Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Porn Pros Network. Joining this site gives you access to the basic Porn Pros Network sites.
-The network collection of the models is very good. Mainly young white attractive teens.
-I like the simple home page with hot links to the major categories:
Home Scenes Girls Sites Categories Favorites Live Cams Deals Blog
-Easy login, if you have cookies enabled. You still have to check the captcha box, and go through the mandatory page asking if you want to upgrade to premium status (for $70), but cookies allow you to forget the random username and password assigned to you.
-Unlimited downloading.
-All content at Cruelty Party is advertised as exclusive.
One member posted that a scene at Cruelty Party was also posted at Passion HD. I would assume that the majority of the scenes at the network are exclusive. Passion HD and Porn Pros Network share the same parent company, AMA Multimedia LLC.
Membership in Passion HD does not give access to the Porn Pros Network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Have to enter captcha to log in to site.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Warning: even if you uncheck the pre-checked cross sale, you might still be charged for the pre-checked cross sale site. So check your credit card and email to see if you were signed up for a trial subscription, and be prepared to dispute the charge. If you used Epoch as the billing agent, you should be able to reverse the charge.
-Segpay is the default biller. If you can, switch to Epoch. I have little experience with Segpay. But I always found Epoch to be reliable, easy to deal with, and helpful if I had any billing problems.
-Each time you enter the site, you first have to pass through an offer to upgrade your subscription for $70 to the premium sites in the Porn Pros Network.
-Advertising for other sites on every page.
-There seems to be some elimination of basic sites over time.
A few months ago, there were 22 sites available in the basic Porn Pros network (not counting the premium sites).
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
Currently (2017-02-09), there are 16 sites shown in the sites listing.
They still advertise that you get access to 24 sites when joining. However, I've found that many porn sites advertise facts that are not true.
-They advertise daily network updates. However, when you check the network update page, you see 1 new scene per week for the last 2 months. Which is not the same as 1 new scene per day.
-User name and password are pre-selected on join. So have to copy them down to enter the site. Can't choose your own user name and password (for easier memory).
-The last update for Cruelty Party was on March 28, 2013. So this is an archive site, with no updates for almost 4 years.
-Some links lead to an Error 503 Service Unavailable.
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
-Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states: Forbidden.
We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
-You have limited choices of definitions to download a video. Many videos only offer a 1080p or 480p choice.
However, when you choose the 1080p definition choice to download, and then check the videos specs of the downloaded file, it turns out that the video is really a 720p or 700p definition video.
On a small monitor, this is not a problem: My 14" laptop plays the 720p videos with sharp images and good colors and good sound. But if you play the video on a large monitor, you might be disappointed with the image quality or other factors.
-Videos download with the default name of the scene only. Does not include the name of the site, the model, or the date posted. So need to rename each video manually.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Interesting scenes with fun-to-watch scenarios
- 57 videos currently posted
- Updates
- Allows DL managers
- Video options
- Pictures and screencaps available
- Good mix of all-girl and b/g/g/g
Cons:
- No performer credits
- Wide chasm between file resolutions
- Slow page loads
- Irregular updates
Bottom Line:
This site seemed to have a lot of things I look for in porn so I recently opted to join. I like scenario-based porn (but not plot-based) and I prefer young and petite models. The site definitely offers those. The fact that it is affiliated with Team Skeet was a plus too.
All of the scenes offer scenarios that play well into the ‘BFF’ theme with playful 18+ models in setups that include carwashes, sports, slumber parties, etc. Yes, some of these can be repetitive but when done right they still work. This is porn after all. This site offers a lot of material for people who like group all-girl scenes as about half are this. The remaining scenes throw a guy or two into the mix for some hardcore sex.
The scenes use a similar practice that sites like In the VIP use, namely that while each scene here has at least four girls usually only two of them engage in sex. The others usually get naked too.
The site currently has 57 scenes available. I think this is good value if you join through TBP (for the discount) and while the site is updating it doesn’t update as often as many other sites. The site started in 2012 and I’d normally expect a four-year-old site to have more scenes available. The update schedule has been a bit irregular in the past but they seem to have settled into one update every two weeks.
Probably the biggest negative on the site is that there is a wide chasm between the available resolutions. The top resolution is 1980x1280, 12000kb/s and 29fps and those look great, but the file size averages around 4GB and some top out at over 6GB. That requires a lot storage. I usually look for a compromise between resolution and file size and often that’s found in 1280x720 but on BFFs the next lowest resolution is a pretty dramatic drop down to 960x540, 3000kb/s, 29fps. The next step is even lower at 640x360, 1000kb/s, 29,fps. This is purely speculative, but I wonder if the site sees their members as either wanting as high a resolution as possible OR something they can watch on their phones.
To make the file size / resolution issue even more cloudy is the fact that the file sizes between the top and the middle quality isn't always that much different on the older files. If the top quality file is 4GB then the middle might be 2GB. That is still a lot of data but it isn't reflected in the resolution or bitrate. The 960x540 files look like you’d expect but they take up a lot more hard drive space than you’d expect for those specs. That issue does appear to have been resolved in the past year or so. The 960x540 scenes are now encoded so that they have file sizes more in line with the specs. (Though I really do wish they offered 1080p.)
This probably isn’t a negative for everyone, but I catalogue my collection by model name and here all of the models are uncredited. If I’m looking for scenes by a specific model in my collection I can find them pretty quickly. This normally isn’t an issue because in almost 20 years of porn collecting every site or DVD I’ve ever had lists the models. BFFs is the only site I can think of that doesn’t list the models in the scenes. That makes no sense to me and I wonder why the stars (many of whom are A-list models) would want to be uncredited.
The site has no search function and doesn’t use tags. Finding a niche you’re interested in is a matter of luck. And speaking of niches, my favorite one is unknown here. It appears that when a young lady is hanging out and fooling around with her friends that anal play or anal sex isn't on the menu.
