Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (95)  

Feedback:   All (744)  |   Reviews (45)  |   Comments (87)  |   Replies (612)

Other:   Replies Received (372)  |   Trust Ratings (59)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 51-75 of 612 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

What is this thing called "friends"? I don't know what that means ;)

03-21-12  12:06pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Let's see, we're half way through March and I've singed up for one site so far this year. Yeah, definitely gonna have to go with a this being a downer type year. Maybe if I start doing more meth fueled porn binges I'll finally pump up stats here ... man, hate to see what that would cost.

03-18-12  08:58pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I'm a mix. I don't use it much during the weekends so it tends to get powered down then but otherwise I'll leave it running M - F unless I know I won't be on it for at least 12 to 16 hours.

03-15-12  11:14am

Reply
54
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

The simple answer, all of them.

03-13-12  01:03pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not to crush TheSquirrel like a piece of roadkill but I also voted for the status quo. Two days keeps it new and interesting. You can also go back and look at previous polls and add votes / comments later on (I sometimes do) so you still have access, you just have to make few more clicks of the mouse.

03-07-12  11:45am

Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Cost, Content (original), & Reviews.

02-10-12  11:00am

Reply
57
Visit Anal Teen Angels

Anal Teen Angels
(0)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Review

Hey Squirrel, good to see you back. Thought that you were run over or that you were keeping a low profile in hopes of getting named the new coach for the Brits National Football team. Great review as always.

02-09-12  12:06pm

Reply
58
Visit Adult Empire

Adult Empire
(0)
Reply of Ergo Proxy's Reply

My guess is that they're based overseas and depending on their exact location, filing a lawsuit is just dumping money down a black hole. Besides, all they have to do is change servers and reincorporate some place else and they're back in business the next day. Chasing down the bad guys can be a royal pain in the ass.

01-24-12  12:22pm

Reply
59
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As far as I can tell, there are really only 3 reasons for having DL limits:

1. Excuse not to upgrade technology / save costs. For sites, having a DL limit means they don't have to spend as much in server and bandwidth fees. I could see this being a reason for the small time players or newbies but not the large sites where we most often find limits.

2. DRM version 2.0. I think most sites figure if your downloading gigs per day then your just ripping their site of all content and that must mean you're up to no good (piracy, selling it to others, illegal tube posts, etc.).

3. We want more of your money. Having DL limits means if you really like the content then you're going to have stay around a while to get it all meaning more membership fees. Of course, if they had regular updates and good content that's usually reason enough for most people to buy a multi-month membership.

As you can see, I'm not terribly impressed by any of the reasons for limits. Thus, I'll continue my practice of avoiding these types of sites even though any reasonable DL limit would probably never apply to me because of fine and discriminating tastes in what I DL :)


01-11-12  11:17am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's one of those things that doesn't come up very often but if it turns out to be a negative experience for the customer (me) than I'll seriously think about it before signing up again regardless of how much I like the content.

01-09-12  11:51am

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most of the time it's not done very well (as others have said). It can be good for solo shots where there is a decent striptease but most of the time it doesn't cut the mustard ... especially when your eating your hotdog on the 4th of July and come across one of these scenes in your archive.

12-19-11  03:49pm

Reply
62
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of pat362's Review

Hadn't heard about sites doing the whole "double thing" before. Sounds interesting in concept but, as you noted, not sure I really want to be dl'ing multiple copies of the same scene. It'd be kind of cool if some other sites (21stsextury or DDF) went this route though.

12-19-11  03:42pm

Reply
63
Visit Teen Sex Mania

Teen Sex Mania
(0)
Reply of theonon's Review

Hey there and welcome to PU. Just as a heads up, you're probably going to catch from grief from some people for coming right out of the shoots and giving a site a perfect score. Also, if you could give more info the "bottom line" section as to why you felt this site was so great it would appreciated and more helpful to others who might look at your review in the future.

12-19-11  03:39pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I say no. How is this different from phone sex only you get the visuals as well.

12-19-11  03:36pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Even though most countries will probably get stricter, they'll be stricter in name and lacking in enforcement. In the US I think you'll see fewer obscenity cases as prosecutors finally figure out you can watch a chick being sodomized with (insert your object of choice here) anywhere in the world with the click of a button and as people who have grown up with internet porn get older and actually consider voting as opposed to just wondering what the concept is.

12-16-11  03:43pm

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think I've looked up about 3 or so. The only one I ever came across that could even be classified as decent was the Tommy Lee / Pam Anderson one. Frankly, I doubt anyone's sex life looks hot or interesting unless you're doing a porn shoot ... just wait until my hc vid hits the net.

11-18-11  08:48pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I said "other" because I've tried some of them but not all of them. Basically I learned that if you're messed up porn just ain't that interesting because your equipment is messed up or your brain ain't working, although the latter is a constant problem with me.

10-24-11  11:02am

Reply
68
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of monty4321's Comment

In short, this site will probably give you what you're looking for. If you can't decide for sure, all of the sites under the DDF banner have an $8 two day full access trial if you want to test the waters.

As for makeup, you'll probably see a lot of that here (DDF does high end glamour porn) but it's generally not overdone. Otherwise, I think you'd be satisfied with the site given how much content they have (clips available on vids, some anal (depending on which sub-sites you join) and a good variety of stuff to ogle.


10-17-11  05:03pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

I didn't know they existed either. I went back and looked at some but almost no commentary. I guess I'm just that damn good ... or else Khan and company actually have more important things to do (take your pick).

10-15-11  03:10pm

Reply
70
Visit Hot Wife Rio

Hot Wife Rio
(0)
Reply of hiker's Review

Hey Hiker, glad to see a new face here at PU. Like a lot of us, we started posting after feeling that we got ripped off by a site. I'll just echo the comments from the previous reply, in that while you're experience may not have been good we always like more info so that others can make a fully informed decision.

10-12-11  01:52pm

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

DOESN'T IT MEAN THAT THEY'RE REALLY COOL LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!!!

10-12-11  01:50pm

Reply
72
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)
Reply of selphy's Comment

I would say that it's less than 90%, probably only about 60%. However, in my past experience they usually have the scenes first before the content starts to filter out to other websites as the months go by.

As an aside, the reviewers at TheBestPorn aren't collectors like us so they mainly rely on a websites description of "exclusive content" when they post their facts. Other PU reviewers may miss that as well. However, I don't usually have a beef when the majority of the content is exclusive like Karups.


10-12-11  01:49pm

Reply
73
Visit Teen Girls

Teen Girls
(0)
Reply of selphy's Comment

Agreed, I just browsed through the preview pages and saw lots of content from teenmegaworld. Still, if you haven't belonged to that site this does seem like a pretty good deal. I might try it for the "sex for grades" site they have.

10-09-11  02:32pm

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Money, money, money. That's why most get into it. Most can't make a living doing it. Money is also why you see some former stars suddenly come back. I'm still looking for definitive proof that is does make the world go 'round.

10-09-11  02:27pm

Reply
75
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(4)
Reply of dracken's Review

Thanks for doing a detailed review on this one. I've been thinking about it and it looks like I'll hang to my bucks for a while before signing up.

10-04-11  05:38pm


Shown : 51-75 of 612 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.69 seconds.