| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tonguey:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Well, that's my opinion. I'm sure some users would disagree but are still fans. I've had a great 2/3 year fun ride on the network. Maybe i should have given them a 99, but anything in the 90=100 range is worth trying. The stars they have are the stars I like and have liked for years. Aurora S., Candy, Spring, the one that was going out with Sheen was on there. It's so vast and like i said the search tags could be refined, but I would enjoy being pleasantly surprised when a subject i'm interested in would show up in a scene that isn't tagged. They work in all the hardcore things that they can without getting in trouble. The picture quality is super and they seem to be very tech advanced. I am not tech advanced so i stick to one way of watching their scenes, but they do have other options and they are always improving. They added two or three new sites to the network while i was there. I love how I wrote them asking them to make a fetish i have more inclusive in the search, and to add the act in these specific suggestions i had to a scene. THe next update was like i was the director of the scene. They really listen to sincere fans. There is a comments section and many leave comments that aren't constructive and just stupid, but as a fan of interracial i would always want to be a member of this network as a base...then branch off to a few others maybe, but it's been my only site membership for the past 3 years and there was still so much to see. Sure we'd like a lower price and maybe if everyone joined they could do that, but these actors deserve a great fee. Maybe my perfect score is overstated for some, but it's how i feel. There is little room for improvement. thanks for the interest.
|
12-06-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
52
|
VideosZ
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Although it's true that I did put a lot more cons vs pros. I can't say that most of them are true cons in my book. This is my first time with this site so I felt it was important to mention that they and VB share many of the same movies. If I were to join VB again then I would also add that VB and this site share many of the same titltes in the con section. It's also true that they appear to have a lot more older titles than VB but that isn't a con in my book but it might be for other people so I thought I should put it in the con section. The video resolution is agin not a big deal for me because I usually select lower resolution videos anyway but this is again an issue for many people so it needs to be added to the cons section. I suspect that I could have put a lot more pros but most of them would have been pretty much the same thing I put in the cons but with the positive outlook.
I really enjoyed the site and have even stayed a member for an extra month simply because I haven't downloaded all of the movies that I want to yet.
|
12-03-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Capn:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I can appreciate what you mean.
I still think ACDSee works best, although Zoner is a close second.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-28-12 11:47am
|
Reply
54
|
I Love Female Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Jay G:
They do make trannies and regular guys look like sissies, don't they?
|
11-27-12 10:05am
|
Reply
55
|
I Love Female Muscle
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Capn:
I have to say 'No' & never would.
I don't mind a bit of muscle definition, but a lot of that just looks like testosterone to me.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-26-12 03:40pm
|
Reply
56
|
Real Life Cam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from theviv:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
The only thing that makes the site a porn site is the 24/7 voyeur ability that access gives you. Basically when you sign up you get access to bathrooms and bedrooms.changing,bathing and showering is not censored.
|
11-17-12 05:55pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from TheSquirrel:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Excellent observation which leaves me little too add.
I was expecting this to be a messmer poll.
I would say fully dressed, with a little teasing. I don't like too much talk, teasing, and oral. That is why I hate the 80's porn films. Twenty minutes of talk then ten minutes of oral, followed by four minutes of sex. Too much like reality.
|
11-14-12 09:41am
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Silly boy - one will have he US Seal of Approval on it!
|
11-08-12 09:19pm
|
Reply
59
|
My First Sex Teacher
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from marcdc1:
It's the naughty america network. About 30 sites in total. If you're interested watch for discounts on twitter or their email newsletter. You can usually pick up the site for between $10-15.
|
11-06-12 05:26pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
You're right, Cybertoad, seeings as to how you put it, I suppose I am the guy. This is still the first I've heard about it, though.
Or for that matter, the first to even not remember.
So, I guess I'm due for another big meal of crow, you think?
For the sake of feigned dignity ....Blame it on fleeing brain cells.
I wonder sometimes if they know something I don't.
|
11-06-12 12:57pm
|
Reply
61
|
My First Sex Teacher
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from hodayathink:
Yes, they are.
|
11-06-12 01:11am
|
Reply
62
|
Emily Addison.net
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for the review, Toad. It's just another single model site that doesn't do the girl justice, a story that's been told many times here.
|
11-05-12 04:56pm
|
Reply
63
|
Twistys
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
me too. I'd hate to have to call someone to resolve an issue that could easily be fixed online like thousands of other adult sites do.
|
11-05-12 04:00pm
|
Reply
64
|
Emily Addison.net
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I would think so. They already technically have 2 solo girl subsites (Nicole Graves and Anette Dawn), with the Annette one looking like it's not updating at all anymore. So I would think they would/could just open up a site for her like those two.
|
11-05-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
65
|
Emily Addison.net
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from hodayathink:
I do know that Emily signed some sort of exclusive contract with Twistys in June of this year. So there's a chance that that exclusive contract prevented her from updating this site, even though it bears her name specifically. Or that she abandoned this site because part of her contract is to have her own official site under the Manwin/Twistys brand.
