Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Content is top notch, especially given the fact that a lot of these are shot outdoors with a camcorder. Video quality is all pretty high, though you are only given three choices: high, med. and low. High ends up being a mix of different ratios, but most of the newer stuff is pretty large and HD. Expect files sizes nearing 1gb at this level.
Extreme hardcore. This really is a no holds barred cage match. The name says it all.
Good production values and overall quality. This isn't just some shop or home operation. They actually do get out into the streets, though usually in a foreign country, or go to sites (in the US)for a themed shoot. The latter is what I prefer as they are the ones most likely to star a well known porn star.
You never know what will happen. That's awesome. Sometimes people just join in and suddenly there's more than one action to watch. And some of the locations also feed into the fantasy, such as comic book shops, porn theaters, bars, etc.
Cons:
Search is fairly limited. In all fairness these scenes would be hard to tag because they tend to range and include so many things. Basic search options are things like small or large tits, race, age. You cannot search for any type of action or location. Location is something I would like to see included.
You have a finite amount of time that a download manager will work before they shift the pages around on you. Admittedly, this is not a big problem here as this isn't really the type of place you will be downloading mass quantities due to the size of their files and the length of the videos.
It's pretty obvious where the line between reality and fantasy is, especially in their outdoor shoots. It's always the same couple of "strangers" that show up and screw the girl. Other strangers are allowed to interact to some degree. However, and rightly so, they are obviously having to screen potential players in advance.
Bottom Line:
This is a really good site if you are into the more extreme BDSM and public sex. I knocked some points off for their limited search capability and overall site layout, which probably would have earned them a score of 95-98.
Content-wise they are hard to compare since there are very few sites like this one. I personally would like to see some male subs from time to time, but that apparently is reserved for other kink.com sites. You can see some big names here like Bobby Starr and Lily LaBeau.
I think ultimately this will be one of those sites you join for a month or so and then move on, perhaps to the other kink.com sites. It would be nice if they would start cutting people deals or allowing them to switch sites within their network from month to month. Personally, I left after a month, but this was due only to my own personal interests in this subject matter. Others may find it more to their liking and stick around longer.
So why did I rank it so high if I was leaving after only one month? All in all the site really is well done and deserves the score it got, despite my own tastes or preferences. I also ranked it so high because it is a kink.com site, and they are all top notch sites. Even if this particular site does not appeal to you I would still recommend checking out their other fetish sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High Kink.com production values and dedication
-Well over 200 scenes to date with weekly update
-A wide selection of female talent, likely partly due to split production between San Francisco and Eastern Europe
-Hardcore enough. Bondage does not always come with sex, here it does
-Creative scenes and setups. Various kinds of bondage, abuse etc.
-Technically well working site with high server speeds
-Easy to manage your subscriptions and hassle free cancels
Cons:
-No 1080p here either. Or high quality photography
-Relatively pricey, it's just one site for the price of many a network. Wait for a discount
-Outdoors scenes are not credible really (how could they be?) which might distract you
-Disgracing stuff itself might do nothing for many. It's not sex nor you getting disgraced so you have to get your kicks from somebody else being disgraced, often not too credibly
-Might be too much for some. There are "failed" scenes where the lady could not do it to the end
Bottom Line:
Certainly one of the best sites offered by Kink.com and that's saying a lot. The site has been going from mid 2008 without interruptions and updates weekly with content that is a mix of BDSM and public sex. While it all seems to have started as outdoors sex in different East European cities, eventually they also started adding less public US indoors scenes, often shot in their San Francisco Armory building to what I'm made to believe is an audience of the subscribers. Well, that would at least explain some of the rather high prices of these sites, subsidizing some SM parties half the world away ;)
Outdoors scenes include a lot of walking around in public in light bondage, random sexual acts in semi hidden spots and eventually more sex in better hidden place, a bar or a supposedly public bus or something like that. Reactions of public vary from quite credible staring and laughing to actually participating which is a bit too much to swallow. Also no accidental under age people, police or such are ever spotted in these scenes leading me to believe in carefully planned routes and audiences. The US scenes are more hardcore in nature with heavier bondage, SM and group of people humiliating, whipping etc. the female talent. Many of those scenes are made to look like parties for the members but some are shot in pubs, sex shops and other closed off locations.
