Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (38)  

Feedback:   All (656)  |   Reviews (16)  |   Comments (71)  |   Replies (569)

Other:   Replies Received (246)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 246 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Hey Little Dick

Hey Little Dick
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)


No masks, it was just done in a natural setting and the guest men, seemed to not be porn stars, or the production was made to appear like they actors were new. But not the starlets just the men were to appear that way. Be the mask series had guest men and was best I could compare to as far as format of the production. I'll see if I can find it.


03-07-13  06:20am

Reply
27
Visit Hey Little Dick

Hey Little Dick
(1)
REPLY TO #2 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)


It was like 2 years ago, and hmmmmm. Something like humiliation, cant get it up or something that hinted. The quality looked good from what I recall. Was along the lines of be the mask and sites like that.


03-07-13  06:14am

Reply
28
Visit Hey Little Dick

Hey Little Dick
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review from Cybertoad:


Great review, reminds me of a site, name escapes me. But they filmed guys who could not get it up with hot girls who would strip, stroke and suck and they would stay limb and embarrassed. Was more funny they sexy.


03-07-13  06:03am

Reply
29
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(4)
REPLY TO #1 from RagingBuddhist: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Thanks for the compliment. I try to spell it out the best I can.

I can understand wanting to brand your product - but not at the expense of the overall quality of your product. When your brand draws your subscriber's attention away from the subject - or worse, covers up part of the models - you're overdoing it. The Japanese sites seem to be the worst offenders I've seen.


03-03-13  06:45pm

Reply
30
Visit The Life Erotic

The Life Erotic
(2)
REPLY TO #3 from otoh: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I wish you had something similar too, GPL... but now that you mention it, I kind of wish you hadn't - thinking to the phone scenario I mentioned, I'm now picturing one of those unfortunate 'accidental' X-ray images with a mobile... sorry :P

02-19-13  12:01am

Reply
31
Visit Young Sex Parties

Young Sex Parties
(2)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Thanks for the kind words.

I wish I had a better command of words, to make my thoughts clear and concise. Instead, I tend to use a lot of words to try to describe what some people can relate in a few well-chosen words.

The site structure is poor, and makes it harder to use the contents of the site.

The site contents (videos) are poor, as well.

I hope I made that clear in my review.


02-18-13  03:11pm

Reply
32
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)



Wouldn't to get any coffee or cream on the keyboard was all !


02-12-13  11:52am

Reply
33
N/A REPLY TO #7 from turboshaft: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I sure hope it's not! Sometimes I just prefer my stimulants in double doses.

02-12-13  10:58am

Reply
34
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
REPLY TO #3 from LePornoisseur: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Right? I can't stand that lying bullshit. Luckily it has only happened maybe once before to me, so I really can't complain.

Thanks for the compliment!


02-11-13  01:46pm

Reply
35
Visit CFNM.net

CFNM.net
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review from spagett:

Great review mate. Could I ask a bit of help and ask how you go about cancelling your membership. They haven't made it very clear how to do this.

thanks


02-05-13  12:05pm

Reply
36
Visit Dirty Boy Video

Dirty Boy Video
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from Ambition: (gaypornolover's Reply)

It's sad, only 16 of the scenes I wanted had acceptable quality (960x540), but 320p or even 240p isn't watchable anymore, especially at low bitrates. I agree, it's very hard to find sites, that do both well. I used to think it's bad, when companies get bought by bigger companies, but what I recently saw (JizzAddiction, BoyNapped) questions me why they gave us such poor quality, when the content was actually shot at a way higher quality. Now that those sites are rebuild and the videos are re-encoded by the bigger companies, that know how to do it, they actually look stunning and are enjoyable.

Don't worry, I'll be posting more reviews very soon.


01-26-13  09:33pm

Reply
37
Visit CFNM.net

CFNM.net
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review from TheSquirrel:

Congrats on a great review. Even though this site isn't my thing I can tell you took a lot of time and care to put this together.

01-26-13  06:33pm

Reply
38
N/A REPLY TO #1 from cp4men: (gaypornolover's Reply)

HI Many thanks-even the smallest bit of advertising helps
All the best!


01-23-13  02:52pm

Reply
39
N/A REPLY TO #12 from graymane: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Sorry 'bout the absent "cock option", Gaypornolover.
Lesson learned!
But should it be of any comfort to our highly valued Gay friends out there, the same can be said effecting all our straight viewers.
To wit ....
Upon close observation, one will notice the choice spelled
p-u-s-s-y wasn't optional to them, as well.


01-17-13  04:03pm

Reply
40
Visit Boynapped

Boynapped
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from Ambition: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad you appreciate my review. I was so happy to see they got rid of DRM. Their content was always very hot, but I never understood, why they use DRM. People who pay to see their content receive limitations while those who pirate their porn can view it DRM-free. The site seems to be part of the GayLifeNetwork now, at least the downloads are hosted there. They seem to improve constantly. JizzAddiction just got added to their bonus content, that's the first bonus worth watching so far.

01-16-13  03:32pm

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree with GP, I like it but when it seems like they really did not want to I think it shows in their acting and in turn makes for bad porn.

12-26-12  08:22am

Reply
42
Visit Dominated Men.net

Dominated Men.net
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from Khan:

Ok, I've asked them to do a new screenshot. Should be changed out w/in a few days.

As far as the site facts ...

Since we don't currently have a log in to the site, I'm not sure when they'll be able to update those. If you see something significantly wrong you're welcome to submit an error report.

We'll look forward to seeing your review.


12-20-12  07:12am

Reply
43
Visit Best Hard Hunks

Best Hard Hunks
(0)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from hodayathink:

Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.

But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.


12-17-12  05:10pm

Reply
44
Visit She's A Freak

She's A Freak
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree in general I stay away from site that have poor preview pages. I'm not looking for you to give away the farm - I just want to know if what you have is what I want.

If you have confidence in your product it should make me want more.


12-16-12  07:02am

Reply
45
Visit Dog Fart Network

Dog Fart Network
(2)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from Marcus:

I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.

12-11-12  01:44pm

Reply
46
Visit Dog Fart Network

Dog Fart Network
(2)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from pat362:

I never asked them but I know that it`s not something they came up with recently because they have had this name for many many years.
I`m not sure which came first. The studio shooting content only for the VHS/DVD market or the the one shooting content for internet/dvd.


12-09-12  09:58am

Reply
47
Visit Male Strippers Unlimited

Male Strippers Unlimited
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review from Capn:

To me, I'm afraid it smacks of laziness & lack of webskills & care.

Cap'n. :0/


12-09-12  07:27am

Reply
48
Visit Dog Fart Network

Dog Fart Network
(2)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from Capn:

I really don't think it appears to matter to them. As long as they have a memorable name, pleasant or otherwise, they are happy with that.

ALS Scan was mentioned by RA.
The 'scan' part of the name, for me, harks back to the 1990's when a lot of porn was scanned in. Time to move on from that name IMO as it would infer very old content.

Cap'n. :0/


12-09-12  07:12am

Reply
49
Visit Male Strippers Unlimited

Male Strippers Unlimited
(1)
Reply of gaypornolover's Review from rearadmiral:

Excellent review, as always. You know you're dealing with a weird site when they actually apologize for the fact that they make it difficult to download photos and that many of the vidoes are crap.

12-09-12  07:02am

Reply
50
Visit Dog Fart Network

Dog Fart Network
(2)
Reply of gaypornolover's Comment from rearadmiral:

I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.

12-08-12  08:29pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 246 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.09 seconds.