Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (340)  

Feedback:   All (1803)  |   Reviews (139)  |   Comments (119)  |   Replies (1545)

Other:   Replies Received (1011)  |   Trust Ratings (69)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1011 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
REPLY TO #7 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I'm from the old school where no one had any clue what HD meant so I don't care that the resolution is subpar when compared to almost anything done today. As long as I can see the performers and the action than that is more than acceptable. I found some movies that I thought I never would on the classic porn and it makes staying a member well worth it for me.

12-18-14  06:00pm

Reply
2
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
REPLY TO #5 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

These days I get more pleasure out of the movies the classic porn site uploads than anything else other sites have to offer and we are talking about some mediocre looking movies. it's just that they are the movies I've been looking for and I can live with a good movie that looks bad. I can no longer stand bad movies that look good.

12-16-14  05:47pm

Reply
3
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I agree with everything you said but let's be honest. It's old farts like us that still pay for porn so sites might as well cater to our needs because the young ones are getting their porn on tube sites so trying to attract them as new customers or retain them is a waste of time.

12-15-14  05:43pm

Reply
4
Visit Perfect Gonzo

Perfect Gonzo
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from jook:

As usual, a BIG thanks for a thorough review. As I mentioned elsewhere, it seems we have similar taste and I joined a week or two ago based on your review.

To be honest, I'm not crazy about the site. While I agree with most everything you said, I don't feel the models are beautiful, or at least they're not my type. Or maybe the gonzo genre is not for me. It's a shame since the site has so many good things going for it. But the repetitiveness is also a big minus for me, though most sites seem to share that flaw. It's like you've seen one, you've seen 'em all.

On a positive note, it is apparently run by professionals who seem to be concerned with treating their customers like valuable assets. What a novel concept! ;) And they are responsive. The site is set up great, the 4 (or 2 for the older videos) choices of downloads is a plus and the production is a plus. I would also like to thank the webmaster for being active here.


12-15-14  05:24am

Reply
5
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from Parsnip: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Hi RA - with regards to darkness, I was referring to both, not necessarily in the same film. There have been largely negative comments from members on the site about some of the recent material (and lots of positive comments from the staff who know where their next paycheck is coming from). Interestingly, quite a few are from female members saying that they don't like it but are OK with it being there if other members do like it.

I saw an interview with Colette from X-Art in GQ a couple of years ago, where she said that although they were aiming at females & couples, they were aware that the majority of their members were male porn users - and they are coming from years of watching much more extreme material. I think that, in the end, this is why the glamcore sites go downhill. It's a commercial decision, and I don't blame them for it. Unfortunately it means there isn't anywhere for people like us.


12-12-14  03:31am

Reply
6
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

Ya'know, RA .....After reading your review a second time, I can see more clearly where you're coming from.
I think I might've put too much emphasis on the girl-girl activity you dwelled on ......as well as another similar agonizing turn-off of mine you mentioned that was seemingly sprinkled about...namely Lesbos chewing up more time than I thought I needed to endure.
I guess I might've jumped to conclusions and likely over estimated.

I appreciate thee settin' me straight, 'ol buddy .....the young girls factor is makin' it look better by the minute.


12-06-14  12:38pm

Reply
7
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from graymane:

Do love to wrap myself visually around models presenting features depicting "beautiful and youthful attributes" > emphasis on youthful.

Don't you just love those gals sometimes featured here who're well within legal but are blessed with anatomical genes making them look deliciously below the eighteen boundary?
But, my good friend, had I been looking at this site contemplating membership ..... considering your usual well written, wall-to-wall coverage ....you've guided me again from plunging into something I might regret.


12-06-14  03:21am

Reply
8
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment from sonofzog:

I can only get to Video Box by typing the website into the browser search. When I click on a link from Best Porn I get a 301 Moved Permanently. Not a huge deal considering the discount is $3 but it is odd. Thanks to your comment I think I'll go back for a month and see what gives. Maybe they've improved the Roku interface. Beware of cross-checks unless you want a subscription to Mr Skin

11-30-14  03:16pm

Reply
9
Visit Sex Underwater

Sex Underwater
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Cybertoad:

Now this is different, one might find a sex scenes underwater maybe but a site water niched is unique. I thought I had seen everything.
I was trying to imagine the work involved to do this, not to mention safety concerns and all. The sheer control it would take in these scenes is impressive. I have to say I am impressed, and a great reviews helping explain the site was very helpful.