Great thing about this site is that they do not really over use same models all the time. There is lots of variation and the models also come quite equally from Europe and US and not only split between the scene types. European girls have also been featured in US shoots.
If you can live with all the make believe and do not easily feel awkward when the girls are made to walk around naked in public, this is really great site to join at least once. The price of nearly 30$ without discount can be a bit too steep with only one weekly update to join more frequently but at the moment there is enough backlog to make most feel happy. Technical side works exactly like on other Kink.com sites, no real issues there unless you want your sites looking flashy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very well filmed scenes with intense multiple guys on one girl sex.
-All the videos have a little scenario which is explained by the performer during the interview at the beginning of each video.
-They have a good selection of models that cover different body types and age group as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV Med or HD as well as MP4 Med or HD.
-The content is dated and they update with one new scene each week.
-There is a calendar for all upcoming Kink site shoots.
-You can use a download manager.
Cons:
-The biggest issue with Kink sites as always been in regards to the photos. Kink sites brake photo sets into 3 or more sections. You can still download each section as a complete zip file but it would be nice to offer a complete photoset in one file.
-The site is still pretty small with only 19 videos. Mind you that wasn't a problem for me.
-Videos are all over an hour long so some might find them a little long.
Bottom Line:
-This is a departure for Kink and in my opinion a pleasant one. Here they have created a site where the the sex is center and BSDM is almost non-existant. When you couple that with the quality of porn produced by Kink and you have the best gangbang site on the net. The only thing that is holding it back is the size of the site. 19 videos is a tiny number and that might put some people off but the quality of what's availabe should more than satisfy anyone who's into this type of sex.
-The selection of models is about the only place where I`d like to see some improvement. They have a good selection but many of the models have done gangbangs elsewhere so they aren`t necessarily new to this type of sex. Of course it`s not every performer that is willing and able to film these types of scene.
-I highly recommend this site to anyone who loves well filmed multiple guys on girl scenes.
**To be avoided by anyone who's looking for gangbang scenes with a BSDM theme. You won't get enough to satisfy you.**
-My score is only because of the size of the site. I would have given this site an above 95.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites.
Cons:
-I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006
Bottom Line:
*This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.
*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.
*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.
**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.
***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Site is large and accurately described - bondage etc.
Large range of activity with much deep throat and anal
Quality of videos constantly improving and up to avi (few) and wmv hd
Pictures of good quality
Interviews add sense of models as people
Some good role play scenes
Feedback pages
Cons:
As usual, virtually all models are shaved - reduces variety
Most scenes set in amorphous dungeon
Model search possible, but only off the screen featuring photo/videoset
Old videos 340x240 and RM
Bottom Line:
Good quality site focused on the BDSM niche with attractive models undergoing submission and offering all orifices!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-More than enough content for several months of subscription.
-Attractive performers all of them, no matter the body type (and they do vary) they are each attractive.
- Enthusiastic (as in real) reactions of pain and arousal from the women.
- For those than love hardcore sex in bondage scenarios, Sex and Submission delivers the perfect hybrid.
Cons:
- Some fairly well-known performers kinda takes some of the street cred from the site. Kind of replaces the whole dirty, underground feel with a mainstream vibe. (Maybe I just don't want to be seeing Steven St. Croix...)
- The "I totally didn't hate this" testimonial at the end is pretty lame, though I understand why they have it. Yeah, I'm stretching.
- Scenes do mirror each other somewhat.
Bottom Line:
The site is amazing. Great balance of video quality and download speed. The scenes are just plain hot, despite the sometimes routine approach. For those that love hardcore fucking delivered with their BDSM instead of just whipping for whipping's sake, then this is just another in a whole family of sites with memorable scenes , incredibly sexy performers, and tons of content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I won't repeat all the stats that others have done so eloquently here. So, I will keep it brief and relevant.
In terms of quality, it is excellent. The newer movies are top notch with good editing.
The women are well known but the slant on their presentation makes for a refreshing change. I have seen Trinity Post a gazillion times but not the way she is portayed on this site. The same goes for all the 'known' babes.
