| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Porn Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Not a one point review.
|
02-06-19 12:58pm
|
Reply
2
|
Porn Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
No way is this a one point review.
|
02-06-19 12:56pm
|
Reply
3
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
You're going to get a reputation as the Mark Twain of PU.
Putting a personal touch on what you write.
LOL.
I personally don't pay a lot of attention to 4K or virtual reality sites, since I don't have the equipment to use either one of them.
I normally watch and download videos in 480p, since they load faster with a slow internet connection, and take less space on the Hard Drive.
Although I realize some people like the latest and greatest, so 4K for them is desired.
|
01-30-19 01:08pm
|
Reply
4
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from SelenaMetArt:
What a lovely review! Thank you for taking the time to write it.
I am so glad that you are enjoying your time with us. I did want to share that we are working on improving our navigation/ability to find content. As you clearly understand, it is a huge task to catalog due to the sheer volume. But it is a work in progress. :)
We very much appreciate the feedback. We love it when it is positive like this, but we also want to hear about what we don't get right. If you ever need anything our Customer Care team gets rave reviews, but I am always glad to assist as well.
|
12-12-18 05:21pm
|
Reply
5
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
Almost poetry
The review reminds me of Kubla Khan by Samuel Coleridge, that I haven't read in over 50 years, it's just the feeling that is more important than the facts.
Weird, but in a good way.
"I'm going to give a more unique point of view from the site."
I think you nailed it. Impressive.
|
12-10-18 04:38pm
|
Reply
6
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I didn't mean to be critical.
I hope you did not take it that way.
But I'm really impressed by the Adult Time network.
Since it's a free add-on to a membership in any one of its sites.
But I was also trying to point out that you should be getting access to the Adult Time network, for free.
Sometimes, I have a membership, and rarely visit it, so I'm not aware of any new devolopments.
So if you had access to Adult Time, I wanted to make sure you were aware of it, since it gives you access to a lot of fine sites.
|
12-04-18 08:54am
|
Reply
7
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice review.
Gave your personal opinions, instead of a formulaic approach.
My question: do you get a free add-on to Adult Time with your 21Sextury membership?
Or did you get Adult Time access with one of your other porn sites memberships?
I'm very impressed with Adult Time, it gives access to over 70 hardcore sites, many or most are premium sites that would be worth joining separately, so it's not just a bunch low quality thrown together to make an impressive collection that turns out to be junk.
I was told by customer support that joining any one of the Adult Time sites gives you access to all the sites in Adult Time.
But you didn't mention the Adult Time add-on in your review.
|
12-04-18 12:39am
|
Reply
8
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Agreed! The prices once you start buying multi-month packages from any of the MindGeek networks are so cheap. You quickly start entering Netflix pricing territory.
|
11-04-16 07:49pm
|
Reply
9
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Toadsith:
FYI: To stream their movies at full 1080p, click the little settings button (an icon of three interlocking gears) to the right of the "Download" button. It has four bitrates: TrueLife HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD High 480p, SD Low 360p.
Not sure if that earns them the 1 point to enter the 90s, but I figured I'd point out that streaming isn't necessarily a con. On the flip side, the whole not being able to view a photo at full res without downloading the entire set drives me insane. The entire meta-network (Brazzers, et. al.) does the same thing. So irritating.
|
11-03-16 09:42pm
|
Reply
10
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Monahan:
I agree with virtually everything says. I agree totally with his score which he discounted significantly for their lousy business practices. They don't need to use subterfuge to make a few extra bucks especially when it serves only to piss of good (paying) customers.
|
10-21-16 12:05pm
|
Reply
11
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from RustyJ:
I'm not joining this site again until they bring back the previews. At some point they made the intentional move to hide all the contents until you pay the membership, probably because what was added wasn't too attractive.
There are sites like VideosZ that do this kind of megasite thing right. Extensive content previews are a minimun requirement these days.
|
05-18-16 11:44pm
|
Reply
12
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from Pyrenees:
First let me thank you for this review. But next I must ask the honest question. Did VideoBox all of a sudden get better? Because last year after their conversion I joined and their conversion to only MP4 pretty much ruined the site. Yes I agree that Joe Average who only wants to fap will be ok with this site. But to the porn snob this site fell a metric ton in terms of quality. To make matters worse there are the video issues which are INTENTIONALLY evident. They allow visual blemishes in their encoding, white washing scenes and worst of all they overlay a lot of their scenes with a "New" musical score that totally ruins the scenes. I even compared some of my older saved scenes to the ones available a year ago and the difference was night and day. When you top that off with the recycling and quintuple posting of material I cannot see how anyone could suggest this site. If you just want to fap ok this site is adequate. But if you want a quality site then VideoBox is a 60 if there ever was one. Quantity is not superior to Quality in my opinion.
|
05-16-16 09:22pm
|
Reply
13
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the fast reply.