Recommending this site is tough as it does more wrong than it does right. The porn is great and a lot of fun to watch but the site lets the porn down. The site has no real organization to it and no way to look for anything specific. That it doesn’t even credit the talent is unusual, baffling and annoying. The lack of compromise with file resolutions is another annoyance. I’d recommend the site as a one-time join for someone interested in the overall theme but I with only two updates a month I can’t see hanging around for long.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 19 scenes in a specialty niche
- Updates weekly
- Many A-list stars
- Exclusive scenes
- Many options to view the scenes
- Photos and screencaps available
- High bitrates and framerates
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Small site (but growing weekly)
- Should really be part of the Porn Pros Network until it grows
- No TBP Discount
Bottom Line:
Lubed is a relatively new niche site from the Porn Pros people. The title and tag line of the site describe it well: this is wet sex with water, lube or oil creating a sexy sheen on some of the hottest models working today. The scenes don’t really have much of a set-up to them, which I usually find to be a negative, but in this case the models and the sex are so hot that I’m willing to forego the sexual tension of a good set-up.
Being new, the site is relatively small, with 19 scenes currently available. The site updates regularly with one new scene being added each week. It’s a valid complaint that the site is really a bit too small to command the full price of a much larger site for now. It seems that Porn Pros has been creating these niche sites and selling them as separate sites rather than bundling them with their network or with other niche sites. I can complain about that business model, but the fact that I bought a membership to this and several other of the PP niche sites means that this business model does work.
The site is well laid out, though with fewer than 20 scenes it would be hard to screw that up. There are 12 scenes per page with each having a medium-sized thumbnail. The scene name is listed, as is the name of the female talent.
Speaking of the models, there is some variation in body types. While guys like me who prefer 18+ petite waifs will be pleased with models like Piper Perri and Rebel Lynn, members who prefer fuller-figured models like Keisha Grey will also have some scenes to enjoy.
Given the messy nature of the scenes, many of them are shot partly or completely outdoors. Pools and hot tubs also work as sets. If you like that sort of thing, this site will have an added allure for you.
The scenes are all exclusive and all are well shot and edited. Many outdoor scenes can get washed out in bright sunlight but these folks obviously have the talent and equipment to make outdoor scenes look good.
Each scene opens into its own page where there are many options to stream or download the video. Streaming is available as HD or “standard.” I don’t stream so I can’t comment on the quality of each of those. One bit of good news is that the scene doesn’t start streaming automatically as with so many other sites. Downloads are available in 5 different MP4 resolutions and one resolution each for MPG and WMV. The MP4 resolutions are:
The MPG file is 852x450, 59fps and 5,100kb/s and the WMV is 1281x674, 30fps and 6,900 kb/s.
I’m open to correction on this, but the framerate is double what I’m used to seeing and the bitrates seem much higher than those used in scenes of comparable resolution on other sites. If you like MP4 files you’ll definitely find a good compromise between file size and picture sharpness here.
Photos are available too. Screencaps are available as singles only and are 1280x674. Photos are available as singles or a zip and both come in at 1125x1500.
There is a simple search function but given the size of the site that really isn't a selling feature yet. For people like me who like anal scenes, I can report that there are currently only three of those (Angel Smalls, Alice March and Keisha Grey).
The bottom line is that this is a great and growing site that could really be improved with a lower price to reflect its small size or to have it bundled with a few other smaller sites to give better value at least until it grows. The porn itself is top-quality in every way: the models are hot, the sex is hot, the production values are high and the site is well laid out and offers many options. I certainly recommend that anyone who likes wet scenes like this check it out and weigh the value using your own scale. I’m certainly not disappointed that I joined.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount for $19.95/month if you join the site directly.
But join through Teen Mega World site for $14.95/month, which gives you full access to First BGG and all the other sites in the Teen Mega World network.
-Can stream or download the videos.
-Videos have multiple choices of definition for download.
For download, all videos have low, medium, and high definition. The newer videos from June 2014 on have a 1080p definition as well.
-A major plus is that the models are attractive to very attractive.
These are young, white teenagers from Eastern Europe, slender bodies. Natural. Very few tattoos, little piercing. Almost no fake breasts. Not a huge amount of annoying fake moans and groans.
-There is a gallery to illustrate each video. Gives you a clear, fast idea of what the action is. The photos are crisp, good quality.
-Zip file for each gallery.
Cons:
-Infrequent updates. Recent update rate is one video in a month or in two months.
-Small site. Only 82 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Videos stream in only one definition. No choice of low, medium or high.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics: Site has 82 videos and matching photo sets.
The recent update rate is erratic: maybe one video plus photo set in one or two months.
Site theme: The videos are supposed to be the first time a boy and 2 girls have sex together, at the same time.
So there's obviously a bit of fantasy element here, that these girls are first-timers having sex with each other and a boy, since you've seen these girls in many other videos having sex, and it's not that big a stretch to think these girls
are porn pros who've done it all.
But suspend your disbelief, and enjoy the action. The girls are cute, and they are not shy. They are kissing and petting and fingering each other, and the boy is just another sex tool for the girls to get off. A sex tool they enjoy sharing in creative ways. And the boy is a young stud, who does his best to satisfy both of the girls, as well as satisfying himself.
The first videos at the site are dated April and May, 2009.
The earliest videos have 3 definitions for download: low (for mobile), medium, and high definition. Low definition is 405p, medium definition is 540p, and high definition is 720p.
Starting in June 2014, they began offering 1080p downloads for their newer videos.
The models can be attractive to very attractive.
Sheri Vi, Juliya B, Ada, Angel, Caroline, Grace C, Rebecca, Dora C, Izi, Gabi, Taissia, Inga E, Alice C, Milana Fox, Ariadna and some of the other teens can be featured at sites like MetArt, 18OnlyGirls, DigitalDesire, and other well-known
porn sites.
So the girls are mainly good-looking teenagers.
With firm bodies: firm ass, pert tits, cute faces, and the enthusiasm to fuck-fuck-fuck.
The stunt cocks do a good job with the girls.
The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control.
This is not a glamour site (or network), it's bread-and-butter sex, little or no romance to the sex, but the girls are both hot and willing.
The site (and network) is well-designed, to make it easy to use. There is a model listing, with nice-sized thumbnails to show you what the models look like, with hot links to all the models videos. There is a basic search, and an advanced
search.
The site only has 82 videos, but you also get access to the full Teen Mega World network, which has 4285 videos of mainly hardcore teen sex, in many different niches. So you will get a huge amount of content for your money. If you like teen sex, hardcore, without a lot of glamour, this site/network should be a candidate for your porn dollars.
Note: A lot of the sites in the network either do not update or update rarely. This can annoy some members.