I like this site because it is not just focused on the S&M action but includes sex which, for me, is crucial.
The guys certainly know their thing and it always makes for a smoother experience.
Great 'feel'.
Sensible layout with multiple download options for movies and pics.
Cons:
Not much content.
Old films are grainy.
Older films are grainy and almost invisible. I believe a gnat would have a better change of ascertaining the action within.
Misleading star search. I searched for Adriana Nicole and found many links for her but the way the links were presented they lead the user to believe the star is on the sexandsubmissive site. However, you are led to another Kink.com site whereby you have to sell an organ or two to join. This form of clever external linking is a new trend that is both annoying and underhand. Spreading content by the same star across sites under the same umbrella that require further subs is not something I like.
Could do with some different scenery and situations.
Could do with some fresh faces that we have not come across.
I need more ethnic babes, more fukin' stockings and classy outfits and maybe some bush would be a refreshing change.
Bottom Line:
Refreshing and fucking sexy even if you are not into the S&M type of content, which I am not.
Great quality on the newer films and it's about time others followed suit.
Needs more content and more updates.
Needs an all-in umbrella membership so we can get all the babes under one roof. Hell, I'd pay the difference in price.
One of my favourite sites and very cleverly thought out to grab the middle market of dudes like me who like lovely babes getting a tad roughed but not bludgeoned beyond recognition.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers
Cons:
-Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good
Bottom Line:
Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.
The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.
Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.
Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.
Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.
This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Slaves are more attractive than any other BDSM site.
High quality Videos.(newer movies only)
Movies have a storyline.
Movies end with sex so you get BDSM and hardcore.
Slaves look as if they are enjoying themselves.
Cons:
Older videos are lower quality.
Videos are segmented.
Infrequent updates.
Some updates are pics only.
Bottom Line:
One of the best BDSM sites on the net.The tour could be improved but once inside this is a fantastic site for fans of female slaves.The slaves are mostly great looking and always look like the are enjoying themselves.
Updates are a mix of Pics and videos and they update 1 segment of video at a time. With an average of 5 segments per movie this means not many new movies each month.
However this is a site which goes for Quality over quantity and is a must for BDSM fans who enjoy the submission of beautiful women.
This is is a site I join for a month roughly every 6 months to download new material as updates are infrequent.Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Consistent updates
- Chanta is very interactive in the forums
- Hot models
- Reasonable price, especially with TBP discount
- Can be purchased witha combo of fuckedandbound and captivemale
- No DRM
- If you like lesbian BDSM, you can't go wrong here
Cons:
- There are other similar sites out there, but Chantasbitches competes with the best of them.
Bottom Line:
This site rocks. Obviously, it owes a lot to the place where Chanta previously worked, but that's not a bad thing. And probably the main reason for that is Chanta pretty much helped make those previous site a major success and don't fix what isn't broken.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. A Kink.com site, one of the most user-friendly group of fetish sites on the web. Quality of videos/photography is in the upper tier of all fetish sites on the web (and I've checked out most of them over the last few years).
2. Gangbang and public humiliation theme with the spice of some bondage, spanking, rough sex similar to others found on Kink.com websites.
3. Quantity of videos is smaller than other Kink websites, but improves with regular updates.
4. Lots of outdoor action with an audience sometimes participating.
5. Interesting before and after interviews with models gives a good understanding of this type of consentual sex.
Cons:
I could suggest minor ways to improve the shoots to fulfill my fetish preferrences, but I can't begrudge the overall attempt by the producers to include a variety of material in scenes (some of which I'm not particularly interested in), but it's fun searching for the stuff I like with fast forward.
Bottom Line:
Overall a worthwhile user friendly site for fetish fans, especially public outdoor and gangbang, at a reasonable price $29.95/mo USD.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-147 MP4 HD videos 1280x720, 6000k. Simply beautiful quality.
-Photo sets(1200x675)of each shoot are zip downloadable.
-Each update comes with a few sample photos and a fairly complete description of the action. For me a huge plus.
