European Girls Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Czech Casting (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. The daily new porn casting call with a new model is superior... it keeps me very interested in the site. From hotties who show skin but don't fuck to grandmas giving great head you never know what will happen next....entertaining even more than sexy. So real it makes all other porn seem fake.
2. Excellent free sites go with this package, from swingers and orgies, gang bangs and pick-up sex to strange behavior sites including voyeurism, sharking & dungeon. Interesting if you like porn that is very much like reality TV.
3. New content every day. |
| Cons: |
If you like anal & kinky sex you will find very little here..... tits & ass, "regular" sex and blowjobs by the bushel here, but almost no kinky stuff. You need to go somewhere else if you have fetishes except for orgies & parties which are plentiful on the bonus sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well worth a subscription if you need reality-type interesting stuff that is somewhat sexy.
Seems like guys with a few cameras and lots of money to throw around are out seeing what there is to see on the sex scene in the Czech Republic. Very real, but fairly good camera-work.
Lots of interesting scenes of girls being seduced into doing a little more than they had planned to do by pervs with cameras & money. Fun! |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Hegre Art (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Decent video player that doesn't buffer much, plays back soon enough, with excellent, HD picture quality
- Decent sound quality on videos
- ULTRA high resolution photographs
- Convenient ZIP file collections
- iHegre mobile site works very well on tablet and smartphone devices
- Neat podcasting feature on both videos and now massage videos
- Genuinely sexually aroused nude models
- Some of the models are incredibly beautiful, just watching them get naked is joy enough in itself; especially Flora
- The scenes are getting more explicit (oral sex, again, by Flora, usually on Alex or Mike--EASILY worth the cost of subscription alone)
- The tantric massage videos are epic
- Some of the masturbation videos are better than others |
| Cons: |
- Photo sets ending cold after escalating well is a disappointment and, unfortunately, increasing in frequency
- Sometimes the content is boring or weird
- Some of the models are too thin, too plain
- Videos, particularly the massage videos, can take a long time to update
- New look and feel of the site is cluttered
- Picture navigation is getting dated
- Some of the masturbation videos are better than others |
| Bottom Line: |
I can't believe I haven't reviewed this site before, as I've been subscribed off-and-on for over four years, but here goes. Love it or hate it, Hegre-Art.com is one of a kind, with photo sets that I've been lusting after ever since the original baby-oil covered model graced my screen from a set I picked up from an old USENET Newsgroup over eight years ago. Before anyone else was doing it, erotic photographic artist Peter Hegre had been leading with way, shooting models with super-model level looks in the highest pixel dimensions of anyone on the Internet and, to this day, still leads the way, using an 80 megapixel camera to shoot some of the highest resolution, large format nude photographs not in print (although he does sell a book, as well as DVDs).
Before anyone else was shooting erotic massages, Hegre-Art.com was producing HOUR LONG tantra videos eventually cutting the length to more reasonable times, and letting us see the forbidden cum shot that was a big risk, even for Hegre. Fans stormed the comments section with angry "I am not gay!" comments, but fortunately, those have been far overcome by the rest of us celebrating the male-female sexual tension in the massage videos.
The photosets got hotter and hotter too, with numerous female models sporting obviously wet pussy. We even now get to see oral sex--but not in the way typical for porno sites. In the Hegre Art way... With all of the gorgeous cinematography they've offered over the years. Great light, clear pictures, clean settings, expert editing and quality audio. This is not a cheap site, and easily offers more than others that charge more.
The one problem the site suffers from is that it enters into months-long lull periods where the material just gets plain boring, and bland. You'll be riding high on super hot pictures photographed in Japan, male models unloading cum onto the sexiest European models in the world to amazing, tantric handjobs. And then you'll get these sets of overly posed, uninteresting models that are good looking, nude, and standing around on a cold set doing different things, wondering--what happened? The massage videos will slow down, or go cold. The films will go cold, and feature uninteresting attempts at being artistic.
