Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 133 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Glory Sluts

51. Glory Sluts (0)

Pay
Active
85
yote78 (5) 04-26-10  07:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A small site (about 30 models, each with her own pic/vid gallery) but generally pretty good quality. All the girls are hot but there are some ( who are fuckin' awesome! (Valerie, Regina Ice, Valentina and Jennifer Love, to name a few).

The video quality is only okay. Usually that would be a "Con" but the mild graininess and the red hue actually adds a lot to the raunchiness of what's going on in the video; like an old "stag film" only the girls are getting MUCH nastier!

The music in the videos ranges from provocative to annoying and it comes and goes throughout each video. Normally this also would be a "Con," but as with the video quality, the music adds a kind of "rawness" which is actually kind of refreshing from the slick polish of other sites.

In some of the videos, the girl is still masturbating even as the camera stops rolling, which gives a feeling that the video is not so much a "performance" as much as a secret vignette into her real and very intimate private moment
Cons: S-L-O-W video download speeds (zipped picture galleries are alright). It takes about 15 minutes to download one 8-15 minute video, even with a download accelerator like DownItAll. But I found that download speeds actually improve if you download two or three videos at a time.

Some of the videos (both download and streaming) stop after about four minutes and go to a gray screen. Very disappointing since all the girls (namely, Greta, Lili, Linda and Lulu) were really getting into it when the vid cut off and looked like they were all well on their way to a nasty, rockin', climactic finale.
Bottom Line: For the price, it's not bad. There are many better sites out there but this one is worth a short look.

My advice would be to buy the $9..95 monthly recurring membership, download everything you'd like (easily done in a month, even with the slow download speeds) and then cancel. the membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tushy School

52. Tushy School (0)

Pay
Newbie
64*
PantyLover (1) 04-25-10  08:55pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Older content is original and a fresh take on an old idea. New content is from mass uploaded Porn star websites. All models are professional, few, if any are true amateurs.
Cons: Site asks for your password over and over. The content gets old and boring fast. out of the 10 minutes videos maybe 2 or 3 minutes is actually nude penetration. On top of that the penetration is repetitive (ie. a "teacher" using a slim toy in a "students" ass to teach her about anal) The content is very unbelievable and is very obviously staged. The new content is from other websites. (tushy lickers, Strap On Lesbians, ETC)
Bottom Line: Don't waste your time. the site is relatively small and can be fully navigated in a couple days. the rest of the month is wasted as the updates are sporadic at best. At first the idea behind the site is captivating. but after watching a dozen or so videos of identical content with girls basically just role reversing you realize how boring the site is and stop going to it all together...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Everything Butt

53. Everything Butt (0)

Pay
Active
95
rearadmiral (340) 04-11-10  10:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Kink.com is among the best (if not the best)BDSM provider on the internet
- Very user-friendly – easy to navigate and download
- Part of a larger network of BDSM sites
- All exclusive videos
- Excellent value for the monthly fee
- Discount access to other sites on the network
- Excellent customer service
- Regular updates
- 77 scenes as of this review
- Multiple options for downloading video
- Pictures available
Cons: None. There is nothing I would change about this site.
Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally write a review so close on the heels of another member doing so, and especially since I agree with most of what Pat362 wrote, but I want to add some details.

First, as Pat362 also noted, this site isn’t for everyone. Everything Butt is an anal-themed site on a wheelbarrow full of steroids. Kink.com is a network well known for its BDSM-themed material, and this site adds a BDSM element to anal play. For someone like me, who is a dedicated, lifetime ass man, and a fan of BDSM, this site is pure gold.

One thing this site is not is an anal sex site. This isn’t like Ass Traffic where the focus is on anal sex. Everything Butt is a site about extreme anal play. Featured here are enemas, bondage, strap-ons, fingers, fists and some very large toys. Only on rare occasions do we see a male get to join in the fun for some anal sex. Men appear more often as in control of the situation rather than as active sexual participants. In some of the scenes there are women solo, administering their own enemas, using toys on themselves, and sometimes fisting themselves. In the remainder of the scenes, there are multiple women with at least one taking the Dominant role over the other(s).

As Pat362 noted, there are several models who appear a number of times. Pat362 considers this a bit of a negative, and part of me agrees with this, but not all of me. When the repeat models are stars like Bobbi Starr, Amber Rayne, Dana DeArmond and Felony – all certified anal queens – I can’t really complain. To see a model like Amber Rayne, who is always on her game, enjoying some really intense anal play is a sight to behold. I’d rather see a model who is capable of the intensity of the play than a model who can’t rise to the occasion. I think in fairness to Pat362 I’d say that I agree that while there are several models who appear a lot on the site, the scenes are different enough that it doesn’t get boring.

Everything Butt is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so everything I’ve written about them before also applies here. I think that Kink.com is probably the best porn company on the internet. The variety of their work, the inventiveness and uniqueness that they bring to their sites, the size of their sites, the value, and their customer service are all second to none. All of that is on display at Everything Butt.

I also agree with Pat362 that the pictures aren’t perfect, but I think that is due to the fact that this site and other Kink sites are more video oriented. I suspect that the photos are secondary, and this may be because there is no way that a photo can convey the intensity of some of these scenes.

If you’re an ass man, and like to dabble a bit on the dark side of BDSM, you owe it to yourself to check out this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Everything Butt

54. Everything Butt (0)

Pay
Active
90
pat362 (371) 01-17-10  09:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some very good anal themed videos with a touch of BSDM added in the mix.
-The anal tends to be more extreme than standard suff(large toys & fisting are common)
-Over 60 scenes in 7 months.
-Surfing and downloading speeds are excellent.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in normal WMV, HD WMV and HD MP4.
Cons: -The pictures are their biggest drawback because they can't be downloaded in one section but even if they could. The angles and choices of photos leave more to the imagination than show.

-I'm adding a mention about the anal in the cons mostly as a warning for those that might not be into the extreme nature of some of the scenes.
There are some very large toys used in quite a few scenes and anal fisting is also common.

-I'd like a bigger variety of models. The same girl can be in more than one scene.
Bottom Line: I first noticed this site during the summer but it was just starting and there weren't enough updates to warrant a membership. They had a promotion last month where you got 2 months for the price of one so that was the perfect time to join.

