Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Toadsith (48)  

Feedback:   All (501)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (24)  |   Replies (453)

Other:   Replies Received (265)  |   Trust Ratings (48)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 265 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A REPLY TO #9 from turboshaft: (Toadsith's Reply)

I've heard that Verizon's FIOS has some of the fastest speeds available from the big ISPs, unfortunately their top speeds are not available everywhere and usually require the purchase of some sort of bundle (web+TV+phone).

I have AT&T's U-Verse with their 2nd fastest tier--the top one requires you to buy a cable package--and have to say it's met my needs. HD streaming, big downloads, and connectivity have always worked for me. At this point I'd probably be more pissed if my Internet connection went down before my other utilities.
: - )


05-24-12  03:13pm

Reply
27
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Capn: (Toadsith's Reply)

I suppose so.....

It is to ensure people remain baffled, I think.

Cap'n. :0/


05-24-12  12:10pm

Reply
28
N/A REPLY TO #7 from exotics4me: (Toadsith's Reply)

You may have just nailed what I thought was a problem. I was thinking Charter advertises 30 MB/s, but it may be 30 Mbps and they're not ripping me off when I download only at 2.5 MB/s.

05-24-12  09:56am

Reply
29
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Monahan: (Toadsith's Reply)

I, too, have Time Warner cable modem access. The problem is that when several users in my area are downloading, my speed drops drastically.

The fastest I recall seeing is about 1.2 Mbps but normal is between 400 and 500 Kbps.


05-24-12  08:51am

Reply
30
N/A REPLY TO #13 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

I like the price of the Kindle itself but there is no way that I'd pay more than 7$ for an ebook. I know there are some ebooks that are way more expensive than that and I think it's discusting and I hope that the publishers go out of business. I can understand when you have to pay more for an actual book because the raw materials themselves are getting more expensive each year but an ebook doesn't cost anything except what the publisher paid the artist.

04-30-12  05:58pm

Reply
31
N/A REPLY TO #14 from turboshaft: (Toadsith's Reply)

Wow, leave it to Toadsith to really hit the nail on the head! It would be interesting to see this poll broken down by country or at least continent. I'll bet the results would be quite varied.

The problem is realistically, even if you don't personally equate nudity with sexuality, the law may not see it that way. It's why in most of the U.S. a guy can mow his lawn shirtless (which I hope has nothing to do with sexuality!), but if a gal does the same chances are someone's going to see her, get upset, and then call the police to rein in her questionable morals.

Whatever reason is given for such laws to exist and why people act so upset at such things--whether they claim that it would pervert men, harm the children, put forth a sexual message--chances are it comes back to religious prudes not being very open about human nudity, especially female nudity. I'm not saying it is all bible-quoting Evangelicals who get offended, but religion does play a major part in why these laws will likely stay much the same for years to come.

So while the vast majority of those who answered the poll say "No" (and we are all admitted users of porn at that), in litigious societies, where laws are quite clear about what is okay for public exposure, the opposite, that it does equate to sexuality, is likely be the current (mis)interpretation of the people.


09-27-10  08:07pm

Reply
32
N/A REPLY TO #13 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

True the poll question was somewhat vague on what constitute nudity but I took it to mean a person devoid of clothing and nothing else.
If the poll question was going for a more philosophical apsect of nudity where it pertains to the nudity of the soul then I missed that.

I think Playboy and all adult oriented magazine intentionally use nudity as a sexual tool. I'd add fashion magazines that often use semi-nude models to advertise clothing and jewellery to the above list.

I agree that nudity in of itself is not sexuality and you've named some very good examples. I hope you'll agree that some guys go to nude beaches to check out the girls and not get their nether regions tanned.

I'll take your argument and add my twist to it.

Playboy has nudity, Playboy has sexuality. Therefore Playboy uses nudity for sexuality. They also have some great interviews... At least that's what I've been told.

Cobras are snakes. Cobras are poisonous. Therefore if you don't know for certain if a snake is poisonous then leave it alone. You don't want to be on the receiving end of a poisonous snake bite.


09-27-10  03:37pm

Reply
33
N/A REPLY TO #20 from turboshaft: (Toadsith's Reply)

It certainly is creepy Toadsith, but also very likely a necessity in the porn business. This seems especially true because it is a quantitative rather than qualitative aspect, and there are some bizarre obsessions with numbers in porn (age, measurements, weight, etc.). Of course porn is almost total fantasy, and much of what we consume as fans is pretty much made up -- from models' names, to their 'backgrounds,' to the various fetishes and genres available -- so making up a girl's age should not be a surprise to anyone.

