Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that I always seem to return to. Thought it would be a good choice to get my 500th experience point here on PU.
- It's a site that can't really be explained by just a simple title like "Public Disgrace".
- Around 360 full scenes, videos and photos for all the scenes.
- You'll see scenarios used in the scenes that you've probably thought about and some that you'll start thinking about.
- Site works well, but it's also pretty basic, scroll, download, scroll, download. Using the navigational buttons isn't much help.
- Like all other Kink sites it has very high production values. These people aren't just shoving out some scene that looks like the last 100 updates.
- Great download speeds. I'm averaging 8 MB/s, most sites I download from only reach 6 MB/s and 6 MB/s is my average.
- One new scene per week.
- Some very long scenes if you like that.
- Lots of outdoors and public scenes.
Cons:
- Believe it or not, I wanted to give it a 100, something I've never done. Thought it would go good with reaching 500 experience points. Something I never thought I was possible. But there's no zip downloads for the pictures and that's been a big no-no for me for years. Took 4 points off for it.
- Took another point off for the disgrace part. I've always struggled with the disgracing of men or women. But only took 1 point off since the site is named Public Disgrace. I knew what I was getting into.
Bottom Line:
I don't think any site works for me in the ways Public Disgrace does. I'll have a little fun with this part. A big part of my enjoyment of porn has to do with the fantasy aspect of it. This fantasy could be me being one of the random guys standing around watching the scene being filmed in an adult video store (do those even exist anymore?) to my self-abusive side imagining my wife (girlfriends in the past) being the woman in the scene. Neither one is particular healthy, but I do need this type of change from mainstream porn scenes.
I always turn to the Kink sites to break my boredom with mainstream porn. The good part with Public Disgrace is it only updates once a week so if you have the hard drive space, you can catch up with every past scene then just join sporadically to pick up the new updates.
What you're getting here is the closest thing I know of to public sex. I've tried the ones going for the more realistic belief (spy cams, voyeur cams, security cams), but I'm able to convince myself on most of Public Disgrace's scenes being authentic. I find it easier to convince myself than trying to watch those green shaded cam videos. So there's the funny part about me and my interest in this site. It lets my fantasies feel realistic.
I guess if a person wanted to nitpick they could say there's no 1080p videos and if there are, I've not found them. The newest updates highest option available is 720p. Bitrates are very high at 5,000+ so they stretch pretty cleanly to a 1080p screen/monitor.
And I will always nitpick about zip downloads for picture sets. I feel strongly about this on a site that is shot mostly in public. Videos work good, but photos let you see not only the action, but also the people in the background, their expressions, reactions, things you most likely miss in videos.
The disgrace part isn't as bad as a I remembered it being. I still see a lot of it as immature. Kind of makes you think you're watching Bang Bros, but instead of goofy/annoying college frat boy talk from the cameraman and crew, you get people writing on the woman's body. Could live without claiming to disgrace a woman by having her have sex in front of a crowd. That part to me is also an insult to the members of the site since I'm supposed to assume the model is disgraced.
As for public sex and nudity, they could do just that and I'd be happy. I feel like porn these days has become too vanilla and predictable. There's nothing predictable about a girl suddenly bending over in a bar and spreading her butt for anal sex in front of 200 people.
A strong suit of Kink's is that they know the models who are capable of doing this type of porn and it shows in the scenes. Just like in regular life, we all have different fetishes and dislikes. I think the majority of Kink's models love doing these types of unique scenes. I'm guessing most have an exhibitionist side that feels holed up by 127 scenes of them having bed or couch porn sex. You get some really great, genuine scenes here thanks to that.
There's also some added mystery and intrigue to the scenes. For example: A 22 year old college girl being tied up outside for sex with four men. Only comes an older man and she starts giving him a blowjob while the other four men take turns with her. Is it because she's getting paid to give the blowjob or is it that she got that horny over the four men taking turns with her? You don't get that with the vast majority of porn sites.
I've said it many times before. There's something to be said for being different and original. I'm not for sure if new porn fans would really be into these scenes. Sometimes there's 10-15 minutes of build-up before there's any sex. It kind of reminds me of going from reading a magazine to reading a Hemingway novel. It's definitely not for everyone just like Hemingway isn't for everyone.
I was surprised by the near my max download speeds and it was on all scenes I downloaded. It's needed as some of the scenes go over 2 GB.
Everything else was as expected. Lots of pretty (many tattoos) girls doing things that go beyond a girl doing just regular porn. That's a major turn-on for me and no site does it better. On the downside, there are times I won't even look at Public Disgrace for 3-4 days. Either way, it's a great site that sometimes will push things a little further than I think they should. I would recommend it to anyone who's looking for a site that is nearly guaranteed to be different than any porn you are watching right now. And just remember, let your fantasies require realism. They might be opposites, but if you can do that with this site you'll probably like it as much as I do.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A wide variety of beautiful models.
- Excellent technical quality to the photographs. Professionally shot by photographers who understand lighting and composition.
- Some interesting outdoor photo sets (in some great locations) as well as the studio shots.
- Videos with a 'movie' feel to them, carefully scripted, edited and produced, as well as simpler photoshoot style videos.
- A friendly feel to the site, more than just anonymous updates. Text about each update, forums, online chats, behind the scenes videos.
- All updates (photos and video) available as ZIP downloads and download speeds are good.
- Daily updates! Almost a con, as it makes it a little hard to keep up with it at times!
Cons:
- When my credit card expired I couldn't find a way to update the details with the payment processor so was forced to re-subscribe to continue my membership.
Bottom Line:
I'd seen the trial pictures from Restrained Elegance and joined as I liked what I saw. I've stayed as a member as I like the quality of the content. During my time of membership (two years so far) the videos in particular have been getting better and better and also the outdoor and location shoots.
This site is as it's name implies, models restrained in an elegant way. There's no hardcore sex or bdsm here, hey I like that too sometimes, just get that elsewhere. Here are beautiful women, enjoying bondage, being respected and not being objectified. There is a thread of 'harder' bondage content but with the back-story and forums, you learn how it's exploring the desires of the model involved. I like elegance, and in this site it meets restraint, what a great combination!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. The quality of videos has improved as time goes by, camerawork is excellent in general.
2. Many beautiful ladies participating in S&M sessions with spanking, bondage, and rough (but smiling) sex.
3. Site goes out of its way with before and after shoots to show that sex was TOTALLY consentual and enjoyed by all parties.
4. Much more creative than other sites, often including more than one girl in a session, something I find much more interesting.
Cons:
1. While I enjoy the site and it does have some outdoor shots, the general dungeon, rusty factory kind of scenes get old. I'd enjoy some hot scenes in more luxurious surroundings.
Bottom Line:
I've been enjoying Sex & Submission for a long time (I think I first joined when it was pretty new a few years ago). It now has tons of content for those who enjoy spanking, bondage, and rough sex. At about $30 USD its a bargain for the quality and quantity.