-Updates every Monday , Wednesday and Friday for three updates a week
-Nice variety of models: Black, Asian, Latina, blondes, brunettes, redheads. Some very petite, such as under 5 feet tall. Some are large, but not plus size. A few have tattoos or piercing, but most do not. Some have implants, but most do not. Most are well known porn stars, but many are not.
-Unusually high level of attractive models.
-Genuine enthusiasm. The models love the action as each one has multiple intense orgasms.
-Extremely creative content.
Cons:
-The photo sets are split into two parts. One is Directors Picks and the other is called Scene Photography. Since both have scenes from the video, I have no idea why they are split into two sections.
-The videos have interviews, both before and after the scenes. The pre shoot interview may be at the beginning or at the end. In some videos the sex starts first, then the post then the pre shoot interview. Comes across as unpredictable and random. The rest of the site and its contents show a lot of thought, so why?
-Only two male models. One is Matt, who runs the site and an unnamed Black man with a huge penis.
-Neither male model cums, except in only one scene. This is hard to believe and I suspect has been edited out. In the forum Matt explained that cumming reduces his sexual energy. I think that scenes can end with a cum shot without taking anything away from the overall quality.
-Updates listed in date order only. There is a way to search by name, but no search engine.
Bottom Line:
This site features a combination of bondage and sex. I am not into bondage or BDSM of any kind, but I like forceful, even rough sex. Everyone has biases, so you should know where I am coming from. This site is definitely different from plain vanilla porn and is not for everybody. The action can be quite intense, but not over the top crazy like many BDSM sites.
Honestly, I was thinking about joining a few weeks ago, but the recent events in Cleveland turned me off big time. What those women endured was more than enough to make me think I should not join. But I am glad that I did. The reality was disgusting, but the fantasy presented here is very, very different.
What this site features are very attractive models who get very intense multiple orgasms in every scene. The enthusiasm is genuine. Interestingly , the male talent and site owner Matt cums in only one scene. It is not focused on him and his pleasure. There are no misogynistic insults and no verbal disrespect. He asks them about their sexual preferences and that is what they get.
Scenes start with the model getting tied up and then they pleasure Matt orally. There may be vaginal penetration, but anal is uncommon. He encourages them to perform well with nice words and the promise of a reward soon-usually an orgasm by vibrator or a sybian. Multiple, very intense orgasms are the norm. Matt goes all out to please, although he never performs cunnilingus. I guess we all have our limits.
The models are generally attractive porn stars. Some are well known, some less so. Some models are former dancers or athletes with nice bodies. There is a lot of ethnic variety, as well as by body type.
The inevitable comparison is with Sex and Submission. While that site focuses on a scenario and has a few different locations, this site is more like gonzo. There is only one video with a story and the location is always the same. I like a little bit of story and a little bit of acting. I enjoyed this site a lot, but it is clear that there is room for improvement.
With three updates a week, this site is a solid A+ in my book.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large lesbian bdsm site, featuring strap ons and anal
Some 'plotted' scenes (schoolgirls, bad secretaries etc.) add interest
Generally good doms
Interviews add a personal touch
High quality video (wmv hd added recently)
Cons:
Post shoot interviews somewhat predictable and repetitive
Model search not easy, bio's patchy with incomplete info
Old videos small and can be just RM
Bottom Line:
For lesbian dom-submissive lovers - particularly those into anal, this is the site for you! Also offers discount to other Kink.com sites (like Hogtied, Sex and Submission and Fucking Machines).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Almost 500 scenes available.
-Post 2003 scenes can be downloaded as a whole.
-Newer videos can be downloaded in HD(WMV & MP4).
-Videos can be streamed.
-One new scene per week(average)
-A good selection of doms and subs.
-Surfing and download speeds are very good.
-They have some truly good looking models.
-Members get a 10$ reduction in price to all of their other sites.
Cons:
-Many of their older videos have a level of BDSM that may not appeal to everyone.
-Photosets can only be downloaded in sections but that's no big deal since they aren't worth downloading in the first place. They are meant to give you a slight idea of what's inside the video.
-Some of the interaction between dom & sub lacks chemistry.
