Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (105)  

Feedback:   All (778)  |   Reviews (48)  |   Comments (89)  |   Replies (641)

Other:   Replies Received (390)  |   Trust Ratings (57)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 784 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit 21Sextury.com


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Good deal at $15 a month for almost 40 sites counting the lesser quality bonus content.
+ 8500+ scenes of exclusive mostly Euro porn with daily updates.
+ Lots of hot models and a good variety of h/c, lez, solo and some tranny. Overall high production value and quality.
+ All scenes have both pics w/ zips and vids
+ Pics are large, going up to 7300x4900 in a few cases.
+ 5 vid download options and stream function.
+ Pretty decent navigation which is rare in my book.
+ Good download speeds (600 - 2,000 MB/sec across multiple channels was usual).
+ Bills through Epoch and no prechecked cross sales. Home page also displays how many days left on your subscription.
Cons: - Many of the sites are dead or only update sporadically leaving about 10 truly active sites.
- A fair amount of anal for those not so inclined.
- More material is being farmed out to secondary producers now and the quality takes a hit on these scenes.
- I had difficulty getting the stream video function to work well (I had to run the vid about 15 seconds, pause it and let it buffer for a bit before being able to jump forward/back).
- Limited model info and interaction. The Fanclub where models interacted is now dead.
- Pix and vid don't always include the same content and some of the sites were painfully predictable as to which hardcore positions would be featured, especially on the pics.
- Especially for pics, the camera work needs to improve (see below).
- Some cross selling, especially for other 21stsextury sites that share the same portal hub.
- File naming is poor (just a number).
Bottom Line: I found it hard to believe that it had been five years since I was last here but my hard drive coffers are now restocked and joy has spread across the land. I always liked this network, even when it was just stand alone sites way back when, and it finally hits the ceiling on my score list. Here be the nuts and bolts:

PICS: Starting in the second half of 2010, the pic sizes jump from 1200x800 to about 3700x5800 and some sets go even bigger. All scenes have zips and have between 100 and 300 pics. Due to some of the large pic sizes, you can get zips exceeding 1 gig in size so be prepared to self edit if you don't hoard disk space. Overall quality is generally quite good. The pics appear all on one page which is nice but when viewing inbrowser you can't enlarge a pic to it's full size.

My main beef with the pics (and this goes to other sites who have introduced large pic sizes) is that you can't rely on autofocus any more. Most of the pics are either screen grabs from the HD movie or separately shot using a narrow range or "dot" autofocus. This works for distance shots or when the body(s) are perpendicular to the camera. However, when the model angles away the result is that a good portion of the body gets slightly out of focus and is annoying. I tossed a lot of pics because of this. It gets really bad on Footsiebabes now and I had to chuck entire sets just because everything but the feet where out of focus. Clearly they have cut back on photography like a lot of othere sites but the over reliance on a narrow focal range gets noticeably bad when you jump to very large pic sizes.

Some of the super sized pics also look grainy at full size meaning they just used screen caps or blew up standard pics beyond their limits.

VIDS: Downloads available in 1080, 720, 540 and 2 phone sizes and most vids are 20-30 minutes long. 1080 starts appearing about 2 years ago. It's not super high end 1080 but it looks good. I downloaded a lot in 540 and it still looks good on my monitor. Other than an issue with the stream player, everything was cool with the vids.

NAVIGATION: Usually I rip sites on their navigation function but I don't have much bad to say here other than "it works pretty well". I never pay attention to search by tag because tagging is never consistent and on a site this size any search simply dumps 100's of scenes on you. Best way to go is by model (the directory seems complete) or by individual site or by network update date. The sites are listed on the side bar. You just click and go. Only real negative is that they need a better page jump system. With some sites topping 100 pages they only let you jump a couple of pages at a time. That's an unnecessary time killer.

OTHER: As noted above, some of the content is produced out of house. AnalTeenAngels and Gapeland use the same models and production as you get with Teenmegaworld. There are more scenes now with U.S. models which are also outsourced. The production value isn't as high with these sites and they get repetitious quick but it isn't terrible by any means. A few sites where also predictable in that you know exactly what every scene would look like in terms of positions.