The girls either really enjoy it or are great actresses, smiling and saying how they'd love to come back and do more sessions. I've been coming back periodically for a few years myself.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many very attractive pornstars.
-Multiple scenes from Eva Angelina, Bobbi Star, and Jada Fire. Jada's best workever.
-Ethnic mix of white, black, Latina and Asian models.
--No DRM or download limits.
-Archive of 205 videos, going back to May 2005.
-Newest videos are about an hour long.
-Supports download managers with excellent download speeds. Mine was 2500kb.
-Videos available as excellent DVD quality MP4 or as WMV 1280x720,7158kbps. Older videos are lower quality.
-Videos can be streamed. Downloads come as clips, while whole videos can be zipdownloaded, and in a few cases can be downloaded as whole videos as well as in clips.
-Photosets for every video. Can be zipdownloaded. They are screenshots that are 1200x675 and very sharp.
-Exclusive material. Mostly known pornstars.
-Mostly the girls seem to be really into the action. They don't come across as acting. The site claims the girls are told not to pretend, but to have genuine reactions.
-Updates at least once a wk
Cons:
-Too many pornstar looking typical bleach blondes.
-All videos shot in the same location. A little variety would be better.
Bottom Line:
This is a light BDSM site, so it is not for everybody. This is my second membership in this site. It has gotten better and better over the last two years since I was last a member. This is the highest that I have ever rated any site, regardless of niche. There is a lot of great sex along with the BDSM, and can be VERY hot. The only site in this niche that comes even close is fuckedandbound.com, but this is much better both in the sex and in the dominance. I am much more into the sex than in the BDSM aspects and can tell you that the sex is amazing. If you like the niche, you cannot do better than to join this site. It has a very large archive of high entertainment value videos and great quality that can be compared to the best videos available on the net.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com family of sites
- 480+ scenes
- Updates weekly
- Standard-setting production values
- Many viewing / downloading options
- Many A-list models
- Rare niche (bondage AND sex)
- Supports download managers
- Clear model consent
- Excellent value
- Photos available as singles and zips
Cons:
- None
Bottom Line:
For those who know Kink.coms sites, Sex and Submission needs no introduction. S+S is one of their older sites and dates back nine years. All Kinks sites focus on consensual BDSM play with each site adding a twist. Here the twist is sex. That may seem self-evident, but many of Kinks sites dont have a lot of actual sex and when they do it is secondary to the specific niche. Here the sex is front and center. The sex isnt plain vanilla though, as there is always an element of D/s play and sex while in bondage or restraint. Kink.com is, in my opinion, the best BDSM company operating today.
For those unfamiliar with Kink, dont confuse them with Abuse sites. Those sites seem to revel in making the model miserable. Kink is the opposite: the models get to explore this facet of their sexuality in a controlled environment and it is clearly all about their pleasure. Its hard to explain, but this isnt misogynistic BDSM.
As with other Kink sites, this one goes out of its way to ensure that the model fully consents to the play. There is an interview in each one where the scene is discussed and the safe word is made known. I know there are some who reject this approach and think that the consent itself is forced, but there is no evidence to support that position. One factor that, in my opinion, speaks well for Kinks professionalism are the numbers of A-list stars who shoot scenes here, and many of them shoot multiple scenes. I suspect that if Kink coerced the models that no A-list star would work for them, let alone shoot multiple scenes. Adding to this position is the fact that many of the A-listers are definitely not fetish models.
The site currently has 480 scenes. Older scenes start with an interview and jump right into the action. Newer scenes are scenario-based which can add to the heat. There is bondage in several positions, with sex in most of them. If the model does anal, there is usually some anal. The scenes close with an interview which can be interesting to watch to see what the model liked about the shoot. The average length of the scenes is a little over an hour. The scenes cant be said to meet usual standards in that Kink.com sets those standards. Set creation and production values are the best there are. For scenes that strive have a dark feel about them, they succeed but they dont look actually dark. They are all well light, shot and edited.
The site updates with one new scene being added per week.
As with all Kink sites there are a lot of options to watch the scenes. (Obviously the older scenes have fewer options) There is streaming in four available resolutions. Downloads are available for portable devices, in WMV and MP4 formats. Each of those offers a choice of resolutions. I opt for the highest quality MP4s and those come in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. My experience with the next largest is that they are 960x540 at 1500kb/s. A few of the older scenes appear to have been remastered to a higher quality, but some havent. The highest resolution for some of the older scenes is 640x480 at 825 kb/s, but keep in mind that these were shot in 2005 so they were up to standard then..
Another difference exists between the oldest and newer scenes on the site. When Kink first started the scenes were relatively simple: ropes, chains, spreader bars, etc. were common implements. As Kink matured the scenes became a lot more innovative in the means to bind the models. Kink clearly has some creative minds at work. A majority of the scenes are innovative and very interesting.
Photos are available, though this is really a video site so those are secondary. I dont collect those so I have no information on them.
Download managers work for queuing scenes. I found the links timed out at about an hour, which is reasonable.
Kink.com isnt a network so each site requires a membership. The good news is that when youre a member to one site you get a discounted price for the others. I usually take advantage of this by joining the cheapest site I want at the full price and then get the discounted price on the others. Im on their mailing list but havent seen an offer in several years.
The bottom line on this site is simple: if you have any interest in this niche you should seriously consider joining. For the price, you get access to almost 500 scenes, regular updates and many big-name porn stars doing some interesting fetish work for the best company in the BDSM business. The scenes look great, the bondage gear is innovative and the models really seem to enjoy the play. This is an excellent value and I highly recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Exceptionally high quality of production
-These guys have lots of ideas, good selection of props and shooting locations and apparently a large wardrobe
-Unlike most sites on DDF Network, this one is still updating almost entirely with all new, non recycled content
-Hot European models with good variety
-Frequent updates, many times a week
-Close to 650 existing scenes at the moment
-Wide variety of fetishes without too much softcore
Cons:
-Complete scenes are divided into up to four separate updates, some of which may contain some part totally uninteresting to one. For example pt1. spanking, pt2. toys, pt3. sex.
-Wide variety of fetishes unfortunately means you usually are not into some of them resulting in wasted updates
-The same few aging guys that apparently are 95% of euro porn male work force
-1080p in mp4 would be nice although wmv is good
-Image size starts feeling bit outdated at 2000 pixel wide
-Not the fastest downloads around, 5-7 megs a second is not bad though. Site can be a bit sluggish too at times
-Occassionally excessive file size. Almost one gigabyte per 10 minutes is too much. I've seen sharper reuslts with half the ratio using H.264
Bottom Line:
DDF Network currently has 13 different sub sites, each updating with different frequency and more or less new material. In my opinion House of Taboo is clearly the best site in the network when it comes to the quality, the originality and the freshness of material. House of Taboo features a variety of fetishes from spanking to pissing to bondage, latex and medical play. The best thing is that the site is quite hardcore too which cannot be taken for granted as sadly fetish often means softcore in the world of adult sites.