Almost all the videos are in some Eastern European language, when the models speak.
The videos at some of the sites are very old, and in poor quality. The models might be attractive, but it's annoying that the video quality is so poor. Because those models retired years ago, and you won't be able to find better quality videos
of those models.
Some members are annoyed by the adds for other porn sites on each page at the site.
Some members are annoyed by the fake cum shots in the videos.
So there can be negative psychological elements about enjoying this site or network.
But: put these annoying elements aside. Enjoy the site and network for what it is. A boatload of hardcore teen sex of attractive girls, for a very low price ($14.95/month if you join through the Teen Mega World site, $19.95/month if you join through the First BGG site).
I'm giving the site a score of 92. Because of the very attractive models. Because of the hot sex. Because you get full access to the Teen Mega World network. Because of the low price.
Add it all up, and I think it's a great value, for your money. That's my opinion, anyway.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Some cute American porn stars.
- Has a really nice amateur feel.
- Very believable reality porn.
- Some great Hazing lesbian movies.
- Fast downloads.
Cons:
- Small site.
- Disappointing endings to certain films.
- Lots of girls with tattoos.
- Often all the girls didn't get involve in the sex.
- Not the best navigation.
Bottom Line:
I thought I'd do a review of this site now which I to be honest found a real surprise and overall still glad I joined for the scenes I did get from it. OK it is never going to appeal to all and I would feel at the full price $24.87 that it maybe wouldn't of been worth that, I did however get a Christmas deal for the site so didn't pay full price. I would say though its worth the $17.87 for the special discount you get here at PornUsers.
I found it very much hit and miss as some scenes were just not my bag but the ones that were I adored, feel like even then though one scene in particular which featured my new fav girl Goldie Ortiz who was the reason in joining to be honest. She was awesome in it but the scene when it got the 3 friends naked in it and then an older girl comes back home, I think she was a step sister of one of the girls and it just ended very prematurely in my point of view when it could of gone on to be one of the most best spontaneous reality porn I've seen in a while.
I'd say one of the only sites I could compare it for greatness in reality porn terms would be HazeHer, (which by the way had some of the hottest lesbian movies ever and such a shame they no longer update)
The standout movies for me were
Ballerinas - Really loved the build up and tension here, great looking girls and would of been even more yummy if the others had joined in the sex.
Oil Wrestling - Really hot lesbian scene with shiny cute bodies slipping and sliding around, thats hot in itself but loved the sex between two of them, very passionate indeed.
Camp Counselors - Amazing movie and I'd say this alone made the joining fee for me, its basically about 3 rebellious camp counselors who don't take their role all that serious and then there's the pretty sensible one who comes along and has a go at them, I won't spoil it all but lets say they convert her into their way of thinking in the end. I really loved its spontaneous fly on the wall style and actually really good acting. Lots could be learnt from this video I think in terms of porn acting and story-line.
Pajama Party - This is the Goldie Ortiz one and again its so amazingly believable, who ever directs some of these, I'm a major fan, the girls are natural and you feel like you are watching something real being a fly on the wall. I would only add loads more actual sex to the videos with all girls getting involved, Goldie was very under used here which was a shame.
Show These Rookies The Ropes - This was actually my fav I think and simply made that because the blonde rookie is like a dream girl, I would equal her to the beauty of Franzinska Facella or Kenna James. I'd love to know the name of her to check out if she'd been on any other sites. But yeah this is a great haze scene where the rookie footballers are put through their paces before they are allowed to join the team.
Overall I liked some and I disliked some but what got me to think actually this site isn't to bad cause I've ended up with at least 5 or 6 movies I really like and will watch again for sure, that doesn't happen too much these days if I'm honest, So If I was the sites owners I would carry on, maybe look for less tattooed girls (personal opinion I know) and get the group to all of sex and carry on doing the great spontaneous plots and story-lines, oh and much more lesbian hazing too, such a great niche in my view that without hazeher.com needs someone to take over the baton.
So who is the site going to appeal to, well fans of reality porn I guess the most, you have to like lesbian scenes though as there's quite a few just girl only, there is a good mix though with boy/girl sex too so I feel something for the most group sex fans.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Emphasizes the "Party" aspect as much as the "sex" part, making things feel more real
Attractive models, many of which have fairly limited exposure, keeping things fresh.
The group sex tends to really be group sex, with most films having at least one scene with the majority of the models active at the same time.
Most movies contain multiple sex scenes.
Cons:
While the site is entirely in English, and many of the scenes end with the site or network name being painted on the models (in English), the dialogue is in Russian with English subtitles. Nothing in the site description mentions this, and the video previews generally don't contain dialogue.
Models are identified by only a first name, which rarely corresponds to the name used by the model in other work.
Archive is a bit spotty, with movies missing from the sequence, and a few older ones lack sound.
Very infrequent updates
Bottom Line:
The site is decent, but the infrequent updates means that a long-term subscription is of little value once you've found the archive scenes that interest you. The Russian audio isn't necessarily a downside, but the site should be more up front about it, especially as the site goes for a plotty approach with a lot of dialogue.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Rare niche
- Coupled with Bound Gang Bangs
- Membership gives you discounts to other Kink sites
- Many A-list models
- 59 scenes
- Updates weekly
- Usual well-done Kink.com site
- Supports download managers
- Streaming and downloads
- Choices for file type and resolution
Cons:
- Not for the faint of heart, probably among the most extreme sites on the internet
- Female model name should be more prominent
Bottom Line:
Let me start with a few of caveats:
• This is probably one of the most extreme hardcore sites on the internet. Consider this a “may not be suitable for all audiences” warning.
• Many of the scenes use a r@ape fantasy as the scenario. I say this for two reasons, first to warn potential members of this fact, and second to tell people that I had an email chat with Khan and while he okayed describing the scenes in this way he said that using the actual word could cause problems for this site so if you’re commenting DO NOT USE THE WORD lest you incur the wrath of Khan.
• Each scene, regardless of the scene set-up, has an interview with the model both before and after the scene. The initial interview CLEARLY shows that the model will be shooting the scene fully informed of what the scene will entail and fully consents to it and that there is a safe word in use. The concluding interview makes it clear that the model had nothing occur that she did not fully consent to. In all the interviews I watched the models reported that they enjoyed the scene.