The most active sites are ClubSandy (sadly, Sandy is not in front of the camera any more, she still looks great I think), Assholefever, Analteenangels, Cutiesgalore, Footsiebabes, Gapeland, Lezcuties, Picsandvideo, and DPFanatics. The other sites are dead or update less than once a month.

The stuff from early 2010 and before is lesser quality (1200x800 pics and 540 sized vids) but that's to be expected. The content is still good and I think looks almost better in terms of models and production value (not comparing to today's world) than some of the most recent stuff.

Despite my incessant bitching, which is common in my reviews, I admit to really liking this site. It has very good production values. Most scenes offer some story line (not a lot of gonzo) in different locations and usually start with the models clothed and then working down from there. You got a ton of variety in terms of content and a lot of different girls. Hell, I even grabbed some content from the "lesser" bonus sites which still had an acceptable level of content and I almost never do that. It has great looking content going back for over a decade and is a great value.

Thus, I plant my flagpole atop 21sextury and proclaim it "King" of my review hill. Not a bad way to finally crest the "100 points" on the review hill.

03-04-15  02:07pm

Replies (6)
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support
Cons: - Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary
Bottom Line: I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.

First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.

The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.

The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.

The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.

My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.

This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money

05-01-08  11:46pm

Replies (3)
Visit Brazzers


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + A boat load of scenes and models (about 4500 scenes)
+ About 8-10 updates per week across a 27 site network
+ Excellent navigation, can search by model, site or across the network
+ All scenes have pics up to 2500x1600 with zips and multiple video options with true 1080 HD on scenes added since late 2009
+ Model directory (with actual info!)
+ Good price at $20 a month (I got in on a special $10 price)
+ Pretty much all hardcore across a variety of genres from teen to milf
+ Excellent production values and usually an attempt to build some story line into the scenes
+ Lots of ability for users to interact on the site (ratings, forum, comments, etc)
+ Good download speeds for me - consistently in the 500 or more MB/sec range across multiple channels
Cons: - As usual the older content (before mid 2009) lacks in quality (no HD video and only 900x600 pics)
- Tags are inconsistent so not a reliable way to do a comprehensive search
- Only about 14 sites update.
- Their motto might as well be "Home of big tits and bit tatts". The majority of models would make silicon valley envious but there is something for about everyone here except softcore.
- Cross sale on signup and advertising on the site and when you log in
- A slew of "bonus sites" that are just tube quality streaming videos
- Too many pics. Many scenes have over 1000 images which just means endless pics of the same thing.
- Although not really a negative, most all the models here are certified porn stars so if you're looking for fresh meat, you won't find it here.
- Nothing terribly original about the scenes so it can seem a bit stale after a while even across the wide genres they cover
Bottom Line: It's been almost 5 years since I was last here and I mostly stayed away because of the low quality pics and "bit tit, big ass, bit tattoos" theme that most of the sites focus on. However, I decided to jump in on a $10 a month special through TBP and have to say I was pretty impressed. There's a reason why this in one of the biggest and most popular porn sites out there. Here's the quick low down:

PICS: Older pics (before mid 2009) are only 900 to 1000 by 660. Since then, the size is great and so is the quality. You don't get download options though. My only beef is that there are too many pics with some scenes having over 2500 pics. A few sites have done better keeping them around 200-300 but most updates still have around 800. I'm glad they don't give you too few pics but I really don't need 15 shots of the same thing. With the large pic sizes, some zip files end up being 600 - 800 mb in size which is just unnecessary.

VIDS: As noted, before 2009 the vid quality is average at best. Since then the HD stuff looks really good. You get up to 7 download options (full HD to mobile sized), in browser streaming which works great (very little lag time), screen caps and 1 or 5 minute screen caps which appear just below the video to let you jump to the good stuff. Download speeds were fast and consistent. Vids range from 20 to 50 minutes. I found that I downloaded a lot of "SD mp4" files (lower rez but formatted with HD dimensions) which look pretty good on my 23" monitor and saved on the 2-5 GB full HD size.