Bottom Line:
This is my second visit at Whipped Ass and I prefer the direction they seem to have gone with their content. I always felt that their older material had a level of pain inflciting that left me more cold than turned on. It's not too say that their new stuff is tame but there seems to be less intense whipping and caning that left marks on the skin of the models. They also seem to have less verbal abuse.
It's surprising to see some of the models they are able to get for their shoots. I'm not sure if this is because of the change in the level of BDSM, but I'm not complaining.
This is my favorite site within the network and I have no problem recommending it to anyone that likes their lesbian sex mixed in with BDSM.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com network
- Huge, huge collection of videos (close to 500 now)
- Interesting fetish
- Done to typical Kink (very high) standards
- A good mix of recognizable stars and fresh faces
- Not degrading
- Good download speeds
- Various formats and quality available
- Pictures available
- Can download the whole video as one file now – even older ones have been converted
- Updates weekly
- Very unique, very high production values
Cons:
- The only real ‘con’ is that like other Kink.com sites this can get a bit repetitive since the featured fetish is so narrow
Bottom Line:
Wired Pussy is part of the Kink.com network and for anyone who’s read my reviews of other sites from the network you’ll know that I consider Kink.com to be pretty much the best in the business.
The premise of WP is simple and fits well with the general BDSM themes in other Kink sites. In WP women are subjected to a mixture of pleasure and pain using electrical instruments. In most of the scenes the women are bound or restrained in some way which really plays to the BDSM theme. The scenes include a fairly lengthy interview with the model where she discusses her limits and clearly gives her consent to what has or is about to happen to her. The scenes vary in length and range from 20 minutes to almost an hour. During that time the submissive woman will be subjected to a wide variety of things from a TENS machine, Violet Wand, cattle prod and various electrified insertables for both the pussy and ass.
Like the other Kink sites, the directors make the whole BDSM thing work as a fantasy without degrading the models. At WP, as with all Kink sites that I’ve seen, it is abundantly clear that the models are really into and enjoying what’s happening to them.
The production values are high, as is always the case with Kink sites. The look and feel of the set adds to the tension.
The models are an interesting mix too. There are a lot of well-known porn stars who make an appearance. This includes some who are known for their BDSM work like Amber Rayne, Bobbi Star and Dana deArmond, and porn stars who aren’t normally seen in BDSM material like Aubrey Addams and Isabella Soprano. Many other models are unknown to me and may be true amateurs.
WP is logically laid out and easy to use. There is a good search function if you’re looking for a specific model. Selecting a scene brings you to a separate page where you have a number of options. You can download pictures from each scene as a zip, or you can download the video in any of four formats. HD is available in both mp4 and wmv format for all of the newer scenes. The scenes can be downloaded as smaller clips or as a complete file. Kink clearly understands the value of making the product as user-friendly as possible. Download speeds are decent, being about average for the industry.
Are there things I don’t like? Yes, but those are probably more personal preferences. The site is lesbian only which though I have no issue with girl-on-girl, I prefer BDSM to be m/f. That’s pretty minor, I know. The other thing that I don’t like about the site is that like some other Kink sites the niche is so narrow that there is only so much that can be done differently. Many of the scenes all have the same look and feel. There are some scenes that are very different, such as an outdoor shoot in New York, or the mix of water and electricity.
The bottom line is simple: if this is an interest of yours, then I can’t imagine you’ll find a site that does it better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Rare sub-niche within BDSM
- Large site
- Many download options
- Streaming available
- Mainstream and fetish models
- Effective site layout
- Allows download managers
Cons:
- May no longer be updating
- Search function ineffective
Bottom Line:
Kink.com sites have a lot in common, and that’s a good thing. The pros are significant while the cons are more detail issues on the periphery. Overall, any Kink site is worth the membership fee if you like the niche.
If this is the first review you’ve read of a Kink site be aware that Kink is likely the leader in online BDSM material. A key element to their success is that they seem to treat the models well. Both before and after the scene there are interviews with the model that make it clear that there is full consent and a safe word is in use. This is not BDSM porn focused on the pleasure of the Dom(me) in inflicting torment, but clearly focused on the sub’s pleasure in receiving that torment.