In all my years of buying porn online this is possibly the most extreme hardcore site I’ve ever joined. Other Kink sites come close, but the use of a particular scenario in many of the scenes is what put this over the top. A membership here is definitely not for everybody.
Unlike a lot of other Kink sites, this one does use a scene setup. There is a storyline that plays out at the beginning. What I mean that is with sites like Device Bondage and The Training of O, which can be quite intense, there is really no scene setup. A model does a shoot and that’s it. Here, there is a story and much more often than not that story involves some sort of force by a group of men against a woman. No matter how you slice it, most of the scenes here involve simulated r@pe. If you think you’d be offended by that, and I’m sure a lot of people would be, then don’t subscribe. Apart from the setup, the entire scene tends to follow the script with lots of slapping, spitting and generally rough sex.
If done wrong, these scenes could likely cause some problems for Kink, but each scene has an interview with the model both before and after the scene where it is made clear that model knows what she’s getting into and then the post-scene interview confirms that. There is no mistaking that this is pure fantasy.
Speaking of the models, one thing that struck me about the site, and it likely speaks to Kink’s good reputation in the business, are the number of A-list porn models who appear here. With material this extreme you’d think that only the hardest of the hardcore or fetish models would be here, but that isn’t the case. Models like Chastity Lynn, Casey Calvert and Tara Lynn Foxx are here. Sure, they aren’t exactly wallflowers but I am still pleasantly surprised to see them here.
There are currently 59 scenes uploaded with a new one being added each week. Most of the scenes last about an hour, with some exceeding that.
As with all other Kink sites, they get the technical stuff right. The site is well laid out and the user can change how the site looks by selecting how much information will be displayed on the main page.
One minor quibble is that with each scene the entire cast is credited. I have no problem with that, but the female should be given top billing in all cases. Sometimes you have to read through several names before you get to the female model. I buy porn to see the women. The men are just props.
Streaming and downloads are both available, and Kink offers a broad range of choices. There are four streaming resolution options available. Downloads are available in WMV or MP4 with each format being available in five resolutions. I downloaded the MP4 HD option which is 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. (For comparison, “large” comes in at 960x540 at 1500kb/s and “medium” is 640x480 at 825 kb/s.) If you can spare the space it is definitely worth it to download the HD files. They are large though, with the average being 2GB.
Videos are also available as clips if you have a slow connection or only want one specific part of a scene.
The site supports download managers and I had no issues with links timing out with five or more scenes in the queue.
To add more value to this membership, it includes a membership to Bound Gangbangs. BGB stopped updating in August 2012. A member explained here explained that this was due to billers being uncomfortable with the content so in order to save it the models were no longer to be bound. There are 93 scenes that are pretty much like what you’ll find on HCG but with the models in bondage while it happens.
Obviously the audience for this material is limited, but if you like this extreme porn (with full consent from the model) this is an excellent choice in a rare niche. I’m not aware of any other sites like this, but if there are some, I’m betting that this is better than the others.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons:
Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line:
STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Part of large network of Russian teens
* Very good quality videos
* Maintains an amateur feel with typical Russian sets - this is not intended to be a glamour site
* Hot Russian teens
* Heaps of bonus sites
* Download managers with no issues
* Good download speeds
* No spam
* Easy to navigate your way around
Cons:
* The sites could be better organized
* Model names are inconsistent not only across the different sites but also within the same site
Bottom Line:
These sites seem to have gone through a revamp and tidied up their act - but there is still room for improvement. If you join one site, you get access to all the others - except for TeenCasualSex; for some reason, this site doesn't give you access to the other networks.
The video quality is very good for the newer videos (from 2012) with 1080p and bitstream rate of 6000+. Of course, the older content is not as good - but then isn't that true for all sites?
There are a lot of beautiful Russian (and some Czech) teens here. Yes, you'll see them on Teen Mega World but I really liked this network - maybe I just got bored with TMW. The sets are nothing glamorous, which I liked because it gave the scenes are more realistic feel rather than the typical white-washed, overexposed, glamour sites that seem to be the fashion right now. If you've been to Russia or to a Russian home, then you'll know that the settings are authentic.
What I liked is seeing the teens doing their stuff. You see teen couples - unlike most American sites where it's "teen" girls with much, much older men.
There are model names listed for each scene and you can search them but the names can be inconsistent. Also, it was irritating that despite being a network, you have to enter your username and password for each site - and you cannot elect your own username or password.
When joining I looked at several sites and noticed that not all offer the same terms. Some offer 1 month + 7 days for the full price, but I joined through this one and got a reduced price for 1 month.
Updates are not that frequent: on average there is one or two across the entire network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most videos seem to be real students, not porn actors.
-Never the same people in any two videos.
-Couples unashamed to lick, suck, fuck and sometimes have orgasms while being watched and cheered by their peers. Wonderful openness and acceptance of sexuality -- perhaps the greatest feature of this site.
-Variety of female breast sizes (almost none enhanced) and body types, all very attractive.
-About 95 videos.
-Updates about twice a month.
-Fake passion/moaning is quite rare.
-No director telling them to run thru set positions without regard to their responses. For the most part they do what feels good.
-Mix of creampies, squirt over tummy or butt, and facials.
-A few BJ with CIM and spit or swallow.
-Lighting and resolution are generally fine.
-Good tech support with live chat that actually works.
-Videos can be sorted by most viewed, highest rated, or newest.
Cons:
-Streaming only. No download mechanism offered. I would give it a higher numeric score except for this. The mechanism to skip to another part of a video does work.
-Very amateurish videography, often blurry, jerky, too close. Well, its taken by one of the students. Sometimes a girl cums loudly off camera.
-Most of the sex is not very passionate -- but hey, its done in front of friends by amateurs while being videoed. And it is young person down-to-business hard sex, not much foreplay.
Bottom Line:
I was very pleasantly surprised. I expected to see passionless porn pros in a dorm, or possibly porn actresses with real student men (which could be very hot -- haven't found such a site but wish I could). A few of the videos seem like strippers who aren't interested in sex making out with guys with big cocks -- as expected. But most seem to be geniune submissions by groups of student friends/peers. I suspect that some of the girls are strippers when they're not in class. There isn't a lot of passion, but there's a lot of openly shared, enthusiastic sex.
Condoms are used about half the time.