NAVIGATION: The more I review and look at porn sites the more I see sites that just grow too big for their original navigation systems and become, at best, a chore to slog through. Since my last join here years ago they have completely revamped their navigation and it freakin' actually works well. Only a few clicks will get you where you want. You can browse through a 1000 pics and with two back button clicks you're out to update page for any site. You can search in various ways except really the tags because they're inconsistent but then I've never seen a really good tag system on a large site.

You can create favorite lists, the sites track the scenes you've looked at that you can easily access and there's lots of opportunity to give feedback and interact if you're into that. The model directory has actual info and lets you follow porn stars.

OVERALL: I'm not really into the big tit slutty porn star thing but I found that I downloaded about 500 photo sets and about 80 vids so I can't say I was disappointed. You got teens, milfs, uniforms, bit butts, big tits, squirting, etc. to choose from so unless you're into softcore or lez you should be able find a few goodies.

Production values since 2009 are great and you get a ton of models.

My negative impressions are mostly minor. A few broking links, the site bogged down my Firefox browser after 2 hours (probably need more ram), and even with all the sites and models the porn does get a little repetitive but then again this is a pretty mainstream porn network.

While I'm not ready to sell out and go sign myself up for life to the silicon boob of the day club I was pretty impressed with the site. If I were to score it just on content and production value it'd only be in the mid 80's but the well thought out navigation and ease of use are some of the best I've seen which bumps up the score to 92. At last, a pleasant surprise.

11-27-13  08:32pm

Replies (1)
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC

No Review.
04-25-08  02:49pm

Visit 21Sextury.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Sweet TBP/PU rate of $20 to join, eventually dropping to $10 month for ongoing membership
+ Thousands (maybe even 10k) of scenes
+ 25 sites network initially, expands to about 41 after a month
+ Good navigation and the search engine looks amazing and goes across the whole network
+ No DRM and no DL limits
+ Newest vids on the flagship sites (PixandVideo, Club Sandy, etc.) go up to 1900x1080
+ All pic sets have zips
+ Professional effects, lighting and photography on the flagship sites
+ Clearly marked updates
+ No cross sales or advertising
+ Lots of hot euro babes
+ Wide variety of content with multiple daily updates across the network
+ Archive going back to 2003 on the oldest sites; all exclusive content on the flagship sites
Cons: - For the first month, only SweetSophieMoone, AssholeFever, PixandVideo, ClubSandy, LezCuties, FootsieBabes and BlueAngelLive have anything great to offer. (I refer to these below as the Flagship Sites)
- Scenes aren't tagged real well so the awesome looking search engine can leave stuff out.
- Broken links on some photos and preview thumbs (click the "x", it's probably there) and I got a few bad video downloads.
- DL speeds not so hot (mostly 120 to 500 kps, the more channels I have going the faster it seems to go for me).
- Pic sizes are obsolete for the level of quality they otherwise offer.
- Zips and movie files are not labeled well.
Bottom Line: I used to love the individual sites but rarely joined in the past because of price. With the sweet PU/TBP deal, I couldn't resist and will probably stay a member for many months, damn near a first for me. Here's the low down:

PICS: All scenes have zip but all pic sizes are limited to 1280x850. WTF? The flagship sites here scream quality but they're still launching 20th century quality with their pic sizes. Most scenes have 100 to 160 pics. Also, when viewing pics individually the horizontal slide bar doesn't automatically appear on landscape shots (again, why?). Once you get past the Flagships, the pics are few and far between but there is plenty to keep you going with the big 6 sites.

VIDS: Awesome size on the newest vids. Most of the stuff within the last few years maxes out at 1280. The oldest content and a lot of the content outside the flagship sites peaks at 640 or even 460. You do get 10 screen caps minimum to see what you're getting. You can DL full scenes or scenes. In browser stream is an option and works well. On the most recent content, you usually have 3 download options, only 1 or 2 on the older. Full scene file sizes range from about 40 mb (low quality) to 2 gigs (best quality). DL speed is an issue as I noted above.