I was a member 1 or 2 years ago (my memory is getting terrible as I get older), and they had a banner on the site that counted off the days before I would have access to all three sites.
So I guess they dropped that.
|
04-15-16 12:48pm
|
Reply
14
|
Nylons X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Cybertoad,
As i wrote in my review:
1. Join Teen Mega World directly (through PU link) for $14.95. That gives you access to NylonsX as well.
2. If you join NylonsX directly (through PU link), that costs $19.95/month.
I gave NylonsX a high score, because I was really giving the score to Teen Mega World. NylonsX is a small site, stopped updating years ago.
Do not expect a lot of content from NylonsX. Do not expect videos that focus on nylons, women's underwear, strip tease, or eroticism.
The girls start out wearing nylons or some underwear, but little attention is paid to the nylons or underwear--it's just a gimmick to create a new site. Teen Mega World has many different sites, and they try to supply material for most niches, as a marketing tool.
If you like Teen Mega World, and I do, it's because of the attractive young models. There are lesbian videos (and at least one lesbian site) at TMW, but most of the content is Boy-Girl.
There are no lesbian videos at NylonsX.
There are 2 videos of a female model masturbating by herself.
But all the other videos are Boy-Girl sex.
Join Teen Mega World for hardcore teen sex. On a more bread-and-butter style than the Diesel network.
But with your membership to Diesel network, you already have access to a ton of high quality teen hardcore sex, that is usually more glamorized than Teen Mega World. And the models at Diesel can be stunning to lovely.
If you haven't explored the three sites you have access to at Diesel, you really should.
All three sites, as far as I can tell, have the same basic focus: attractive teens in softcore or hardcore sex. Years ago, there were many more sites in the Diesel network, but then they merged the sites into 18 Only Girls (they dropped some of the old sites completely, and dropped some of the content from the sites they did merge).
But you really should examine each Diesel site, because there is a ton of worthwhile content at all three sites.
|
04-15-16 12:38pm
|
Reply
15
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yeah don't get me wrong its a really good quality site, just my tastes are more for groups of girls than solo or g/b stuff, it never did too much group stuff but I'd find gems I loved, my fav to date is still the girls at the party when theres about 7 of them all getting naked, amazing movie.
|
04-15-16 09:38am
|
Reply
16
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from elephant:
Nice review, I used to love the site but for me my joining the site was to see the groups of girls together scenes, when they had 3 or more in a scene, often I really liked even when they just were dancing or swimming. sadly they seem to of knocked those scenes on the head as they haven't done any new ones since I was last there.
The prices too put me off, its sister site especially 18onlygirls is really expensive if you live in the UK.
|
04-15-16 05:05am
|
Reply
17
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
from lk2fireone:
It used to be that if you stayed a member of 18OnlyGirls, WowGirls, or WowPorn for a certain amount of time, you automatically became a member of all three sites.
Is that still the way it works?
And how long do you have to stay a member at one of the sites, to automatically gain access to all three sites?
There was a separate method of gaining access to all three sites, if you paid a higher membership fee.
Or if you paid an upgrade fee after you joined one of their sites, to get access to all three sites.
I assume, since your membership is over 3 months, that you now have access to all 3 sites.
Correct?
The girls at the 3 sites are extremely attractive. And the videos, as you wrote, are top quality, as well.
|
04-15-16 02:03am
|
Reply
18
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from bebelover:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks
|
05-12-15 03:44pm
|
Reply
19
|
Sex Underwater
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for commenting. Almost all the later scenes are shot in a pool so the safety issues would be less I think. If anything goes wrong the models are no more than a few feet from the surface. The ocean SCUBA scenes are a different matter though.
On a related note, some of these stars can hold their breath for a loooong time. It gets hard to watch it they can stay under so long.
|
11-10-14 02:49pm
|
Reply
20
|
Perfect Fucking Strangers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drona:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That pretty much sums it up...
|
11-06-14 03:29pm
|
Reply
21
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Thanks for the compliment, Cybertoad.
|
10-29-14 03:57pm
|
Reply
22
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
I like her now look or at least what I assume is her new look because the dates on the content don't always make sense except that they may be when the scene was uploaded as oppose to when it was actually shot.
My actual issue is with the bulk of the content. I prefer g/g and b/g content that is at least midcore to hardcore in nature and there is not a whole lot here and what there is isn't very good.
|
10-27-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
That's what I thought the question referred to. I have quite a lot in my PU Favorites list.
I also have a few (perhaps 5 or 6) free sites that I guess I should blow off. Don't look at them very often.
|
10-21-14 03:42pm
|
Reply
24
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Baboom:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes, they probably all are competing for viewers.
|
10-11-14 01:00pm
|
Reply
25
|
Playboy.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Cybertoad's Reply)
Yes.... I can watch those showtime & cinemax shows for about 35 seconds before I'm totally bored. Like watching a football game where all the touchdowns & field goals are removed.
|
10-10-14 01:13pm
|