The first half or more of each video (they run 30-70 min in general) is conversation and partying -- often with spin the bottle and truth or dare games. Some of the conversations among groups of girls is quite interesting, about their sexual experiences and preferences. Towards the last half or third of each video, usually a few of the girls don't mind taking their clothes off and then having sex in front of a bunch of friends who still have their clothes on and are cheering them on. Possibly they are having sex with their boyfriends, tho in some cases there are 3somes.
The one thing that seemed possibly unrealistic to me is that almost without exception, the boys last a very long time. I would expect some college men to cum quickly and then maybe again later, or 3 times. There are some that, realisticaly, seem to have trouble getting hard with a blow job (in front of 5-10 onlookers and while being videoed -- not sure I could!).
Here are some of my favorites:
-Bed Buddies. Charming and hot. A black girl films two white couples going at it.
-Birthday Wishes. Tiny girl fucks 2 guys alternately. The only video where the guys cum in short order. She orgasms about 36 min.
-Fooling Around. Nothing special in the first 63 min. Then a lovely slim tan brunette really gets into it and has several orgasms.
-Get a Head. A lot of real excitement, one orgasm around 45 min.
-Kiss Thiz. Nice foreplay and several orgasms.
-Pants Off Dance Off. One of the best orgy videos.
-Pleasure Pak. Gorgeous brown girl rides cowgirl a long time, has two orgasms around 33, 35 min.
-Pledge Fuck. One of the best with 3 couples fucking for a long time, enthusiastically. Brunette on bottom of bunk beds cums several times. 2 guys jizz at the end.
-Sleep Over. Girl-girl but sweet and hot, girls getting each other off.
-That's So. First half is a single couple with night vision. Tall slim brunette with real passion and trembling orgasms. Last half is forgettable.
-The Best Gift. Girlfriend invites her very hot roommate to trade off fucking her boyfriend. The roommate and the boy seem a bit shy about it which makes the whole thing more realistic and hotter.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons:
-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.
-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.
BOTTOM LINE:
Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.
Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones
Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.
So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.
If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.
The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.
The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.
In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.
I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content is all exclusif and is from a niche that is not really represented.
+They add one new scene a week and all content is dated.
+You can view material online.
+You can download the videos in both WMV and MP4 and each versions is offered in normal resolution as well as HD.
+They have a very nice selection of models to choose from and they have started to add some Europeans to the mix.
+Membership to one site gives you discount on the other sites.
***Current membership also gives you access to bound gangbang***
Cons:
-I'm going to put this in the con because it's important that people be aware that this is an intense site and the content is definetely not for everyone.
-The site is quite tiny with only 14 scenes. You do get access to BGB(that adds another 35 scenes) but I don't know if that is going to change in the near futur or if maybe they will incorporate some or all of the content into this one. Clearly they don't need two sites with almost identical content.
-There are pics but this is primarily a video only site so they aren't really worth talking about.
-This is a small con but two of the performers on this site have done scenes for BGB so you aren't really getting much of anything new.
Bottom Line:
*If you know Kink then you have a good idea of their business practices. If you don't then it's important to know that they take the well being of their performers to heart so although the shoots are quite intense. At no time is the girls in any danger to their health. The before and after interview makes that quite obvious.
*I'm going to stay on the fence for now and say that the content has potential. I sort of like the idea behind the site and the women do appear to really be into it but this is still forceable gangbangs so there is play acting done from all the players and it can be a little disturbing. That's why I don't know if I will join as often as I might for some of their other sites because I think they are too intense for my taste. The slapping, chocking and spitting are not my cup of tea and sadly most of these are in all of their shoots. I don't care if the performer is okay with any of these things because I'm not and I'm the one paying.
*I also can't help but feel that the scenarios get close to rape and that is a little hard for me to enjoy even though it's all fake. Mind you BGB wasn't much different than this one but it sometimes felt a little less intense.
**This site will appeal to anyone who enjoyed bound gangbang or was interested in joining that site. I would highly recommend that anyone who prefers more passion filled porn avoid this site because there is none of that here.**
***The score has less to do with my feelings in regards to the content and more to do with the site's potential. I may not have enjoyed myself as much as I could have but that doesn't mean that they don't do an excellent job producing the videos.***
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hot girls all around. Granted they all seem to fall into the typical porn star mold and tend to have fake boobs)
- Great quality mostly 1080p 3.2 mbps. Everything is as least: "DVD Quality" 720X540 3mbps. Of the 90 or so shoots their divided about 1/2 and 1/2 between "HD" quality and "DVD" quality.
- pictures (mostly screen shoots) are available in zip format for all scenes.
- "trailer" downloads are available and useful to see if the scene is interesting to you before you download the whole thing.
- part of a huge network (naughty america) with over 5,000 scenes available.
- hot fantasy setups. Of all the sites in the network this is one of my favorites.
- good organization to help you find what you're looking for with keywords and clean interface.
Cons:
- Mainstream focus means you see "vanilla" fantasies.
- poor directing. I think of some of these girls that have shoot for other companies (like kink or manojobs) and they've been much hotter.
- while the network updates everyday this site only updates about once every 3-4 weeks.
Bottom Line:
2 chicks is one of the best NA has to offer. The network is often up on sale just watch their twitter feed and website for offers.
Bottom Bottom Line: there's plenty of FFM action on this site with top notch talent. The preview section let's you know exactly what you're getting. When they run a $10 special it's worth checking out and seeing the work of your favorite girls.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content appears to be all exclusif.
+You get access to 3 other sites.
+They have a very nice selection of teen models.
+You can stream videos online.
+They offer multiple download options for their videos which include ipod/PSP and go all the way to HD at 1080P.
+You can download the photosets in a single zip file.
+The content is all dated and they are still updating.
Cons:
-The site is tiny with only 20 scenes and since they only update about twice a month then it's going to take along time to accumulate a decent amount of content.
-Their idea of High quality picscs is 720x480 so not remotely close to HQ.
-Each video includes two girls with one guy so this may not appeal to people looking for some one-on-one.
-There are no search options and most of the performers are given a different name than the one they are more commonly known under.
Bottom Line:
*I don't know if this site can appeal to anyone other than people who are really into oral sex because each video is basically two girls giving a guy a BJ for over half an hour. There is some lesbian action between the girls like kissing, breast play and some pussy licking but that is a small part of the video. There's no sex between the guy and the girls.
