| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Nubiles.net
(4)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from nutcrackr:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I would assume so, I don't believe it would be retroactive because they would need to process all the source images again.
|
02-13-14 11:56am
|
Reply
2
|
Eve Angel Official
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from graymane:
I can see, CT, that you put a hardy amount of effort and time on this review. Good job!
The content quality and stupendous volume of this work truly stretches the mind. .
Subsequently, the end results of My would-be choices derived from your impressive coverage are now sufficiently drawn.
|
02-05-14 07:45pm
|
Reply
3
|
Eve Angel Official
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from tangub:
I couldn't agree more CT, I love Eve Angel but also found this site disappointing. Her old site run by another company was much better in terms of photo content back in the days when it was still active.
|
02-05-14 01:55pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from yote78:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Nah.
I wouldn't worry about that happening, EVER. Sexual gratification is too strong a force in the human psyche for porn to go away, and the internet is by far the most efficient and egalitarian means of mass distribution of that gratification.
Yes, there are parts of the world where porn is suppressed, sometimes brutally. But it doesn't take a very in-depth look at those countries to see what kind of society is created by the suppression of such basic human needs.
There will probably always be some places in the world where sexual gratification/porn and other basic human desires are suppressed. But I believe the general trend is leading towards more freedom of thought and self-determination, despite some occasional setbacks.
|
01-31-14 08:11am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jberryl69:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Nice explanations, and one would take it that you have extensive experience with a device as such, but the follow up questions (I didn't read all of your replies so I may have missed an answer - sorry if I did) are:
What brand do you use;
and, What is the cost;
and, What do you personally like about your choice?
|
01-29-14 09:18am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Just yanking'ya chain, CT ..like the others' response, I didn't have a clue what you was asking us about..
I just threw the John & hooker bit in for some light humor.. But the idea probably deflated in quick order because it drew enneadic response.
I did a through thread on genital toys for men about two years ago, with special emphasis on visual-electro stimulation.
My motivation for bringing this up was because of the simplicity of jumping on this undertaking until the source's goal meets fruition, wherein, via connecting you/me with a configuration (probably head gear), sending and receiving real-time erotic sensations with our favorite porn star, progressively creating visually identical sensations to actual foreplay, followed by intercourse and culminating into mind-blowing orgasm.
This, my friend, leaves no doubt in my mind this process is already waiting in the wings to make its appearance anytime. ..... if, indeed, it already hasn't.
Oh yeah, CT ...... I brought up the fact sensation from vibrators, as well as other sundry high assortment of mechanically operable masturbating devices, do far exceed the existing, antiquated but magically equipped five-fingered marvel that's served us for so long.
But guess what? the "attachment" is so strong, I was shouted down and run out of town
|
01-28-14 10:09pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
OK, CT, OK.
You're, of course, right. There are a few (very few) babes who fooled with Mother Nature where the enhancements still worked (Madison Ivy, Dayna Vendetta & Memphis Monroe are three examples) but tan lines on those three would not be a problem.
|
01-21-14 02:14pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
CT, "i have never seen fake boobs looks good with tan lines"
Agree. In fact I've never seen fake boobs that look good. Period. Tan lines or not.
|
01-20-14 10:09pm
|
Reply
9
|
VideoBox
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from stingerxxx:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Everything is fine with the connections and speed tests. I have membership to other sites and no problems. Just this one when I joined back in November. I'll still rejoin some time later because it has such a massive database.
|
01-17-14 11:35am
|
Reply
10
|
VideoBox
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from stingerxxx:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's strange because I have an ethernet connection as well and a 30MB connection.
|
01-16-14 10:25pm
|
Reply
11
|
VideoBox
(8)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from stingerxxx:
How were the download speeds for you? I joined for one month a couple of months ago and found that download speeds were throttled to around 500KBs, which was very slow. I haven't rejoined as a result of the slow download speeds.
|
01-14-14 11:39pm
|
Reply
12
|
VideoBox
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Cybertoad. That seals the deal for me: with resolutions that low in 2014 I won't be back.
|
01-11-14 10:00am
|
Reply
13
|
VideoBox
(8)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from rearadmiral:
Welcome back cybertoad.
I used to subscribe to VB at least twice a year and usually three times a year but haven't for a while and likely won't again. For me the problem is file resolution. Can you advise if they still upload four videos per day at fairly low resolution and then one "HD" and medium resolution? TBP reports the resolution as 720x576 for the majority of the videos, which is pretty low by today's standards. Is that still the normal resolution?
Another thing that bugs me now is how there are no tour options. Up until a year or so ago you could see everything they had but now, as you know, there is no tour at all.
VB used to be one of the best sites on the internet. How the mighty have fallen!
|
01-11-14 06:16am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Thedebilman666:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
If I was forced to choose a color, it would be pink on the right model.
|
09-20-13 11:26am
|
Reply
15
|
Elegant Angel
(3)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
My only reasons for the fairly high score is that they seem to have fixed the access issue since I brought it up because I haven't had any problems since then and even if they aren't really updating with new content. All new member are still getting 100's of gigs of incredible porn and that won't change for the immediate future.
That's why I gave a warning to returning members.
|
09-12-13 06:38pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Really?
If I read you or Pat right, assuming we're primarily talking about blotting out gentiles, I have to say The stuff I've seen in Asian porn, although there's some blocking-out, but for the most part has liberally displayed the entire gentiles.
|
08-23-13 04:31pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I've tried for two hours to find some way to answer your request.
Opened my paypal account but could find nothing that could help you with.
I can only suggest you call them .... I have every reason to believe they'll answer any questions you have.
Their number .....1-402-9357733
BTW ...... on most sites you want to inquire about .... you have to go all the way to the point just before summiting your order to join. to where they post the payment options. All use their logo ... just click on the paypal logo ( if the site uses them)
I suspect You must create an account with Paypal in order to use their services, of course
Good luck
|
08-21-13 02:58pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Sorry, 'ol buddie .....can't remember.
Their contacts includes a phone number where you can ask ...... any search engine should bring it up.
If the site uses them, their logo along side the other processors will appear on sites.
|
08-20-13 12:06pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
What about Pay Pal?
Got any thoughts on them?
|
08-19-13 02:57pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I like chocolate cake. :-)
|
08-11-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from RLane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I agree, even if I do have a guy in it, all I'm focused on is the women.
|
07-31-13 08:39pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the comment, Cyberfrog.
You've been missed. Really glad to see you're back on board.
|
07-29-13 01:41pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from TheSquirrel:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Well put Cybertoad, I'm agreeing with you 100 per cent, and I am trying to work out the TBP/PU reasoning.
I could be right in they were discussing closing PU, decided against, but had to do something quickly to cut costs. There was nothing in place to replace the raffle, and no time to think of a plan on what to do with PU, so now they have been working out what to do to with it. I think PU may become a very unimportant and unsupported wing of the organisation, with TBP and new sites being the main earners. I think it will probably close eventually.
|
06-17-13 03:33pm
|
Reply
24
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Randyman:
Every single woman who takes off her clothes for the camera is beautiful.
|
06-10-13 11:21pm
|
Reply
25
|
Bikini Riot
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from luv lickn clit:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Hi Cybertoad. I wish they could find a few different beaches to shoot at too. There are a number of sites out there that run $20 a month specials that are probably better than Bikini Riot, which is $25. But the material is exclusive, and the HD looks good. They had enough of my favs there that I wanted to collect the material. For me it was worth it. The free tour model page doesn't show all the models, but I think you can see one or two pics from every update on the free tour Updates page. If they didn't have so many fake boobs I would have considered it a great deal.
|
05-29-13 05:14pm
|