The general niche with any Kink site is BDSM, and the specific niche here is the use of electricity as a means of torment. Various implements are used, both externally and insertables, that cause the subs to squirm. In a majority of scenes, the electrical implements are used while the model is in bondage or restraints.
The site is laid out like all other Kink sites. There are a number of shoots per page and an easy way to advance the pages. The number of scenes per page is user-selected depending on how much detail you want.
It’s a good thing that there is a simple design because the search functions are pretty dismal. It may have been the way I was using the functions, but I couldn’t find anything I was looking for. And I found that the model search didn’t work either. I was given a list of all the shoots a model may have, but I couldn’t access it that way.
The site began back in 2002 and updated regularly until recently, so there is lots of material here. There are currently 537 videos available on the site. Kink appears to have been an early adopter of high quality videos because the vast majority of the scenes here are available at 1280x720. The highest resolution on the oldest files is only 640x480 but I’m not going to criticize that since it was good back then.
Like other Kink sites, there are options for downloading the scenes. Streaming comes in four ‘sizes’ and downloads come in WMV and MP4 formats. Within those choices are different resolutions. I downloaded the highest resolution MP4s offered and those came in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look great on a 24” monitor and look fine on a 50” TV too. Some may criticize the lack of 1920x1080 but I find that the increased file size isn’t warranted by the increase in quality unless you’re using a huge TV. The site permits download managers.
A highly subjective negative for me on this site is that it uses Dommes rather than Doms. Kink.com appears to be an affiliation of sites by different directors who work under the Kink roof. In this case, the site appears to be run by a popular director and sometime model, Princess Donna. Since it’s her site, she calls the shots and she’s the Domme. A corollary to that is that there is almost no b/g sex here so don’t come looking it. There are some scenes that have it, but there are likely less than a dozen.
Perhaps the biggest negative for the site is that it no longer appears to be updating. After regular updates for 11 years, the last update available is now eight months ago. That’s not to say that it’s dead, but for now it may be safest to consider that there won’t be new scenes. There is often debate about this, but the fact that the site is no longer updating is only a minor issue for me if I’m joining for the first time. With 537 scenes available at an average of about 45 minutes each I think this is an excellent value for the first-time member. Obviously this equation is quite different for a repeat member.
One difference here that I like, and I hope Kink maintains, is that they are honest about the lack of updates. The scenes are dated so anyone can see that there may be no more scenes added. But I hope that a prospective member would also consider 537 top-quality scenes to be great value. This contrasts with another Kink site, Water Bondage, where they have removed the dates and a prospective member could be misled into thinking the site was still active. Wired Pussy is a great site that doesn’t need to hide the fact that it may be dormant since it is a good value anyway.
Like other Kink sites, this one got better as it progressed. The newer scenes have some creative bondage and implements, and while many of the older shoots had only fetish models, there is a steady stream of A-list porn stars lining up for some electrical play in the newer shoots.
The bottom line is that this is a Kink site and that means that all the good reasons to join are here: high quality scenes, top models, great production values, innovation and uniqueness, and an intuitive website with easy downloads. The fact that it may have stopped growing shouldn’t deter a new member because at the membership price this is still a great value and highly recommended.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- maledom/femsub submission combined with sex (as site name suggests)
- most models (both male and female) really love it;
- variety; new ideas all the time
- ability to leave feedback (and sometimes even get the answer :-); also they're open to users ideas for future shoots)
- ZIPped downloads (ability to download whole episode as a ZIP)
- video/image quality is good
- cameraguy work is excellent
- setups are very good
- navigation is extremely easy and obvious
Cons:
- thrashy billing and authentication system; recurring intermittent problems with logging in
- number of models is rather limited (though models that keep appearing are very good).
Bottom Line:
One of kink.com sites (the same company that is famous for their hogtied.com and fuckingmachines.com sites); lots of models are the same with other kink.com sites, though content is unique (sharing models with other sites of similar niches can be good or bad depending on point of view).
As usual for kink.com sites, most (if not all) of the models are really into it, which (if chemistry of specific models matches) creates very strong feeling of the real Safe Sane Consensual BDSM encounter.
Site has very convenient system of member comments, which helps to create 'community feeling'; also it seems that they do read comments and take them into account.