I disagree with you a bit on the "23 to 26" aspect, because even though many models do look better at that age, if they started in the business in their teens then they may now longer look that great, or even 'act' that great. A few years working in the business can really wear some of these women out, and force them to adapt a very typical, and sadly bland, look and act. I think most regular members at PU have expressed their pet peeves about these in the forum.


08-19-09  09:09pm

Reply
34
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Denner: (Toadsith's Reply)

Thanks to Toadsith - man, this is certainly leads/links to a lot of new stuff - already I look forward to some good ol' browsing here....and see whats comming up - very welcome to those hints...

02-28-09  11:54am

Reply
35
N/A REPLY TO #7 from messmer: (Toadsith's Reply)

Yes, there is a difference. Scandinavian I like, the type of blonde who lounges by the pool at Heff's mansion I dislike heartily.

02-05-09  11:28am

Reply
36
N/A REPLY TO #19 from jd1961: (Toadsith's Reply)

Yes, Hulu rocks!

12-23-08  06:26pm

Reply
37
N/A REPLY TO #9 from mbaya: (Toadsith's Reply)

Thirty years ago black on white was shocking and rare. Witness the movie Behind the Green Door. However, I recall Sahara as the first black pornstar, starting in 1984. As best as I can remember, there was no white on black before that time, as well as no black women in porn of any kind. Even after that there were very few until the 1990's-almost yesterday. Many find the contrast in color interesting as well as attractive. It most definitely is less common.

11-19-08  09:54am

Reply
38
N/A REPLY TO #22 from williamj: (Toadsith's Reply)

"when does it all end"

11-18-08  01:20pm

Reply
39
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Cybertoad: (Toadsith's Reply)

ROFL -------->

11-17-08  08:43am

Reply
40
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Wittyguy: (Toadsith's Reply)

Mmmmm, that wasn't exactly what I was going for but now that you mention it ... yeah, it is John Waters. That should be adopted as the official emoticon for pervs around the world.

11-13-08  06:40pm

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #18 from Pinche Kankun: (Toadsith's Reply)

YEAH!!

11-09-08  10:09pm

Reply
42
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Pinche Kankun: (Toadsith's Reply)

I SURE AIN'T... HA HA HA!!! :D

11-09-08  07:03pm

Reply
43
N/A REPLY TO #21 from roseman: (Toadsith's Reply)

From a psychologist's side your answer coheres.

09-19-08  09:03pm

Reply
44
N/A REPLY TO #20 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

Pat the Bionic nosed man. Able to sniff a female crotch from across the room. That could come in handy with detecting if a girl is in need of Gynacure.

09-19-08  07:57pm

Reply
45
N/A REPLY TO #15 from roseman: (Toadsith's Reply)

Interesting zombie information though I never understood how you associated it with this poll.
Prolly, you are a big fan of Resident Evil? lol


09-19-08  12:21pm

Reply
46
N/A REPLY TO #14 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

Yeah, I like the smell of hickory as well. Oh! you said victory. Sorry, it's a side effect of all those damn bombs.

09-18-08  07:28pm

Reply
47
N/A REPLY TO #12 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

Thanks for the invite. I was a little worried with the impending doom and all. At least I'll have a roof over my head for after the bombs fall. Being Canadian, I know that these snowblowers can take one hell of a punishement, and with some modification should do wonder in cleaning the streets of zombies.

I must also thank you for that excellent zombie information. I know I will be better prepared for my first encounter with the walking dead. Although burning zombies is a valid option. I can't help but think that burning flesh isn't likely to smell all that good. Of course I'd rather smell burning flesh than having a bunch of them trying to chew on me while I'm still alive.


09-17-08  07:40pm

Reply
48
N/A REPLY TO #7 from MargulisAZ: (Toadsith's Reply)

LOL, the sad part is that I was completely sober at that point in time, haha.

08-24-08  12:20am

Reply
49
N/A REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (Toadsith's Reply)

You took the words right out of my mouth. At least it has the distinction of been the most bizarre question ever.

08-21-08  07:12pm

Reply
50
N/A REPLY TO #8 from turboshaft: (Toadsith's Reply)

I agree here: I don't consider oral + another orifice to be a true DP, a sort of false advertising. Even double anal and double vaginal don't strictly qualify as DP to me, even if "dual" is the same thing as "double."

07-25-08  09:04am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 265 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.91 seconds.