Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Site Feedback Feedback and ratings from other users just like yourself.
Visit Sex Art

Visit Site

Sex Art

Type: Pay Site

NICHES COMPANY COST

1. Nude Photography
2. European Girls
3. Hardcore Sex

HLP General Partner Inc.
18 Sites Listed
Partner: Met Art Money 2

Monthly: $29.99  Our Price $19.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $29.99 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.99 (recurring)

View all Sex Art Site Facts at TBP.

86.7
Feedback History  (17)

Active Reviews 4
Newbie Reviews 2
Active Ratings 0
Newbie Ratings 1
Comments 10
Review by TheBestPorn:

87.0
TBP Review

Date: 12-04-13

Type: 2.0

Maggie
+  Exclusive collection of scenes.
+  Very high quality content!

User Reviews (6)

 User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.

Newbie
79*
Arlen84 (2) 12-17-13  06:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1)Stunning models
2)Well-directed sex scenes (almost cinematic)
3)HD content (though low-bitrate)
4)Regular updates
Cons: 1)Low-bitrate content (despite being HD resolution)
2)Site navigation is a bit confusing at first
Bottom Line: This site has stunning models and great video directing. They look almost cinematic. Really quite an attractive site. However, I can't bring myself to staying with them.

To me, the biggest disappointment with SexArt is its video bitrate. This could have been right up there with my favorite sites (e.g. X-Art, Nubile Films), but instead, I couldn't wait to leave. While all videos are HD resolution (1080p), the low bitrate encoding makes them look choppy or too soft. If they'd only raise the bitrate to at least 7000K, then I'd go back in a heartbeat.

As it stands, I'd rather spend my money elsewhere. I'd still recommend it if you only want to go in for the pictures of the models, or you don't mind the low bitrate encoding.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Active
90
Parsnip (10) 10-29-13  10:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Stunningly beautiful cinematic quality films
- Almost all attractive models, many from MetArt.
- Increasingly active comments from users. They can be a bit pretentious, but are often interesting.
- They have promised that they don't fiddle votes, and only block abusive comments.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 2 MBytes/sec).
- Easy navigation and basic search facilities. All updates are clearly dated.
- All exclusive content, I think.
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos. Videos up to 1080p.
- Streaming available - never tried it
- So far, unlike for example X-Art, SexArt has held the line against including ugly mysoginistic male-oriented material like anal.
- Around 200 films and slightly more photo sets. Daily updates - 3 films per week.
- Other interesting material, including interviews with models. After a long pause, these are starting again.
Cons: - Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- Photo sets by and large not so good.
- Rather too many models with tattoos and piercings for my tastes, and some less attractive models recently.
- Cross-site advertising is a pain.
- Photo sets which come with the films are very variable, partly because the lighting is set up for films and they are obviously done in a hurry.
- Recent issue with the Los Angeles operation (due to the mandatory condom laws), which has reduced the variety of material over the last few months.
Bottom Line: This site is very firmly in the "glamcore" or "heartcore" genre. They started off with a lot of heavily artistic material, but are now concentrating on making the sex as real as possible. They release 3 films a week, mostly with associated photo sets, and separate photo sets on the other days. The films are markedly higher quality than the photos. There is a fairly even mix of solo, GG & BG films - for a while there were no solo films but they have made a comeback recently. The films are pushing boundaries of eroticism and getting a real connection and excitement, but the photo sets often just look like more explicit MetArt photos. Stylistically the photos & films don't match.
There is a real effort with the setups and stories for the films, and several have really changed my ideas of what can be done with erotica. The films mostly have good scene setting, and a fun or romantic bit at the end, which make them feel much more intimate and real. I find this much better than a film that is nothing but sex. There have also been two long series of films (Snow Fun and currently The Game) which allow time for a bit more character development.

I particularly loved the more stylized and artistic earlier material - the body painting etc which have been criticised in other reviews. While I really like the current material too, I do find that my favourite films are almost all the earlier ones which is a slight concern.

I must be honest, I love this site. A lot of the films are an absolute joy to watch. Some people may complain that it isn't hard enough, but it is wonderful to see material that is done with such respect for the performers and has no sign of mistreatment or ugliness whatsoever. In fact it is a real indictment of modern porn that people will criticise this site because models don't get mistreated or hurt.

It isn't perfect, and I'm not that impressed by a lot of the photo sets, but they are trying hard, and are brave enough to try things which might be less popular. I will definitely be renewing when my current annual membership ends. If you are unsure about joining a porn site because of what you might see, you will find nothing nasty here.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Active
90
BobA (5) 09-30-13  03:10pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Couple friendly porn - Some of the scenes on this site are my wife and I's favorites!

They treat the male models as people as well. They actually get a model page.

Good diversity for this genre - They seem to use different people that give good diversity to this style of porn.

