| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Boynapped
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from sk8ershoez:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad you appreciate my review. I was so happy to see they got rid of DRM. Their content was always very hot, but I never understood, why they use DRM. People who pay to see their content receive limitations while those who pirate their porn can view it DRM-free. The site seems to be part of the GayLifeNetwork now, at least the downloads are hosted there. They seem to improve constantly. JizzAddiction just got added to their bonus content, that's the first bonus worth watching so far.
|
01-16-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree with GP, I like it but when it seems like they really did not want to I think it shows in their acting and in turn makes for bad porn.
|
12-26-12 08:22am
|
Reply
28
|
Dominated Men.net
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
Ok, I've asked them to do a new screenshot. Should be changed out w/in a few days.
As far as the site facts ...
Since we don't currently have a log in to the site, I'm not sure when they'll be able to update those. If you see something significantly wrong you're welcome to submit an error report.
We'll look forward to seeing your review.
|
12-20-12 07:12am
|
Reply
29
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from hodayathink:
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
30
|
She's A Freak
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree in general I stay away from site that have poor preview pages. I'm not looking for you to give away the farm - I just want to know if what you have is what I want.
If you have confidence in your product it should make me want more.
|
12-16-12 07:02am
|
Reply
31
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Marcus:
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
|
12-11-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
32
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I never asked them but I know that it`s not something they came up with recently because they have had this name for many many years.
I`m not sure which came first. The studio shooting content only for the VHS/DVD market or the the one shooting content for internet/dvd.
|
12-09-12 09:58am
|
Reply
33
|
Male Strippers Unlimited
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Capn:
To me, I'm afraid it smacks of laziness & lack of webskills & care.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:27am
|
Reply
34
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't think it appears to matter to them. As long as they have a memorable name, pleasant or otherwise, they are happy with that.
ALS Scan was mentioned by RA.
The 'scan' part of the name, for me, harks back to the 1990's when a lot of porn was scanned in. Time to move on from that name IMO as it would infer very old content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:12am
|
Reply
35
|
Male Strippers Unlimited
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review, as always. You know you're dealing with a weird site when they actually apologize for the fact that they make it difficult to download photos and that many of the vidoes are crap.
|
12-09-12 07:02am
|
Reply
36
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.
|
12-08-12 08:29pm
|
Reply
37
|
Dog Fart Network
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from TheSquirrel:
Absolutely agree with you. It's a hideous name for a porn site. A real turn off.
|
12-08-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
38
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from tetros:
LMAO, this can't be true, crazy world
|
12-07-12 07:53pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from marcdc1:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree. I grab some pix (and then hardly look back at them). For me it's almost always videos.
|
12-05-12 05:42pm
|
Reply
40
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from otoh:
I noticed this one too... and - purely out of morbid interest (er, dicks are not really my thing, clean or smelly) clicked through to the site. Not recommended - although perhaps amusing for Red Dwarf fans...
|
12-05-12 05:28pm
|
Reply
41
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Ewwwww... This is definitely high on the 'weird' list...
|
12-05-12 01:17pm
|
Reply
42
|
Clips 4 Sale
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ergo Proxy:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
If he didn't pay Clips4Sale directly he has a problem. Once I bought a clip which was extremely crappy and got my money back, but this was a regular clip...
|
11-30-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
43
|
Clips 4 Sale
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from hodayathink:
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
44
|
Clips 4 Sale
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I've never actually heard any horror stories about this site but I would still never use it's services because I find that their prices are offensively expensive.
|
11-28-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
45
|
Mandy Flores
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from roberbear:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks dude. There are a few other sites that I will review as they were great. Still in shock (lol) how bad mandyflores.com is!
|
11-25-12 04:00am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
gaypornlover, "I can only assume the major studios will relocate and some of the smaller ones will ignore the law - I mean how can you prove where a movie was filmed really?"
The proposition calls for all porn production companies to notify a new bureaucracy whenever they start a production so that the bureau can send an inspector* to the site. Failure to do so will result in serious penalties.
Because this was a ballot proposition and not a city ordinance, it cannot be ignored, but if they choose to, the producers can take the proposition through a court process which will delay implementation at worst, and possibly cause the law to be thrown out..
My guess is that the serious economic consequences to the City will result in a future proposition reversing this one. Soon. (The porn industry is located in the San Fernando Valley which is part of the City of LA. There are small towns and unincorporated areas that are not part of the proposition spotted throughout the city but none of them are near Chatsworth or Canoga Park where most of the big producers are located.
* This would be my kinda job!
|
11-22-12 09:17am
|
Reply
47
|
Ferro Network
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Omne35:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Hi, thanks for the kind words.
The cum shots are easy to notice once you look for them. They show the sex up to a certain point, then they cut to the guy's face going through all kinds of contortions, then they cut back to the main event and there's semen all over but nothing actually coming out. Let's be realistic, they're not going to film the guys face and miss an actual cum shot going on. Some of the expressions bring to mind a neurological problem, not intense passion.
Other times they cut directly from the sex to a shot with everything done, same issue, why would they not film it?
They get pretty elaborate sometimes having the girl mouth some stuff then drool it out, at other times it's just saliva. Some of the women are better at it than others. If you look close you can sometimes notice that the guy has something in their hand while they're stroking and it flies around.
Since it looks like they film several videos a day using the same guys I can understand that they aren't normally going to be able to cum 8 times in a day. When you see a lot of the videos in a row, such as when you're downloading in bulk, you can see the sets are the same as far as movable items like flower arrangements and clothing.
However, I'd rather they just skipped the weird facial expressions and ended it.
|
11-21-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
48
|
Gay Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
It seems weird to have the guys run off after being caught. I agree with you that this seems almost anti-porn. It would be much better if the cameraman were to catch the action and then join in!
|
11-17-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
49
|
Gay Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
The site itself doesn't give a lot of info on their content so I'm left with what TBP wrote in their review. I think part of the reason for the score is that I gather that the viewer is meant to believe that what he is seeing is happening for real and that's where the being caught aspect comes in to add to the overall reality of the scene. I personally think that it's your run of the mill fake voyeurisiitc porn site with a slight twist.
I have to agree that the being caught on video would not add anything
worthwhile to the porn scene and I know that I'd never join an hetero site with simnilar content simply because this kind of porn is not my cup of tea.
|
11-14-12 06:40pm
|
Reply
50
|
Boynapped
(1)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Jay G:
DRM.....(Downright Rotten Method)....that's really ancient and stupid terchnology. It's hard to understand how with modern technology, someone could still believe this is a useful means of extracting money from customers.
DRM only hurts customers who PAY for your product, making your work almost unusable to them. Hackers and pirates can get around DRM as easily as burglers can pick locks.
DRM....bad idea.
|
11-11-12 11:40pm
|