The counter side to the variety is of course the negative point that you only get so much of stuff that does anything to you if you are only into say spanking. Even though the site updates thrice a week, the number is in truth quite inflated since a single scene can be split into spanking section, toys section, sex section and pissing section, each posted separately. I for example only care about the middle two so half of one scenes updates can go by me. It's good to notice that the scenes on this site are almost entirely fresh ones and not recycled old ones.
The quality is great in terms of production, technical details, inspiration and models. Photography is the best I've seen although they could add higher resolution sets since many already own monitors with higher resoltion than their max 2000 pixel wide images. Videos are right on the top although there is a minor nitpick too: They are quite huge in file size. If you ask me, 21Sextury has slight edge in crisp image and colors but their H.264 files are significantly smaller. House of Taboo has a nice variety of (female) models with different style and looks with handfull I've not seen before in other networks (Linet, Tigerr Benson for example). Scenes have great variety and the same props are not over used. The settings differ between differnt houses, outdoors and so on, not too many shady basements unlike on many other bondage sites.
For me this is a site that nearly alone justifies the subscription to DDF Network. Only thing I could wish for was more updates, especially of bondage sex variety but that's always the case with me I guess. My cons are mostly minor nitpickings, I consider this site one of the best ones I've seen so far. I need to rise my old score few points as the quality has gotten better in these one and half years and the site still delivers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very unique niche
- Part of the Kink.com network
- Over 500 scenes
- Updates several times a week
- Multiple download options
- Pictures available (individual or zipped)
- Fast download speeds (1.4MB/sec on a single download)
- Interesting mix of amateurs, BDSM models and mainstream porn models
- Excellent value
Cons:
Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line:
I realize that Device Bondage might not be for everyone, but if you have a bondage interest this is an excellent site. The sites claim to fame is that they dont use traditional rope bondage, but, as the name suggests, they use a variety of other means to bind the models. The most common is a set of pipes and clamps that can be used in countless ways. It all makes for quite a unique site.
Most of the scenes follow an effective formula: first there is an interview (to make it abundantly clear that there is full consent this isnt Max Hardcore). Then they move to a bondage scene with some S+M thrown in. Usually a second bondage and S+M scene follows. At some point there will be forced orgasms. Finally, the scene closes with another interview. The basic formula is also followed where there are multiple models.
As of this review, there are now well over 500 scenes on the site. They continue to update several times a week. Adding the uniqueness and creativity on the site to the volume of material makes this site an excellent value.
On the tech side, this site meets the high standards of all other Kink.com sites. There are both HD and SD wmv files, an HD mp4 and a format for IPods. You can download the entire scene as one file in the listed formats, or you can download it in segments. Pictures are also available individually or as a zipped set.
My only two criticisms of this site are subjective. First, at its core, this is really a non-sex site. Mostly the only sex is forced orgasms on the models while in bondage. This is excellent stuff, but it isnt something that Im really into. Kink.com has sites, like Sex and Submission that are more to my liking. Second, Id really like to see the women being bound, either as part of the scene or part of a behind-the-scenes view. All the scenes start with an interview, and then move immediately to the model in bondage. Please Kink, add some BTS here!
Finally, the listed price may seem high, but consider the cost and effort that goes into the site when deciding to join. This site doesnt hire a male a female and stick them in a bedroom setting to fuck. There is a lot of creativity that goes into these scenes. It is definitely a good value at full price. Having said that, there are ways to avoid paying full price. Kink.com usually offers a discount on a second site and having memberships to two Kink.com sites isnt a bad thing. Also, register as a Kink.com member (free) and get on their mailing list. They regularly email special offers and deals on this and other Kink sites.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent niche site. It is unique, it is creative and it exceeds industry norms for the technical stuff. If you have an interest in BDSM, you owe it to yourself to have a look.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 650+ videos
- Many big name stars appear
- Updates approximately every four days with the addition of a new scene
- Good variation in age, body type, tattoos/ no tattoos
- Variety of ways to download and view the videos
- Streaming is available
- Mp4 in two resolutions
- WMV in two resolutions
- Photos are available usually broken down into sets with set zips being offered
- Supports download managers with no obvious time-outs
Cons:
- Probably a bit extreme for many
- Some may not like the price
Bottom Line:
Full disclosure: I think Kink.com is likely the best online porn company in existence, but Ill do my best to stay objective
Obviously with any website if you dont have an interest in the material being offered then youre likely not going to like it. That is especially true for a site like this where the material offered is definitely not mainstream porn. If you dont like extreme BDSM then you definitely wont like this site, but I trust that you can still appreciate the effort that Kink puts into the scenes.
Device bondage is just that: the scenes all involve a female submissive being put into bondage by using various devices rather than more traditional ropes. Kink has amassed quite an impressive collection of implements to immobilize the models. Once immobilized the model is subjected to some further torment and in most cases there are forced orgasms. Actual sex does occur, but not in every shoot. Many of the Doms are females.
This may or may not be new since I last looked at this site, but I find that there are more big-name porn stars here. Amber Rayne appears to have shot a bunch of scenes in the past while and there are other stars that I wouldnt expect to see on an extreme BDSM site. Examples of this are Marie McCray, Sensi Pearl and Kaylee Hilton.
The scenes tend to follow a set formula: the scene begins with an interview where the viewers can see that this is 100% consensual. Then the scene is broken down into three segments so the girl isnt in one device for the entire scene. This adds a lot of variety and keeps the scenes from becoming dull. The interviews have been polarizing here at PU and Kink uses them on all their sites. I suspect that they do this more to appease the puritans and provide some measure of legal protection, but the frequent criticism of them is that including them at the first of the video can kill the sinister mood. I tend to agree with that and would prefer the interviews to be at the end or even as a separate file. But since theyre easily skipped it isnt that big a deal.
As of this writing there are more than 650 scenes and updates are posted approximately every four days with one scene being added each time.
This could be a good or a bad thing, depending on how you view it, but the models on the site dont all look alike. There is a good mix of stars and lesser-knowns, ages range from 18+ to over 40. There are models with lots of tattoos and models without tattoos. The site seems to want to appeal to as broad an audience as possible.
Another new element (which I may just have not noticed before) resolves one of the few complaints Ive had about this site. I wish that theyd include more behind-the-scenes material and show the model being put into the devices rather than just start with the model already restrained. The site has posted a few live shoots where the cameras are left rolling as the model is put into the devices and the production staff communicates with members watching the show live. There arent many of these live shoots, but it does give a glimpse into the inner workings of the site and I hope that the site continues to add them.
Being a Kink site, the technical bits are all up to or better than industry standards. Each scene has its own page and you can either stream or download the video. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720. The bitrates are a bit different between the formats but both are approximately 7000kb/s. Both play at 30fps.
The site allows download managers and I didnt experience any of the links timing out. Download speeds are a bit faster than Im used to at other sites.