This site is in many ways similar to Whipped ass but the emphasis here is on anal with a mixture of BDSM. Whipped Ass is BSDM with anal added for flavor. I highly recommend this site to anyone interested in a more extreme style of anal sex. The scenes are mostly lesbian anal sex. People looking for standard B/G anal sex should avoid since there are only a couple of scenes.

The one thing that seems to be similar in each video is that these girls are into anal sex and not just there for a paycheck. I'm not saying that they aren't but that they appear to love anal sex.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 360 Solos

55. 360 Solos (0)

Pay
Active
70
ace of aces (179) 01-06-10  07:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++nice discount price
++ good video quality
+ preview pics
+ no dl limit
+ no drm
+ network access
Cons: --- semi exclusive
--- search engine
--- only 51 exclusive videos
--- very much bald pubic hair
--- inconsitant updates (read bottom line)
- price went up
- file names changed from 2007 till today
--- corrupted videofiles
Bottom Line: one more site of the porn.com network

the pu discount price with 9,99 € is a good deal.
the video quality with wmv videos and two different download qualitys of 720x540 and 320x210 is quite good. the videos for themselves have preview pics and are with arround 350 mb good sized.
there is no dl limit, no drm and the network gives you access to over 130 (70 network sites /differs up to 72 sites, depends on the site you are at, and 60 extra) sites.

sadly the content is semi exclusive. much more a shame is, taht the good navigation is "killed" by the fact, that you are forced by searching with keywords, you also get the not exclusive content (well known dvd`s series e.g. prouductions of combat zone)
you got only 51 exclusive videos, but that`s not enough for a niche site. also sadly found in here, is that mostly the girls are totally shaved. that`s for itselve curious, because the girls are not the same as at the other network sites 0o o0
the former price of 7,38 € in 2007 went up to 9,99 € discount price. also the download files get different names now, so that it is quite difficult to manage youre hd. the updates that seem to come new, aren`t new. it`s only mostly the old files in new outfit.

a very big con, which was also there at the beginning of the site is that if you download more then one file simultan, most of the downloaded files are corrupted (broken).

all in all that site is a monthly try worth and

Might recommend
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

56. Fucking Machines (0)

Pay
Active
87
pat362 (371) 12-16-09  06:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -A very good selection of models with many of them being amateur or semi-pro.
-You get a feel that the girls truly get off with the machines.
-Post 2004 videos can be downloaded has complete scenes(all othes are zip).
-They have over 550 videos to choose from.
-Members get a special 10$ discount on all their other sites.
-Upadtes come approximately once a week.
Cons: -The machines are noisy, cumbersome and tend to drag your eyes toward them instead of toward the performer.
-The dildos have a tendency to come out and that often requires that the machine be stopped so that they can reinsert it.
-Photosets can't be downloaded as a whole. You have to download them by section. That's not a big loss because they aren't very good when it comes to showing the action.
Bottom Line: -I've been aware of this site for many years and I knew that I'd have to join simply to satisfy my curiosity. I can't say that I'm entirely disapointed but I can't see myself rejoining them anytime soon.

Watching a girl have an orgasm or appear to have one (it's hard to doubt the orgasm at times) is quite nice. Specially after what I'm used to seeing in quite a few porns scenes these days.

Their biggest problem is that the site is called Fucking Machines and the machines are partialy the stars of each scene. They are rather weird looking contraptions that make a varying degree of noise. They tend to distract from the action.

The videos are for all intense and purposes solo masturbation scenes but with some very high end vibrator and dildos.

The one really great thing is that membership to one of their sites gives you that automatic 10$ reduction on any and all of their other sites.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

57. Wet And Puffy (2)

Pay
Active
78
anyonebutme (14) 12-07-09  09:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Many of the top European girls
-A style unique to the site
-Easy to download zip sets & .wmv videos
-About 5 updates per week, decent schedule for a brand new site
-Nice tag search feature
-No DRM, no download limit
Cons: -Low resolution videos (640x512 @ 2.4mbps), though more recent videos are better quality and should get better with time
-Site layout relies heavily on Adobe Flash which made for a slow loading site often with girl names or other elements not displaying
-Repetitive style to the picture sets and videos
-Models not currently sortable by name for easy searching
Bottom Line: This site is built like a fetish site. It has a unique style where the girls squeeze her pussy lips out, or pull them to wrap around a glass toy. If you love that look, you'll love this site. Most of the content is done with this style, where if it's not of interest there is not a whole lot of additional variety.

I thought it was a good value for a month to see favorite Eurogirls in this unique style. There are also a few sensual blowjob videos sprinkled in which I thought were surprisingly very well done.

Things appear like the owners are excited to get the site up and going, will keep an eye on where they go from here. Definitely wish to see the site design adjusted a bit for faster loading times. And a bit more variety, perhaps using various toys instead of the same glass dildo that is in most sets.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Naughty Alysha

58. Naughty Alysha (0)

Pay
Active
79
ace of aces (179) 10-30-09  06:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + nasty action
+ nice lady
+ hughe archive of videos
+ regular update
+ network access
+ high download speed
+++ exclusive content
Cons: -- the older the videos the less the quality
-- older videos are split into pieces
--- dl manager doesn`t work
- high monthly price
--- continental pricing policy
- few talking videos
- to less variety
Bottom Line: i was a member of that site quite a few years ago and the site has improved since then.

you got nasty dildo insertion, fisting, sucking and fucking action.
the lady is in good shape, even if you see the years haven`t gone beside without wanting a tribute.
the video archive is hughe, beginning from 2001 till now, updated regular.
you got a network access where are also insertion ladies to find (one to meet in real :))
the dl speed is with my max 16.000 up to date.
the content is 100% exclusive and therfore a good one time value.

now the cons:
the older the videos are, the less the quality is. the old videos are really weak. also the cut in scenes for old videos make it a plague to download them (9 parts e.g.) that combined with the not use of a dl manager makes it awfull.
the monthly price therfore is with 20 (whatever) to high. the continental pricing gives me the rest (see comment).
there are also videos with only smalltalk (BORING) which i didn`t like to see ;o)
less but not least there is to less variety. to less? yes, to less: what to do more is e.g. vegtable insertion, hammer, bureau materials...only dildos makes it a little bit boring (sorry)

all in all for mega dildo lovers a must have been a member, for all others
Might recommend
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In The Crack