SEARCH: There is a 25 filter search system which looks awesome. As noted, the problem lies in the lack of adequate tags. Thus, the system sort of defeats itself and you're better off just going through the sites you like one by one. There is a central model directory which appears complete but no model bio's are given.

As for "the rest": Some sites have lots of dead links for pics and the like. Just click them, they usually bring something up but it's annoying and a pretty basic problem to overcome. If you liked the old calendar version of the site, the new set up takes a little getting used to. However, after a few days I found it much easier to use, especially on a network this size and found they had lots of options for customizing. It didn't take more than a few clicks to go and get what I wanted.

A big issue for me is why are they adding all this content beyond the flagship sites for the first month. It's obviously 3rd party produced and the models and production values just aren't up to 21stSextury snuff. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with Brazzers or NewSensations and add a bunch of sites to pump up the numbers and add "new" sites with overlapping content. My advice is to keep your standards up and focus on the good sites you already had. I'll take quality over quantity ... especially if you boost your pic sizes.

Lastly, despite the many negatives I pointed out, I'm still scoring this one a "91" simply because of the volume of content on even just the flagship sites, the hot babes and hot videos. With more sites coming to me soon, it can only get better. Well worth a join even if it leaves this picture fan a bit miffed.

02-24-10  07:17pm

Replies (12)
Visit Met Art

Met Art

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM
Cons: - No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy
Bottom Line: As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.

I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.

As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.

Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate.

05-29-08  06:09pm

Replies (2)
Visit Suze Randall

Suze Randall

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Suze is a legend
- Huge Photo Archieve
- Multiple Download Options
- Model Search & Index
- Good Customer Service
- Hot babes if glamor and/or fetish is your thing
- Sweet $4.77 full trial
Cons: - Some photo sets are limited (not showing full suite of photos)
- Some "pseudo porn" on the old sets
- You have to hunt for the trial offers
- Possibly some set rotation but does not appear to happen often
- No videos (based solely on the trial offer I signed up for)
Bottom Line: (Note: This is a review for Suze.net only, it does not cover suzevideo.net)

If you love huge quantities of quality photos of hot girls then this is the place for you. If you're not familiar with Suze think of Penthouse and Hustler as the standard I'm talking about.

I was at Suze.net a few months ago and just came back and what a difference. You now get 10 years of photos which means 500+ boy/girl sets, 300+ girl/girl sets, 1600+ centerfolds and hundreds of additional sets. The sets allow zip and download options of 800, 1024 and 1400 pixels. The sets prior to '03 generally lack the 1400 option. The sets generally had 50 - 100 pics each with older ones usually having less than 50.

A lot of this stuff I hadn't seen since the days when a 56k connection was high speed, Jill Kelly ruled and white guys with names like "Dale DaBoner" swung their stuff. Depsite the fact that many of the sets were older they didn't seem too dated given the glamor/fetish emphasis of the site.

My only dislikes were that the older sets had a lot of psuedo (aka nonpenetration porn) and that Suze keeps shifting her trial offers. I'm a cheap bastard and I eventually found a tgp link that got me into the $4.77 full trial as advertised by TBP. Otherwise, it's hit or miss on the posted trial amounts if you go to the site. Also, a few sets I had seen before lacked all the images available.

With a full trial of less than $10 you simply can't go wrong. Basically, this site rocks.

03-31-08  02:27pm

Replies (0)
Visit Hands on Hardcore

Hands on Hardcore

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging.
+ Exclusive content.
+ About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general.
+ Professional quality production and lighting.
+ Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time).
+ Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser.
+ High quality pics, all with zips.
+ Good model directory and generally good search.
+ All updates are date stamped for future reference.
+ Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well.
Cons: - Not all HD labelled vids are HD.
- Search options for pics are worthless.
- Content gets a bit repetitive.
- Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work.
- As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality.
- Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out.
- Need more screen cap previews for the vids.
- Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it.
Bottom Line: I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny:

PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets.

VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not.

The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going.

Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here.

04-07-13  08:33pm

Replies (1)
Visit Hot Legs and Feet

Hot Legs and Feet

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.

VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.

OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.

The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).

If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.

I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.

