Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (38)  

Feedback:   All (603)  |   Reviews (16)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (522)

Other:   Replies Received (232)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 232 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #15 from otoh: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I find all my news online, but as far as reading goes, I too prefer actual paper novels. I'm not holding out against ereaders so deliberately - I think they are great tools and if I travelled more I would get one to avoid carting books around, and being able to have more than one to hand. But as it is, I'm happy with books, and I can easily loan them to friends.

05-11-13  06:35am

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #19 from jberryl69: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I learned it through trial and error - I just downloaded it this year so I'm no expert on the matter. I still manually ok each site. One of the issues is that some sites require you to turn on all the scripts for them to work - like show a video - which actually defeats the purpose in my mind and I don't turn on any sites permanently. Just temporarily. I have to do it for this site even though I trust it, I'll turn it on each time.

05-05-13  12:47pm

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #16 from jberryl69: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Every website sends out scripts and it's the only way you can assess them. So with the script blocker you can Allow a site but disable certain crap scripts like googleanalytics. facebook, twitter, etc. Or you can never allow a script permanently and do a temp allow for that one browser opening (another words, when you close the browser all your temp allows go away). I'm not sure that is what you had in mind but I feel it's none of their damn business what I'm browsing.

05-03-13  01:11pm

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #15 from sk8ershoez: (gaypornolover's Reply)

It's actually quite not that rare anymore, many studios have recently released fisting scenes.

04-15-13  05:17pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)



Wouldn't to get any coffee or cream on the keyboard was all !


02-12-13  11:52am

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #7 from turboshaft: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I sure hope it's not! Sometimes I just prefer my stimulants in double doses.

02-12-13  10:58am

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #1 from cp4men: (gaypornolover's Reply)

HI Many thanks-even the smallest bit of advertising helps
All the best!


01-23-13  02:52pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #12 from graymane: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Sorry 'bout the absent "cock option", Gaypornolover.
Lesson learned!
But should it be of any comfort to our highly valued Gay friends out there, the same can be said effecting all our straight viewers.
To wit ....
Upon close observation, one will notice the choice spelled
p-u-s-s-y wasn't optional to them, as well.


01-17-13  04:03pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree with GP, I like it but when it seems like they really did not want to I think it shows in their acting and in turn makes for bad porn.

12-26-12  08:22am

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #19 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree. I grab some pix (and then hardly look back at them). For me it's almost always videos.

12-05-12  05:42pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (gaypornolover's Reply)

gaypornlover, "I can only assume the major studios will relocate and some of the smaller ones will ignore the law - I mean how can you prove where a movie was filmed really?"

The proposition calls for all porn production companies to notify a new bureaucracy whenever they start a production so that the bureau can send an inspector* to the site. Failure to do so will result in serious penalties.

Because this was a ballot proposition and not a city ordinance, it cannot be ignored, but if they choose to, the producers can take the proposition through a court process which will delay implementation at worst, and possibly cause the law to be thrown out..

My guess is that the serious economic consequences to the City will result in a future proposition reversing this one. Soon. (The porn industry is located in the San Fernando Valley which is part of the City of LA. There are small towns and unincorporated areas that are not part of the proposition spotted throughout the city but none of them are near Chatsworth or Canoga Park where most of the big producers are located.

* This would be my kinda job!


11-22-12  09:17am

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #21 from messmer: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Gaypornolover, I think the real world consequences are found in gangs at war with each other over territory, drive-by shootings to get rid of a rival pusher, immense amounts of money in the hands of those who will use it to corrupt others, overcrowded jails, an overwhelmed justice system because of all the frivolous charges like possession of the weed.

Of course there are often harder drugs involved as well but it is all lumped together under "The War On Drugs" and that war was lost a long time ago because VICE cannot be suppressed or eliminated by law, you can only drive it underground. People will always seek licit or illicit pleasure, no matter what restrictions society attempts to impose upon them.

Just look at the world's oldest profession. After a few millennia they are still very much around despite all the laws passed, as well as the scornful disapproval of the majority.


11-09-12  06:33pm

Reply
13
N/A REPLY TO #19 from Drooler: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Sorry, not telling!

10-27-12  06:42am

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Toadsith: (gaypornolover's Reply)

The appeal of the exotic is very strong, no matter what style it comes in.

10-25-12  07:55am

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Toadsith: (gaypornolover's Reply)

You know, if there was more money in it - I think they'd have cracked that problem by now. I think the M-t-F side of the industry has got all the cash right now. Some day perhaps; maybe if science can learn to grow arteries and veins...

10-25-12  07:54am

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #7 from graymane: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Many, many thanks, GPL for your enlightened response to this poll inquiry,...... Jus' cannot express how hard I labored over an effort to incorporate something here that would bring together straight and gays based on a single composition.
But it appears -- through the merit of your taking this on -- you've done a magnificent job for me as well as those following different paths.


10-25-12  07:52am

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #10 from jberryl69: (gaypornolover's Reply)

"Men need to ejaculate regularly after all, so I'd say there's more of a physical need that way." Seriously?

10-24-12  08:39pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #8 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree right now it's cumbersome to look for it. Making it available would help understand the perspective of the reviewer.

10-11-12  06:36am

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #4 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I agree gaypornlove. Speaking just for myself, I did a review or two years ago, then stayed away. I've only been back for a few months and have been blown away by the dedication and sincerity of the community.

It's always nice to grow a community.

Here's to improving PU for all of us.


09-29-12  05:49am

Reply
20
N/A REPLY TO #16 from BadMrFrosty: (gaypornolover's Reply)

You can get the equipment to do it but its not as simple as buy a cable and plugging it in. It will most likely be cheaper to buy a TV with a HDMI port.

09-22-12  01:24am

Reply
21
N/A REPLY TO #18 from Cybertoad: (gaypornolover's Reply)

LOL

09-18-12  03:41pm

Reply
22
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Claypaws: (gaypornolover's Reply)

LOL. I've never really understood the appeal of videos when photos are available. :-)

09-05-12  04:55pm

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (gaypornolover's Reply)

It's far easier to make excellent photos than to make an excellent video. There are fewer factors to control in a photo than in a video. That's the main reason, I believe, why wonderful or good photos far outnumber the number of excellent videos.

There are other reasons, as well. Photos cost less, in terms of time and money to produce.

And as a viewer/consumer, it's simpler and easier and less time-consuming to view photos than to view videos.

Photos and videos each have their own appeal.


09-05-12  04:23am

Reply
24
N/A REPLY TO #21 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

Ever get back at that SOB?

Glad you can laugh about it now.

Best Wishes-


08-11-12  04:58pm

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #19 from marcdc1: (gaypornolover's Reply)

I'm so sorry to be laughing.

All the best.


08-11-12  05:34am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 232 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.8 seconds.