Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Niche - Solo Models The category portal for a specific niche.

Individual Models Reviews & Comments

Top Sites

Top rated and most active sites in the niche.

Top Rated

No Sites Found.
Most Active

Site Name (Reviews) Score
1. My Sexy Divya (1) 91.0
2. Bree Olson (1) 91.0
3. Faith 69 (1) 90.0
4. Bryci (1) 90.0
5. Nadine Jansen (1) 90.0
6. Rubber Eva (1) 89.0
7. Roxy Raye (1) 89.0
8. Cathy's Craving (1) 88.0
9. Silvia Saint (1) 88.0
10. Ashley Doll (1) 88.0

Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.

View All: Most Active Sites

New Reviews

Latest 3 user reviews in this niche.

Visit Faith 69

1. Faith 69 (1)

Pay
Active
90
marcdc1 (167) 03-01-15  02:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great Amateur Site. Older stuff is poorly light, but as things progress the content is pro-am. With good lighting and sound
- Faith is a real woman. In her words she is "curvy" Less so in her younger pictures/videos.
- Diversity of content. I love the flashing material. There is also interracial, girl-girl, gangbang, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, anal. The preview section does a good job of showing off all that is inside.
- Lots of Content. Over 100 videos (Sorry I didn't count), and nearly 150 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 960X540 2.5 mb/s. Newest material is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates. After years online Faith is still adding content.
- Network. Faith is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
Cons: - Older content is in .wmv, newer in .mp4. Usually there is not a choice of format.
- I'm running a mac, and for some reason as soon as I download content using safari, my cpu goes crazy and climbs to over 100%. However switching to chrome doesn't trigger this problem. I don't hold faith responsible for this, just wanted to let you know if you join and have the same problem - switch your browser.
- Organization is a little lacking, there's nothing to help you - each set is added chronologically. I love her flashing stuff and wish I could search or sort to get to it more easily.
- Limited interactions. Faith does a cam show once a week, and you can email her but that's not the experience she's selling. She does offer a blog and does maintain fan interaction via the blog.
Bottom Line: I'm enjoying Faith's site. I've wanted to check it out for a while and I'm glad I finally got around to it.

I like that Faith is not afraid to get naughty and nasty. I particularly enjoy her public hijinks and her dirty talk. Her site is definitely worth the price of admission and you get a lot of bang for your buck.

Other than adding an organizational structure I have no complaints. I'd like to see more fan interaction (maybe a forum?), but that's being nit picky.

Faith delivers everything she promises and that's a lot of delivery.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Abbey Brooks

2. Abbey Brooks (1)

Pay
Active
50
LPee23 (16) 12-01-14  07:48pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site offers very little for your money, and has gotten worse rather than better over the years. It is actually the bare minimum to avoid being called an overt scam, but I feel scammed nonetheless by paying a regular price for such poor content.
-8 photosets
-13 videos
Abbey Brooks is a hot model, but her site has been decimated by poor ownership over the years.
Cons: This site has been nothing but a disappointment and a waste of money.

AbbeyBrooks.com may have been great under it's original ownership, but I will never know for sure. What I can say is that, with 8 photosets and 13 videos, this site gives the bare minimum to say that they gave you something in exchange for your money. What bothers me even more is that this site seems like it once had tons of content, but removed almost all of it when it was acquired by new owners.
Bottom Line: If you go to the TGP pichunter.com you can find hundreds of promotional galleries posted by AbbeyBrooks.com under it's original owners. It is ironic that now, the amount of promotional content available from this site's heyday is orders of magnitude greater than the amount of content available in the member's section.

I am incredibly disappointed with this site, especially since it has suffered a near-total loss of content in it's member's section. This poor upkeep is made all the more shocking by who the site's new owners are. Supposedly it is part of the "OpenLife Network." However, if you scroll to the bottom of the page, you will see that "AbbeyBrooks.com is a site of Gamma Entertainment and its subsidiary Chargepay B.V."

Yes, this is the same company Gamma Entertainment that owns the DDF Network. How could they take such bad care of this site?

I contacted Gamma Support to ask about it. I also told Gamma Support that I would be reviewing the site, so if Gamma sees these comments here, it should not come as a surprise. I basically said, I'm a paying member, I saw a promotional shoot on a TGP that wasn't available on your site anymore, would you be able to send me a full copy? The shoot that I was interested in was the only promo shoot that featured her peeing. Not sure if it was the only peeing shoot she ever did. Anyway, the response that I received from Gamma Support was "we do not currently feature that type of content on our sites."

Oh, really. I pointed out that Gamma owns DDF which produces some of the best peeing shoots online, and I received no reply. I know DDF reads this forum, so if you happen to see this, then know that this was totally remediable if not avoidable, if support had just even replied to my second email. I said up front that I would be reviewing the site, so what did you expect?

This touches on another issue relating to Gamma Entertainment and their ownership of the DDF Network. I hate to digress from AbbeyBrooks.com, and I hate to slam a network that touches on greatness, but I was told by DDF that certain major issues would be resolved in October. I have not brought attention to these issues yet here, and they seem to have been unnoticed so far, but I am losing hope that anything will ever be done.