Perhaps the one thing that many prospective members might take issue with is the price. I agree that price is important, but price has to be taken in context too. I think that the price, when weighed against the value of the site, is very fair: this isnt cookie-cutter porn. This is all exclusive, with mostly top-name models, in a dungeon-like building and excellent production values. Kink has some of the highest production values of any porn company and this stuff cant be cheap to make. If price is an issue, be sure to sign up for emails from them because they occasionally offer membership deals. Also, once youre a member of one Kink site you get discounts on the other sites. An element to the value debate is that Kink isnt a network. Each specific site requires a separate membership. Given the high production values and exceptionally high quality of the scenes on all of the sites, I dont think this detracts from the value.
Device Bondage continues to do almost everything very well, and since I was last a member there have even been a few improvements. Even at full price the site is a great value if you like whats offered.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ femsub training (by both males and females, but mostly males) combined with sex
+ strong psychological element
+ Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM
+ most models (both male and female) really love it
+ ability to leave feedback
+ ability to download whole episode as a ZIP
+ video/image quality is good
+ cameraguy work is excellent
+ setups are good
Cons:
- still less content than other kink.com sites
- training of the same girl is divided into several episodes (which is ok), but these episodes appear not one after another, which is annoying
Bottom Line:
TheTrainingOfO is quite a recent addition to kink.com sites. It is quite similar to SexAndSumbission, but also is very different. The idea is that the same guys take one girl and train her as a good slave. It takes them 4 days to do it (actually 5 with 1 day rest), which means ability to see gradual progress of the girl. Not all girls succeed in training, but most are trained well. Site has very strong psychological element in play, and it's a bit more geared towards domination/submission theme, than towards SM or sex (though there is plenty of both SM and sex too, with all kinds of sex present, including anal).
As all other kink.com sites, TheTrainingOfO is all about SSC (Safe, Sane and Consensual) BDSM, with most models being really into the scene. Chemistry is usually excellent, and overall feeling is just great.
Site is new, but at this point they've already got about 50 episodes (which is still less than other kink.com sites, but quite enough for me).
Bottom line: one of the best BDSM sites out there, with strong emphasis on psychology, a bit physics, with lots of sex added to the mix. Highly recommended (in a sense, it's "advanced version" of SexAndSubmission, at least for me).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The biller is Rocketpay. I have had positive experiences with them.
-Comes with the Kink Network of 66 sites
-Discount through Pornusers
-Archive of 112 updates
-Very big name pornstars.
-Very educational, making this site unique
Cons:
-Not updating any longer. The last was in February of 2016.
Bottom Line:
The Kink Network was reviewed at 88 by The Best Porn and 89 by Rabbits Reviews. On Pornusers Wraith gave it a score of 85, Exotics a 94 and Pyrenees a 95. Kink University has not been reviewed by The Best Porn, but it was rated at 69 by Rabbits Reviews. On Pornusers marcdc1 reviewed it at 91 and Rear Admiral at 88.
There are presently 112 videos available. It is no longer updating and the last was in February of 2016.
The director of the University is Danarama and he costars with some big name pornstars such as Nina Hartley, Abella Danger, Lorelei Lee, London River, Bella Rossi, Daisy Ducati, Mona Wales, Charlotte Sartre, Holly Heart, Siouxsie Q, Emma Haze, Isis Love, Penny Barber and Bobbi Starr. There are both black and Asian women.
The videos are explanations with demonstrations of how to safely do many of the things that are to be found on Kink, which specializes in BDSM. Some examples are fisting, flogging, caning, pegging and lots more.
I am not really into all of that and never expect that I would use these videos as a reference. I am keeping nine videos that are of a more general interest.
I have kept videos about blowjob basics, humiliation, anal, pornstar sex tricks, cunnilingus, analingus, oral play and oral taste test which analyzes different diets and how they affect the taste of oral sex both on men and women. Especially enlightening Is one on how to make a woman squirt. This is very interesting and most definitely something not to be found on your everyday pornsite. The videos are very hot porn, as well as very useful. The explanations are very detailed and easy to understand.
As part of a huge network at a discounted price, it was diverting and somewhat enlightening. As porn it is unique I know of no other site anywhere like this.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I see this as an introduction to an alternative lifestyle that may not appeal to many.
Extremely creative and with an eye for porn as art.
Every scene is a surprise as each is different. I can find no real formula that repeats.
For a site that is specialized, there is a lot to see as they have 252 scenes.
Nice preview photos, trailer, scene descriptions and helpful tags.
Cons:
Presently one update per month. The last was in July.
4K is available, but for an extra price with a premium membership
Bottom Line:
Before joining the site, I have read the glowing reviews posted here. I was highly impressed, but still a bit hesitant. I thought that BDSM sites were misogynistic as well as had portrayed cruelty. What I did not realize until I checked further is that there are many among us who enjoy a bit of role play.
What I mean is that I saw scenes on the site that showed that there are some people who play at being submissive and dominant just for fun. I have heard that some females feel that if they met an alpha male that turned them on, they would be very submissive. I myself am not dominant or submissive, but good porn is about something you can imagine, even if you would not participate in such a thing. Role play on the site is by professionals who know that they are not going to hurt anyone or get hurt their selves. The dominant male here, Dr. Mercies, shows a concern for the safety as well as pleasure of his female submissive actresses. I don’t feel his actions show a lack of respect for his partners. The behind the scenes videos and interviews show just how mutual the pleasure is, and how often the women suggest the action that turns them on.
The site is fairly large with 252 scenes. There is plenty to see here, despite the fact that new scenes are being put up only one per month for almost a year. The most recent feature a real hotty, a great porn actress, Rebel Rhyder. I think she is great at this kind of extreme scene. She would make a terrific runway model based on her looks alone and she also would be on many favorites lists if she was simply a nude model.
Each scene is highly creative, using props that look to be custom made for each movie. The themes range from being a patient of Doctor Mercies, or appearing at a job interview to work in his office, Halloween themed, or even meeting on a dating app. The ideas are as varied as Dr. Mercies can make them and include many that surprise me and I hope you also.
The name of the site, Assylum, tells you to expect an anal theme. There is lots of anal sex, female on male rimming and anal play with insertions. This is not for the squeamish, but requires the viewer to accept what you see and not be judgmental. I am thinking of the term suspension of disbelief.
This is well done porn, not real life. As a fantasy, this site is great at what it sets out to do. I was pleasantly surprised how much I liked the content as I have never watched BDSM with sex before.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The sister site of the almost as impressive Slave Mouth.
+ As good of unscripted porn as I have seen.
+ Leans heavily on dom/sub scenes.
+ One of the few sites I download each video from.
+ Scenes are filmed outdoors.
+ Attractive subs and believable.
Cons:
- I could see a site like this being grouped with every other BDSM site, but definitely should not be.
- It is a small site in quantity but the quality makes up for me.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed Slave Mouth several months ago and was blown-away by the authenticity and realness of the content. I decided to try Dom The Nation and I am happy to say, I like it even better. The obvious reason is I like the less focus on oral.