Bottom line: Highly recommended for lovers of this specific niche (Safe, Sane and Consensual BDSM, as opposed to sites simulating rape/violence); definitely best in class.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
An excellent site. Models selected, for the most part, try to be convincing. Women selected are all very attractive.
The tormentors attempt different means to bring their subjects to orgasm.
Cons:
Some uneven approaches to bondage and torture. Could improve their types of insertions, and suspensions. No discounts given for joining another of their sites.
Allowing women to moan and scream more would add to their attempt at reality.
Bottom Line:
An excellent and entertaining site for people interested in bondage, torture and forced orgasms of women. They update frequently, and pick very attractive females as their subjects.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership in 5 sites for the price of 1
- Huge amount of material
- Download speeds (1MB/s and 1.5MB/s) as advertised
- Many big-name porn stars
- Many beautiful models
- No over-emphasis on one body type – most people will find models they like
- Pictures and video available
- Pictures are available zipped
- No download limits
- One of the best BDSM sites available
Cons:
- Videos are broken up into segments (the segments mark a different part of the scene, but no full download is available)
- Video links are hidden within picture galleries, not readily available
- Can get repetitive – same settings, same equipment used frequently
- Older videos are smaller and play in Quick Time
Bottom Line:
Society SM (SSM) is one of five sites available through a membership to any one of those five sites. (This includes Society SM, Fucking Dungeon, Cum Bots, Perfect Slave and Strict Restraint.) This bundling seems to be new, and creates an amazing value for BDSM fans. This review will look at SSM specifically, though much of it will also be applicable for the other sites.
SSM is a large site, having been in existence since about 2004. They have over 200 models, and many of those models have multiple scenes on the site. For quantity, this site is a great value.
For quality, this site is also an excellent value. The video is available in two formats, though I only downloaded the .wmv format. Download speeds are advertised at 1MB/s and I achieved those speeds consistently. I’m not a technical guy so I can’t really translate the video into technical specs, but I can say that it is comparable to what is available on other sites.
If SSM has one failing, it can be blamed on an embarrassment of riches. The site is so large that the number of models and scenes using the same settings, equipment and techniques actually starts to become a bit boring. The number of settings is limited, and the equipment used (even though it is innovative and creative) remains a constant throughout many of the scenes. For many scenes, the only variable is the model herself. Don’t read this as me saying “one negative aspect to this site is that it offers too much porn,” since that isn’t possible. But they could use different settings. The scene with Julie Night, for example, is shot outdoors and has a completely different feel to it. More outdoor work, or more in a setting other than the dungeon would be great.
As for the models, they are top notch. Many popular porn stars seem to have passed through SSM’s dungeon. I’m a big BDSM fan and always appreciate seeing a mainstream porn star on a BDSM site to see their reactions. One important thing to note is that this isn’t a site that degrades women. There is nothing inherently degrading about being a sub, and these Doms know this. It is fun and interesting to watch some of these women explore a unique sexual interest.
If you’re a fan of BDSM my recommendation is that you get a membership to SSM. You won’t be disappointed. Maybe a bit bored eventually, but not disappointed.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- maledom/femsub submission and sex;
- in most cases both male and female models seem to enjoy it, so "Slaves In Love" is not just a name;
- creativity; most clips are real videos with a story behind;
- stills/video quality is quite good;
- one of masters/owner seems to be professional composer, so music in clips is outstanding.
Cons:
- more than half of updates are stills-only (no video);
- less updates compared to kink.com sites (such as sexandsubmission); still ok though.
Bottom Line:
One of the very few decent sites originating from Russia; video clips are in Russian but with subtitles in English. It seems that originally it was created by a composer guy (which explains role of music in some clips), but currently I'm not sure he's also with the site (would be a pity).
Usually they create very intimate and really loving atmosphere, with masters using BDSM implements not as a tool to abuse, but more as a tool to reach mutual excitement (though recently they got a new master which is a bit more into abusing his slaves; not exactly my cup of tea, but overall they're still very loving).
More than a half of updates are stills-only, but the rest are parts of pretty long stories with real (obviously, BDSM-oriented) script behind; scripts are usually extremely well-thought (and IMO create better storyline than, say, costumed porn videos by Private - and it says a lot).