I really hope that someone from OpenLife or Gamma can reply here. Please explain why you have reduced a site with many hundreds of shoots to 8 photosets and 13 videos. When marcdc1 reviewed the site in 2012 it had 36 photosets and 13 videos, and it had gone backwards since then. Before OpenLife acquired the site, it had hundreds of shoots. Also, the newtork of 15 sites included with membership in 2012 has shrunk to 8.

I don't know what is more troubling, that Gamma has done this to AbbeyBrooks.com, or that they own DDF, and some of the great porn there could likewise be lost some day, perhaps not too far from today.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Lady Sonia

3. Lady Sonia (1)

Pay
Active
78
pat362 (371) 10-26-14  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lady Sonia is an extremely beautiful older woman.
+You can stream or download all her videos.
+Videos are in the preferable MP4 format.
+Lady Sonias has started to add new content.
Cons: -The site design could be improved in key areas and for that reason finding content is made much harder.
-No way of knowing how many videos have been removed and no easy way to count the total number as well. I'd say at least over 300.
-A lot of the content is solo stuff that's mostly softcore to midcore.
-She does shoot with a black male but he wears a stupid mask so that removes a lot of the heat that would have been there otherwise.
-Content is dated but it's clear that some older stuff has been given a more recent date and it's also clear that the order of videos is not based on when it was made or originally uploaded.
-I can't help but feel that the site is now there more for her to book private meetings than to actually shoot porn for the site.
Bottom Line: *I've been aware of Lady Sonia for many years and although I find her very attractive. The content she offers doesn't do anything for me. There are glimpses that look interesting but the execution and final product is somewhat lacking to me. I know she stopped shooting porn but I read that she was at it again and I was curious to know if her new stuff would be like.

*Sadly for me there is very little that was different from past content and therefore not any more enjoyable than her past stuff. I find that a lot of her content gets repetitive rather quickly so buyers beware. You have to be into seeing an older woman play with herself more than seeing her with different partners. There is a certain level of teasing and cuckoldry in many of her videos which is something that may not appeal to everyone.

*I had an offer to join for about 13$ and I took it to satisfy my curiosity. I won't need to join again as I downloaded maybe half a dozen videos which will all wind up in my garbage bin.

**I know that she advertises private meetings for people in the UK and it's a recurring theme in her tweets. To the point where that's basically all they are. That's why I felt like the site is more like advertising for that business than an actual porn site where the model shoots exclusively for it.***
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

View All:  New Reviews

New Comments

Latest 3 user comments in this niche.

Visit Busty Buffy

1. Busty Buffy (0)

Pay
mike11w (0) 02-25-15  08:53am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)

Busty/Lucie

This is a frustrating site because you have no idea what is on it unless you join; no previews, no update list, no tags, nothing.

So here it is: There are as of 2.02.15 (when my second subscription to the site expired) exactly 57 scenes, of which 25 are boy/girl sex, 1 lesbian and the rest are solo. The scenes are generally good HD and all have decent pics. The site is not updating since last fall. The scenes are not dated so you have no idea what or when.

Buffy/Lucie is unique in my experience in terms of her looks and her body. You can see several of her scenes on pornhub if your interested. Her talent in porn is only fair, she is not very experienced and most of the time is just going through the motions. With some experience and some fresh scenes it should be a real winner, but she doesn't seem to have the drive to succeed long term.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lady Sonia

2. Lady Sonia (1)

Pay
LPee23 (16) 01-27-15  06:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)

Update on Lady-Sonia.com

She recently posted an update on her landing page that explains some of the changes that people have commented on recently:

"My site has gone through many changes since its launch way back in 1998 and due to the change in the law here in the UK at the end of 2014 with regards online content I have been given the chance to make perhaps the biggest change of all. The site is now exclusively themed around the content that I enjoy myself which is all about classic glamour and the exotic. I am not interested in ANY explicit content at all myself so if this is what you are looking for you will not find any here! Lady-Sonia.com is all about REAL women who love to dress to show off. Fully fashioned nylons, classic lingerie, pantyhose, high heels and the sort of things that a lady wears to REALLY get attention. This is the world that I love and the world that I want to share with you!
Enjoy :-) xx "

She may be moving away from porn and back towards escorting.

Also, for my fellow pee fans out there, yes, her peeing content is gone now. Hope you got it while you had the chance.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Lady Sonia

3. Lady Sonia (1)

Pay
mike11w (0) 10-19-14  07:25am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)

A Shame

Recently made the mistake of visiting the site after a couple of year absence. It now consists of 3 types of scenes; Gill talking dirty to the camera or someone in the room, Gill masturbating, or Gill fucking some black guy who wears a mask. Oh yeah, she got fat. Waste of money.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


View All:  New Comments


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Related Niches
1. Amateur (25)
2. Porn Stars (18)
3. Webcams (4)
4. Non-Nude (0)

View All : Niches


Solo Models @ TBP
1. VNA Girls 88.0
2. Rachel Aziani 86.0
3. MistressT.net 86.0
4. Club Sandy 85.5
5. Leony Aprill 85.0
6. Naughty Alysh... 85.0
7. Jessica Jayme... 85.0
8. Cathy's Cravi... 85.0
9. Dawn's Place 85.0
10. Chica's Place 84.5
11. Peter North 84.5
12. LeLu Love 84.0
13. Rocco Siffred... 84.0
14. Jonni Darkko ... 84.0
15. Janessa Brazi... 84.0

View All : Solo Models Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.18 seconds.