you click again on the preview picture. The scrolling in one gallery is fully animated and annoying. To change the gallery itself you have to click back to the main menu and start from the very beginning.
The second biggest con is that they don't have .zip archives of their galleries. If you plan to copy a whole gallery to your PC it takes a lot of time if you don't have automated download tools.
A further con could be the small video section (.wmv,.avi,.rm formats, mostly 480x640) but it is clear that their main focus is on pictures. One should also be aware that all their videos are with music, ranging from classical music to Techno beats. |
| Bottom Line: |
As I have already said, at present the biggest con is the user interface of their site. The good news is that they are currently working to improve it. Another point is that they don't show any intimate parts of the models (boobies are no problem and are sometimes uncovered). If they appear by chance they are coated by a Fetish Bunker logo. According to the sites administrator this is partly because of difficult laws about nudity and pornography in their country and partly because the models are non-professional posers and no porn models. I think this should be unproblematic if one is mainly interested in the latex fetish. I think a main drawback for some people could rather be that the main models of the site consist only of 2-3 women. Personally this was no problem for me since the sets are very diversified. So there is only a little chance for boredom. As I can say for now updates come regularly one times per week.
What I have not discussed so far is the price of 22$ per month which is quite high. But it is a niche content so it may be partly justified.
Finally, I would recommend this site. You will find many unique pictures here that will surely satisfy ones fetishistic needs for quite a time. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Latex Angel (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
GREAT for the anal fetish fan with loads of different anal extremes.
Gaping, fisting, huge objects and hot latex outfits.
Good quality DiVX files and nice photosets.
Good looking lady
All exclusive content with NO DRM. |
| Cons: |
NOT updated very often.
NO replies from webmaster.
This lady doesn't seem to have vocal chords or something... very little noise even in the most intense penetrations.
Some video files are corrupt/non-working. |
| Bottom Line: |
LatexAngel has a great niche but lack the updates.
It's all solo for the most part but the gal is quite attractive in a kinky MILF sort of way.
It's explicit,exotic and hardcore anal, so not for the squeamish.
The lack of interest on her part gets sort of old. She just doesn't seem that into it and that's what left me bored after a while.
Good site for any anal fetish freak for about a month I'd say. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Hot Rubber Babes (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The quality of the pictures is quite good with (mostly) 2240x1488 pixels, few are 1024x1536. The average number per gallery is about 80 (more or less). From a latex fetishistic point of view the pictures are great, especially the catsuit shoots which are quite a lot. The photographer knows how to catch the details of the material and the beauty of the girls. Over 90% of the models are very appealing. They have a natural beauty and are real rubber lovers I think. |
| Cons: |
First of all I've found at least 9 galleries (they have 28 total) which are identical to the pictures on www.fetishworlds.net. This is a site which features panty girls, large vs. small girls, latex girls and flexi girls (similar to Zlata). To my knowledge the last update there was about 3 years ago. The monthly cost for that site is nearly the same as the current site (26.95$ per month, CCBill). Same goes to fets-fash-girls.de.
Biggest Con : Old galleries, possibly nothing new in the future. |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all the monthly cost of about 30$ per month is FAR to high. I only joined one month in order to search for sets which were not in my collection (call it nostalgic or something?) Even if the few galleries were superior to other sites the cost would outweigh the gain. Time will tell if there will be new stuff in the future. I am afraid the chance is very low. Concerning the date of the last galleries they may be update every two weeks or so. If you are really into latex and rubber it would be interesting to join for a short period just to check out some of the beautiful rubber girls. For others I would not recommend it. Perhaps check back in one, two months. I will defintively observe their work on this site in the future. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