*Some of the videos are nearly an hour long and that seems to be on the long side of things. The videos are all well shot and well lighted so no complaints in that department but I don't know how many people will want to sit through a half hour BJ scene and since some of the videos are nearly an hour long then that is an even longer BJ scene.
*The bulk of the girls appearing on this site have at least one scene available on a site in the network and they also do BJ on that video so you are only getting a longer BJ scene here and the added girl to the mix.
*I got access to the site with my first anal quest membership and although this type of content does very little for me. I thought I should at least add a review since there are currently none available and maybe there are some people who might be interested.
*This would not be a good stand alone site but if you are into this type of fetish and really like anal as well then you should be happy with it. If you aren't into long BJ scenes and don't like anal then avoid the entire network because that is the bulk of their content.
*I'm boosting my score a little since you get access to some great sites with your membership.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The site has a large content with currently 72 parties
-It contains longer scenes with some partying, which creates a more personal atmosphere than just bedroom sex. It also leads to the performers looking more like real students getting together.
-The site offers different file sizes, including HD quality
-They have young, attractive girls, who look natural and not pumped up with botox and silicon
-There's a variety of party themes / locations (Halloween, Xmas, locations sauna, hut)
Cons:
-They are using the same guys over and over again, which gets a bit boring after a while. They should use some variety like with the girls.
-The camera work is often rather unprofessional with shaky pictures, bad lighting etc.
-The movies are sometimes not in a great quality, even if you watch them HD, they still appear a bit grizzling
Bottom Line:
In spite of the negative points mentioned above, this is a very good site.
The best thing is that most of the parties don't look fake. The first of the four to five vids of each scene is some kind of warm up with the girls and guys meeting and talking to each other.
Unlike many party sites, where this looks very clumsy and fake, they appear to enjoy themselves on this site.
With mebership to this site you get bonus membership to currently 5 other sites, most of which are also good.
To sum it up, this is a very good site, which I can highly recommend.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
On the majority of scenes I'm glad of the join here, its far from perfect but very few sites are. It is quite unique content and one of the leaders in this party niche in my eyes as the girls are the hottest.
There good variety of girls 232 to choice from but obviously some are in the same movie with others.
There is 67 parties currently to choose from so plenty to keep you occupied.
You get some great insight into the girl's personalities here with them being open and look to be generally having a good time with friends.
Good choice of video downloads
mp4 720p
avi 576p
mp4 432p
mpv 320p
Cons:
Huge filesizes, the 720p HD mp4 scenes and they average 5 scenes an episode vary but I found they could be too huge for me sometimes 5gb or more a episode. They do give you and option of avi 576p which seemed around 3/4 of the size of its HD sister. I opted for avi and did tend to preview a scene to see if it was group sex before I download. I have enough girl on boy stuff so unless she was a fav I gave these scenes a miss.
The girls sometimes didn't get naked or have sex which I found annoying on some vids, you go to the hassle of getting a girl there at least tell her to get her clothes off and join in or don't bother turning up. I found some scenes would of benefitted on some behind the scenes direction to tell them to change position or do something else as some scenes drag.
Same guys in nearly every vid, I am not looking at the guys so not a major con but would be good to see them having sex with some other people from the same 3 guys nearly in every vid of the network.
Bottom Line:
Overall I rate the site its get some good stuff and nice to see some of my fav girls in something apart from one on one boy/girl sex hardcore. I've always been a fan or orgies, the more girls the better in my eyes but they can be hard to film and do right, few have managed to create classic orgie movies, focusing on the action can be difficult for the best of camera men/women. Here the camera work sure could be improved but I guess it's all done on the premissis that its a home movie of a group of friends have a sex party and the camera crew is them.
Theres some scenes with little nudity or none at all which does get tiresome and I think the site would be improved to have the option of the highlights on one vid and an edited best of, they go to the hassle of subtitling the movies (which is nice) so they could do it.
I would of though preferred more anal scenes here but I guess not every girl is into anal so they let them be natural and do what they want.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Each video documents an evening at a Prague swingers club attended mostly by amateurs and consists of a broad spectrum of singles, couples, age and body types. In 2006 when the 1st video was made there was a lot of obvious nervousness in the participants as they became familiar with the scene. As the series progresses with about 2 videos released each year up to the present, the swing experience in Prague is more familiar and the participants more at ease. All activity takes place in a dedicated house with all the amenities including an indoor pool, bar and many play rooms.
Video & sound quality is good and the overall look is realistic.
English subtitles are provided which allows understanding of the interplay among the players.
Cons:
As the series has progressed, the focus shifts as the videographer tries to entice participants to play with him instead of just being the observer. The style of the earlier videos consisted of couples and groups having their fun with the camera just recording the event has now changed and is nowhere as erotic. The earlier videos usually included playroom scenes with most of the guests for the evening playing together which does not often happen in the later videos.
The participants in the later episodes seem to be less amateur, more experienced, returnees and possibly local sex workers.
The subscription costs are high for the quantity of swinger material available on the site although access is allowed to 3 sister sites.
Bottom Line:
I recommend this site to anyone who enjoys spontaneous amateur group scenes with normal looking people.
I'm a fan of the European style of porn which features more typical looking people and not exclusively the bronzed, tanned, enhanced, 20 yr olds found in mainstream US porn. Czech Mega Swingers provides an appealing counterpoint to the 'porn star' mentality of US porn.
The site should return to the earlier style with the camera as an observer and not a participant.
Participants in the swing evenings are solicited by local and on-line adverts promising free booze, free sex and payment if one participates in a filmed sex scene.
The Czech Mega Swingers content was originally posted on the swingersakce.cz site which is part of the freevideo.cz group of Czech porn sites. The freevideo.cz sites including swingersakce.cz have been re-edited, reformatted, english subtitles added and moved to servers available in the US and access available by subscription. Unfortunately one cannot access the original Czech site if accessing the site from a non-European net address.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+content is mostly all exclusif.
+There are 299 videos and they can all be downloaded in WMV.
+There are over 400 phototsets and they can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+You get access to 25 other sites.
+Content is all dated they are still be updating.
Cons:
-There are only about 80 videos at 640x480. The bulk are only 320x240.