59. In The Crack (1)

Pay
Active
88
RagingBuddhist (65) 10-04-09  01:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + small sample videos - good for those with bandwidth usage issues
+ All newer content (see con about dates) is available in 3 resolutions 640x360 @ 1500+ kb/s, 1280x720 @ 3900+ kb/s and 1920x1080 @ 7800+kb/s
+ Searches by 32 fetish preferences (Breasts, Panties, Treadmills, Ass Jiggling, Clitoris Views, etc.) and by release date, model name or keyword (See con)
+ No in-your-face upsells
+ You'd knock over your best friend to get a chance to date most of the models
Cons: - No alphabetical model search - you can put them in ABC order, but the pages are numbered, not lettered
- You can order episodes by release date, but the files aren't dated
- File names don't have the model's name - they're numbered along with the scene title
- A few videos have no audio (I really don't get that at all on this site)
- No date information on files
- Average to poor server speeds
- $35 a month is high
- No multi-month discount
- Won't remember login - have to type it in everytime you access the site
- Use of download manager is tricky (See bottom line)
- I'm pretty much strictly video now but, just for the review, I'll mention that the pictures, while available in 2 sizes and in zip files, they only average about 80 per model and come in oddly cropped shapes, as in not uniform sizes.
Bottom Line: I can't believe I haven't done a review for this site before now. This is my third trip in and I have to say the content is as hot as ever. The girls are among the best looking anywhere on the 'Net and the photography is awesome. While some have said that the angles and serious zooming they use in their shoots is annoying, I think it's one of the things that makes ITC stand out in a class by itself. Up close and *very* personal. The video quality is the other thing that makes them a leader in the porn biz. I stay with the 1280 resolution because it looks as good on my TV as DVDs from my standalone player. The 1920 file sizes are just more than I need - no sense in tying up gigabytes when the 1280s are already crystal clear.

But - there *are* a few things on the down side. One thing I don't remember is the server speed and how it dishes out files on my download manager. I have FreeDownloadManager set to grab 8 sections at a time. By default, I get 1 section from here and it's sometimes slow to connect even on the first chunk. When I try to manually add another section, sometimes it goes, sometimes it doesn't. On the larger files, after 10 or more tries to add sections, I managed to get up to 4, for a top speed of a respectable 1 MB/s, but on most, I could only get 2, for a top speed of around 600 KB/s. I'm thinking this is what they've substituted for a download limit, which is okay by me. I can line up a bunch of files, walk away and check 'em out later. I just wish the files had the model's name instead of a number, and it would be nice to see the episode release dates. I also don't remember the site not being able to remember your login - it has to be manually typed in every time. This site has enough content now that it needs a revamp of it's search function and probably the site navigation in general. A keyword or fetish search is nice, but finding a model isn't all that easy.

Two of my pet peeves exist here. There are more than a few model with silicone tits, but they all appear to have been done by damn good surgeons. I didn't see any obvious scars and none of 'em were "overdone". There are also some models who overplay the sex with that open-mouthed look that I think looks cheap. But, because the focus is rarely on a model's face, it didn't seem as distracting as it usually does to me.

(Continued in replies)
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Wet And Puffy

60. Wet And Puffy (2)

Pay
Active
59
ace of aces (179) 09-30-09  09:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content
+ direct contact of admin
+ full trial access
+ cc bill
Cons: - to less content
- only 14 videos
- average video quality
- no extras
- high monthly price
- music in videos
- unregular updates
- small videos
Bottom Line: what a mess. a good looking site but nothing (right now) behind.

the content is exclusive with dildo fun, mastrubating and few blowjobs.
the admin contacts you directly which makes the solution of problems easier.
the trial access is full (but there is not really something to downlad) and you are billed by ccbill.

there is to less content. the girls are changing the dildos, but there should be some more big dildos e.g.
there are only 14 videos in average quality.
there are no extras. no site no chatrooms e.g.
the monthly price is much to high for what you get. a price arround 5 € would be ok.
also you got some music in the videos what is the absolute killer for me.
there is no update plan and the updates doesn`t seem to come often. the videos are small /120mb 10minutes and therfore not that good.

all in all the site looks more dead then alive, but maybe they will do some more work until then
Not recommended
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Machine Sex Slaves

61. Machine Sex Slaves (0)

Pay
Active
75
ace of aces (179) 09-16-09  09:36am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + nice girls
+ much stocking content
+ network access
+ easy navigation
+ ccbilling
+ no dl limit
+ no drm
Cons: - high price 19,95 €
- continental pricing policy
- slow updates
- 49 videos
- music in video
- slide effect in video
- girl is not changing in machines
- average video quality (wmv 640x480)
- not sure abaout exclusivity
Bottom Line: one new (?) machine sex site
it seems to be a new site.
the girls are nice to look at. you got all kind of haircolour, pubic hair cut, tits and built of girls. the only ones that are missing are asians and real blacks.

the girls are dressed up sometimes in uniforms and there is much stocking content there.

you got network access to the Burning Ticket. that offers you quite freaky and fency topics.
the navigation is quite easy. you can surf by name, by word, by update or by points. also the click on the name of a girl offers you all scenes from here from the whole network (easy click).
the ccbilling is for me a plus, because of all bad experience with other billing systems (i won`t call names :) )
there is no download limit and the videos have no download restriction manager.

and now the cons. the high price of 19,95 € combined with the dammed continental pricing policy (look at my comment by) makes that a bigh con.
also the ammount of videos with 49 is to less for that money. the update rate withe one video per week is to less for that money.
the videos themselve are not my total taste. you got less, but music in them, the videos have a slideeffect and they are cut, so you can`t see the changing of positions e.g.
also the girl in the video doesn`t change a machine, like in other machinesex sites. with that goes, that the videoquality is rather average with a wmv format and 640x480.
less but not least i think i knew that kind of slideeffect and that background of the videos from another fetish site (if i remeber what kind, i will let you know).

lower the price, raise the updaterate and my points will go up above 80.

