Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit XL Girls

XL Girls (0)

messmer (137) 07-12-08  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)

Company Logo Way Too Big!

This is another site where the watermarks are way too big and intrusive, at least in the picture sets. Who wants to stare at a company advertising itself in the most conspicuous places when you've paid to see an unmutilated, unobstructed picture. It's as bad as 40something.mag. The moment they'll reduce their self-promotion I'll be happy to subscribe. The models seem to be fine!

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (5)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

TheRizzo (23) I don't mind it if they do it big on their free promo material but to have that size of watermark on their members content is just ridiculous.
07-12-08  02:36pm

Reply To Message

2

messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - TheRizzo :

It's a constant beef of mine, Rizzo. As far as I know all their sites suffer from over-sized logos. It's a puzzle to me that they keep any subscribers at all. Unless I'm too nit-picking about it and other users just aren't bothered by those abominations. I really wish a webmaster would look in on this one and give a reasonable explanation.
07-12-08  06:47pm

Reply To Message

3

TheRizzo (23) REPLY TO #2 - messmer :

Well there are at least 2 of us that hate it. Its a huge reason for me to cancel for sure. Distracting and ruins the sexual nature of the photos to me. Like I said for free area promo, fine, I understand that. But paying customers shouldn't have to deal with it. A small watermark is perfect. I don't even mind a logo if its transparent and small enough, but I love the sites that just do the year and url in a nice crisp font.
07-12-08  07:13pm

Reply To Message

4

pornpundit (3) Please Sir Get real. If all you have to complain about is the logo...In Any case I appreciate logo's as they help to identify flicks in my collection. Now If only I could join the site at $19.95
07-15-08  08:46am

Reply To Message

5

messmer (137) REPLY TO #4 - pornpundit :

Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!

All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.

To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.

Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"

07-15-08  10:24am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.