01-26-11  02:26pm

Replies (2)
Visit Asshole Fever

Asshole Fever

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Currently 305 scenes available, all with pics and vid
+ Newest max vid sizes are 1900x1080 with most maxing out at 1280 (smaller for the oldest stuff)
+ No DL limits and Downloadthemall DL manager works
+ Awesome $20 initial join fee (dropping down to $10 after 2 months) through TBP.
+ Access to 25 other sites including ClubSandy and PixandVideo right away.
+ Excellent search engine with 25 filter categories.
+ Model directory spans the whole network
+ Exclusive content with no apparent recycling
+ Loads of hot euro babes taking it where the sun don't shine (all HC content).
+ Professional photography and video with very good lighting.
+ Wide variety of content (MF, DP, Indoor/Outdoor, etc.)
+ Average sized watermarks in cornor
Cons: - Only 1 update per week
- Pic sizes are too small given the overall quality of this site.
- Some problems with downloads not coming through.
- Some problems viewing pics in the browser
- New site design is fine but navigation could be a bit better
- Logging in is a major eye strain (their teeny sized authorization letters you have to copy are almost impossible to read)
- Some of the action gets a bit rough and/or mechanical
- Some nonworking links (not many though and mostly individual pictures)
Bottom Line: If you can't even handle watching your dog/cat lick it's butt, then this site is probably not for you. It's all hot looking euro babes taking like champions where the sun don't shine. Here's the "scoop" (not to be confused with scooping your animals poop):

PICS: All pic sets have accompanying video (and seem to match the video in terms of content) and all sets have zip. Excellent quality with only a little air brushing from what I can tell. Bad news, pic sizes are only 1280x850. On average, you get between 100 and 180 pics per set with most pics being 250-300kb in size. Why do sites always seem to do this; getting hung up on video while neglecting their photos standards? These sizes don't cut it any more. Also, when viewing photos individually in the browser, I found that the landscape shots get cut off with a monitor setting of 1080x720. They have an up/down slider bar for portrait pics but no right/left slider bar for landscape. WTF?

VIDS: As noted elsewhere, newest max size vid downloads come in at 1900x1080 with most on this site being 1280 by 850. You can stream in browser at L, M and H and download in L, M and H in either .wmv or mp4 settings. File sizes on full length vids vary from about 2 gigs on the newest and largest to about 40 MB on the smallest. Each scene has 10 scene screen caps with scene and full scene download/stream options. Almost no music in vids and I haven't found any scenes yet with direction cues being shouted out. I did have a few problems with some vids just not downloading correctly and having to redo them.

They have redone their navigation on 21sextury so now after you log in you get a page that looks like a blog almost. It's easy to jump around but it takes a few clicks to get to what you want if just trying to find, say, all of the scenes in a single site. Once you get used to that, their filter system on the search engine is one of the best I've seen but the scenes aren't tagged very well so relying solely on the search functions will leave out some of the goodies that should be included.

Unfortunately, the action sometime gets a bit over the top with chicks just being pounded up the poop shoot because the shot calls for it. While these hot euro babes take it well, there's still a difference between just taking it and actual acting (same with the guys too). The overriding theme here is the anal action doesn't seem very spontaneous or a taboo thrill. The action can still be hot but it's just not all I hoped it would be.

I'm scoring this site an 87 on it's own. I'll be working a review on the whole 21sextury.com site soon, probably scoring the network in the low 90's. If you like butt sex, this is one of the best sites I've seen out there. Considering the network you get and the great price (after the second month you only pay $10 a month for a recurring membership) you simply can't go wrong in my butt ... er, I mean book.

02-17-10  03:46pm

Replies (7)
Visit My XXX Pass

My XXX Pass

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ 13 network site
+ Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Good mix of Euro and American babes
+ Good action and professional quality shoots
+ Good download speeds on vids
+ No DRM or download limits.
Cons: - Cross sales on sign-up page
- A lot more action in the vids than the pics
- Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics
- Search is OK but could be better
- Each site in network updates 2x per month
- A few deadlinks and pics that don't load
Bottom Line: I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases.

Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files.

Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot.

There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good.