All in all that site can`t beat Fucking Machines.
Might recommend
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Machine Sex Slaves

62. Machine Sex Slaves (0)

Pay
Active
80
Pornbro (8) 09-07-09  04:58am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-07-09  05:42am  (Update History)
Reason: additonal facts like price and some functions
Pros: - exclusive content
- about 4,000 high quality pictures (download as zip)
- 1 update per week (every monday)
- 47 full-length video clips (one clip = 25min)in different qualities for streaming and downloading (WMV)
- 47 different hot models
- no download limit
- funny latex/rubber monster in some clips
- easy but good navigation (favorites, rating, top voted, comments, find and filter options)
Cons: - there could be more scenes
- similar looking machines and locations (could be more different from scene to scene)
- model informations would be nice
Bottom Line: Machine-Sexslaves.com is one site of the Burning Ticket Network, which consist of 10 Sites (straight and fetish) at the moment, the 11th. page Fuckslut-license-test.com is announced for the 15th. of September.

This crazy site is for the dildo, toy and fuckingmachines loving people, who want to see beautiful looking girls fucked in a futuristic and mechanical looking place by a fast moving dildomachine.

My first impression was, that this content is more amusing than lustful but I am not really into this kind of fetish. So if you like this niche you will be satisfied I think. Anyway I have seen all scenes and always enjoyed them.

The girls are hot and unique dressed, so you can see nice babes in schooluniform, leather, rubber or even in a police uniform.

In few scenes there is also a second person, a crazy looking rubber guy with a gas mask (I wish I could leave a picture here :) ) who helps the girls enjoying the machines.

The Quality of the Vids and Pictures is quiet good but not HD (they are 768 x 576).

Prices: about 25,00$ for 30days recurring or 60,00$ for 3 months, 100,00$ for 1 year

The assessable amount of content is ok (47scenes + 1 per week) but it could always be more if you are just looking for site with this kind of content. For me it's a nice bonus site to the good Burning Ticket network and a welcome change.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In The Crack

63. In The Crack (1)

Pay
Active
87
turboshaft (24) 08-23-09  07:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + A near literal translation of its name; this site can define the closeup genre.
+ Nearly 300 naturally beautiful models in 325 shoots.
+ Excellent use of technology; newer videos (shoot #114 and above) are offered in 1920x1080 @ 9MB/s .wmv.
+ Great photography up to 2400x1900; near perfectly lit, lots of wide angle closeups, great colors and details.
+ Model action is pretty diverse and interesting; girl-girl, toys, weird insertions, anal, peeing.
+ Fully archived content all the way to the very beginning in 2001.
+ Downloads are as fast as they are big: I have gotten speeds of up to 1.5 MB/s!
+ Little behind the scenes content, almost no off camera talking or interference.
+ Billing through CCBill.
Cons: - $35/month is high, and there are no recurring or multi-month discounts available.
- Graphic, screen-filling closeups and certain content (queefing, douching, pissing, etc.) may not be every member's favored approach to porn.
- First eight shoots are video only.
- Earlier photography is smaller, around 1024x800.
- Lots of wide angle lens used, and unconventional photo cropping done; for example, some photos are 1800x1800.
- Though navigation is simple and clean, the search engine may be too weak for some, and it only applies to videos.
- Ethnically homogeneous; few really 'exotic' models, vast majority are white north Americans and eastern Europeans.
- I still wish there was a little more girl-girl content.
Bottom Line: I have been a member of the 'Crack on four separate occasions over the last few years, and every time I am more than happy to fork over the money and fill up my hard drives some more -- they keep adding models but never stray too far from the close-is-not-close-enough approach.

Yes, this site is deep within the glorious chasm of the female nether regions, and it is more than happy to bring you along! I love a good girl models-only site, but they take things to a unique macroscopic level of enjoyment and seem to revel in it the whole time. There are more than a few times when video camera lens are fogged up or hit by flying body fluids...and if you have to think about this and still ask, then this site may not be for you. In a more technical way of putting it, lots of wide angle lens are used, and though you see plenty of models stripping and posing, the emphasis is below the belt at distances best measured in fractions of an inch.

That having been said, I love the presentation of their perverted arts. For the last four years they have offered videos in beautiful 1920 x 1080 .wmvs at very high bit rates. They are big files, but the payoff is eye candy that only a handful of current sites can reasonably rival. As I stated above, lighting is excellent, never harsh, and only occasionally do they use an obvious additional light source, like a small pen light when, say, a model is rocking a speculum (again, not everyone's type of porn).

They do not slouch on photography either. These are great photos with bright colors, the same professional lighting and care in details, which are pretty important in this closeup work. They don't really use conventional sizes in photos; there are numerous square butthole shots (the literal “Crack” of their title), and quite a few panoramic shots of models relaxing on a couch or bed. But photos are still big and never so Photoshopped to make models' corresponding videos have glaring differences.

I find it easy and fast to get to the content, as download speeds feel turbocharged. I regularly get 1.5MB/s, so even the biggest videos – say a 30 minute video at nearly 2GB in size – came in between five and seven minutes, if that. Combine this with no download limit and your hard drive may start looking for a new owner. The flip side is that there is a limit of twenty connections at a time, so as to discourage members from using download managers, or at least stop people from queuing up tons of downloads (I can just hear badandy400 cursing at this one), but you still get lots of downloading down in a relatively short period of time.

(Bottom Line continued below.)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude 2 Rude

64. Nude 2 Rude (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 08-02-09  08:45am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive monthly price
-Cheap ($3.95) 4 hour full access trial.
-Bill through epoch.
-Videos available as full 1080i, 1920x1080, 10,384kbps.
-Presently 144 videos, mostly split into clips.
-390 photo sets. Zipdownloadable and available at 3008x2000.
Cons: -Blabby camerman.
-Often poor camera and video camerawork. When watching a video, I don't want to see the photo cameraman. Sometimes not even off to the side, but blocking the view.
-A few too many tattoos and fake blonds. Not overwhelming, but I feel a negative.
Bottom Line: I completely agree with GCodes very complete and descriptive review, so I will not repeat the same points. He said nothing I would disagree with.

The four hour full access trial is definitely a great buy. They encourage the use of download managers, and the download speeds maxed out my fiber optic connection. That being said, you can easily get whatever you want within the four hours of the trial. I recommend you zipdownload the photos and look at them later.

The videos at 1080i and the xl size photos were exceptionally crisp and very sharp. My only criticism is that I would prefer a lower quality option, say 1280x720, so that the file sizes could be a bit smaller.

I primarily signed up for the speculum videos and the softcore spreading ones. The other videos that were available were fisting, peeing, etc. and were not really to my taste. The hardcore b/g were lame and completely a waste.

