| User Reviews (8) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive high-quality content.
Great quantity of photos (460 sets) and videos (131 sets).
A lot of amazing teen models (~300) and some of them I never saw at other websites, just at AmourAngels.com.
Each model has only 2-3 sets (just some of top-models have more photos and videos), so base of models are very varied.
Resolution of photos is 3000-5000 pxl, most of videos have HD-quality.
Three formats of photos (low, medium, original) and 2 formats of videos (wmv, avi) are available.
Pretty nice new interface and user-friendly navigation after redesign. |
| Cons: |
Some photos have wrong, insufficient focus, but quantity of them isn't valuable.
Besides that there are some videos (from old shooting), where camera shakes and jumps, but usually models are so cool, that you don't pay attention to this defect.
Or it's features of new photographers. |
| Bottom Line: |
As for me, at AmourAngels really teen models are collected. Yeah, at other websites there are a lot of beautiful models, but they are rather babes, not teens. And here, at AmourAngels, exactly teen, innocent, shy models with natural beauty. There is no unnecessary make-up and other stuff. I think,
that it is main advantage of this website. Besides that some cool features were added after redesign. I mean slide-show, adding to favorites, Amour GFs
(I hope, owners will develop it in future) etc.
I am downloading from Europe and have no problems. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive content
Gorgeous-looking models
Large amount of content (304 models, some with 2-3 image sets with amount 60-80 images/set)
Excellent image quality in the highest resolution (2000x3000 or 2600x3900 for newst sets)
About 108 videos in DivX and WMV format. |
| Cons: |
Images display in 3 sizes 400x600, 700x1024 and highest resolution. The lower resolutions are useless. It should be better for the members if they offered their images in 700x1024 (small), 1600x2400 (medium) and orig resolution.
Download speeds are very slow (< 100kB/s) both in east and west coast of the US. This would explain why they offer such a small size images.
It can take over 30-45 minutes to download one set. Downloading videos can take so long that most of the video content of this site is practically non-viewable. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site offers a large amount of content of very good quality (image sets and videos). The navigation needs to be improved along with their download speeds in order to make this site worth the price of admission. Given that many of their photographers also have their work shown in better sites such as met-art, metmodels, Femjoy, this site really has a way to go before being able to offer the same type of navigation/download experience as those sites. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (1 Reply)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (11 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (6) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
|