So you, as I frequently do, will find yourself subscribing and unsubscribing. Constantly. Were it not for the inconsistency, you could set it and forget it but with the cutting edge, experimental nature of the site, sometimes to get those few hits, you're going to have to be patient with all of the misses. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Sex Art (2)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Cinematic quality films
- A lot of attractive models, many from MetArt.
- Active comments from users.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 5 MBytes/sec).
- All updates are clearly dated.
- All exclusive content
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos. Videos up to 1080p.
- Streaming available - never tried it
- Around 350 films and slightly more photo sets. Daily updates - 3 films per week. |
| Cons: |
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- Photo sets by and large not so good.
- Rather too many models with tattoos and piercings for my tastes, inceasing number of less attractive mainstream porn models recently.
- Cross-site advertising is a pain.
- Recent site revamp is a big step back, with prominent adverts for webcams in the middle of the screen, and a very difficult to follow and uneven layout.
- Photo sets which come with the films are very variable, partly because the lighting is set up for films and they are obviously done in a hurry.
- The sex is becoming harsher and less joyful. Over recent months almost every scene has had to include something "controversial" - blindfold, gag, ass licking, toilet sex, anal, humiliation, or the scene is so dark you can't see anything anyway.
- The films are becoming far too long. 30 minutes is now common, lots of dark, meaningful guff followed by the kind of sex you don't actually want to watch anyway. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am rewriting this review as the site has changed out of all recognition since my last review just from over a year ago. The basic facts listed above haven't changed a lot, but the material they produce has.
This site was in the "glamcore" or "heartcore" genre. They seem to be now concentrating on "fantasy", by which they clearly mean "male fantasy", and the material often now has an ugly edge to it, as though beautiful sex is no longer enough (for us, beautiful sex is ALL).
They release 3 films a week, mostly with associated photo sets, and separate photo sets on the other days. The films are markedly higher quality than the photos. There was a fairly even mix of solo, GG & BG films - for a while there were no solo films, and over the last few weeks it has been almost exclusively GG. For a while the films pushed boundaries of eroticism and getting a real connection and excitement, but now they have fallen back on being controversial for the sake of it, like they don't know what else to do.
The photo sets have always been of mostly much lower quality, often just look like more explicit MetArt photos. Stylistically the photos & films don't match. The are very few BG photo sets, and they are of pretty low quality.
My last review stated that I would definitely rejoin. In the end I took a break and have dipped in for a couple of single months since. We've now cancelled for the final time and won't be rejoining. The films just aren't fun anymore. We watch the early films - bright, simple, beautiful, short & disciplined, and above all FUN, over and over. I don't think there has been anything released over the last year that we have watched more than once. The films are getting longer and longer, and darker and uglier.
I originally joined this site when it was about 6 months old, and absolutely loved it, it did everything I wanted as far as the films were concerned even if the photography wasn't as good. It has been on a long gradual slide since then. I watch erotica with my wife who has a hair-trigger as far as ugly material is concerned, and she just doesn't like it any more. They've clearly run out of ideas and are just pushing down the obvious easy route of nasty sex claiming to be "brave". If you think anal sex is a "Milestone", you're not making glamcore anymore.
I've given the site a higher mark than I otherwise would because it still has the library of amazingly gorgeous early material. Even if you would dislike the current material as much as we do, it is worth joining for a month to get that first year - 18 months of absolutely ground-breaking erotic films.
While the site is still a long way from violent abusive mainstream porn, it is nothing like the beautiful, elegant, joyous place it was. It is no longer really that female or couple friendly, more a place for hardened porn addicts who fancy something a bit classier looking.
All the glamcore site move in this direction in the end - see what happened at x-art & joymii. It seems that a couple of years producing bright, beautiful, female friendly material is about the limit. Then they just become harder, nastier, darker, all in the name of "development" but really just chasing the male porn addict market. Given the state of that market, it seems a strange thing to do. I guess we will just wait around for a new high quality site to appear, and follow that for it's period at the top. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
