Lesbian Sex Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 2 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Nude Fight Club (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Great price as you get loads of other sites on the network too, $19.95 for the network with heaps of porn to keep you going for ages.
Very sexy dominant girls being real amazonian and strutting their stuff, great turn on for me.
Lots of choice for downloads to suit all needs.
One of the biggest networks of porn sites so really good design and easy to navigate around.
Regular updates on the network sites, there is currently 177 scenes
Seems to be getting better and better with quality |
| Cons: |
Maybe can get a little repetitive the action in some of the fights in a ring.
Not all the cuties from the network have done a scene here.
Sometimes there is not as much sex as I'd like and a bit going through the motions in certain scenes.
It is rather niches so you have to love girls wrestling or you ain't gonna like it much.
Could do with more oil and diverse scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
Yeah I was actually pleasantly surprised here with this site as I was after something a little different and it seems as a refreshing change from the lez cuties site which I love.
My only niggle with the site would be that they seem to be making more oil based scenes now which I adore and found very sexy but sadly most vids are done in the ring so I would of loved to of seen many more oil based video ideally.
It reminds me of a great tribbing site that I remember tribgirls I think it was called. Something very hot about watching two girls wriggling around and wrestling naked, you get to see things in a whole different perspective than you do in your average sex scene.
I wouldn't of joined this as a site alone no but as a site on a network I have to give it a good score and well worth a look at if you are after something a little new from your norm.
But seeing the video of Doris Ivy and Sophie Lynx you will think you have died and gone to heaven, oil up cuties rolling around on gym mats, for this scene alone the site is worth joining in my opinion.
I would like the site to now mix things up somewhat and have more tag teams, mud wrestling, lots more oil as I stated before. I would also love to have loads more tribbing which is so hot its untrue to watch in my opinion, tribbing with oil, get beat it lol.
No but overall I did enjoy the site and as a network bonus it really gives you some great hot scenes that are a little different from the rest of the sites.
Thumbs up here. |
| Respond: |
7 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Lay The Kat (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening.
-The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip. |
| Cons: |
-Archive site. No updates since September 2007.
-Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets.
-Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend.
-More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment.
-Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other.
-The videos are not dated.
-No search function.
-No model bio.
-No streaming option.
-Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos.
-Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition.
-Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is part of the Diesel Access network.
The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing.
LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend.
LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network:
At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets.
At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets.
Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets.
Video stats:
Number of videos: 44
Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download.
Sample dimensions:
Height x Width: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
Photos stats:
Number of photosets: 57
Number of photos per photoset: 80+
Width x Height: 799x1200
or
Width x Height: 1198x1800
Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc.
The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused.
Bottom Line:
Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a
membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted.
However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Lesbian Ass Worship (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-tons of videos
-videos get right to the point
-3 different video options
-lots of ebony ladies
-uses ccbill
-some great videos |
| Cons: |
-very amateurish videos
-not so appealing models
-fake licking |
| Bottom Line: |
the videos are around 5 minutes each and get right to the action. about 3 videos make up one shoot, but theyre split well so it doesnt effect viewing
the videos production is the worse ive seen. it looks like theyre all shot in the same motel room. theres a mirror above the bed and the camera guys head pops up so they blur it out! also the videos go out of focus often and i dont think the camera guy even knows about it!
some of the models i recognize, most i dont. theres a great selection of white and black and even some asians. however the makeup people do a horrible job and you see face acne and even worse tons of butt acne. i really dont want to see that!
lastly, for the most part, the performances are bad. most of the girls do fake licking. i have only gotten half way thru the site and i quit |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