-Many of the newer videos are actually only part a complete scene and even some of those videos are split into 2 or more clips.
-I found that the cameran does a poor job on many of the videos and you often don't see the action from the right angles.
-The resolution for pics varies from set to set but anything prior to 2009 isn't worth downloading and I have seen some after 2009 that are only at 800x533.
-The large majority of photosets are taken from the video shoot so not very much variety.
-There is no search option. All you have is a choice between the year and whether it's a photoset or video.
-Site is pretty slow to surf because it takes about 4 seconds from the moment you press the icon to the moment somethin happens.
Bottom Line:
*Tracy has been doing this since 1999 and she doesn't seem to be slowing down. She's a pretty attractyive blond woman in her 40's or maybe even in her early 50's with a very active sex life. She has a few lesbian videos but I never got the feeling that she's really into women. On the other hand she is definetely into men, and the age, number or race of these gentlemen is not important.
**The first major problem is that the bulk of the videos aren't worth looking at or saving because they are onlt at 320x240 and that's such a low resolution. The photoset seem to fair ven worse because most of them are from the video shoots and resolution is way below HD.
**I have a personal problem with the site in regards to anal. There is no anal to be found anywhere except if it's from other performers. She took a small toy in the very beginning but nothing since then. I was hoping that she would have at some point done some but I didn't see any on the site.
-It's difficult to give the site a good score because the content could be good but since you can't really see the bulk of it due to poor quality then all you are left with is stuff done in the last 3 years and that's not enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautyful Young Student Girls
Crazy Sex Parties
HD Video
Cons:
Only Streaming - no downloads
Even second Video are not running or stream not found/lost/ break after 2 Minutes!
You can not skip in the video forward. I take 10 minutes and longer. Very shitty.
I cancel my membership and come no more again.
Bottom Line:
This site is a very goodd idea. But the
Site needs the new technologies form the other Streaming Site of the IT look like Videobox.com
At thist Time, the Site was very poor and the last shit.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Attractive eastern European female models paired with groups of guys
+ some of the models are well known (and sought after)
+ exclusive content
+ high standard videos in three different resolutions and sizes (see bottom line) plus a flash-stream
+ downloadable photo content
+ access to five more websites of same quality
+ long videos, 50 to 90 minutes each
+ good download speeds, managers supported
+ updates are dated
+ content is searchable and can be ordered in many different ways
Cons:
- only 20 scenes
- only 1 to 2 updates per month
- model naming is erratic and generic
- some setups are iterative
Bottom Line:
... and here we go again, trying to review a single site that in fact is part of a site family (I am avoiding the term 'network' here because I do not consider 6 sites to qualify as a network) consisting of "Student sex parties", "My pickup girls", "Cash for sex tape", "Porn traveling", "Chicki Porn" and this site itself.
Each site of the family has a rather unique approach to its scenes, however, in the case of "Hard Fuck Tales" it's straightforward:
One girl, more than one guy, a more or less interesting setup and 50 to 90 minutes of hardcore sex per session.
Saying that, as a single site, Hard Fuck Tales would be mostly noted for spectacularly looking eastern European girls, many of which you have seen and noted before elsewhere and now that you see them again causing some confusion due to the creative naming of the models by the site's producers:
Take some generic russian girl's names, mix them with some anglo-american sounding names and count them up with numbers. WTF? The site's list of the 10 top rated models then reads accordingly: Sweet Tanata (ok, at least she is traceable under that name) leads over a Monica and an Ashley, closely followed by some Lenas, Ritas and Svetas.
Ok, so you can forget the naming and thus have to depend on some other ability to track down the girls elsewhere, but the models themselves really are of a high standard.
Same goes with the video sessions: There is some serious action going on here, most of the scenes contain anal and dp sex, all of them are worth the download.
In the end, you are almost relieved that there are only 20 of them to the date of the review. Although bear in mind that 20 scenes easily mean 15 to 24 hours of video (I did not make the exact calculation here although info about length and specs are given for each scene).
The content you get seems to be exclusive and is, as I pointed out, good quality.
As you would expext from a modern age porn site, you can chose between three different video resolutions: SD 1024x576 in AVI, HD 1280x720 in MKV and 460x320 in MOV. Even the lowest quality allows you to follow the action on a laptop or regular screen. File sizes vary accordingly between around 120 to 150 MB for the MOV's and up to 1.5 to 2.0 GB for the HD MKV's.
Download speeds of the movies are on par, download managers are supported.
In addition, you can view or preview the video content on a flash stream that works very responsive and in a good resolution.
The picture collectors also get satisfied with 150 to 200 unique photos per session (and not just screenshots), they can be dl'd as ZIP and are accessable through a gallery. Format is okay (1152p at the long side).
Bottom Line:
------------
A solid performance modern age porn website with a fair amount of high quality content. Attractive on its own, it becomes a highlight when considered part of a 6-site-family with sister sites of similar quality.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good amount of material with 56 very long parties that consist of multiple scenes
-Very attractive models
-Amateurish feeling with all out hardcore action
-High definition downloads with no limits or DRM on newer videos
-Includes membership to five other sites which are mostly good
-Multiple payment processors available
Cons:
-Sometimes the parties are way too long with no sex action going on
-The other side of the coin to the amateurism also affects this site. There are scenes with no sound, cell phone interference noise, wind blowing on the microphone, awkward camera work and just general messing around
-Download speed can be really bad at busy times but up to 5 mgeabytes per second at good times. Downloads limited to two at the time also preventing you browsing the site while they are on
-Background noise on the scenes, radio usually
-Not everyone at the party takes part in action
Bottom Line:
The theme of this site is very similar to HardFuckTales which I alos reviewed. While that site is dedicated to three on one scenes with not much fooling around going on, this one features bigger groups of people having sex and doing lots of other things too like playing ball, drinking, dancing and partying. These parties last easily three hours or more and total in 6-10 gigabytes at the best resolution. Along with MyPickupGirls this site is where the main amount of content on this network is.
Some of the parties are like films where there are multiple scenes between different participants while others have lots of fooling around and only one all sex clip. There are also often girls on the scene who don't take part in all of it that kind of reduces the overall feeling. They should just have models who do it all.