http://business.avn.com/articles/technology/Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html
|
11-05-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
66
|
Back Room Casting Couch
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bestimmt:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Happy to - not sure I know exactly what you're asking for. If you have specific questions, feel free. Basically, the site updates about once a week (it seems to have been doing this for some time), just straight video, each about 20 minutes, downloadable. As others have said, each video is a carbon copy of the others, except for a new pretty face. Girl comes in under the pretense of getting a job in the "adult industry" that pays "$1000 to $5000 per day," is persuaded to take her clothes off, then is told, "producers don't just want to hire a pretty face. they need to see you take direction. so suck my cock" or some variation thereof. The interview in inane and lasts most of the video. She sucks him for as long as he can take it (usually not very long), then he lays her on on a desk (as others have pointed out, no padding, nothing), and eats her out for a bit. Then, he makes her bend over the desk (it ALWAYS follows this progression, by the way), he asks her "what's going to happen now," and she replies "I'm going to get fucked" or some variation thereof. He has sex with her doggy style for as long as he can take it, usually about 30 seconds (in a good number of the videos, he ejaculates at this point), then he pulls out, and has her lay on her back on the desk. After about 2-3 minutes of re-arranging cameras and telling her how to sit, he fucks her standing with her laying on the desk for as long as he can take it, usually no more than one minute. Then, he asks her, "do you know how porn movies end," she says "no," he says "with a facial." Then he lays her on the couch, jerks off for about as long as he can take it (usually about 20 seconds) and ejaculates. Fin.
What I find so frustrating about the site is that the sex is SO INCREDIBLY SHORT. He literally can't keep from cumming. Its amazing that a guy in the "adult industry" so long hasn't learned to hold it in for more than a minute. We all work very hard for our money, and there are lots of great porn sites out there - this is not one of them, and I cannot recommend anyone spending their hard-earned money on this garbage. Disappointing is a euphemism.
|
10-29-12 09:05pm
|
Reply
67
|
Donovan's Darlings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes, I have to say I don't care for their update / charge model system.
Sounds like rotation & 'nickle & diming'?
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-29-12 11:03am
|
Reply
68
|
Wank Pass
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the comments Cybertoad. The time-out is actually one minute, but your point is well taken: this is a very unusual way to restrict downloads. Like you, I've never seen it before and it is VERY annoying! I might (and I stress 'might') have been able to live with it if there weren't the other issues, particularly that a lot of the scenes are really short so you have to wait a full minute between downloads that take 30 seconds. And the video quality itself isn't great. I'm no "HD snob" but this is lower quality than I'll accept.
This is a pretty crappy site and PU members will do well to avoid it.
|
10-20-12 05:31am
|
Reply
69
|
21 Sextreme
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from littlejoe:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
club sandy in the regular 21sextury does
|
10-19-12 02:20pm
|
Reply
70
|
3D Sex Games
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from RustyJ:
I still cannot believe you need to pay a hefty sum monthly to play what looks like limited and dated video game.
|
10-19-12 06:10am
|
Reply
71
|
3D Sex Games
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Toadsith:
3D Sex Games really needs to update their game engine, the current engine is quite old and compared to the 3D work out there with current games, it is really showing its age. As Capn said, there is a ton of user content, but that can only help so much.
As usual, in the sex simulation world, the Japanese game market is still king, with Illusion bringing the best games to market. Still, I haven't seen anybody working with DirectX 10, FXAA or anything like that. As porn slowly loses its stigma, maybe a company like EA will create an erotic division and we'll finally be able to see some truly impressive interactive content.
|
10-18-12 06:03pm
|
Reply
72
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
My pleasure. Her site is 30$ and I don't think that a single one of the other performers in the network are actually still active.
|
10-18-12 07:47am
|
Reply
73
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from Spizoo Inc:
Guys I am gonna clear up your minds :)
Jessica is been shooting at least 3 scenes a week for her site( she is backing up sooooo much content for the next 10 years ) !!! from solo/gg/bg/group/pov/fetish/amateur etc ... her site didn t miss an update in 4 years that is up ( just look the dates ) , there are 4 full sets released a month plus camshow 1 hour shows archived solo , gg and bg
you can see all the latest updates from the tour video page
she is been working hard on fuckmyfan.com and she is been shooting 1 scene a month for Brazzers and 1 scene a month for naughty america !!! so I can guarantee that her site has as today : 365 videos !!!!
one more thing, her network is in the process to be refreshed , with brand new site and improved member areas, streaming, and more content . To get to the end if you read her blog , you can see how much she works, I don t know anyone other pornstar site with more interaction and hard work put in ... Cheers
|
10-17-12 03:19pm
|
Reply
74
|
Jessica Jaymes XXX
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
from atrapat:
After checking the blog and the previews in the free section, I'm pretty sure the site is consistently updating at the same rate and in the same style as always. AFAIK, Jessica Jaymes has been focusing a lot on her site in recent years so, IMHO, the fact that not many scenes of hers for other companies come up shouldn't be an indicator of the quality of this site.
|
10-17-12 03:05pm
|
Reply
75
|
Sugar Paradise
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Obviously, I can't be positive about what triggered the alert for you but a shared script would be my guess.
|
10-17-12 12:38pm
|