11-10-14  11:18am

Reply
10
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from jook:

RA, thank you as always for your incredibly prolific and detailed reviews. You are the Robert Ebert of porn reviews. -)

I believe we have similar taste and that is another reason I read your reviews carefully. This site sounded right up my alley. Unfortunately, I was disappointed.

While the site has lots of great things going for it, I was bored after a few scenes. The scenes don't differ much and like the saying goes, if you've seen one, you've seen 'em all.

I also disagree about Ryan not trying to upstage the wimmin. Maybe upstage is the wrong word, but he certainly has more of a presence than most males and sometimes even takes center stage. I believe he's a bit narcissistic and I grew weary of him fast.

Or maybe I've just grown jaded. I felt the same about the Abby Winters site, same ol' same ol'. Abby Winters even sent a generic email asking if there was a problem since I hadn't downloaded very much. I think I need something truly different but I have no idea what.

Kudos to the site in just about every other respect.


11-07-14  06:58am

Reply
11
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from Drooler: (rearadmiral's Reply)

That's fair enough. It's not surprising that two people would have different views and tastes--and responses--to the same kind of material.

11-03-14  03:35pm

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Yosemite: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Right on target. If there is no buildup that one can relate to almost everything that follows has no context. Gonzo fans will completely disagree and I understand that but that is how I favor my porn.

11-02-14  11:18pm

Reply
13
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
REPLY TO #6 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

The number of videos was the same before and after the down time. The total size of the videos was 221 Gb beforehand. If it's the same now, then there probably was not any editing.

11-02-14  12:49pm

Reply
14
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Drooler:

Excellent review as it is thoughtfully in-depth and informative.

Personally, however, I'm not one to renew with the site just because I really dislike the way Ryan goes about things. I think that of all male performers I've seen, he's one of the most distracting and visible in the scenes, tossing the girls this way and that in a sexual frenzy. He does live what excessive editing and camera cutting would otherwise do post-production. I just can't enjoy watching that kind of porn.


11-02-14  07:28am

Reply
15
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
REPLY TO #2 from LPee23: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Did you see that hardcoregangbang.com is back up now? You should check it out!

11-01-14  06:43pm

Reply
16
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from rooka:

I look at this sight often for reviews and the reason i actually signed up is so i can tell rearadmiral that your reviews are not only detailed but also right on target. This looks like another great review so i def will be checking it out. Thanks again rearadmiral........

10-30-14  08:53am

Reply
17
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from Cybertoad:

A++ review nicely done

10-29-14  08:47am

Reply
18
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from RagingBuddhist: (rearadmiral's Reply)

That definitely helps, ra. Appreciate the long response. I was asking about this site because I've got free access to it as a bonus from Back Room Casting. But, as a bonus site, there are only tiny thumbnails and a flash video for each model. There are no details beyond that - no mention of file sizes or file type or anything. It turns out they're all mp4 of various bit rates and dimensions, some of which are pretty low quality. I was hoping the full access site was at least a little better detailed. From what you told me, it seems to be somewhat better, but not by much. Despite that, it looks like I'll be checking it out of these days... Thanks again for the reply.

10-28-14  09:43am

Reply
19
Visit VIPissy

VIPissy
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from LPee23:

Glad to see this site getting some notice. Great review!

I agree with you that this is an excellent site overall. In my book, they are the unquestioned leader in hardcore pissing. In the year 2014, with hardcore pissing in decline due to biller regulations, they take it to the limits. They keep their shoots high quality and classy too. My only critique would be that the site still needs time to grow and add more scenes, but that is usually the case with relatively new sites. I would definitely recommend anyone with even a passing interest or a bit of curiosity to check this site out.