Photo set with most every video!
Cons: It's hard to put this in cons - but because of the diversity of creators - at time there are scenes that are just dull.

No EASY way to find scenes by kink or category. There is a user submitted function - but I would like some effort put in by SexArt to categorize a bit.
Bottom Line: While the content is more hit and miss than other sites, you get a lot of bang for your buck here due to the daily high quality updates, and some of the best unique, sexy, couple-friendly porn out there! The site is easy to use, easy to download and they pay attention to the details to make it a great site!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
80
skippy (40) 09-23-12  04:55pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: High quality video and photos of sex scenes and solo scenes. Many Met-Art models but less softcore.
Cons: Not enough content, although it is improving. Navigation is not consistent with Met-Art.
Bottom Line: This is basically all the stuff that the photogrpahers wanted to shoot for Met-Art, but the relatively softcore nature of that site prevented them from publishing it. Or...to put it another way...it is a way for Met-Art to expand thier network and make more money without having to use anything more than ask the assets they already have to have sex, which many of them do on other sites anyway.

The emphasis is on glamorous sex scenes but there are a lot of solo acts and decent photo sets with all kinds of toys. The girls, of course, are awesome....as usual for this network. The only problem is that there still is nowhere near enough material.

Navigation is fine for a small site, but when it gets big, they will need to switch over to the same system they use for Met-Art. For this site, you have to page forward and back to get anywhere quickly, or you can follow the "back to gallery" links...which ever is your preference. I have accidently left the site many times because I thought I was on Met-Art.

The cross-advertising is still very frustrating.
They cross-advertised based on models and photographers, so at the bottom of a page, you will see a link back to Met-Art or one of the other sites in the network (all charging separately).

I was fortunate enough to see this site for $12.50 because I was already a member at Met-Art. Look for bundle packages and consider doing one $12.50 secondary Met-Art site at a time because there just isn't enough content here for you to keep all four $12.50 sites for long.

Overall, this is a pretty good site, especially if you get in on a package deal. But it won't be a great site until they get a lot more content.
You see a nice girl on one site, there is a picture of her from another set at teh bottomfg
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Active
80
exotics4me (463) 09-14-12  04:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons: - Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line: I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.

It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.

They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.

Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.

Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.

So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.

The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).

The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.

It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.

I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.

I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.

I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.

I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply

Expired
88*
Abel Semen (3) 04-17-12  01:59pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score.
View: Read Expired Review (10 Replies)

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
User Comments (10)

 Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.

nadiencendia (83) 02-27-14  08:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)

Nice site, complete free trial

First of all I have to say that I joined this site thanks to a 1 day free trial offer, so I cannot complain much since I didn't pay for it.

The reason I joined was, basically, to get access to the videos by some of my favorite girls, in particular Little Caprice (Caprice A in this site) and Blue Angel. And so I was a little dissapointed to see that there were only to videos of each, and although they were in fact highly erotic and extremely well filmed, well, I was expecting more.

During my 1 day free trial, of course, I also browsed and downloaded pictures and videos from other models, but I have to say that, after a while, and if the models didn't seem remarkable enough, it all started looking the same to me. I lost interest.

It's a pity because, in other aspects, this site seems made precisely for me: it offers high quality, sensual erotic material, without the hardcore, often extreme, sometimes disgusting stuff that you can find in most sites. Videos are filmed with care, and actors and actresses act passionately and with tenderness. Of course, if you are looking for a more extreme take on sex and porn, this site will probably dissapoint you.

From the technical point of view, I have almost nothing to complain about: you can stream videos (although I couldn't get to fast-forward) or download them in different qualities. Download speeds were good, and there didn't seem to be a download limit, even in free trial mode.

All in all, this site is excellent in the quality of the videos (technically and artistically), very good in relation to the beauty of models, quite good in design and navigation. It just gets a little repetitive when you browse through the archive. But hell, what site doesn't get repetitive after a while?

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

elephant (65) 01-31-14  02:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

Has anyone tried these Free Day Trial offers

I've seen them for a while now on the met art network sites, says free day then you are charged $30 or something. Has anyone anymore info, is it legit, can you download anything on your free day and is it possible to cancel in time or do they charge you even if you cancelled as soon as you signed up.

Anyone tried them

Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Abel Semen (3) 11-01-13  06:57pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)

What's the deal with MagikSex

As always, these guys are fairly aggressively marketing to ex-members like myself. Their latest (Halloween-themed) e-mails advertise a deal on six of Met's sites, mostly on the harder end of the scale, including one called MagikSex that I hadn't previously heard of. Anyone know what the deal with this site is - how long it's been around, whether it's a pre-existing site or a newly created one, etc?

From the previews I looked at, it seems like the hardest site in Met's network currently with the possible exception of Ninn (e.g. there's a fair amount of orgies and DPs), but still artsy. However, oddly for this network, I've seen some of the content before - at least some of it seems to be repackaged from various Private films. So seeing it on Met's network is odd, to say the least.

