Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit We Live Together

Visit Site
We Live Together Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Lesbian Sex
2. Amateur Girls
3. Reality Porn

RK Netmedia, Inc
55 Sites Listed
Partner: Nasty Dollars

Trial: $1.00 (2 days, recurs $29.95/mo.)
Monthly: $17.95 (recurring)
1 Year: $89.95 (non-recurring)

Special Price! The Monthly membership cost is a special low price option available to our users. The regular price is $24.95.

Beware of Pre-Checked Cross-Sells! Be sure to uncheck additional offers (if undesired) to other sites when inputting your credit card info.


View all We Live Together Site Facts at TBP.

78.3
Feedback History  (14)

Active Reviews 1
Newbie Reviews 3
Active Ratings 1
Newbie Ratings 0
Comments 5
Review by TheBestPorn:

84.5
TBP Review

Date: 10-18-09

Type: 2.0

Duke
+  Exclusive Lesbian Video/Reality Episodes, Sexy Models.
+  100's of Total Episodes, Years of Archives.
-  Clips Only, No Full-Episodes Downloads on Oldest Episodes.
-  Older Episodes Have Lower Video Quality.

User Reviews (8)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
65*
moby dick (0) 01-22-10  04:10pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Pretty girls well shot, nice enviroments
Cons: boring senarios same girls all the time. one in particulars voice drives me nuts. scenes very formulated for 'reality porn'. A bit of a bore actually.
download options are a bit crappy too
Bottom Line: It's a shame the director has nice models in good locations and chooses to shoot esetially the same scene all the time with diferent actors (yawn!)I hated this site and i think 65 is being kind!
is reality porn and oxymoron?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
85
badandy400 (99) 07-21-08  05:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (46), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Models look absolutely wonderful!
-Updates weekly on Thursday
-Loads of scenes so far
-Full access to a huge network of sites
-Price is decent, $25
-Videos are long, around 45 minutes average
-Exclusive content
-Site navigation is pretty simple
-Zips for photo sets
-Loads of lesbians! Damn I love lesbians!
Cons: -DOWNLOAD LIMIT- All sites
-The videos are sub-par looking
-Photos are small, 900x600
-Older videos are in chunks only
-Some people might like more download file types
Bottom Line: This section of the network is great, so make sure you check it out. I am a huge fan of lesbians and that is what this one is about. There are a huge amount of threesomes and more! All the girls are good looking and some are absolutely stunning.

The video are like the rest of the network and need a lot of clarity work. The bit rate is around 1.2 MBit/s depending on the video. There are 250 currently and you would need 60 GBs to hold them all. The resolution varies a bit from terrible up to 720x480, but the bitrate just does not support a great looking video. Do not get me wrong though, the content of the videos is awesome.

The photos are a lame size here. 900x600 is the best is gets, but they look nice for the size. They need to work on that a bit, but keep in mind it is a video site. Older photos are just screens, but newer ones are actual photos, so they really should be better.

I would give this site a higher score if they could catch up on visual clarity. The content is great and I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in a couple chicks meeting another girl and then banging her lights out! They have a nice theme and offer good amount of lead up to the sex, this is typical for the whole network.

By itself this site is worth the membership, the rest of the sites are a huge added bonus. Hell, there is over 175 HOURS of video already and it is still growing!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
70*
tintintin (0) 04-09-08  03:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: This site has very beautifull girls
I love the fact that there are 3-somes
Cons: Although the makers put effort in the girls meeting and greeting... there is no passion between them. I hate the fake moaning of beautifull nikki. There is not a drop of sweat to be seen after 30 minutes of lesbian action. Hardly any analingus, the kissing is much to short. The girls always leave their shoes at the fron door. The same set up vervytime with the girls meeting, kissing, likcing, trainposition, masturbating and finish
Bottom Line: This site could be soooo good but unfortunately the girls aren't really into lesbian sex. They don't put any effort in really gettting eachother off. Every now and then there is a good scene (like the one with the four girls in lingerie).. but most of the time it is boring
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Newbie
90*
drifter (3) 02-15-08  02:44pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: The entire network access for reality kings is definitely worth joining up to. I especially liked the flower tucci site. We live together has evolved over the past few years and it can seen very easily by browsing through their older videos.
There is allot to download here and you definitely get your moneys worth.
The women are extremely sexy and the site seems to do justice to being a 'reality ' videos.
The scenes themselves are of an acceptable to good quality.
The content is not bad, however I would prefer some more one on one scenes rather than the threesomes which seem to dominate the site.
Theres some great girl/girl action with toys and some occasional dirty talk too!
There is almost no anal action here, however their sister web-site 'milf next door' can make up for this loss.
Cons: They definitely need to do something about the video quality. Sometimes it seems to be good, other times it definitely needs some more work.
The settings for the scenes do seem to vary and they do great 'off set' pre-sex shooting. There is however room for improvement with the camera angels, audio and occasionally even lighting.
The updates are frequent enough for the network, perhaps not quite enough for the girl/girl lovers out there.
The daily download limit is a bit off putting, but from the perspective of the guys that run the website, this is definitely a wise business decision, as heavy downloaders can get allot of downloads for a mere 30 bucks!
Bottom Line: The bottom line is that this is a great site and a must join for all the lesbian and reality lovers out there. There is enough variety in the network to accommodate most porn users and lovers. There are enough downloads available as of now to last you for a whole 2 months worth of non-stop downloading, based on the daily download limit!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
75
Davit (46) 01-01-08  02:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
87
exotics4me (361) 10-16-07  12:09am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (1 Reply)

