Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (376)  

Feedback:   All (1945)  |   Reviews (156)  |   Comments (125)  |   Replies (1664)

Other:   Replies Received (1065)  |   Trust Ratings (73)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1065 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
N/A REPLY TO #6 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

In order to spare the system drive the burden of IDM, you not only have to point your downloads to an external, but you also have to change the location of the temporary folder for IDM downloads. Under the Options menu go to the 'Save To' tab, and change the location of the temporary folder.

05-13-15  06:43pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

That's right. IDM makes extensive use of the hard drive, which is the bottleneck for the speed of most operations on most systems.

05-13-15  06:23pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

IDM was slowing down my dv7 a lot when I first started using it. Then I moved the download folder off of the system drive, and the issue resolved. It makes extensive use of the hard drive when it downloads files in chunks and reassembles them, so if you run it on your system drive, it can really slow down your OS.

Now that I upgraded to an SSD, I deliberately put the download folder on the SSD, which of course also hosts the OS. IDM doesn't slow down the response time in the slightest now, but IDM downloads are actually a lot faster since the chunks are reassembled very fast.

05-12-15  04:18pm

N/A REPLY TO #1 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I use Bulk Image Downloader for photo sets that aren't in zips. I haven't tried IDM yet. Does it let you queue up all the downloads you want, then basically just walk away while it does the work?

01-15-15  06:31pm

N/A REPLY TO #9 from Yosemite: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Right on target. If there is no buildup that one can relate to almost everything that follows has no context. Gonzo fans will completely disagree and I understand that but that is how I favor my porn.

11-02-14  11:18pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto. The only aftermarket installation I have ever found appealing were with Memphis Monroe's. They were done by someone who understood the appeal of nat mams.

An old controversy was whether Carmella Bing's mams were all natural but since she has decided to add a lot of weight (I gotta believe she's way over 200 lbs) it no longer matters.

09-21-14  10:40am

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto that. I see PU as the Consumer Reports of porn and want to know about the bad apples in the biz.

06-21-14  02:31pm

N/A REPLY TO #2 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Ditto that. The only exception is one DVD I rented back in 2006 or 2007.

06-08-14  12:23am

N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

That's my approach as well. I have afile for each babe, and a sub file by source so I can go back and check the source site for any new stuff.

This approach makes it very easy to use the search function.

06-02-14  05:24pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from Loki: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.

It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.

04-09-14  11:04pm

N/A REPLY TO #16 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

lol -- I thought you'd like that concept.

03-27-14  03:07pm

N/A REPLY TO #14 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yeppers! I've seen one where some girls head was inserted.

03-26-14  03:07pm

N/A REPLY TO #12 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Well, as I think I said, I would not join such a site if it didn't provide me a lot of content in my main niche. One could join dirtygardengirl.com if one were really interested because that is all they do.

03-23-14  07:03am

N/A REPLY TO #9 from YankeeBastard: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Got nothing against British people I just can't stand the pompous accent, total turnoff. Like nails on a chalkboard to me.

03-22-14  07:29pm

N/A REPLY TO #10 from jberryl69: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yes but screw them. I know there are a lot things that are included in porn that will turn someone off. When the heat gets turned up I get turned off.

"Don't feed the trolls"

Certainly there can be no argument in regards to this because whatever floats your boat so be it. Yes, there are several illegal acts (kids, bestiality) though I'm sure there are people who would argue for it. Nonetheless I try not to be judgmental on such matters, though if I knew someone who oversteped those bounds with kids, I would call the cops on them.

03-21-14  04:54pm

N/A REPLY TO #3 from Khan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Though I would never presume to know what graymane actually meant, what I *think* he meant was the forum pages as opposed to the several threads that always show on the PU main page.

I base that on his remarks when the poll first ran last year.

01-08-14  02:53pm

N/A REPLY TO #7 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Just because you're a nice guy and so likable ......
I'm gonna fill you in on a site I've been subscribed to for years (unbroken)that has gobs of clips featuring Tanner.
I just checked it out, and figuring you're so enamored with this gal it might be worth your while to shell-out a meager $15 just to see what its all about.
Click on this link Skin Video and it'll land you at the best of porn and their write-up as well as other reviews.
OK .... I guess the ball is now in your court,.

12-26-13  03:10pm

N/A REPLY TO #2 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Few things make me laugh anymore .......but your reply just did,


12-25-13  10:36am

N/A REPLY TO #8 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I'm not into facials. I'd even add that I consider facials to be one step higher than spitting in the face and that is one of the acts that really bothers me.

On the plus side. You and I still have plenty of things that we both enjoy.

10-29-13  05:33pm

N/A REPLY TO #20 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Always sincerely a pleasure to be of help to any of our more esteemed PU veterans .....and certainly you RA meet and exceed that capacity.
I hope you took my comment to be one of a positive nature, my friend. The point I was trying to make was that you're one to never back down.
May anal always be "up" to your liking. (chuckle. ha, ha, snort)

10-06-13  09:37pm

N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

The moment I read this Poll, I could see storm-clouds forming on the horizon. Following them was the inevitable: an approaching storm whose labeled by the user "rearadmiral"

And having seen previous assaults on this topic, prompting the ire of the admiral, It follows we best turn down any vitriol on the one now roaring into this part of the poll, lest he turn up the wind speed.
So far, the admiral's been quite tame. Although I'm one on this poll who's already said too much ..... he has my assurance I've now zipped it.

10-05-13  04:12pm

N/A REPLY TO #4 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Most Western Digital (WD) hard drives have software on them that password protect the drive. It works very well and is not invasive.

10-02-13  03:44pm

N/A REPLY TO #6 from Monahan: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Thanks, RA. I forgot about that deal and have always liked Evil Angel, especially Christoph Clark's stuff.

Just signed up at the PU price.

10-02-13  03:41pm

N/A REPLY TO #5 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Zips make my life so much easier as someone who really likes pics. Flash and Java based slide shows are the worst. They make it very tedious to get all the pics that I want. My biggest complaint is that most of them actually degrade the quality of the photos in the slideshow. The webmaster will set up the gallery by uploading the pics in whatever size the photographer has taken them. This is almost always different from the 5 or so size options offered by the slideshow program. So the program takes the original photos, and re-sizes them. This is done by overlaying the pixel array of the smaller photo on the large photo and determining the color for the new pixels by a weighted average based on the percent overlap with the original pixels. If you do this process once and don't decrease the size much the pictures will be perceived as slightly different by the human eye, but one will not be clearly better than the other. If you were to do this process a second time, the loss of quality would become apparent in the re-sized photo. Of course, if your original is much larger than what is offered by the slide show, you are getting a huge loss in quality right away. I think most sites either don't realize this is going on, or don't think their average users will know or care. But if you are paying for high quality photography, using an expensive DSLR camera, and especially if you take pride in your work and consider it an art, why would you ruin the quality of your work at the last phase in bringing it to your customers? With slideshows like some of the bad ones I've seen, why not just take pictures with your iPhone?

08-25-13  10:49am

N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I've used PayPal on every porn site that they did the billing.
No problem..... they took on everything I threw at them.
They canceled those renewable sites for me and emailed me a confirmation.
I think in one case they got my money back on a site that I had a compliant.

08-19-13  08:26pm

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1065 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 2.6 seconds.