There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning.

Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal.

05-13-09  11:05pm

Replies (3)
Visit Brazzers


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 22 sites and growing of exclusive hardcore content
+ No DRM, No DL limits
+ Multiple daily updates, nearly 2000 scenes throughout the network
+ Good search function across whole network
+ Very good user interface
+ All scenes have vids and pics (pics have zip)
+ Scenes actually have story lines although acting is, well, about average for pornstars
+ 40 bonus sites (nonexclusive third party movie clips, not really worth it but it's there)
Cons: - Pics are a bummer coming in at 900x600
- Video quality is just OK
- Too many pics in sets but they're getting better (new stuff has 700-1000 pics per set)
- 8 of the network sites no longer update
- Some minor technical problems
- Quality is only OK but certainly not amateur
- Smallish opaque watermark but it sometimes gets in the way of the action
Bottom Line: I reviewed this site 10 mos. ago but recently rejoined and I'm re-reviewing as I was too harsh on my initial take. For the uninitiated, this is a large network focusing on the Sir Mix-a-Lot school of porn (big booty and big busts). I'm not really a fan of the genre but there is enough content to satisfy just about everyone: they have big tit, big butt, anal, teen, interracial, schoolgirl and milf content. For those into American girl booty, silicone and tats, it's probably about the best site around for you.

PHOTOS: I'm a photo guy and so all I can say is that you join here for the vids. For some reason, the "Walmart's of Porn" (Brazzers, Newsensations, RealityKings, NaughtyAmerica -- they make their money on volume while the quality is spotty) all seem to go small with the pics (900x600). You get too many landscape shots here with a lot of dead space (hint, turn the camera sideways and zoom in a bit more). What is frustrating here is that some sets have random 1350x900 shots so they obviously know how to make them. Some shots are a bit grainy and out of focus but overall they are OK for the size.

VIDEOS: Vids come in WMV, Mpeg1, Mpeg4, and Ipod/psp formats and have a streaming option. The vids are not hi-def and come in clips or full length. They average about 30 min. long and are about 300-400 megs in size. Screen size is 640x480. Sort of like the pics, sometimes they get too much "dead space" in the shots but for the most part they are well done and entertaining with no talking camera men (yay).

I would say this site has the best user interface I've seen on a porn site. You can rate each scene and post comments. They have a "personal favorites" function too. There is a user forum with a ton of postings although it's mostly "Beavis & Butthead" level commentary. There are discount (tastefully small) ads for other sites with good prices. There is a very good search function with multiple search options available.

I did have some small technical issues: a few browser crashes, some sets had pics that didn't match the thumbnails, some dead links and pages that wouldn't load but most of these were overcome.

As an aside, I was happy to see Nicole Sheridan come out of retirement for a hot new scene here.

I'm scoring this site an 86 for two reasons. The main issue is quality. Like I said, Brazzer's has the Wal-Mart mentality of porn: they produce a lot and have reasonable membership fees with frequent discounts but they skimp on the quality. They're getting better but still have a ways to go. With HD vids and hi-rez pics, I'd put a score of 90 or more on this site. The other reason is that it does get a bit stale. A lot of scenes seem alike, performers appear in multiple genres, and the girls they use are usually not top shelf "hottie" talent.

Like I said, there is enough here for most anyone to get their money's worth for a month. It's not the best site but it's certainly worth a membership to check it out.

12-10-08  10:19pm

Replies (4)
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + 1200+ scenes of mostly hardcore Eastern Euro hotties. Heavy emphasis on school girl and massage themes.
+ Huge pics (5700x3800) with zips, about 125 pics per set.
+ 1900x1200 HD vids with multiple download options and in browser playback. Generally good download speeds - 700 mb/sec or more on multiple channels when not in peak time).
+ Good $15 per month price through TBP.
+ Updates 2-3 times a week.
+ Professional production value.
Cons: - Site is sensitive to peak traffic times and can slow down a lot.
- Prechecked cross sale on sign up and advertising and cross sales in members area.
- Very little English in vids.
- A fair amount of anal if you're not into that.
- Almost all nonexclusive content (all stuff you see on Teenmegaworld and places like that).
- Site went through a "bad phase" around 2012 with some sub par material.
- A few problems with in browser streaming, fixed by watching in mp4 mode.
- Navigation just OK. Some missing tags and mislabelled scenes.
Bottom Line: Let's be clear here. You're not joining this site for exclusive content. Most of this stuff comes from other sites. What you're joining for is the better quality you get here over other sites so it's really more of a collectors site than a casual porn surfers paradise. You can find more quantity for about the same money elsewhere.