Dom the Nation looks like a tour of debauchery. I did not list it in cons because I think people know what they are getting into with a site like this one. Some of the scenes and actions might be seen as lewd and that's okay, none of the actresses seem to mind. It is one of the strongest pros of the site. The females appear as legitimate submissives looking for their dominant male. It adds an authenticity most BDSM sites lack. There is never the feeling of these women are doing these actions just for a paycheck. It feels natural and though rough and maybe lewd and rude, if it's what the woman likes and desires, I have no problem with it and even believe in celebrating it.
While BDSM and bondage content is often viewed as restraining, it's anything but to a submissive who finally finds the dom she can trust and give herself to.
The size of the site will be a downside to those used to mega networks with heavily scripted and nearly all scenes seeming identical. Slave the Nation only has 60 videos right now, but all 60 are an adventure and vert different from each other.
Every video is worth downloading or watching just to see what is going to happen. There is a freedom the subs experience that can be felt and even shared with by the viewer.
The scenes are all filmed outside. I do believe that's a bonus for the subs and incites their exhibitionist side. The video quality is excellent especially considering the outside scenery, natural light changing and even sounds.
The subs range from cute to pretty. I am not familiar with any of them from other porn sites and assume they are all amateurs. The content also delivers that feeling. These are subs finally experiencing what they have always wanted and maybe even needed. I do not know if everyone who views these scenes will have as strong of a positive feeling as I have, but I do know I feel more watching these scenes than I do watching hundreds of everyday porn. I do like Dom the Nation a little more than Slave Mouth, but give both my highest recommendation.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is not reliable but VirtualXS is better biller
-7 BDSM sites
-The network has over 740 scenes
-Many Eastern European models that are eye candy and perform very well.
-Comes with the ability to create your own clips and playlists
- Comes with a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites
-Comes with cam girls section with 8000 models called Club Seventeen Live
-Hands on customer service from the webmaster
-Tag system for searching
Cons:
-Prechecked cross sale on sign up page
-Slow and irregular update schedule. About two or three new scenes a month
-Poor use of scene descriptions
-No trailers in members area.
Bottom Line:
The Submissed network of seven BDSM sites has in total over 740 updates, including bonuses. Within the network nearly every video is available in HD, as well as a photo set for every video.
The sites are:
MachineDom. Mechanized dildo machine fucked women. 43 updates, may not be updating.
BallGagger. Ball gagged dominated women over 98 updates with no schedule, irregular.
HogTiedUp. Women tied up and immobile. Almost an archive site 29 updates, only 1 for 2019.
Subamateur. Submissive dominated amateur women. Archive site and not updating. Has 8 videos.
Boundmenwanked. Femdom handjobs. In all honesty I am not a fan of femdom or male humiliation, so this was a complete surprise. I loved it as the female dom used her man as a sex object and got great pleasure from the handjobs. I think this is a hidden gem of a site and would have joined for this one alone if I had known I would have liked it so much. Over 38 updates, barely a few in 2019.
Femdum where women dominate men with strap on punishment and cock milking. Archive and not updating. 17 updates.
Struggling Babes has over 427 scenes and updates two or three times a month. Recent videos have just a little lesbian or male/ female sex, or in some scenes none at all. Women are powerless and bound and you see light use of floggers, paddles, toys, and Magic Wands. Although I did not recognize many of the models, I saw Antonia Sainz, Ashley Ocean, Cindy Dollar, Delirious Hunter, Eveline Dellai, and British ebony model the beautiful Kayla. I did not know any of these did BDSM scenes. This is the anchor of the network and the reason most members join for.
If you are looking for wild and crazy BDSM scenes with lots of sex, this is not for you. Also true is that if you are a hardcore BDSM fanatic, this is not for you either. The BDSM is not terribly forceful and the subs never get welts. I don’t think it is much more than light pain that never leaves a mark. This is soft by BDSM standards and will not make you uncomfortable or squeamish if you are not a hardcore BDSM fan.
Some of the extras are truly fantastic quality and quantity both. For example you get content from 556 DVDs, a Secret Spinners game, a cam girls site called Club Seventeen Live with 8000 models, a portal site https://www.secretfriends.com/portal/videos with over 14, 000 streaming only samples of videos from other sites, as well as a feature I have only seen on International Media sites.
You can create your own clips and playlists. Often there is a certain part of a video that you like best. Whatever part you prefer, you can select it from the video and save it. This way you can enjoy your favorite parts whenever you want or loop them to play over and over. A single clip can be up to 5 minutes which should be more than enough to get the good parts.
One huge plus is the webmaster is very hands on with customer service, and is helpful even on the weekend. He has told me no problem goes unresolved and is interested in suggestions for the network as well as new scenes or models.
The site navigation is easy to use and there is no advertising on the members pages.
The billers are Epoch as well as Virtual XS. These are very reliable and safe to use. I have used both many times in the past and never had any problems.
Unless you are into much harder BDSM, this network can be an interesting way to enjoy some content that is very different from mainstream porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I knew I would eventually find a hardcore, dark, artsy combination site.
Excellent production values, some scenes tie together and the scenes are long (some over an hour).
The model list isn’t huge, but they have 116 models that are all I would think in the top 10% of models in looks. All are pros as far as I can tell.
There are 163 scenes and they update 4 times a month.
The video quality is maybe the best I have seen. It could even be overkill. The file sizes are huge. Picture sets are also downloadable and very professional.
Probably the best alternative to Pure Taboo. Even tops Pure Taboo in some ways.
Easy site to use, but they push their upsells of their other sites in ads.
Cons:
They limit you to 25 downloads per week and that limit starts on day 1 of your membership. If you don’t download any scenes in your first week as a member you just lost 25 downloads. If it was 100 per month it wouldn’t be a big deal since they do only have 163 scenes, but they are limiting you to 25 per week. It’s not as bad as it sounds.
As good as the production values are there is a sameness that creeps into the scenes. They do have scenes that are part of series that do not fall into sameness. Those are produced by semi-retired model Kayden Kross.
They show you what looks like good deals on upsells, but don’t show the price until you click to upgrade.
Bottom Line:
This is exactly the type of site I look for. There’s creativity, story, there’s hardcore sex, they list it as passionate sex with light kink. They mostly leave out the taboos, but if you’re a fan of Pure Taboo you will likely enjoy this site.
This site is owned by the group that owns Blacked.com, Blacked Raw, Tushy Raw, Tushy and Vixen. They are now offering a package that includes all those sites and Deeper for one price, but they don’t show the price. I think that’s worth mentioning if you’re into those sites. I have only been a member of Blacked.com and Tushy. I didn’t think those were anything special, but Deeper is like a completely different site from those. I say that because Blacked.com and Tushy were very similar to me. Deeper is just that. It adds a much deeper feeling to the scenes. I don’t think the download limit is terrible. It’s obviously set up the way it is to get you to stay as a member for more than a month and I plan on doing that. Two months should be enough to get all the scenes I want to download.
The models are really outstanding. I didn’t recognize one named Sofi Ryan, but thought that’s the kind of model I think men want to see. Emily Willis is on here too and I know she’s popular. Gianna Dior, September Reign, Adriana Chechik, just to name a few. There’s not an unattractive model on here.
