Anal Sex Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Fassinating (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Very good (1,280 x 834 pixels) photography for lovers of anal pictures.
2. 122 models at this point, many of them very good looking. Good navigation from "models" page.
3. Includes very large network with over 1000 girls with great variety of sexual activity including lots of anal and oral.
4. Daily updates.
5. Very reasonable price ($30 USD/mo, then $25/USDmo) |
| Cons: |
This network has a reward system that adds websites each month you keep it, but adds them in its own order so you have no choice. Even though you already have a lot of content, this can be irritating when you see something on a "coming attraction" you won't be able to get for several months. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a bad deal for the money. Great site for anal fans and a very large network of sites.
Lots of quantity and pretty good quality in general. Although the idea of adding sites each month can be irritating, you still get a lot for the price right away. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. All Internal (7)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of contents, HDV 1080 on available on recent videos with smaller sizes also available.
Easy navigation and very good DL speed. Can use DL Manager but don't use too many threads. 1 thread per file works best for videos anyway. Lots of updates real updates not recycled. You can DL first video to last. All single file videos. I did not look at the Pics sorry, |
| Cons: |
I did have a few problems before I joined this site mentioned in comments. but after joining no problems. There really is nothing wrong with this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is the standard all webmaters should aspire to. They have worked hard at making it fast and consistent. For me 640x480 is good enough video size vs file size. I bet their stats show they are a good site too. I stronly recommend this site too you if you like creampies. I do. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Gapes In POV (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive content.
Movie download options (640 x 480 or 1280 x 720)
Vids are good quality.
Preview trailers for all vids.
Can get access to network of 6 sites for an extra 5 bucks.
No DRM or download limits.
Most of the girls are attractive.
Lots of vidcaps for the scenes. |
| Cons: |
20 scenes only (pics and vids).
Many scenes have nothing to do with gaping.
Slow download speeds (averaged 100-150 kbps).
No longer updating.
All gaping is basically anal gaping, almost no pussy gaping.
Site is slow.
Viewing pictures is a hassle as you have to sift through many pages. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is another site of the network of 6 sites you can join from this company. Supposedly this is the "gaping" niche but it seems as though it's just another example of this company throwing some scenes together to make a site, in essence padding the number of sites to make it seem like it's a big network. This is painfully evident when this site only has about half of the scenes focus on gaping. Points of interest:
1. First, something that frustrates me to no end. Why on earth does every movie or site that has a focus on "gaping" seem to ONLY FOCUS ON ANAL GAPING?!?! Seriously, it's beyond annoying for someone who does not like anal but does like pussy gaping. I can't think of a movie I've seen in a porn shop or a website that had "gaping" in the title that didn't seem to be overwhelmed with anal gaping. Yeah well, same thing with this site.
2. As I said, only about half of the scenes on this site focus on gaping, or even have it in the scenes. Pretty funny isn't it when that's the name of the site? There are a good bunch of updates throughout the member area that are just blowjobs. Can you explain this to me please?
3. Along with all the other sites in this network, the videos are great if you have the patience to sit through the slow downloads and huge file sizes. It can take hours to download a full scene at the highest quality since the best I ever had on a download was about 150 kbps and the files can top a gig. Ouch.
4. The preview trailers are nice. Those along with the vidcaps makes it very easy to decide what to download and what to avoid. I wish more sites would do this consistently. Along with this, all the scenes in the member area are on the preview area so make sure you check out the preview area completely before joining to see if there is anything you will want.
5. The girls on this site are mostly original and you won't see them a lot of other places except for maybe sites like Xcoreclub or some sineplex films. However, most of the girls on this site are also on the other sites in the network, wearing the same outfits and everything. So, clearly, they just shot a few scenes one day of the girls and didn't even bother trying to change their look at all. Not a real big deal, but worth noting.
The biggest reasons I knocked the score on this site is the lack of content, no updates, and scenes on the site that are complete filler. If you are going to join this site I recommend joining the network for an extra 5 bucks since you get access to 5 more sites (some better than others but definitely a lot more content). |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