Expired
87
BostonPJR (72) 01-13-07  05:47pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

Expired
88
TheConnoisseur (40) 01-12-07  10:29am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (0 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (5)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

monty2222 (15) 04-25-09  12:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)

Any recent members who can tell something about it?

Are there any recent members who can tell something about how this site has evolved? I was last a member back in December 2007 and I remember being disappointed with how fake, repetitive and formulaic it had become after Nikki replaced Nicole as one of the permanent girls. Even though I find Nikki a lot prettier than Nicole, Nicole just seemed a lot more into the sex and the scenes felt a lot more "real".

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

tintintin (0) 07-21-08  11:04am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)

Add on to my review

One of the latest installments with nikki handling the camera herself looks promising... maybe its better to let the girls do their own thing.. without a director tell them what to do.

The action could also be a bit nastier:

1-deep anal tongue fucking
2-girls really digging into a pussy with their tongue while pulling a toy out of another girls ass
3-girls getting their asses licked in the "piledriver" or "ankles behind the ears" position
4-2 on 1 girl ass/pussy eating (particularly sensual kissing between the 2 lickers periodically as they break from licking)
5-dirty talk between the girls.......not so much loud or abrasive but almost seductive and bad :-)

So I think ... less directing and more spontanious action would make your production much better.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

nygiants03 (160) 01-21-08  10:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)

Things Changed

I miss when this site had no pornstars, and had real genuine amateur girls. This site has turned into a glamor lesbian porn site. There is so much fake moaning in the recent videos, its getting ridiculous. The early videos you really felt the sensuality, and there were actually real orgasms. I mean the girls in the videos now are more attractive, but very phony. The original gang of girls was the best. Molly was one of them, but she has turned away from acting natutal in the videos. She has also enhanced her self with fake breast!! :-(

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

littlejoe (13) 01-25-07  06:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)

good but repetitive videos

havent been on there in a while but last i remember they videos were very repetitive and used the same 2 girls with a different 3rd girl. got old very fast for me

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

elephant (24) 01-14-07  03:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)

Needs more variety in scenes

Very Hot girls now adays, just need to mix it up, they seem to shoot it all to directed and samey instead of being natural and adventurous. 7/10 though, got potential to be awesome with some different scenes, it mostly is all done in the bedroom.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

RSS FeedsAll We Live Together Activity - We Live Together Reviews - We Live Together Comments - We Live Together News

Visit We Live Together

Site News Updates and comments from the webmaster(s).
Company Sites Top sites from this company.

Webmaster(s):  hafty (4)

No site news added yet.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. Cum Fiesta (1) 96.0 84.0
2. Pure 18 (1) 92.0 81.0
3. 8th Street Latinas (1) 89.0 84.0
4. Round and Brown (1) 88.0 82.5
5. Big Naturals (1) 88.0 80.5
6. Mike's Apartment (1) 86.5 84.0
7. Monster Curves (2) 85.5 78.0
8. In The VIP (1) 85.0 82.5
9. MILF Next Door (1) 85.0 81.5
10. Big Tits Boss (1) 85.0 78.0

RSS Feed : RK Netmedia, Inc Activity

View All: Company Sites (55)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.