The video quality could explain why they have download limits. They offer these resolutions on all 163 scenes -- 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and three mobile resolutions. The newest scenes offer those resolutions too, but have much higher bitrates and are massive files. The newest scene’s 4K resolution video is nearly 12GB, the 1080p is 6GB, the 720p is 4GB, even the 480p is 1GB. Besides higher bitrates on the newer scenes they also are long scenes. The Muse series has 3 episodes in it and is the newest 3 scenes. The 3 scenes combined are 3 hours and 20 minutes.
Just like there isn’t an unattractive model, I don’t think there is a scene I would want to skip from downloading. It feels like they took a risk with this content since it looks like the softer hardcore porn, but it’s not soft.
There are 116 models which when combined with the number of scenes tells you there are quite a few scenes with multiple models in them. That’s the touch of kink they added. I have been very happy with the content I have watched from here and think it’s one of the best sites I have been a member of. I definitely would recommend it to those into hardcore scenes, but maybe think “does it have to be that hardcore?”. They do a very good job, especially the series scenes, of being just edgy enough to be exciting, but not too hardcore to make the scenes feel uncomfortable. One of the best sites I have joined this year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Realistic BDSM Femdom content
+ Believable dommes
+ Videos are direct and to the point, though short in length, it improves the realism
+ Multiple updates per day
+ Videos and image zips are downloadable
+ Production and casting are outstanding
Cons:
- Some will want higher download quality on the videos
- Price is high at $34.95
Bottom Line:
This site excels in many ways. The production is some of the best and the casting is nearly perfect. An in-between pro/con for me is this site likely shows the blurring of reality and fantasy. It shows the strengths of that blurring and the weaknesses.
To explain, this site has just over 1,200 videos. A very high number for a believable and realistic BDSM site, but a small number when compared with some of the BDSM networks that are more in the mainstream realm of porn. This site shows the pro of superb casting when compared to a mainstream BDSM or Femdom site. The majority of these scenes cast a very masculine male with a pretty, feminine female. Mainstream BDSM and Femdom do not. It isn’t unusual for mainstream BDSM and Femdom scenes to look completely contrived and unbelievable to a fan of the genres, but to the majority crowd, those scenes are more about the niche and genre than believable casting.
For my viewing palette, I want to see a female who isn’t imposing lure and enticing the imposing male into doing things he usually wouldn’t do – things like being pegged. Femdom Empire is excellent in this regard. If you are more of a beginner in this genre, you won’t likely even notice that and just the niche alone will be enough.
Most mainstream Femdom sites just assume the viewer is convinced of the believability of the niche. For those fans, a site like Femdom Empire might not shine as much as it does for me. I want to look at the male and female and be convinced by their actions, they want to be dominated or pegged or have their orgasm ruined.
There are multiple daily updates though it could throw a red flag up. I am not that invested in updates or the need of. You will notice the best video download quality is HD. You will also notice the number of scenes hasn’t increased that much for a site that has been around for 12 years. I am not going to let that affect my score. I do not require updates or highest download quality, but if you do, you should take note of this paragraph.
I like everything about the site and content. This site shows how the attractiveness of a female, both mentally and physically, can overpower the natural-born dominance of the masculine male. You won’t find that or feel that in mainstream BDSM or Femdom scenes. It could be simply explained that these scenes feel more natural and less scripted than the majority of BDSM and Femdom scenes on other sites.
It’s a great site and I would even say genre-defining site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most unique and largest networks on the internet.
- Kink covers lots of ground in niches, also there is a large variety of models (body type, race, hair length, etc...).
- I have seen others say they have DL speed problems but I haven't had any. I download at 85% of my max download speed.
- Depending on your depth of interest in varied niches, one could easily say this network has the most value of any network.
- The network continues to grow and offers access to 71 sites. Will detail in BL.
- Update schedule is inconsistent but there's right at 2 updates per day (across the network).
- High quality throughout but not HD (720p max).
Cons:
- There's the obvious; Kink's content isn't for everyone but I do think most people could find at least a few of the sites appealing.
- Navigation is okay but it can be frustrating thanks to so much content (across the network) and some poorly tagged scenes.
- It's hard to say a network with 71 sites is losing steam but they do have their times when the content is inconsistent from scene to scene.
Bottom Line:
The first time I reviewed the Kink network it was right after they had launched the full network. I was shocked to see so many sites I had joined before but with the network all were available for 1 price. The old saying of "Too much of a good thing is never enough" doesn't really apply here. I can't imagine how someone could go through this whole network in a month, even two or three months, if I'm focused, I can scour two or three sites, download what I want, in about a month. You definitely get your money's worth.
The basis of Kink's content is in bondage, rough(er) scenes, light torture, excellent production values including costumes and sets. Because the number of sites it comes with keeps growing, I'm going to list them in groups so you can see the amount of depth this network has. I will separate gay men, transsexual, into their own groups. The rest includes male with female, female with female, groups.
Then there are these that are straight male, woman and some bisexual women but these focus more on the women dominating men and/or women (asterisk is dominating men):
I really have trouble believing any network or even DVD site has that many genres and niches covered under one subscription. Similar to Pink Panther's comment about Evil Angel having filters to filter out content you don't want to see, Kink also gives you the ability to filter out the transsexual and/or gay content.
There's a few things I have noticed this time as a member. One of my favorite Kink sites is Public Disgrace, it has had its share of controversy over the years but I now notice it is named, "Public Disgrace ... Sluts In Spain", all the archive content is still there and up until June 2018, they had been releasing 2 scenes per month. Only one in June and none so far in July.
Overall, it feels like the updates have slowed somewhat. The amount of sites is also much higher than it usually advertises, 71 to 23 that TBP advertises. But a lot of those sites are newer and don't have a lot of content on them. I also don't remember if the gay content used to be counted in the Kink network.
My interest in the network hasn't changed much. Public Disgrace is still one of my favorite sites. Ultimate Surrender is a great site but in moderation as the content does become repetitive. Fucking Machines features a lot of more mainstream models. Sex and Submission is as accessible as 95% of hardcore/bondage DVDs you'll find. The Upper Floor is still as far-reaching as it ever was. I'm under the impression at this point that its goal was never really realized so they just use it as a roleplaying/rich/wealthy society type fetish. There really is something for everyone and they do have pictures available for download but those vary from site to site.
The only technical knock is one that has been there for years and it's that the videos are 720p. I've told this before, that's my preferred video resolution so it's not a big deal to me. More importantly, the Kink scenes are relatively long compared to most porn scenes, some go over an hour each, so even the 720p versions are often 3-4 GB each. The only real disappointment I ever have with the Kink network is the lack of time. They have content of two of my favorite "softer" models, Lana Lopez and Satine Phoenix but I usually forget to download them. On average, I keep a membership here 6 months out of each year but a lot of times, I won't visit it for 2-3 months at a time. My score is a little lower than my first review of the network but that's because of the lesser updates, especially Public Disgrace and the newer sites not updating enough to make up for the older sites slowing down. It's still the best of non-mainstream porn and the best value as well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).
Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.
When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com.
Cons:
The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.
Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.
They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times.
Bottom Line:
Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).
As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A very unique site on the Kink network
Close to 500 scenes
A pornographic example of gender role reversal
Comes with the super Kink network
Long videos that are detailed and involved
Attractive models
Cons:
I am sure there is limited appeal for this niche
Some of the best scenes are older video quality
Bottom Line:
Disclaimer: I am a happily married straight man. My wife and I have been using porn to keep our sex life from becoming stale. She joins a site every few months that she knows I wouldn’t join. I have been a member of Kink before and several times at that. I hadn’t ever viewed the site, Divine Bitches. I had an unfair belief about what the site is about. It is not a site about women being cruel or terrible to men. And my belief was the women would be from the diva personality. Some of the guys in these scenes probably wish I was right!
My disclaimer is not there because I’m concerned about my masculinity. It’s there because I am mostly ignorant to this type of porn and lifestyle. I was raised mostly conservative and the idea of gender role reversal during sex would normally be denied by me.
The basis of these scenes is a dominant female tries (and succeeds) to flip the gender role during sex. I received a warm-up to this content when we joined a site called, Forced Crossdresser Fantasies. I am an enthusiast-level cartoonist in my free time. Forced CrossdresserFantasies is an artwork-only site. It was interesting enough and my wife loved the drawings.
Imagine my surprise (laugh if you will!), when I saw Divine Bitches on the Kink network. I know this niche won’t appeal to most males, but for those that it does, this is a really good site. I am even going to call it respectful which I think is extremely important in this niche. The scenes play out with the female seducing the male to let her use a dildo, strap-on, in his ass. These scenes do a really good job of keeping at least a little playfulness from the female. I believe if the females really were “bitches” or divas, I would have cried while watching the scenes!
Instead, you see consenting adults having fun and exploring the gender role reversal. The good news for the guys is they all get to get off. And the women are sexy and hot. Some of the women do seem to be more experienced and even dominant. The scenes end with the male and female talking about the scene and you see the laughter and playfulness. I guess that makes these scenes pioneering or planting the seeds in a male viewer’s mind. You get to watch the guy look like he’s having a great time even if it’s not his preferred sexual role. It opens doors and minds (butts) to exploration and how that can help a couple trust each other more.
Watching these scenes made me think about how boring mainstream porn scenes are to me and now, I have a whole new niche to start looking into. I think this is how we’re supposed to evolve as sexual human beings, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
I do like the site and my wife loves it. It at least gives me an easy clearance for joining Kink Networrk for a year on a holiday deal. It’s a super value even when not on a holiday sale.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. Not a lot of sites do exhibitionism. And this site does it over the top. Public Disgrace stages elaborate shoots with many bystanders. While I'm sure all the backgroud people are in on the scene - it makes very hot and believable public humiliation
- Almost 480 videos as of February 15, 2020
- 1 hour long on average (incudes exit interview)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Extreme action models are spit on, written on, called names, etc. (this could just as easily have gone in the Cons for how extreme it is)
- Never the same thing twice. They have a huge amount of variation within this topic
- Easy organization. There's a heart system to easily find what you want to save. There's also a 5 point rating system so you can see what others have been enjoying
- Top talent along with new comers. I find plenty of my favorites and find new gems.
Cons:
PROS CONT
- Good model diversity in every imaginable way: body type, ethnicity, age
- plenty of orgy content, fisting, extremes
- interesting plots and set ups. They have more imagination that I do!
- Models are put in humiliating situations and degraded. This may be too much for some - but if it's what you're looking for, few do it better
CONS
- Infrequent updates: Current schedule looks to be 2/month (although last one was Jan. 21st 2019 - I hope this doesn't mean the end of this site. I'm hoping there was just a break in the action)
- You need to suspend your disbelief a little bit. For example they may be shooting on a bus but it's the same "extras" each time
- Many sets are international - I prefer English so this can be a distraction
- More expensive than most sites (although with excellent production and a wide array of models you are getting what you pay for)
- cross sells inside the member side
- A lot of talent that I've never seen before (this could just as easily be a Pro)
Bottom Line:
- Some of the real standout talent includes doms Mona Wales, Steve Holmes and Mz. Berlin. I'm a big fan of both. I find that anytime Mona Wales is dirty talking I go crazy.
- Some of the best scenes with subs were the vids by: Cadence Lux, Ashley Lane, Cherry Kiss, Isabella Clark, Lilyan Red
I don't think any network does BDSM as well as kink.com does. This site does the humiliation/exhibitionism better than any. The imagination is incredible.
If you are interested I highly recommend looking at their previews 1st. Previews run a minute and a half to 2 minutes and give you a good idea of the action. A lot of this was more intense than my interest.
A lot of the shoots start with a girl being stripped outside and walking around before she goes to a "public" place to be gang banged. The "public" place may be a shop/bar/restaurant/bus/whatever. It seems like the windows are done one way so you see people walking past - but since they have no reaction to what's happening inside I'm guess there's some film magic going on.
Even with a high price, I think this is a solid buy. Enjoy some previews to make sure it's not to extreme for you. If you like that, you'll find plenty to enjoy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High Kink.com production values and dedication
-Well over 200 scenes to date with weekly update
-A wide selection of female talent, likely partly due to split production between San Francisco and Eastern Europe
-Hardcore enough. Bondage does not always come with sex, here it does
-Creative scenes and setups. Various kinds of bondage, abuse etc.
-Technically well working site with high server speeds
-Easy to manage your subscriptions and hassle free cancels
Cons:
-No 1080p here either. Or high quality photography
-Relatively pricey, it's just one site for the price of many a network. Wait for a discount
-Outdoors scenes are not credible really (how could they be?) which might distract you
-Disgracing stuff itself might do nothing for many. It's not sex nor you getting disgraced so you have to get your kicks from somebody else being disgraced, often not too credibly
-Might be too much for some. There are "failed" scenes where the lady could not do it to the end
Bottom Line:
Certainly one of the best sites offered by Kink.com and that's saying a lot. The site has been going from mid 2008 without interruptions and updates weekly with content that is a mix of BDSM and public sex. While it all seems to have started as outdoors sex in different East European cities, eventually they also started adding less public US indoors scenes, often shot in their San Francisco Armory building to what I'm made to believe is an audience of the subscribers. Well, that would at least explain some of the rather high prices of these sites, subsidizing some SM parties half the world away ;)
Outdoors scenes include a lot of walking around in public in light bondage, random sexual acts in semi hidden spots and eventually more sex in better hidden place, a bar or a supposedly public bus or something like that. Reactions of public vary from quite credible staring and laughing to actually participating which is a bit too much to swallow. Also no accidental under age people, police or such are ever spotted in these scenes leading me to believe in carefully planned routes and audiences. The US scenes are more hardcore in nature with heavier bondage, SM and group of people humiliating, whipping etc. the female talent. Many of those scenes are made to look like parties for the members but some are shot in pubs, sex shops and other closed off locations.