There were 10 speculum videos and they compared favorably with those on specialexamination.com. Those on inthecrack.com were generally of better quality and overall hotness, but these are much more creative. I have never before seen a dp using two speculums, for example. There is also a scene with three-her pussy, ass and mouth. Sometimes they pour liquids into the speculum, or put cherry tomatoes or dildos into them.

The other videos I found interesting were the spreading ones. There was a degree of tease that I liked, before becoming very explicit.

The problems I saw in the videos were that the cameraman was continually talking, sometimes did not focus the camera where it belonged, or the photocameraman got into the scene in an obtrusive way. Some scenes were so badly done that I had to delete them.

Overall, a good deal at the $3.95 price. A nice balance of quality and price, with enough quantity to be satisfying.

By the way, I was charged the trial price and now three days later I still have full access.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Solo Interviews

65. Solo Interviews (0)

Pay
Active
65
MargulisAZ (84) 07-21-09  10:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Newer updates have option for full movie download, different movie formats, many screen caps, and different pics sets.
Download speeds were acceptable (400-500 kbps)
Most girls were at least decent looking.
Access to network with 7 other sites.
Trial is full trial.
Cons: 70 updates is all.
Old content, nothing new since I was a member years ago, regardless of the site saying there are new updates.
Not all content is exclusive.
Not every update has a full scene download option (some broken up into 10+ parts)
Some updates have no pics at all.
A lot of the models are ones you've seen before a hundred times.
Bottom Line: I got a special offer to join this site again for free for 3 days since I was a member in the past, and the add said the following "Over 100 new girls since last time you were a member!". Guess how many new girls there were. Zero. I'm assuming they were referring to the network as a whole with 100 new girls, but the way it came across made it seem it was for Solointerviews, which is the only site of the network I really cared about. I won't bitch too much since it was a free deal, but my review is what it is without any bias, so 65 is all it gets. Some points.

1. Even though it claims to have updates and it lists the dates and everything, it must be recycled because none of this crap is new and most, if not all, of these models aren't even in the business anymore they are so outdated. The older content does seem to have more models that are exclusive to the site, but those updates are also the more annoying ones that do not have full scene downloads or pictures, so you're stuck downloading a bunch of 1 minute file clips. Annoying.

2. One good thing that I can say is that at least you know what a movie is going to be like since even the new updates have 1 minute clip options (with a screen cap for each) and screen cap pictures. I absolutely HATE sites that have 10-20 minute movies with like 1-2 pictures total to see what the movie is going to be like (I'm talking to you Karups, ATK, and many others!).

3. Basically I wouldn't recommend this site for the full membership option, but if you can get in for a trial of some kind it can be worth it since you get access to the other sites in the network, one of which is Innocenthigh which is decent.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Huge Strapon Lesbians

66. Huge Strapon Lesbians (0)

Pay
Active
80
MargulisAZ (84) 06-15-09  12:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Access to Brutal Dildos and many other bonus sites.
Full scene downloads.
Video size options: 1920 wmv, 640 wmv & mp4
Hard lesbian action of girls taking giant dildos (in most scenes anyway)
Decent mix of euro and american models.
Updates are consistent on a weekly basis.
Cons: New site = small amount of content (35 updates)
Some models are not very attractive.
Some scenes contain dildos that aren't really huge.
Only newer scenes have 1920 vid size option.
Had some random download problems with the sites, with downloads ending before completely finishing.
Bottom Line: If you are a fan of the site Brutal dildos then this is a very nice site to check out as well. It's basically the same thing but in a lesbian setting. This is good because you kind of get double the bang for your buck, two girls taking huge dildo per update as opposed to just 1 a week with Brutal dildos. Not only that, but you get access to Brutal dildos when joining this site which is a great bargain. Here are a few points to mention.

1. It seems the updates rotate every week for American and Euro models. I've also noticed that the updates for the euro models tend to feature more of the gigantic toys similar to on brutal dildos, while the american girl updates will often, but not always, contain more normal sized dongs. This is somewhat disappointing, especially since some of the american girl updates are of girls like Cameron Love who is hot as hell. Keep in mind, however, that there are some american model updates featuring the giant toys, but not all of them. A lot of the euro models on the site are ones you may see on random ddf sites also.

2. Regarding the bonus sites, some of them are pretty quality and in line with Brutal dildos and others are just your normal run of the mill streaming crap that is basically worthless. You get brutal dildos, extreme cream, and anal dildo lesbians which are sites set up just like huge strapon, but then there is the crap after that pretty much.

3. Some of the dildos are so gigantic it makes you wonder how the girls could ever feel any human penis again. Awesome stuff really!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty Alysha

67. Naughty Alysha (0)

Pay
Active
84
nygiants03 (162) 05-28-09  11:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -967 videos/clips
-933 pic sets
-hot milf.. looks like Heather Locklear but with bigger tits
-Awesome extreme fetish material
-natural squirter
-amateur videos, no scripts
-frequent updates
-newer pics come in at a solid 1024 x 685
-access to extreme mia, slut savannah, and extreme ty
Cons:
-the older videos are fuzzy quality
-older pics are a little shady
-old videos cut into short clips
-way less than half of videos are of good quality
-descriptions of the videos can be a little better
-only .flv, high quality and low quality WMV.. no HD
-NO CAM SHOWS
-needs better search options
Bottom Line: -she twitters/diary all the time
-clips/videos range from about 1 minute to 71 minutes.. really no average one week a video can be 5 minutes, the next one 8 minutes
-the latest videos are the longest
-as of like 2003-4 she got her a boob job even though they were already bigto begin with. They are probably the most natural looking fake tits I have ever seen.
-videos of gloryhole, creampies, masturbation with insane sized toys, sex, interracial sex, pussy pumping, double fisting, threesomes, squirting, videos showing her cervix, and pretty much anything you can think of sexually.
-She puts wine bottles, bats, footballs, and pretty much everything humanly possible up her snatch.
-She has lots of hot squirting orgasms.
-site design has similiar setup to like a realitykings site
-Films are taped by her husband adam, and everything is amatuerly done.. nothing fake on thsi site. This is a true slut and we just get to view her adventures. Videos of her even fucking members, and locals off the street.
-She has aged very gracefully and she appears much more attractive in her recent videos then her old videos which started back in summer of 2001.
-Supposedly there is a 2gb a day download limit, but I never reached it( so I dont know).

