| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I said "other" because I've tried some of them but not all of them. Basically I learned that if you're messed up porn just ain't that interesting because your equipment is messed up or your brain ain't working, although the latter is a constant problem with me.
|
10-24-11 11:02am
|
Reply
27
|
DDF Network
(4)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
In short, this site will probably give you what you're looking for. If you can't decide for sure, all of the sites under the DDF banner have an $8 two day full access trial if you want to test the waters.
As for makeup, you'll probably see a lot of that here (DDF does high end glamour porn) but it's generally not overdone. Otherwise, I think you'd be satisfied with the site given how much content they have (clips available on vids, some anal (depending on which sub-sites you join) and a good variety of stuff to ogle.
|
10-17-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I didn't know they existed either. I went back and looked at some but almost no commentary. I guess I'm just that damn good ... or else Khan and company actually have more important things to do (take your pick).
|
10-15-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
29
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
hiker's Review
Hey Hiker, glad to see a new face here at PU. Like a lot of us, we started posting after feeling that we got ripped off by a site. I'll just echo the comments from the previous reply, in that while you're experience may not have been good we always like more info so that others can make a fully informed decision.
|
10-12-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
DOESN'T IT MEAN THAT THEY'RE REALLY COOL LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!!!
|
10-12-11 01:50pm
|
Reply
31
|
Karup's PC
(2)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I would say that it's less than 90%, probably only about 60%. However, in my past experience they usually have the scenes first before the content starts to filter out to other websites as the months go by.
As an aside, the reviewers at TheBestPorn aren't collectors like us so they mainly rely on a websites description of "exclusive content" when they post their facts. Other PU reviewers may miss that as well. However, I don't usually have a beef when the majority of the content is exclusive like Karups.
|
10-12-11 01:49pm
|
Reply
32
|
Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
Agreed, I just browsed through the preview pages and saw lots of content from teenmegaworld. Still, if you haven't belonged to that site this does seem like a pretty good deal. I might try it for the "sex for grades" site they have.
|
10-09-11 02:32pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Money, money, money. That's why most get into it. Most can't make a living doing it. Money is also why you see some former stars suddenly come back. I'm still looking for definitive proof that is does make the world go 'round.
|
10-09-11 02:27pm
|
Reply
34
|
X-Art
(11)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Thanks for doing a detailed review on this one. I've been thinking about it and it looks like I'll hang to my bucks for a while before signing up.
|
10-04-11 05:38pm
|
Reply
35
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I know, now. Just after I posted this comment I looked back at the TBP page on this site and saw the disclaimer as a limited trial. Sorry, just didn't read ... or least my brain refused to comprehend. You can scrap my original comment and these replies if you want.
|
10-04-11 12:22pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Poll
Cause I'm so full of shit that it overflowed into my screen name.
|
10-03-11 09:35pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Another thing that I've never understood. I mean, what ... is the guy too lazy to walk over to the bathroom? Is some chick flowing free just testing the strength of her feminine sanitary products? Then someone has to clean up after it all. If someone really wants the full effect why not get a job at a farm or a zoo and just stand around a horse or an elephant? Whatever.
|
10-03-11 09:33pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
If there was no porn think of all the bandwidth that would become available and all that former porn money waiting to be gobbled up. I'm all in on cow tipping, the next internet sensation and international sport. Don't forget about the bikini girl cow tipping leagues either.
|
10-03-11 01:36pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Uh, the countries with the hottest babes doing the hottest things for the lowest subscription cost. So much for nationalism, when it comes to porn I'm all about the dollar ... no wait, the peso, euro, zimbabwe dollar?!?!?!!? Nevermind.
|
10-02-11 10:47pm
|
Reply
40
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Let's be real for a minute. 5 new reviews, all in the 90', in one day. The site itself is plain. According to TheBestPorn it has 7 videos and about 200 photo sets. The webmaster is defending himself left and right after never having appeared on this site before. Did I mention that the people posting the highly regarded reviews here have never posted reviews before? This is nothing but a con game so let's leave it at that and move on to more important stuff like how long it's been since I've cleaned my belly button lint.
|
10-02-11 10:33pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Isn't this poll question basically preaching to the choir? Most of us wouldn't be here if we didn't think porn was a great thing to throw a couple of bucks at.
|
07-11-11 11:47am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you have to wear goggles and still see barely recognizable 3-D there's no point. I doubt that anyone can even download a 3-D movie that plays back decently in 3-D in a commonly used viewing format (WMP, VLC, etc). Right now it's just a gimmick until the technology makes it look good. Even then, it won't have much of an impact on me because you'll need to play it back on a big old monitor / tv to get the full effect which I don't do.
|
06-09-11 10:54am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Not really sure how this would work. As an old school dude, I wouldn't use social networking to access PU. However, for the younger crowd who actually thinks surfing for porn on your phone or ipad is cool then maybe it'd work. Not really sure what TBP or PU would tweet or post though - read up on Khan zapping a crappy review or forum spammer, Duke just tweeted that he got a woody from looking at new porn site. I'm not really sure I'd want my newest reviews or forum posts spread even further around the web (they're bad enough as they are).
A better idea would be Groupon take, where if x number of PUers sign up, you can get a great deal on a website.
|
05-02-11 12:54pm
|
Reply
44
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
MountainMan's Review
Good first review there MountainMan. Glad you've come down from your peak of to share your porn wisdom with the masses. A few more technical specs (vid sizes, etc.) would be useful but darn good for a first review. Hope to see more.
|
04-21-11 05:03pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
So, do I get a paycheck from Rick or what for bringing this up as poll question :) I've looked at it a few times but the only weakness I see in it is that join pages can easily change and they might quickly become outdated. Probably best used for sites off the beaten path.
|
04-14-11 12:04pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Don't most of us get depressed if we don't get our daily dose of porn?
|
04-06-11 03:47pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Echoing BadMrFrosty, I use Firefox blocking along with Ad Block Plus and that kills most everything. I can't imagine anyone surfing without a pop up blocker; you'd spend a lifetime just killing the crap showing up on your screen.
|
03-17-11 12:03pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Charlie Sheen just made Winners out of all of us pornophiles. Screw the rest of the trolls.
|
03-14-11 12:44pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Face facts man: If you have PU book marked, have a separate email account for porn sites, continuously sign up for porn sites and have a drive(s) full of naked bits you're a collector. At least it's in digital form otherwise we'd all be featured on the tv show "Hoarders: Buried Alive".
|
03-09-11 12:23pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I say get on with it because the interviews are often poorly done and little of interest seems to come from them. Occasionally there are good tidbits but it's mostly some perved up interviewer going over the same old tired questions and answers.
|
03-03-11 11:35am
|
