Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Polls Daily polls where users can vote and give their opinion!

Should all adult websites have an 18+ warning?

Type: General

Submitted by Colm4 (10)
Yes, this should be enforced 68% 30 Votes
They should do it voluntarily 14% 6 Votes
Only if there are big previews 0% 0 Votes
No it doesn't work anyway 18% 8 Votes

Reply to Poll
Register to Vote!

44 Votes Total

Nov 14, 2009

Poll Replies (14)

Replies to the user poll above.

Msg # User Message Date


NMC2008 (7) Yep, just to have their asses covered just in case, because here in the US you never fucking know what stupid shit is gonna happen, kinda like the Max Hardcore deal.
11-14-09  12:13am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) I'd say enforce it. That way, a site I might love wouldn't be so easily taken down for legal reasons.
11-14-09  12:27am

Reply To Message


lk2fireone (196) I'm guessing that's a legal requirement. So anyone not posting that 18+ warning is asking for trouble.
11-14-09  02:13am

Reply To Message


Jay G (67) CYA
11-14-09  02:55am

Reply To Message


Capn (28) If it is a legal requirement, which it quite rightly is, it should be adhered to.

Conformance to that is a no-brainer.

11-14-09  02:59am

Reply To Message


pat362 (373) Yes, they should and if they don't then whatever happens to them is fine with me. It may seem arsh but anything that brings legal scrutiny on the porn world puts pressure on all other that follow the rules.
11-14-09  09:17am

Reply To Message


Monahan (42) IMHO, a site should do everything it can to stop access by anyone under the legal age. But there really isn't very much they can do beyond the warnings because it's rather difficult for a site to check a photo i.d., isn't it?
11-14-09  09:38am

Reply To Message


littlejoe (23) it doesnt work, but it should be done anyways
11-14-09  11:32am

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) They do it so they won't get sued/prosecuted. I don't think they really care.
11-14-09  11:36am

Reply To Message


james4096 (126) Yes it doesn't work. But it can be a good warning to not just kids, but those that don't want to be surprised by seeing a girl getting fucked by 3 dudes with huge rods.
11-14-09  12:10pm

Reply To Message


asmith12 (124) Yes, and also ALL the sites should be marked as RTA/whatever else, so browser filters (school ones and those installed by parents) are able to filter such sites out. While I really hate government regulation, I think THIS (site labeling) should be made the law (it does not create any problems while solving concerns of those who cares about minors accessing porn).
11-15-09  10:28pm

Reply To Message


GCode (101) I have no kids but I have to say that this should be enforced. Of course, the curiousity of kids is quite high but there needs to be some sort of warnings for sites that contain explicit material. While of course, the classic enter your date of birth and electronic sig is easily bypassed; at least it shows that the adult material is attempting to make it harder for young ones to see it. The internet is a easy way to showcase adult material and will always be nowadays but I have to say that any way of warning should be enforced. I think the young enough ones will actually take the warning serious while the ones who are 'old' enough will be exposed eventually no matter what and the possibiliy of this is inevitable. But, I can see someone like an 8 year old boy coming across a warning and actually be a bit worried about entering, therefore making this rule rightfully enforcable.
11-15-09  10:54pm

Reply To Message


Woodruff (37) I guess they should do it just in order to be public-spirited, but honestly I can't think of any audience more in need of quality porn than teenage boys. In an ideal world, there wouldn't be some crazy notion that letting a 16-year-old watch porn is going to ruin his mind or turn him into some woman-objectifying monster. I mean, should we force boys to watch The View or something, so they'll be perfect little woman-respecting gentlemen? Or maybe that's a good idea - maybe I'd get more chicks if I watched more daytime TV and less porn :) I'm just jealous of teenagers these days, who can hit up Bangbros from their rooms. Didn't have that back in my day. Of course, they can also bang 15-year-old girls, which I can't legally do.
12-11-09  07:48pm

Reply To Message


Wittyguy (105) I agree that it should be strictly enforced. The more that sites avoid it, the more likely that governments will start trying to regulate porn even more so. Abide by the basic disclosure laws and we'll all be happier in the end.
12-17-09  03:22pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.