Site would be so much better if all the older videos were made into one big video instead of having like 10 clips of 1 scene.
Plenty to keep you busy for atleast a month. I feel I got my moneys worth. This is the best amateur website with extreme material on the web.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Fucking Machines

68. Fucking Machines (0)

Pay
Active
95
ace of aces (179) 05-09-09  08:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + high video quality (newer ones)
+ videos since 2008 often downloadable in one part
+ high dl speed 1200 KB/S
+ arround 500 videos
+ different video formats (streaming/wmv/real/ipod)
+ lot of pics
+ 2 regular updates per week
+ fency girls in crazy action
+ no softcore content
+ no drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
Cons: - only two downloads at once

the cons for the elder videos then 2008:
- videos are split up in to 2 - 8 pieces
- zip download
Bottom Line: in my opinion the best machinefucking site i know.

i like videos and fast downloads. that combined with funky sex machine positions with girls that really seems to like what the do is CRISPY...

you got well known actresses also as unknown women. from hairy to saved from dressed up in different styles up to totally undressed, different positions diffeerent machines.

you got mass videos in all kind of format. the hd quality is great but i takes some space at youre hd. the content is exclusive and with two updates a week, the price isn`t that much anymore then it was before.

all the cons of my last review were mainly solved. the dl speed is top, the videodownload in one part is up to date. it only hurts, that they changed in 2008 the oppertunity to download more then two videos simultan.

and however the elder the videos the lower the quality, but what shall i say to this?!

more updates would be great, but anyway, guys the work you have done is better, therfore i raised my rating with 5 points
Highly recommended
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

69. Fucking Machines (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
gosh (2) 04-16-09  05:08am
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -lot of contents
-regular updates (2 every week)
-good models
-great quality for recent updates
-real orgasms
-no download quota
-if you say that you want to leave, they give you 30% off
Cons: -search tool is bad and unusable
-old materials has bad quality
Bottom Line: This kind of fetish fit me really well. I would love to see my girl in there movies.

I would love to see some kind of written report made by the models with some comment about the machine. this should be great.

Other sites from kink.com seems very good and they should propose a rotating membership like "one month" in each site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Nude 2 Rude

70. Nude 2 Rude (0)

Pay
Active
79
GCode (101) 04-08-09  03:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great price at $12.95
- I believe these are exclusive photos and videos, I have seen some girls wear nude2rude t shirts during shoots but I also have seen some watermarks for other sites.
- Photos are available for viewing in three sizes (850 X 565, 1400 X 931, and 3008 X 2000) but only available for download in zip format in 850 and 1400.
- Videos are available in lots of formats (WMV: 1920 X 1080 with 10,000 kbps and 730 X 410 with 1396 kbps) (DIVX AVI: 730 X 410 with 112 kbps) (PSP, iPOD, and Mobile 3GP).
- No DRM protection.
- Unlimited downloading.
- Easy site navigation.
- Pretty good descriptions and commentary of the videos you are downloading.
- Full range of scenes (hardcore, solo, fetish, to lesbians)
Cons: - Say they update 6 times a week, I'm not a believer. Last video update was 3 weeks ago but before that they came quite often.
- The updates are not labeled when added for photo shoots but for videos they are.
- Updates are in the 'news' section but nothing is labeled as to when it was updated.
- Videos are said to be high def at 1080i, while the quality is better than most sites, they are extremely large files (HD can range from 200 MB to 2 GB for less than 30 min scenes) and are not the most elite for that resolution that I've seen.
- Model's index is just one page going down and only photo shoots are in the profile, but there are preview pics for the models.
- Bonus 'friends' gallery is just one model available in zip format with a link to another site which isn't even a discount.
Bottom Line: This site, despite the cons, is an average site for the price of admission. While I know I am being hard on a site for only charging $12.95 a month, most are cons that could be easily changed so I think they should have been implemented already.

The site (as of date) contains 73 models but this is not entirely true because the index adds models in pairs as well if they do a shoot together. These models are primarily Euro and I'd say more than half are from the UK. They are overall quite attractive and each has a nice style about them.

The Videos all vary in types of content. The majority are solo and lesbian scenes. The solo scenes are usually masterbation scenes with either their fingers or a toy but there are also quite a few speculum scenes or close up scenes with either the woman or an outside party gaping the pussy open for inner shots. The lesbian scenes are plenty and the women seem to be quite in to it, they are quite sexually charged and go at it pretty good. There is also some videos for the fetish niche, with some peeing scenes, smoking, breaking plates (yes, a girl breaking plates on the floor), candle wax, to feet. Plus, I've seen some toyplay that involves food including cucumbers and chocolate/whip cream. The hardcore scenes are bit lacking in my opinion, they bring in the corn factor with a guy wearing a leather mask for a lot of them. I just find this stuff ridiculous but whatever. The videos are shot in an overall amateurish quality, it isn't bad, but gives you that feel that it's not highly trained professionals. Plus, there is quite a bit of chitter chatter amongst the camera man and girls, if that bothers you it can be a burden. At the time of this review, there are roughly 136 different videos but these are sometimes different scenes of the same video, since they are so huge, this is an okay plus.

The photos are decent. While these can be hit or miss, I feel they are done a lot more professionally than the videos. Each model averages about 2-4 shoots but I've even seen a few with up to and over 20 different shoots with an average of 80-100 in the sets. I've seen lower and higher but it's never absolutely too low or too high. The quality is actually above average but I would not give them high praise. The resolution is good and they actually do vary a bit with some being glamour, amatueresque, masterbation scenes, and lesbian footage. One great thing is these are not just video stills and if they are all exclusive, these are a great addition to any collection.