10-19-14  05:12pm

Reply
20
Visit VIPissy

VIPissy
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from turboshaft:

Great review, rearadmiral!

Love how this site takes this fetish seriously, if that's the right word to use when discussing golden showers. Normally it's relegated to something only done at the end of scene so webmasters can just add another tag, and rather clumsily at that. Even better, it has long, hot, and enthusiastic girl-girl scenes which can be kind of rare within this genre. It's one thing to watch a pretty girl do a standard boy-girl or solo scene, but quite another to discover she's done work for this site.

As far as I'm aware this site is totally exclusive, if also appearing to be the hardcore side of Wet and Pissy, though the companies are different. A model seems to do W&P and/or Wet and Puffy, and then move on to this. Those sites' solo scenes are well done, but again, add a second girl and it becomes even better, IMHO.

Also, there has been at least one American performer on here, Tiffany Fox, who's also done solo scenes for both Wet & Pissy and Wet & Puffy. Still wish they did have more American performers though.


10-18-14  08:08pm

Reply
21
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
REPLY TO #13 from pat362: (rearadmiral's Reply)

I grant you that face fucking is probably in a class all of it's own and should not be used when describing other sites but some of the stuff assylum does sort of reminds me of the stuff I saw on FF. It doesn't look like they are out to degrade the talent like FF but it is very hard to walk the line when you are shooting some very extreme stuff.

Both sites are located in the North East so far away from California and therefore that may appeal to performers that live in that part of the US and commute to CA when they want to do porn. I think that is one of the reasons why FF is still able to get performers because if they were in the valley than most girls would avoid them like the plague.

As to why some girls shoot more than one scene. I personally think that they accept to shoot for FF more than once because they are in desperate need of cash and foolishly choose to shoot for them a second time. Normal porn is already hard on the performers so I don't want to imagine what an FF shoot must be like.


10-12-14  10:27am

Reply
22
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
REPLY TO #8 from jook: (rearadmiral's Reply)

Yes, as far as I could tell, it allowed full access. I didn't mind paying the hefty price so much (I think it was $10+) since it got me full access and, as you pointed out, I could have easily downloaded everything in the trial time if I wanted.

10-12-14  05:51am

Reply
23
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(6)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment from FBI REPORT:

I ORDERED THE YEARLY MEMBERSHIP $119.40 AND GOT TWO ADDITIONAL EMAILS SAYING $29.97 & $19 .96 WAS BEING CHARGED ! WHEN YOU CALL THE FAKE CUSTOMER SERVICE THEY HAVE A SCRICPT THEY SAY.. PRETENDING TO VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT - THEN TO TELL YOU ITS NO THEM AND TO CALL THE OTHER # ON THE WEBSITE (THAT GOES TO THE SAME PLACE). CREDIT CARD FRAUD DELIBERATE UNATHORIZED OVERCHARGING IS A FEDERAL CRIME THAT HOLD SERIOUS TIME! MAKE A FBI REPORT AND CALL YOUR CREDIT CARD COMPANY. YOU SUPPORT BANG BROS BY BUYING A YEARLY MEMBERSHIP AND THEN THEY OVERCHAGE? %^*# NO!!!!!!! FBI REPORT.

10-04-14  10:25am

Reply
24
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from jook:

As always, stupendous review!.

I'm considering the 2day trial. I figure I can all the videos in that time if the site is that small. Any thoughts?


09-26-14  03:30am

Reply
25
Visit Assylum.com

Assylum.com
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review from elephant:

Yeah Nice review rearadmiral like always.

I had heard of this site a while back on the massive Sarah Shevon thread on another forum about dvds. She seems to love doing the extreme end and talks openly about it on that thread. Its nice to see some sort of alternative to evilangel and kink doing something a little different. dunno if it will be too extreme for my tastes though, I'll maybe wait till they get some more vids as the price is quite high for a new site.

I love Sarah Shevon but she is very rare and most of the women that do the extreme stuff I tend not to find that attractive, I'm quite a picky bugger.


09-26-14  02:17am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1011 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.18 seconds.