Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (340)  

Feedback:   All (1802)  |   Reviews (139)  |   Comments (119)  |   Replies (1544)

Other:   Replies Received (1011)  |   Trust Ratings (69)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1011 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Yosemite: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Right on target. If there is no buildup that one can relate to almost everything that follows has no context. Gonzo fans will completely disagree and I understand that but that is how I favor my porn.

11-02-14  11:18pm

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto. The only aftermarket installation I have ever found appealing were with Memphis Monroe's. They were done by someone who understood the appeal of nat mams.

An old controversy was whether Carmella Bing's mams were all natural but since she has decided to add a lot of weight (I gotta believe she's way over 200 lbs) it no longer matters.


09-21-14  10:40am

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto that. I see PU as the Consumer Reports of porn and want to know about the bad apples in the biz.

06-21-14  02:31pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto that. The only exception is one DVD I rented back in 2006 or 2007.

06-08-14  12:23am

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

That's my approach as well. I have afile for each babe, and a sub file by source so I can go back and check the source site for any new stuff.

This approach makes it very easy to use the search function.


06-02-14  05:24pm

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Loki: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.

It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.


04-09-14  11:04pm

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #16 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

lol -- I thought you'd like that concept.

03-27-14  03:07pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #14 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yeppers! I've seen one where some girls head was inserted.

03-26-14  03:07pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #12 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well, as I think I said, I would not join such a site if it didn't provide me a lot of content in my main niche. One could join dirtygardengirl.com if one were really interested because that is all they do.

03-23-14  07:03am

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #9 from YankeeBastard: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Got nothing against British people I just can't stand the pompous accent, total turnoff. Like nails on a chalkboard to me.

03-22-14  07:29pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #10 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yes but screw them. I know there are a lot things that are included in porn that will turn someone off. When the heat gets turned up I get turned off.

"Don't feed the trolls"

Certainly there can be no argument in regards to this because whatever floats your boat so be it. Yes, there are several illegal acts (kids, bestiality) though I'm sure there are people who would argue for it. Nonetheless I try not to be judgmental on such matters, though if I knew someone who oversteped those bounds with kids, I would call the cops on them.


03-21-14  04:54pm

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Khan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Though I would never presume to know what graymane actually meant, what I *think* he meant was the forum pages as opposed to the several threads that always show on the PU main page.

I base that on his remarks when the poll first ran last year.


01-08-14  02:53pm

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #7 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Just because you're a nice guy and so likable ......
I'm gonna fill you in on a site I've been subscribed to for years (unbroken)that has gobs of clips featuring Tanner.
I just checked it out, and figuring you're so enamored with this gal it might be worth your while to shell-out a meager $15 just to see what its all about.
Click on this link Skin Video and it'll land you at the best of porn and their write-up as well as other reviews.
OK .... I guess the ball is now in your court,.


12-26-13  03:10pm

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #2 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Few things make me laugh anymore .......but your reply just did,

Thanks.


12-25-13  10:36am

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I'm not into facials. I'd even add that I consider facials to be one step higher than spitting in the face and that is one of the acts that really bothers me.

On the plus side. You and I still have plenty of things that we both enjoy.


10-29-13  05:33pm

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #20 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Always sincerely a pleasure to be of help to any of our more esteemed PU veterans .....and certainly you RA meet and exceed that capacity.
I hope you took my comment to be one of a positive nature, my friend. The point I was trying to make was that you're one to never back down.
May anal always be "up" to your liking. (chuckle. ha, ha, snort)


10-06-13  09:37pm

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

The moment I read this Poll, I could see storm-clouds forming on the horizon. Following them was the inevitable: an approaching storm whose labeled by the user "rearadmiral"

And having seen previous assaults on this topic, prompting the ire of the admiral, It follows we best turn down any vitriol on the one now roaring into this part of the poll, lest he turn up the wind speed.
So far, the admiral's been quite tame. Although I'm one on this poll who's already said too much ..... he has my assurance I've now zipped it.


10-05-13  04:12pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Most Western Digital (WD) hard drives have software on them that password protect the drive. It works very well and is not invasive.

10-02-13  03:44pm

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks, RA. I forgot about that deal and have always liked Evil Angel, especially Christoph Clark's stuff.

Just signed up at the PU price.


10-02-13  03:41pm

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Zips make my life so much easier as someone who really likes pics. Flash and Java based slide shows are the worst. They make it very tedious to get all the pics that I want. My biggest complaint is that most of them actually degrade the quality of the photos in the slideshow. The webmaster will set up the gallery by uploading the pics in whatever size the photographer has taken them. This is almost always different from the 5 or so size options offered by the slideshow program. So the program takes the original photos, and re-sizes them. This is done by overlaying the pixel array of the smaller photo on the large photo and determining the color for the new pixels by a weighted average based on the percent overlap with the original pixels. If you do this process once and don't decrease the size much the pictures will be perceived as slightly different by the human eye, but one will not be clearly better than the other. If you were to do this process a second time, the loss of quality would become apparent in the re-sized photo. Of course, if your original is much larger than what is offered by the slide show, you are getting a huge loss in quality right away. I think most sites either don't realize this is going on, or don't think their average users will know or care. But if you are paying for high quality photography, using an expensive DSLR camera, and especially if you take pride in your work and consider it an art, why would you ruin the quality of your work at the last phase in bringing it to your customers? With slideshows like some of the bad ones I've seen, why not just take pictures with your iPhone?

08-25-13  10:49am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I've used PayPal on every porn site that they did the billing.
No problem..... they took on everything I threw at them.
They canceled those renewable sites for me and emailed me a confirmation.
I think in one case they got my money back on a site that I had a compliant.


08-19-13  08:26pm

Reply
22
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Jay G: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks a million for the information. I remember Vista and other operating systems that were not compatible with so many of my programs and saved data that I had from earlier computers. I am always afraid to repeat that horrible experience with a new computer that only works with "new" programs.

Thanks!


08-19-13  04:15am

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #6 from turboshaft: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Oh, I had almost forgotten about the browser history! I'm sure the NSA or the FBI or whoever has had a good laugh over it but I'm not sure a tech guy who has to meet me in person would be so kind.

I'm kinda worried what will happen when The Google finally gives up it's "Don't be evil" code of conduct and my search history goes up for grabs to the highest data-mining bidder. I don't think "It's research--nothing more!" will be much of an excuse at that point.


07-19-13  03:07pm

Reply
24
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Capn: (rearadmiral's Reply)

So do I, but the fact that it has worked out that way, only goes to prove that the raffle idea did work, & still did until it was totally pulled.

Cap'n. :0/


06-16-13  10:30pm

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #16 from RagingBuddhist: (rearadmiral's Reply)

And here I thought I took a lot of shit on those occasions when I've been told, very emphatically, that my opinions are wrong and that server issues were something I was doing wrong. But I've never been threatened with a lawsuit. Congratulations - you win the gold medal?

03-09-13  09:52am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1011 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.24 seconds.