Overall, I can't say that this site is not actually worth it for one month. The girls arent bad, the content has a wide range of various activities, and price is right. Yes, there are some changes that could be put in to place but at such a lower price than the average site, I don't see any drastic changes soon. Even if it appears that the site is not doing their stated 6 updates a week, I do see updates that come. As a one hit stay, I think it's worth it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Dildos

71. Brutal Dildos (0)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 04-01-09  01:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Part of a network of 9 sites. The network has more than 900 scenes.
-Has 258 updates, about a half hour each. About 125GB of video. Updates once a week.
-Three full video download choices by quality. The best quality is WMV, 640x480, as high as 8297 kbps. Streaming is possible. You can also download clips.
-Some variety of age and body types, but almost no ethnic variety.
Cons: -No photos of the videos. The ones they have are of low quality and not these videos.
-Multiple videos of many models, but no search engine. Updates are listed by date only. The site is simply to big to be so disorganized.
-Videos have watermarks.
Bottom Line: The girls here are American and European pornstars, so you do get some fake blonds aand some fake orgasms too. Overall the girls seem reasonably well into the action. Some are quite enthusiastic, or they are better actresses than I am giving them credit for. Almost all scenes are of a girl using huge, and I mean unbelievably huge, dildos in their pussy or ass, sometimes both. I saw only two scenes involving two girls together. The action is simply unbelievable because the girls use dildos that you just have to see. This is EXTREME action, especially when you see the small size of many of these girls. I was previously a member of hugerubberdicks.com,and this is much better in quantity and quality of camerawork, as well as in how hot it is. If you find this theme appealing, you will not be disappointed. I really enjoyed this site and so will you.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In The Crack

72. In The Crack (1)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 03-14-09  03:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Stunningly beautiful girls. Some of the best on the internet. The girls are from the US, Canada, Hungary or the Czech Republic and the scenes are shot in those locations also.
-Huge site. Despite not being part of a network, there is really a lot here. There are 271 updates, each is about 3 to 6 clips of between 3 to 15 minutes. Some are longer.Three download options, only WMV.
-Nice text description and screenshot for each video. Truly helpful.
-Most videos can be downloaded as almost 1080i HD 1280x720 or 1080p superior HD 1920x1080. This is truly great quality and as good as any site I have ever joined-very highly recommended.
-High quality photo sets for each update.
Cons: -No search engine. Just like FTVgirls, the updates are listed in order. There are multiple videos and photo sets for each girl, but no easy way to find all of them. The so called search engine doesn't function well. It looks for keywords in the text describing each video. If you look for "black" you may get "black dress" or "black earrings" etc. Not helpful if you want to find all the peeing videos or the strip ones.
-No support for download managers. Very slow tedious downloads if you have to look at descriptions of easily 1000 videos and then download the ones you want one at a time.
-No ethnic, age or bodyshape variety. I found two Asian models and two Black ones.
Bottom Line: The site has solo girl videos (there are also a few lesbian videos that are ok) that focus on either stripping, displaying assets, masturbation, looking inside with a speculum, or peeing. Most videos showcased their pussy or ass or both, but some focused on their face or moving erotically while fully clothed. Nice mix that provides some variety.

While I did not find all of the videos to be my taste, there are lots and lots of scenes to choose from.

The girls on the site are professional models, and a few are pornstars. This is both a big plus as well as a minus. The plus is that they are quite attractive, are well made up and know how to move erotically. They manage to not look like typical pornstars-no fake boobs, only a few fake blonds, no fake moaning or overacting.

Generally they play up to the camera in a sensual way that works well. Picture a girl pushing her pussy right in your face and then opening her lips to show you what's inside. By looking directly at the viewer, they generally create a personal link that can be very appealing as well as arousing. The minus to professionals is that they are totally dispassionate and are just doing a job. No enthusiasm, no feeling of daring exhibitionism as you would get with real non pro amateurs. The camera work is close to perfect. I feel most porn camera work is terrible and hurts more than helps videos. Here it is done right.

Specifically, the shots are straight ahead, no diagonals except for the earliest videos. Next each video starts with a focus on whole girl and only gradually moves in for closeups. This is a slow process that creates a buildup to the best parts at the end. Many times I preferred the buildup to the the extreme closeups.

The sets are a big plus also. Most sites use a house, even a hotel room. Here you get outdoors in the Virgin Islands or great homes in the Czech Republic, for example. Makes for a very professionl, polished, well planned video.

The only reasons for not giving the site an even higher score is the lack of a search engine, the lack of support for download managers, and the lack of variety in the models. It is very good for what it is, but it cannot be described as all that I hope for in a 90 level website. Overall a very creative and interesting way to showcase solo models that I hope other sites imitate.
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Huge Rubber Dicks

73. Huge Rubber Dicks (0)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (356) 02-04-09  06:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Discount available through TBP.
-Part of Adultdoorway network of 20 sites.
-Decent quality videos, 720x480 with 9 download options and two for streaming.
-Professional camerawork. Stays focused where it should. Many pussy closeups when the girl is done and she is wide open.
-Appears to be genuine orgasms. Often the girl is quivering after the orgasm. Minimum of fake sounding moaning and overacting.
-Photosets available as zip downloads.
-Can use download managers.
-No DRM, download limits, no problems with links, nothing to complain about.
Cons: -Tiny site. Only 11 screenshot sets of photos and 11, 7 to 15 minute videos. Site started on Dec. 23, 2008 so it is only a few weeks old.
-Plain looking girls. Not one worth remembering. About half have ugly tattoos.
-Very blabby cameraman. I don't care what he has to say. The girls sometimes talk dirty so that can be a plus.
-Ten of the 11 videos are vaginal only. Only one has anal, none has even a moment of oral.
Bottom Line: This site features masturbation using the biggest plastic penis I have ever seen. It has to be at least two feet long and maybe 4 to 6 inches in width. As you might guess, the girls cannot insert very much of it and they use it VERY gently. The one anal scene was definitely the most interesting in my opinion. The models are not the girl next door type, but they are not well known pornstars either. I suspect they are lesser known ones, as they don't look or act like you would expect from true amateurs. I did not find any of them attractive to look at. Overall this site needs a lot more growth and some variety in the girls and what they do. It may possibly then become a site I could recommend. Right now, join for the network and see this site as only an extra.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Give Me Pink

74. Give Me Pink (0)

Pay
Active
88
exotics4me (463) 02-02-09  12:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-22-09  11:34pm  (Update History)
Reason: Site stopped updating in Feb 2009, still great quality, for amount of archived content can't hold a 94 without new updates.
Pros: - Has to be one of the highest quality sites on the internet.
- Model selection is very good, nearly all top Euro models have at least 1 set, some have as many as 4.
- Picture sets are some of the most complete that I have seen. You can download a zip of the high res photos, and/or a set of screenshots from each set. Will explain more in BL
- Videos do vary a bit, older ones have the highest option of 512 high end with 1500 bitrate, newer ones have 4 options that range from a small mpg to full HD 1920x1080 with 8000 bitrate.
- Very download manager friendly, especially if you just allow 1 DL to run at a time, I had 38 files in mine (1 DL at time, others cued up) last night and those were done without any errors
- DL speed is 99% my max speed
- Navigation is very clean and neat with well-placed buttons for video, pictures, screenshots for each set
Cons: - Can be repetitive, as most solo sites do become repetitive.
- If you plan on getting the Full HD files be prepared to look into an external hard drive, files near 2 GB each, not a con for me, but could be for some.
- Some of the older sets especially do have some different content, like speculum, shooting milk from their butts, the good thing is, most of this is at the end of the videos which are usually 30 minutes+ each
Bottom Line: This is my updated review of Give Me Pink. I do agree with Denner that there are some shots that might be a little too close-up for some tastes, but overall, I really like the content. I just skip the weird parts.

