| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from luv lickn clit:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wittiguy, I will gladly cross that bridge when I come to it!
|
03-27-13 01:07pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jberryl69:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes sir but then that goes outside of the scope of virtual which would be the requirement to get my interest. Something like the replicant Rachael from the movie Blade Runner would do quite well thank you. Or maybe that slutty little Pris (the basic pleasure model) who would head lock you between her thighs, nom, nom .... dam, one can only fantasize.
|
03-26-13 04:21pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from slategrey:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
This statement is only valid if you dont think phone sex is cheating. Which i do (it got the word sex in it :s, gotta be cheating)
|
12-19-11 05:40pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Capn:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Nice trollish try, WG, but I ain' biting!
DOH!!!!!! :0D
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-12-11 04:20pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from slategrey:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
lol "winning?"
When have following what charlie sheen do ever been a good idea? Porn takes negative hit :(
|
03-15-11 01:11am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
To be fair, he is "winning" because he has the porn come directly into his home--one of his, uh, girlfriends is a porn star.
Though he probably still has a healthy porn habit too.
|
03-14-11 12:56pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RustyJ:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
But there's a difference. I'm a hoarder, not a collector. I think collecting is a more refined thing. One where you have maybe a theme and select what you get and keep while I just download it all and often never view again ;)
|
03-09-11 12:39pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from lk2fireone:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Is the fluffer supposed to be male or female, or does it even make a difference?
I never realized a porno flick required so many different talents. Lol.
|
02-11-11 06:57pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Some of us are have more than enough to do just trying to keep ourselves aroused!
: - (
|
02-11-11 02:14pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I don't think I can do that from here.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-11-11 02:06pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from slutty:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I once saw a guy on a plane reading a Hustler, and he wasn't trying to hide it. I can sort of understand Playboy, as it actually used to be funny sometimes, but Hustler in an aisle seat? I'm sure if you looked carefully you could catch someone looking at porn on their iPad or something.
|
11-23-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
That one's gonna have to be put into this year's PU Awards for sure!
|
11-03-10 04:08pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wouldn't the price of Coca-Cola go up, since they have to pay for all that promotion? Considering they are the planet's most ubiquitous brand I would imagine they spend a pretty penny to maintain their lead in the market.
|
06-24-10 02:55pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from dracken:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I completely agree with this one. Porn is for my Pc, at least so far just in case I get addicted to high def videos :P
|
05-17-10 09:50pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from careylowell:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Ladyboy option didn't occur to me. Gay would of been listed should I have had seven choices, not the usual six.
|
05-12-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Oh, okay. Don't have a breakdown on me, now that you've given us a satisfactory explanation you are no longer in danger of having to face the mighty PU inquisitors over this poll! :-)
However there is still one more who voted like you: be afwaid, be vewy, vewy afraid!!
|
04-15-10 02:51pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from RagingBuddhist:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'd be leary of buying used electronics online, but I would still say to give your local craigslist a chance. That way you can check out the goods before you buy.
|
02-25-10 03:22pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from littlejoe:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
thats funny, i usually cut out the hc stuff and keep the girl dancing around hehe
|
02-25-10 03:16pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from GCode:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Why is it not worth arguing or discussing? Yes, that's where it is but why would a statement such as 'not worth arguing about' be stated at all from anyone? I am for saying that the age 'limit' is a bit low in my opinion and I can discuss or argue (whatever u want to call it) that many other things involving an age limit are quite misleading as well. For example, a person in the USA being able to put their life on the line and kill others in war but not being able to drink a beer legally. So, a 'woman' can get gang banged by 50 guys on film which can be shown world wide but cannot sip a beer legally? Hmm, I think that's grounds for discussion right there. I am by no means advocating that there should not be an age limit for any of these acts. However, the poll topic is involving a 17 year old and as I said earlier, I find it laughable that anyone would find a difference between a 17 or an 18 year old doing any porn as one being 'okay' while the other as 'bad'. But, I do know that 18 years old is where the legal age is at world wide and I respect it in the fact that I would not seek out or search content of 18 and under models. Nor do I think it is right for anyone to do so. Therefore, I think it can and should still be discussed or argued that the age limit may still be a little young for it to be 'okay' for a girl (yes, a girl) to be doing such acts on camera legally at 18. Personally, I think 18 is still too young but many can argue that it is okay. I think it is valid to discuss or argue this and quite interesting to get others takes on this subject. Therefore, I think there is grounds for discussion. My 2 cents....
|
01-13-10 08:11pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Duante Amorculo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
lol
|
09-02-09 05:29pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I actually think the technology exists but is too expensive at the moment to make any venture worth it. Another big problem is all the copyrights that this would break. Companies get sued for just using a stars picture for advertising. Can you imagine what they would do if they appeared in a porn film? I also don't think that they are able to create proper facial expressions yet. I don't think that there is a program that can simulate laughing or crying on an animated character. They can do animals because there are tons of commercials or movies that have them. Just look at G-force. I'm pretty confident that no hamster was harmed in the film.
|
07-24-09 06:35pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
You are without a doubt certifiably nuts. Funny has hell but nuts.
You forgot to mention your foot wear or is that too personal?
P.S: I couldn't add anything after this
|
06-19-09 06:22pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
"a Sponge Bob t-shirt and ..." your scotch is?
|
06-19-09 01:30pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from messmer:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hard to argue with that observation, Wittyguy! I am eager to subscribe to my next site yet the various tours I took have not convinced me that quality is written big in the Porn business (picture sites have run out of ideas and most video sites lack quality as well as "different" material that would make you go, wow I would have never thought of doing that, and my wallet remains firmly planted in my back pocket. The few sites I do think are classy don't update often enough (for obvious reasons) and I usually have to wait a year or so before I re-subscribe.
|
06-11-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Cybertoad:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Witty, doesn't it taste like chicken ? :-)
|
06-01-09 11:47am
|
