Gang Bangs Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Bound Gangbangs (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very good class of quality HD files.
Good choice and range of files to download
Good navigation on the site and you can browse network
Seem to update regular, once a week I think it is.
Some of the dialogue I did like and was quite good to hear some chat, I do tend to watch European movies more and do miss some sexy banter. |
| Cons: |
Women not really to my taste. but again the type of girls who like rough sex are those that like piercings and tattoos so this is only a con for me as I do prefer ink free women.
Not the cheapest of sites to join but high production which is what these movies are come with lots of overheads so you can understand they have to make a profit.
Not a very large site and still in its early days, there was only a handful of videos that really interested me much. |
| Bottom Line: |
I find this a difficult one to review for me cause, I joined after seeing Princess Donna having sex in her appartment with around 8 guys and the Sasha Rose movie, it did look so hot I had to try the site, but then soon found it really isn't for me at all. I did love that movie but I struggle to get the violence in the end and ended up not really been turned on by the sex, I know totally its not real and totally consented adult fun and acting on fantasies and such but I guess you can't like everything in porn and the positive thing I discovered from joining here is I know for sure bondage and rough sex isn't for me, I still like gangbangs and would of prefered a more softer approach and loving nature but I guess that really isn't what kink do and don't get me wrong their quality is second to none, if you are into bondage and rougher sex plays and fantasies being acted out you really couldn't find a better site.
So with the scores, I didn't in the end even bother to go back after my first week getting what I wanted and really haven't much interest in watching much of what I did get as explained above, so can't give it super high score,I was going to give it a score in the 70s cause I personally didn't get off on it much but felt that would be unfair and have to represent the site more as a site catering for what it is meant for, I should of checked it out more before joining, the quality is there and if its your type of niche its a winner for you. So personally for what I got out of the join I marked it down a little but marked it up also for uniqueness and production value.
End of the day I personally know I'll never be back here but do think I can still go on to recommend the site to BDSM fans and fans of high intense rough sex. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Ass Bangers Ball (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Around 85 scenes each one available as 640x480 WMV or Ipod format, as well as a few images (around 20-30 images per set, not that many but enough to get an idea of the action)
- Zipped archives available and images are up to 3072x2048 although the lighting is not always the best in the photos.
- Most scenes have two girls that get pounded by several guys. There is a ton of anal, deepthroat and DP. Also there are some serious cumshots with multiple guys covering one girl in semen. Pretty intense stuff.
- Access to the rest of the network which has several good sites with multiple updates. A lot of fetish/ extreme action here including BSDM, latex, and fuck machines.
- Some very cute models and fun costumes (there are a few masks, a Indians vs cowboys theme) lost of stockings and high heels. |
| Cons: |
- Last update published 2010/12/02
- Several scenes have strange cuts during the scene. I understand that this is necessary when you are shooting an orgy with multiple people, but it still feels strange when the action suddenly changes.
- Some models are really disappointing (older looking, strange body types) More make-up or better light might have helped the scenes. It's also strange to see a very cute girl paired with a woman that is not the same body type/ look.
- Navigation is okay, but feels a bit outdated, would like more categories/ search functions. Right now the main search tool is a type in yourself deal, which can be a bit hard if you're new to the site.
- Sometimes the focus of the scene is not necessarily on the most interesting action. For example a girl is getting DP'ed but the camera is focused on her giving a BJ. |
| Bottom Line: |
For the price this network is very decent, as long as you like pretty extreme content, and enjoy BSDM. They have several sites dedicated to rough sex and orgies with this one being a very interesting one. Almost all scenes feature two girls and several guys (there are one or two video with only one girl and 4 or 5 guys, but for the most part expect dozens of dudes.) The focus is on anal sex and DP, although several times I believe only one of the girls does anal.
I say I believe because the action can get pretty confusing, which is understandable when you have 12 guys and 2 women having sex. However, the scene editing doesn't help the situation. In one scene we cut away from a sex scene to a shot of the other girl crying out in what seems genuine pain, we cut back to the sex and then back to the distressed girl after she presumably got some more anal lube. That is 4 cuts within maybe 2 minutes, completely unnecessarily in my opinion. Unfortunately this happens a lot in the more recent scenes. They cut from one girl to the other almost every few minutes and seem to have a lot of close-ups of either one of the girls face or her genital area then cut and switch around.
I understand the difficulties of filming an orgy and I have to say that all things considered they do a pretty good job, but less editing would have been preferred. It's not like the scenes are incredibly long, most of them come in around 32 minutes which I believe is on the short end considering how much material they could get from two girls having sex with multiple guys.
Aside from the way the videos are edited the site doesn't seem to update anymore, so that's a big downside, but considering they have almost 100 intense scenes I am okay with the amount of content (just don't plan to spend a whole year on this site)
The final issue I had with the site was that the model quality is hugely varied. They have some incredible looking girls that I couldn't believe were ready to do this kind of action, but on the other hand they have some ladies that would be more at home on a big and beautiful site or on a mature page. Combining the two types of models in one scene can make for some awkward moments, especially since they like to cut from one girl to the other pretty fast.
Speaking of the two girls, I was a bit surprise to see that in several scenes the two females don't really interact that much. The focus is mostly on the two girls getting pounded by the males, almost separately from each other. At times you could easily forget that there were two women involved in most videos.
Aside from the points above the site was a very nice experience. Downloads worked fine ans streaming was excellent. I wish they had more images available for each scene, but the few they do have are all pretty hardcore action so no major complaints there.
The navigation and design of the site felt a bit outdated, but still very functional and while they could use a more improved model page or a category search I had no issues previewing and finding content.
The bottom-line: A good site for anyone who likes orgies and hardcore sex. Worth checking out for a month or two, especially if the rest of the network looks appealing to you. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Bound Gangbangs (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Very well filmed scenes with intense multiple guys on one girl sex.
-All the videos have a little scenario which is explained by the performer during the interview at the beginning of each video.
-They have a good selection of models that cover different body types and age group as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV Med or HD as well as MP4 Med or HD.
-The content is dated and they update with one new scene each week.
-There is a calendar for all upcoming Kink site shoots.
-You can use a download manager. |
| Cons: |
-The biggest issue with Kink sites as always been in regards to the photos. Kink sites brake photo sets into 3 or more sections. You can still download each section as a complete zip file but it would be nice to offer a complete photoset in one file.
-The site is still pretty small with only 19 videos. Mind you that wasn't a problem for me.
-Videos are all over an hour long so some might find them a little long. |
| Bottom Line: |
-This is a departure for Kink and in my opinion a pleasant one. Here they have created a site where the the sex is center and BSDM is almost non-existant. When you couple that with the quality of porn produced by Kink and you have the best gangbang site on the net. The only thing that is holding it back is the size of the site. 19 videos is a tiny number and that might put some people off but the quality of what's availabe should more than satisfy anyone who's into this type of sex.
-The selection of models is about the only place where I`d like to see some improvement. They have a good selection but many of the models have done gangbangs elsewhere so they aren`t necessarily new to this type of sex. Of course it`s not every performer that is willing and able to film these types of scene.
-I highly recommend this site to anyone who loves well filmed multiple guys on girl scenes.
**To be avoided by anyone who's looking for gangbang scenes with a BSDM theme. You won't get enough to satisfy you.**
-My score is only because of the size of the site. I would have given this site an above 95. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