This site, has nearly every major Euro model that I know of. Here are some of the major Euro stars and number of sets they have: Eve Angel (4), Peaches (4) Sandra Shine (2), Sophie Moone (2), Zafira (2), Gianna/Ginger B (3), Cindy Hope (3), Eve Smile (2), Simony, Anita Pearl and Suzie Carina all have 1 set and there are 100+ more models. In each of these sets is a 30 minute video, high res picture set usually 50 or so pictures, screenshots that number up to 300, for each set.

That to me is very complete.

The picture sets are worth noting. I can't give an exact date, but it has been over a year, that the picture sets come with a high res set that is 2250 high end and screenshots that are 1900 high end. When you download the screenshots you get both a folder with the 1900 high end ones and another folder with 1024 high end copies. I would guess this is for those who are looking to save some hard drive space and want to keep the smaller ones.

What is amounts to, to me, is that this site especially over the last year gives you nearly everything you could possibly ask for. The extremely high quality true HD videos, the 2250 high res zipped photos, the high end 1900 screenshots that are also zipped.

I think that puts me in a bind. I don't care for the extreme content of a beautiful woman squirting milk 10 feet from her butt, but the quality makes it impossible for me to score low. I guess if the whole video focused on the extreme, I would knock some off the score, but a large portion of the videos are of these often considered timid, glamour softcore Euro models masturbating in very intense hardcore fashion.

I think what I'm trying to say is that this site shows you a side of these gorgeous runway quality models being very kinky.

Another plus for me is that these models seem to really enjoy working with this site. You get a lot of big playful smiles from them in the sets and they look like they are having fun and enjoying it.

As you can see, there is very little, outside of personal preferences, to dislike about this site. The specs on the videos are as high as any site and the several options for videos really push it up near the top. I would score it higher, but would love to see them take another step up and remaster the older videos, at least to 960 high end.

Note that I only download the 1900 high end videos of my favorite models. They have a nice 960 high end, 5000 bitrate wmv that is smaller, but still higher quality than the vast majority of sites offer.

If you're a fan of Peaches, her sets here are amazing. As are 90% of the models. The only real negative is one update per week. If they could maybe squeeze one remastered update in I would be considering an even higher score! Recommended.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

75. Yanks.com (1)

Pay
Active
70
TrashMan (Disabled) 01-23-09  08:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Site search which works well
+Homepage has every list (keyword "LIST") you could want - top rated models, latest videos, latest pic sets, latest updates, etc.
+Site celebrates female masturbation, so you get videos with some odd, but entertaining female masturbation techniques (check out a scene from Mercedes where she uses the edge of a table to get off)
+Two formats (WMV,QT), and two qualities (low,high) of videos offered on most videos (some just offer WMV)
+Images are high quality
+100% exclusive content with girls you have never seen before. A few girls here and there have done professional porn vids, but for the most part they are newbs.
+Theres a headshot for every girl in the directory
+Yanks provides scans of introductory survey that each girl filled out when they applied for Yanks (using their porn name of course). So you get every bit of information you want to know about a girl - measurements, sex habits, likes, dislikes, etc. It is fun to know this stuff about a girl.
Cons: -Watermarked videos and images
-Disappointing library size
-Girl directory not alphabetized
-Can't download imagesets as ZIP files
-No free bonus material. There are two bonus pages totaling 5 types of bonus content: links to buy porn hardware (like dildos and fleshlights), links to "trusted" partners (nothing more than links), friends links (sites which have offered a bit of their junkier content for free to Yanks), streams (junky streams like Lightspeed, which themselves are limited), and actual bonus sites on the Yanks network (except they are not automatically included with Yanks membership). Like I said, no bonus material.
-Videos with multiple girls are featured on their own page. E.g. Mercedes has a video with a girl named Jordan. Instead of this update appearing on Mercedes' or Jordan's page it appears on a separate page for "Jordan and Mercedes"
-Homepage only shows latest 5 updates, no page to show more, and videos are not tagged with dates after being pushed off the homepage
Bottom Line: Overall the site is very underwhelming and feels like it is lacking, mind you the layout has not been updated for years. The site is still updated, at what exact rate I do not know (since I can only see the last 6 updates), though it seems like it averages out to a little LESS THAN one update per day. The material is high quality (good resolution video, good resolution images) and enjoyable to watch, just I wish there was more of it. Each girl has only one or two videos, maybe 2 or 3 image sets and that is it. What is a little more disappointing is that the videos generally have no associated imagesets and the imagesets generally don't have associated videos - which sucks because there are some image galleries that get my blood rushing, that I would love to see in full motion.

Personally, I would have liked if this review applied to the other sites in the Yanks network (Billies Bitches, Girls and Fingers, etc.) but it can't because each site requires separate membership (I mean I guess you could sign up the same username and password on each site, but you still have to pay extra each time).

$10/mo is rather cheap, but VideoBox is also $10/mo and you get 5 full DVD's per day, which works out to 35 DVD's per 7 days, or an average of like 150 individual scenes per 7 days. Compare this with Yanks.com which adds something like six or seven scenes per 7 days - underwhelming to say the least.

Am I going to say to avoid this site? No, because there is some really unique stuff on here, like the masturbation techniques of some of the girls (e.g. Mercedes), and there are also a content from a few girls that I like whose content is hard to find (e.g. Adara Star under the alias Adera). But, the 70 rating is warranted; there is a lot this site can do to improve, and the first thing would be to update their outdated page layout - get with the Web 2.0 revolution, please!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 133 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Wet And Puffy (2)
2. GF Sex Toys (1)
3. Yanks.com (1)
4. In The Crack (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.