Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : turboshaft (24)  

Feedback:   All (665)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (13)  |   Replies (641)

Other:   Replies Received (231)  |   Trust Ratings (42)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 667 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Though I usually take a certain pleasure in declining to answer such questions I will say "Maybe, maybe not" on this one. :-)

I have watched stuff in groups that might have been just large enough to constitute an "exhibition purpose" that I don't think (legally) bought/downloaded content is allowed for--of course I had no idea if this was ripped or copied stuff in the first place.

If you ever look into the legalese surrounding buying/downloading/renting content it's actually pretty restricted. You don't actually own the content, just a license to personally view your copy, not show it to a big group and definitely not to make money off of it.

Performers probably have it much worse though, as I doubt most of them even own a little if any of their content, and probably have to sign away ownership of it for all space and time before the cameras even start rolling (seriously, appearance releases can read like something that an astronomer had to be consulted on).


04-28-14  08:37pm

Reply
27
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review

Great review, LPee23!

I'm not sure 100 would be appropriate for any site, but if you can fit your viewing habits into ALS' particular niche and how they capture it then why not go all the way? I just know that since giving it a score of 97 way back when that I've grown bored over their approach and really disappointed over their use of boy-girl content, no matter how limited.

Oh, how the mighty (and shaven) have fallen! :-(


04-26-14  07:08pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Barefoot, please.

I'm not a foot fetishist beyond preferring clean feet, and I've just never found high heels particularly sexy; looks like an elaborate game of dress up that I have in no way ever fantasized about. I guess it's because in real life the women I'm around don't wear heels and it's frankly the last thing I'm looking at anyway. (Though far less incriminating that getting caught drooling over cleavage.)

Put on a pair of tall leather boots (no cowboy boots or Uggs, damn it!) and I might actually notice footwear.


04-26-14  06:21pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Sucks that Seymore had to waste his time and money on that case, especially considering that there was plenty of this and even harder content on American sites by then, but apparently DVDs are sacred media.

I seem to remember reading that most of the jury who had to watch the offending scene at trial--you know, "evidence"--were more bored than offended, plus it's something you have to seek out to really get all worked up about. Of course that's how so many of the concerned moralists of the world work; leaving no stone unturned until at least one fragile person finds something offensive.


04-21-14  03:12pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not often, since I assume most models wouldn't actually play drums or guitar buck naked, though I'd imagine the best use of a flute or recorder is for a women to masturbate with.

04-17-14  11:28pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!

Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.


04-14-14  06:58pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)

04-10-14  08:52pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'd say 2-3 years for their actual career, but longer lasting fanbase with the web and its trove of archived material. How many of us have "discovered" a performer only to learn she did a few scenes and has not been in anything in months or even years?

And of course we have the outliers like the amazing Nina Hartley who's had the longevity of a male porn star--without the creepiness.


04-10-14  03:53pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

A part of me hopes that Hillary Clinton stays away from the 2016 presidential race, if just to get Joe Biden to run instead and hear some more of his priceless gaffes. He's like that uncle at Thanksgiving who's had a little too much to drink...except he's the Vice President.

"Big fucking deal" indeed! :-)


04-05-14  07:46pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

I second jberryl69's comment; might as well get one more in before you're incinerated by one of their high tech death rays (if they can travel across galaxies then they must have death rays).

Aliens landing at the White House reminds me of Independence Day, and if I remember correctly they destroy most of the major cities including the one I'm living in now.


04-04-14  08:19am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Woodruff's Poll

Considering that her "one hardcore/bj performance" wouldn't be with me...never! :-(

If anything I've not rejoined a site because it turned hardcore, even if only for a few scenes.


04-02-14  04:12pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Somewhat anti-social, in both real life and online.

I don't Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Tinder, Chatroulette, etc., and am probably won't anytime soon. Obviously I'm pretty happy to be here on PU, but I just can't share that with everyone in real life, while the sheer ignorance and knee-jerk prejudices of more mainstream sites make my blood boil. Personally I just get more out of socializing in real life than looking up old classmates (why would I want to reconnect with all assholes who made school so shitty?) or see newborn baby pics (I simply don't care about your children), though I do have my limits.

I guess this means I'm introverted because being around other people constantly, especially in bigger groups, just gets exhausting after a while and I need some time to "decompress/recharge" on my own. If you're an outgoing social person this can be hard to see as not weird and even harder to explain. And it certainly doesn't help that there now seem to be social groups for people and their interests that I always thought were, at least in part, to get away from bullshit traditional social obligations--atheist "churches" are the most blatant example. Does everything require a community?

A quote from the movie Heat sums up my feelings: "I'm alone, I am not lonely."


03-31-14  08:07pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

If a model was only doing softcore than she wasn't my favorite anyway--probably not even on my radar.

03-29-14  09:06am

Reply
39
Visit Wired Pussy

Wired Pussy
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Great review, rearadmiral!