Great thing about this site is that they do not really over use same models all the time. There is lots of variation and the models also come quite equally from Europe and US and not only split between the scene types. European girls have also been featured in US shoots.
If you can live with all the make believe and do not easily feel awkward when the girls are made to walk around naked in public, this is really great site to join at least once. The price of nearly 30$ without discount can be a bit too steep with only one weekly update to join more frequently but at the moment there is enough backlog to make most feel happy. Technical side works exactly like on other Kink.com sites, no real issues there unless you want your sites looking flashy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Content is top notch, especially given the fact that a lot of these are shot outdoors with a camcorder. Video quality is all pretty high, though you are only given three choices: high, med. and low. High ends up being a mix of different ratios, but most of the newer stuff is pretty large and HD. Expect files sizes nearing 1gb at this level.
Extreme hardcore. This really is a no holds barred cage match. The name says it all.
Good production values and overall quality. This isn't just some shop or home operation. They actually do get out into the streets, though usually in a foreign country, or go to sites (in the US)for a themed shoot. The latter is what I prefer as they are the ones most likely to star a well known porn star.
You never know what will happen. That's awesome. Sometimes people just join in and suddenly there's more than one action to watch. And some of the locations also feed into the fantasy, such as comic book shops, porn theaters, bars, etc.
Cons:
Search is fairly limited. In all fairness these scenes would be hard to tag because they tend to range and include so many things. Basic search options are things like small or large tits, race, age. You cannot search for any type of action or location. Location is something I would like to see included.
You have a finite amount of time that a download manager will work before they shift the pages around on you. Admittedly, this is not a big problem here as this isn't really the type of place you will be downloading mass quantities due to the size of their files and the length of the videos.
It's pretty obvious where the line between reality and fantasy is, especially in their outdoor shoots. It's always the same couple of "strangers" that show up and screw the girl. Other strangers are allowed to interact to some degree. However, and rightly so, they are obviously having to screen potential players in advance.
Bottom Line:
This is a really good site if you are into the more extreme BDSM and public sex. I knocked some points off for their limited search capability and overall site layout, which probably would have earned them a score of 95-98.
Content-wise they are hard to compare since there are very few sites like this one. I personally would like to see some male subs from time to time, but that apparently is reserved for other kink.com sites. You can see some big names here like Bobby Starr and Lily LaBeau.
I think ultimately this will be one of those sites you join for a month or so and then move on, perhaps to the other kink.com sites. It would be nice if they would start cutting people deals or allowing them to switch sites within their network from month to month. Personally, I left after a month, but this was due only to my own personal interests in this subject matter. Others may find it more to their liking and stick around longer.
So why did I rank it so high if I was leaving after only one month? All in all the site really is well done and deserves the score it got, despite my own tastes or preferences. I also ranked it so high because it is a kink.com site, and they are all top notch sites. Even if this particular site does not appeal to you I would still recommend checking out their other fetish sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ I wonder how many of us whet our bondage porn whistle with the Kink Network? I’m one!
+ It has made a strong comeback with about 10-12 updates per month
+ Always unique and creative
+ Sexy models from both genders
+ It’s easy to find what you’re looking for except the newest 15 months. Those are a little harder to sort through without a designated site attached to the scene.
+ Long, involved scenes
Cons:
- Some of it is a little too hardcore for some people, but you can always fast forward
- There’s a thin line between lust and pain. You will understand if you watch the scenes with the volume up
Bottom Line:
The Kink Network probably popped more viewers’ BDSM/Bondage cherries than anyone ever has. I didn’t even watch porn, but knew what the Kink Network was. Even then, I hesitated before I joined it the first time. What would people think if they knew? Once I joined it, I found myself coming back to it 4-5 times a year. It’s good porn. The scenes are long and involved. The majority of the scenes make perfect sense to what they are trying to show.
I did think Kink was done for when they stopped updating their sites. But they have made a good comeback. It’s enough of a comeback that when combined with their old scenes, makes it a complete network worth joining. I will say the current update style isn’t as good as it used to be. Used to, you knew what the update contained by looking at what site they were releasing it to. There were Sex and Submission updates, Ultimate Surrender, Fucking Machines, Public Disgrace as examples and you knew what to expect from those scenes. The newer updates are just updated without a set theme. I can appreciate that, but did think it was better when they released scenes to their different sites.
That is still the best part of Kink. All their old sites are still available and can be clicked on to visit. You then have pages of updates in your preferred niches. I have spent weeks on one site within Kink’s network. I notice others have reviewed some of those recently and I agree with all the high praise. Divine Bitches, for example, is one of the most accessible and enjoyable women pegging men sites. Ultimate Surrender threw an athletic twist on lesbian porn. Public Disgrace shows submissive women being treated like submissive women, in public – no less. The Training of the O has some of the best masturbation scenes.
You will see women and men being pushed to their sexual limits and showing, as most of us know, we can usually go a lot further than we expected. The last few minutes of the newer scenes shows the models, men and women, talking about the scene and what they enjoyed and didn’t enjoy about it. I just don’t think you can get this kind of intimate content on any other site. It’s very real and the emotions, screams of pain, screams of joy, seem to be on a blurred line.
It’s one of the best buys you can get in online porn and it’s easily one of my favorite sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons:
-Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line:
The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.
There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.
When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.
The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very well filmed scenes with intense multiple guys on one girl sex.
-All the videos have a little scenario which is explained by the performer during the interview at the beginning of each video.
-They have a good selection of models that cover different body types and age group as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV Med or HD as well as MP4 Med or HD.
-The content is dated and they update with one new scene each week.
-There is a calendar for all upcoming Kink site shoots.
-You can use a download manager.
Cons:
-The biggest issue with Kink sites as always been in regards to the photos. Kink sites brake photo sets into 3 or more sections. You can still download each section as a complete zip file but it would be nice to offer a complete photoset in one file.
-The site is still pretty small with only 19 videos. Mind you that wasn't a problem for me.
-Videos are all over an hour long so some might find them a little long.
Bottom Line:
-This is a departure for Kink and in my opinion a pleasant one. Here they have created a site where the the sex is center and BSDM is almost non-existant. When you couple that with the quality of porn produced by Kink and you have the best gangbang site on the net. The only thing that is holding it back is the size of the site. 19 videos is a tiny number and that might put some people off but the quality of what's availabe should more than satisfy anyone who's into this type of sex.
-The selection of models is about the only place where I`d like to see some improvement. They have a good selection but many of the models have done gangbangs elsewhere so they aren`t necessarily new to this type of sex. Of course it`s not every performer that is willing and able to film these types of scene.
-I highly recommend this site to anyone who loves well filmed multiple guys on girl scenes.
**To be avoided by anyone who's looking for gangbang scenes with a BSDM theme. You won't get enough to satisfy you.**
-My score is only because of the size of the site. I would have given this site an above 95.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