Anyway, anyone know anything about this?

Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 02-15-13  10:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

SexArt wins "Glamcore Site of the Year" award at the 2013 XBIZ Awards.

The 2013 XBIZ awards were held on January 11, 2013, at the Century Plaza Hotel in Century City, California.

I don't follow industry news that much. I think the X-Art and Diesel Access networks are two of my favorite glamcore sites/networks.

Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

tangub (151) 10-12-12  12:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)

Check your email for free access..

If you've been a member of Met Art previously or are on their mailing list you might find an email in your inbox offering free access to Sexart. I've already checked it out and it certainly seems to be a genuine offer. It's actually a free 2 day trial through CCBill so you don't need to worry about any dirty tricks. As far as I can tell it's a full access free trial, I've been downloading to my heart's content for a couple of hours without any restrictions or limitations.

I'm only really interested in the photo collection so as it's still a relatively new site it only took me a couple of hours to go through the collection and download all the photo sets I wanted so it wouldn't really be worth paying a full month from my point of view. Still I got around 100 photo sets in total including some of my favorite Met Art models like Dido, Caprice A, Milena D and Mia Sollis.

The free trial renews at $29.99 if not cancelled so if you want to stick around for the month better to cancel and sign up from the PU link for $19.99. I won't bother with a review on this one as I seem to remember some PU rule about reviews not being able to be based on free access to a site.

Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

exotics4me (463) 08-13-12  06:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)

Don't think I get it

I have a 2 month membership so I will give them the full 2 months before reviewing it since my review wouldn't be that fair or even that positive right now.

The quality is very high. I really like the photo sets as well. The ones I have downloaded top out near 6000 long end on the pictures.

Video quality is very high as well, though a little confusing. I don't know if they are doing something to optimize bitrates/file size, but full length 1920x1080 files are only 200-300 MB.

One reason the video files are small is because the time of the videos. I haven't seen a video over 20 minutes yet and the average seems to be in the 14-15 minute range.

As I had worried would be the case, the picture sets are better than the videos. I believe the basis of this site is really good, but it's going to take nearly perfect execution to pull it off. Most of the models, especially females, are younger 18-22 range, and I'm not for sure how believable an 18-22 year old can be when it comes to passionate sex.

To my surprise, there isn't much dialogue or story with the scenes which was something I was expecting a lot of. On the other hand, there is the Kamikaze Love series, which I downloaded all of, only to end up deleting all of because it was like watching an HBO after dark movie.

I will give it the two months before reviewing it with the chance maybe their steady updates will start showing some improvement.

Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 04-18-12  11:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

Created by Zalman King.

Sexart is featuring some videos with the byline of "Created by Zalman King".

Zalman King was a producer/director/writer of softcore erotic theatrical movies and television series and movies. He was involved in Nine 1/2 Weeks, Two Moon Junction, Wild Orchid, and Red Shoes Diaries, among other projects.

He died in February of this year, aged 69.

Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply

lk2fireone (194) 04-17-12  04:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)

Sex Art site just opened.

This site just opened. This is a new offering from Met Art, but with more eroticism, less softcore. The PU discount makes it more attractive. But I think I will wait a while before joining, to give it more time to build more content.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Monahan (40) 04-14-12  09:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)

A Hard Core Met Art

I checked out the preview site. The sampler ranges from the softest of soft core of Met Art to some truly erotic hard core.

The preview site has little in it but it does have head shots of the models. The only "name" is Alexis Texas and the number is rather small...but it's a brand new site.

At the TBP price, I'm very tempted to give the site a go for a month or two.

Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

elephant (65) 04-07-12  05:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)

Anyone else looking forward to sex-art, the harder version

Seems like Met-Art are finally thinking we can still do the hot girls in arty solo photography but are now stepping into the erotic hardcore arena with a new site launched on 1st May called sex-art. I guess its going to be like x-art type material with boy/girl stuff shot in a softer approach.

The value of this type of porn is proving popular as it appeals to women much more too and can look incredible when done right.

I'm looking forward to it.

Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Sex Art

Company Sites Top sites from this company.

      Site Name (Reviews) Score TBP
1. ALS Scan (1) 100.0 89.5
2. DOMAI (1) 100.0 83.5
3. Met Art (3) 94.0 95.0
4. Errotica Archives (1) 94.0 89.0
5. The Life Erotic (2) 89.0 89.0
6. Rylsky Art (1) 89.0 82.5
7. Sex Art (4) 86.7 87.0
8. Erotic Beauty (2) 86.5 89.0
9. Holly Randall (1) 83.0 85.5
10. Goddess Nudes (2) 81.3 81.5

View All: Company Sites (18)

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.43 seconds.