Can't say I'm a fan of this niche, as it seems to be more about what someone is feeling than can ever really be shown in porn, but Kink has always piqued my curiosity to say the least. And the now dormant Pissing.com made some lovably deviant material in its time.

They do seem to be in love with longer scene lengths on other sites, so maybe that's the reason behind "the lack of 1920x1080." I assume that's the case with this site as well, because you just don't want a 1080i download of an hour-plus long scene.


03-23-14  03:33pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'd like to think I'm smarter than average but show me a couple of well edited teaser videos and I can easily make some stupid decisions. So I'd say I'm pickier than average because I'm pretty specific about what I like and don't like in porn, regardless of the current trends.

A lot of the "mainstream" stuff just bores the hell out of me and is largely a turnoff, not to mention the growing celebrified aspect of porn stars with inane Twitter feeds and convention appearances. And I find the current porn star look--swollen lips, sculpted breasts, Cleopatra makeup, and "girly" tattoo--absurdly unattractive and only vaguely sexual at best.


03-23-14  01:38pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Depends on the girl.

My Fair Lady's Eliza Doolittle-esque cockney accent isn't exactly my idea of a beautiful voice, but not all English accents are that bad. Some American ones can be frightening--New York and New Jersey come to mind--while others like Southern accents can go either way.


03-21-14  07:55am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"Yes, maybe"...then I watched it and my nausea told me otherwise! Curiosity killed the cat, and the porn hound.

However, first coming across porn when I was younger definitely developed my interest in the illicit arts! The fetishes seem to have been hardwired in me already, I just had to find depictions of them.


03-20-14  07:49am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I use Firefox's built-in blocker and it works reasonably well, minus the annoying "Please Take Our Survey!" shit a lot of otherwise legitimate sites dump on you.

Unfortunately I've found NoScript a time-consuming add-on, even if eventually effective. But my favorite add-on (though it doesn't affect pop-ups) is the free AdBlocker Plus for Firefox--no more ads in streaming videos!


03-17-14  05:54pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

Glad to hear it, graymane! :-)

03-15-14  08:15pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

With regards to whom I've had sex with, I'd consider myself straight. But then I also hate sports, enjoyed Brokeback Mountain, and am not viscerally enraged by two men kissing in public, or really doing anything else for that matter.

The question reminds me of Gore Vidal, who on being perpetually asked about his orientation wrote that there is "no such thing as being gay, only gay sexual acts." Gore refusing to call himself gay may be more of a result of the era in which he grew up and became a published writer than anything else.

There's an enlightening paragraph from that article that explains my own irritation with our cultural obsession with labels and definitions: "The word homosexual, said Vidal, was invented in the 1890s and heterosexual in the 1930s: 'To create categories is the enslavement of the categorized because the aim of every state is total control over the people who live in it. What better way is there than to categorize according to sex, about which people have so many hang-ups?'"

I do think it mostly is just another bullshit social construct to control and divide people. Why else would we care about such things as "What makes a real man?" if not to simply invent arbitrary rules to further discriminate against people. Taken to its extreme it convinces idiots to decree that a man can't have anal sex with a woman because it's "gay," but watching two women have sex is somehow the height of male heterosexuality. It's that sort of boneheaded logic that's made the issue all the more unimportant to me.


03-15-14  07:58pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of YankeeBastard's Reply

LOL! I didn't think so either, Yankee, otherwise I would have had a serious calcium deficiency starting around my early teens years (though I did drink a lot milk then). I know evolution can be weird at times but it would be hard to see how we evolved to simultaneously fire out millions of sperm while also losing calcium. :-0

03-14-14  08:03pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Where's "None of the above/other"? ;-)

I like to rely on that golden rule of golf: "Play it where it lies."

If it seems appropriate for the scene, then that's how I want it to end. So a facial isn't always required, certainly not when it's done so hastily like a grenade's about to explode. But if the performer is into it on the receiving end--because honestly, it feels good for the shooter no matter what his "target" is--then a facial can be totally fine. When the poor gal is closing her eyes I don't think she's that into it, or at least doesn't have the thespian talents, and I'd rather it be done somewhere else.

Facials in real life are like meteors. More common than we'd like to think, and can be cool to watch when they occur, but most people would rather not be in their path.

When the guy doesn't come at all I say it's a little weird, and I'm usually thinking How the hell did he not[i] come after all that?! Those always seem the most unnatural.


03-13-14  07:35pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

Balanced minds are overrated, graymane! :-)

03-13-14  06:24pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Unless it was a site where the members' section was censored anyway, like a Japanese site (though not all are censored), it wouldn't be a huge deal.

Still, it's Internet porn! We know what the naughty bits look like and know that they're the main attraction, no reason to pixel/black out the lucky few in the preview section or trial.


03-11-14  09:13pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

Unless the PU forums count as literature, no I don't. :-/

03-07-14  05:26pm


Shown : 26-50 of 667 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.02 seconds.