Models are all young Russian girls. Some are totally unknown while others are easily recognizeable from many subsites on 21Sextury for example. Here however they all go by some bogus names that are so generic that they often have numbers behind them. Girl you might know as Logan is Eva here and Ioana is Anya_7. I've seen the same names used to numbers well over 10. Are they trying to make following the production of these Russian girls this hard on purpose?
The sounds are the weak point of this site. The recording quality can be bad with cell phone interference or sounds can be missing from some scenes completely. Also some irritating background music on the indoors scenes. There's lots of talking and having fun which is all in Russian but they have included subtitles in English which is nice.
I recommend this site if one is into East European
and Russian porn. The other sites you get also are strongly focused on the same theme. Parties can be long and often deviate from the real action but this is as close as it gets to having some reality porn. Certainly beats having some big brother junk running on your TV.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very nice looking models that you haven't seen too many times already
-Genuinely amateurish feeling that fools you succesfully into thinking these are not professionals (which may actually be true)
-Long scenes. Never hurts unless you are short on storage space
-Image quality is surprisingly good for amateurish hand held stuff. I've seen worse lit big studio films
-Video download without DRM or limitations in either HD wmv or mkv files that are somewhere between HD and FullHD resolution
-Lots of photos downloadable in zips
-Large selection of payment processors. Pay attention to avoid the ones using regional billing
Cons:
-There are downsides to the amateurish feeling too. There's lots of messing around, failing and such that almost should be edited out. I understand that a DP for example isn't an easy thing to pull off but sometimes in these scenes they try for quite some time only to give up and try again later. Sometimes it's ok but sometimes it frustrates the viewer too
-In many indoors scenes they have radio blasting so you cannot hear anything but some dance music. Good thing these are subtitled as they'd speak Russian anyway
-Some awkward camera work where you feel like you are missing the action. It's usually handheld and often by the actors themselves
-Download speeds vary a lot. I've seen 5 megabytes per second sometimes but often it is well below 500 kilobytes per second. Also you have very limited connections as earlier review mentions. If you are downloading two clips, you won't be able to browse the site itself
-Some strange fade-ins to the very same scene and position
Bottom Line:
This is relatively new site with 17 scenes available so far. Updates have been regular once every two weeks. The theme of the site is the same three (usually) guys picking up a girl leading to group sex. There's some acting before the action starts but not too much. The girls are probably all Russian ones that you could categorize as teens. They have generic names (like Julia_3 and Olga_6) but you could find some of them on sites like AnalTeenAngels and CutiesGalore with the names they are better known as.
The content is deliberately amateurish and succeeds quite well. Sometimes too well. It appears it's all recorded and released as such even though there are some strange fade-ins where nothing changes but you can still notice them. Don't know why since they don't edit even obvious bloopers out (messy anal, anyone?). There's quite a lot of dialogue in Russian but fortunately they have subtitles too since even if you understood Russian, a lot of it would be lost in the radio blasting away right next to the camera.
Video is surprisingly good, especially in the outdoors scenes. There's also photographs available in good numbers and zipped.
All the girls look very good and the action is hard. There was maybe one scene where there WASN'T anal and dp.
The site itself comes as a part of a package of handfull of sites with similar amateur theme. In my opinion this site with StudentSexParties are the strong points of the deal. The score reflects my hopes of this site keeping on with the updates and the kind of content and quality we've seen so far. A very nice one to balance all the glamour stuff I've gotten used to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
06-18-1109:27am (Update History) Reason: I rejoined the site and I find that their updates have slowed.
Pros:
-Acces to 5 other sites with one membership.
-All the girls are popular newbies in the porn world.
-All videos come in 3 formats: iphone 480x320,
standard AVI 1024x576, and HD MKV 1280x720.
-You can stream the videos in Flash.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a single zip file.
-Content is dated.
-You can use a download manager but are limited to only 2 and sometimes 3 downloads at a time.
Cons:
-This is a very small site with only 24 videos.
-They now appear to only update with one new video every month.
-Some of the content on the other site might have limited appeal.
-Many performers have the same first name only. The people behind this site have simply added a number to their first name ie: Lena 8, Lera 5 and so forth.
-You can only download about 2 videos at a time and you cannot surf within the site or network until one of the downloads is complete.
Bottom Line:
-This was a small site within a network of 5 other sites in January and at the time I gave it an 85 for potential but the network has not gotten better but worse. Most of the other sites except for pickupgilrs almost never update.
The theme of the videos are mini gangbangs with one girl and 3 guys. Anal in all of them with most getting a dp.
-The first 8 videos were all shot outside and that is consistent with content shot in the summer or early fall while the most recents are all inside and that makes sense as it is winter overthere.
-The 35$ join price may be a little too high for what you will get.
-It's hard to say if this is now a network worth joining because of the update schedule. In January I would have said yes but now it's not so clear. You should only join for what you will find on this site and the others within the network and not for what might be coming up in future updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments.
Cons:
-Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number,
Bottom Line:
-I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.
-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.
-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.
-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive ladies
-interesting group content
-decent bonus material
-navigation is pretty good, they have a model index, rating system, and member comments
-no DRM
-video quality is good (mpeg-4).
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers worked for me
-exclusive content as far as I can tell
Cons:
-price is a bit high
-scenes are excessively long and large
-download speeds are inconsitent, sometimes poor
-in-browser video player is glitchy
-not a huge site 178 girls in 52 parties
-videos are broken up into pieces, although as one file they would be enormous.
-advertisements on home page
Bottom Line:
This site has decent, unique content, however like some other sites from this company it can be a bit hard to get at. The files sizes are very large, and many parts of some of the scenes are just background and chit-chat. It is very necessary with this site to preview the material before downloading the content, as I have several times downloaded scenes with little to no nudity in them at all, let alone sex.
I think if you have the time and the harddrive space this site is a pretty good site for group sex action with euro ladies. However, I gave the site some demerits for the fact that it takes so long to find material you want to download and to download it.
There are definitely some attractive ladies here, and the video quality is generally good - although the camerawork can get a bit iffy at times.
Considering the bonus content available at the time I joined, this site may be worth considering if you are into group sex with euro ladies, however expect to spend a lot of time sorting through what you want to download - and expect to immediately delete some of the content you do. I'm all for having fun and drinking, however I don't think I need a 50 minute clip of some folks boozing, smoking and chatting. If only they had some better editing and made it easier to get at their material I would recommend this site more highly.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