Bottom line: highly recommended for lovers of Safe, Sane and Consentual BDSM niche (opposed to sites simulating rape and violence).
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Hardcore G/G w/Strap On Sex Slapping Spanking Rope Bondage Electrosex and that verbal domination that only Chanta can bring.
-The updates are consistent and plentiful
-She takes on girls new to the BDSM/Porn scene as well as seasoned professionals and each shoot feels authentic.I've never seen any obvious "acting"
-Chanta seeks constant feedback and input from her members through her forum and blog. They are an integral part of her site.
Cons:
I wish that you didn't have to sign into the forums seperately
I wish that you could download an entire set (vids and pix) with one zip file.
Bottom Line:
If you're looking for the most hardcore g/g fetish site on the web, you've found it. Hot girls, a Hot Domme, inescapable bondage, unique BDSM, and lots of chemistry between Chanta and her "bitches". It's also very reasonably priced. I say, get in while the gettins' good!!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large selection and variety of models, many of them very attractive to me.
Chanta is a great spanker and knows just how to push the limits for each girl. Bobbi Starr says she's up for anything except face slapping and chanta slaps her face (and in the end Bobbi is happy).
Chanta's sexual interest in the girls seems very real and the sexual tension makes the shoots very erotic.
Cons:
Somewhat repetitive. I'd like to see a wider variety of scenarios. After an interview, we see the girls bound and then tormented which is great, but I sure would like a little resistence from the girls, then Chanta (with help if needed) overpowering the girls and tying them up before the torment. The excitement of a buildup would be great.
Bottom Line:
For those who like a "Whipped Ass" girl-on-girl spanking and tormenting scenario, this site is great. Chanta is so much more genuine than many dominatrixes, I really believe her more than any others. Her verbal and physical torments is not too much, not to little, but JUST RIGHT. She always seems to be pushing each girl's limits.
The girls are beautiful, even if the scenario is quite repetitive. I get bored after awhile, but always come back later because this site has something special for this particular "kink."
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1. Many beautiful women fulfilling the "fucked & bound" fantasy.
2. Site is growing and seems to be trying to be a half-step above "Sex & Submission" in its intensity.
3. Price, especially multi-month packages, is still fairly reasonable.
4. One of my favorite models, Bobbi Starr, is much more intense on this site than on her previous sites such as "Sex & Submission."
5. Excellent response to my e-mail in less than 24 hours (unusually good for web-sites, many don't respond at all).
Cons:
1. Some episodes are fairly mild spank, fuck, and blowjob sets.
2. Some models are simply "OK" and not drop=dead gorgeous.
3. Site is still growing and not as large as other sites.
Bottom Line:
For intensity in the "spank & fuck" genre, this is the best site so far, even out-pacing the pioneering "Sex & Submission" site in its intensity. Fans of Bobbi Starr (I'm one of them) will be blown away by her 2 intense episodes so far. Fairly good price for a cutting edge and growing site. Excellent response to e-mail inquiry also is light years above most unreponsive web-sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
•Very unique – it’s more about the training than hardcore sex, though there is sex
•Fast download speeds
•It may not look like there is a lot of content, but the clips are long
•Beautiful women
Cons:
• Updates are only once a week (but since this is entirely their own product I can forgive that)
• Updates appear to be staggered (in other words they don’t upload one training day per girl in sequence – that means that if you like a particular girl you may need to hang around for a couple of months to get all her stuff)
• There is a lack of continuity in the scenes which takes away from the realism. For example, the girl might have welts on her ass that are ‘gone’ right after that.
Bottom Line:
Excellent site and promises to get better as more material is added. I’ve never seen a site quite like this. I also plan to take out memberships on other sites on the Kink network based on my positive experiences with this site.
Obviously if you have little or no interest in , or are offended by BDSM, D/s, stuff then you shouldn’t bother with a membership. If you do like this stuff I can’t imagine that there is a better site out there. The premise is pretty simple: take a willing woman and submit her to four days of training. At the end she’s a submissive slut.
I highly recommend this site if you are into this kind of kink.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
