Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-- Large number of models.
-- Easier to naviagte and find content than Scoreland master site.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons:
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- For some reason, the DL speed and streaming was slower than at Scoreland.
-- Probably not enough updates to keep long-term subscribers used to large volume. Best for one-month subscriptions.
-- Should be part of Scoreland main subscription.
Bottom Line:
Background:
My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.
I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.
--Navigatiuon and menus are a bit simplified from the information-overload present at Scoreland.
-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.
-- Streaming and DL speeds are not as quick as at the master site Scoreland.
-- The site will likely not keep long-term interest. Site should probably be included with a Scoreland subscription and not exist as a seperate pay-site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary:
I added this site when signing up for a one-month subscription to Scoreland. The cost was $19.99 for one month, non-recurring.
BBW stands for Big Beautful Women.
The first two two terms here are relative. I have had an erotic interest in this genre over the years.. I have discovered that 'Big' can mean anything from slightly plump to to morbidly obese. The women shown at XL girls generally falls somewhere in the middle. One characteristic all the models have is that that they all sport large, natural-looking breasts. Most appear to be young, twenty-somethings, althought there are a few MILF models. Pretty faces are the norm.
Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and this genre won't be for everyone. It is refreshing, however, to see more natural-looking women in this industry--the kind you are likely to encounter on the street. Also, in the photosets, the models will actually smile and don't look irritated or annoyed.
The photos at the site are much more profresinal-looking than most BBW images I have come accross in the past, The photographers could tone down the airburhsing a bit, however.
I guess this genre is defined by anything that does not fit the cookie cutter mold of what the average man would find appealing in terms of physcique. The women at XLGirls look like natural women on the plump side, all with motherly figures.Silicone appears to be used sparingly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:
This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of plump, rubenesque women one would find in classic paintings, albeit with large chests.
The site is a mix of photos and videos. There is not a large amount of XX action here and most videos are solo or girl-girl.
IMO, who would like this site:
Photo lovers and those with a fetish for plump, rubenesque, motherly women or those who have a breast fetish. Also, this site will appeal to those who enjoy a more classic, conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.
IMO, who won't like this site:
Those who are looking for the cookie-cutter, well-toned models who spend most of their days in the gym and count their calories. Also, those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):
Site Navgigation: B
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: C
Quantity: B
XXX Action: D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:
Addf this site to the standard Scoreland subscription.
More creativity in photos. Diversify the photosets to include more angles and perspectives. Photosets tend to stick to a classic script.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
1) This site features all natural, large breasted, really heavy women. There are no skinny women here, but I like women with curves and there are lots of curves here. Most, if not all of these overweight woman are very beautiful.
2)It has a really large selection of photos. There are around 1500 sets; each of them are zipped for easy downloading and there is a good mix of hardcore and softcore material.
3) The video streams since about November 2009 have been decent quality: 480p and 720p.
Cons:
1) The streaming video content since November 2009 is not uniformly high quality. About 6 or 7 are lower quality streams (including two in June 2010).
2) The quality of downloadable videos is quite bad. They are 640 x 360 for both WMV and MP4 files that are somewhat grainy. Not a bother for me as I like streaming, but this would be an issue for others.
3)The older videos are utterly crappy in terms of quality and there has been no move to replace them.
4) The price: TBP lists the price as 39.99 per month recurring and it may be 29.99. This is fairly high for what this site offers. This is a bonus site when you are a member of scoreland for more than one (or maybe two) months. I find scoreland to be worthwhile to keep as a site for extended periods of time, so I get XL girls for free.
5) Updates are a bit slow. You get two or three a week.
Bottom Line:
Really good site if you like your women heavy. This is an excellent photosite for looking at pictures and downloading them. In the last year, the site has become excellent for streaming video, but it is still mediocre for donwloadable videos.
Not worth the price as a stand-alone site, however as part of the Scoreland loyalty package it is excellent.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (8)
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
TPB has this listed for $39.99 recurring. It's really still just $29.99 for recurring and $39.99 non-recurring (one-time for the suckers out there who don't know how to cancel)
Well, I was a member a year ago. I've joined again last week and I already have all the videos that were added since last year. Not much content. I was tempted by divinebreasts but there is a daily 500 MBs download limit. Any suggestions of big breasts sites I should try? I am also a member of videobox and it expires soon. Should I try another?
I was a member a year ago. I have just join again because I love all the models but the video quality is still average. The site mostly tries to sell their DVDs. Downloads can sometimes be slow.
This is another site where the watermarks are way too big and intrusive, at least in the picture sets. Who wants to stare at a company advertising itself in the most conspicuous places when you've paid to see an unmutilated, unobstructed picture. It's as bad as 40something.mag. The moment they'll reduce their self-promotion I'll be happy to subscribe. The models seem to be fine!
The videos were not clear. In 2008 I expect sharper crisper images. I know this is a big breast site, but the videos focus excessively on touching breasts. If a girl is sexy because of her breasts, the GIRL is sexy. Her breasts make her sexy and should not be the focus. More whole girl emphasis please.
UPDATE FOR JULY24 HEY BEST PORN GANG This is oneof my favorite BBW sites and the sign up page still claims that " this ,embership is not available" This is still the only site I've come accross that won't take my money1 HELP! At the present time there seems to be no way to join. Entering the usual info and clicking on any payment method brings up " this membership method is not available" Anyone know what's g
oing on. Help this is the first site that doesn't seem to want to take money! Pornpundit
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
RSS Feeds : All XL Girls Activity - XL Girls Reviews - XL Girls Comments - XL Girls News