This is my second time around and while I joined expecting one thing I actually got 3 things. The oldest content is straight hardcore from Teenmegaworld. That's what I expected. Then, around 2012, the site jumped to daily updates and the quality of the girls and production value went down and you got a lot of solo girl scene. Over the last 15 months you now get something more like WOWGirls which is high production value, bright lights and more "heartcore" level porn but with some "tender anal" (an oxymoron?) thrown in. Interesting. Overall, I'd say the site is 75% hardcore now.

Here's a breakdown:

PICS: Pics are huge and that's I why I came back. I will note the cropping has gotten a bit tighter (I like full body) but it's still very good. The stuff around 2012 is not very good and poorly cropped. Save some hard drive room because the zip sets come in around 500 mb per set.

The most recent "heartcore" stuff is almost exclusively back lit with very bright sun light or lamps which can cause some pixelation and washout of the pic which can be annoying at times.

VIDS: I did have some playback issues with in stream browser as noted above. Download speeds varied a lot by time of day (peak traffic times sucked). Vids were very good quality overall though. Most vids were 20-25 minutes long and overall specs matched TBP's review specs. Again, with the brightly back lit new content, washout can appear in some scenes.

NAV: Like almost every porn site I come across, navigation needs work. You get only 3 search functions (hardcore, lez and solo) and the tagging for more detailed search is too inconsistent to bother with. At least updates are date stamped. The model directory seemed complete. Page jumps are also limited.

There aren't many male actors here and, as on reviewer complained, a few are a bit rough with the girls but this isn't uncommon with Eastern Euro porn and it's not terrible. The most recent models seem to have limp dick issues but don't overly detract from the scenes.

The site does get a bit repetitive, especially the last year or so with the constantly bright lit scenes and unending parade of massage and bedroom school girl scenes but there are definitely worse things to see than hot girls having sex.

Overall, if you know what are getting into and value quality over sheer quantity then this is definitely a place to consider. I gave this site an 85 rating mostly because of navigation/search and nonexclusive content.

01-09-15  02:32pm

Replies (4)
Visit Twistys


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Tons of babes and content
+ 3 photo set and 2 vid updates daily
+ Pic sizes up to 3000 pixels
+ Vids from 2009 onward go up to 1280x720
+ High quality search and model directory
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Good 2 day full access trial for $2.44 through the bonus sites
+ 6 other sites offered of which only 3 have original content
+ Professional, high quality content
+ One of the better forums I've seen for members
+ Smallish or nonexistent watermarks
+ Good customer service
Cons: - Download speeds were a bit slow for me but it may just be a prolem on my end.
- Vids before 2009 mostly max out at 480x360
- Most of the pic sets clock in at 1020 x 720 or smaller
- Some advertising on the site but not terrible
- The 3k pixel photos only available in zip format
- A lot of nonexclusive content
Bottom Line: I was last here in '08 when I dished out an 81. Glad to see things have improved although, as we know, there's always room for improvement.

Pictures: About 9500 solo sets, 1350 HC sets and 880 lez sets. As noted, in '09 Twisty's started putting out 3000 pixel pictures but only in the zip sets. Why Shap? Especially since other sites go this big as an option and sometimes we just want to pluck the good stuff as opposed to downloading an 80mb file only to toss most of it later. Most sets have about 100 pics. Pics are professional and generally very good in terms of quality and lighting with some airbrushing, mostly on the solo sets. All sets have a zip function. Watermark is small, posting dates are included, and slideshow option is available (all definitely welcomed). About the only real negative is that most of the pics are 1020 or smaller but this is somewhat expected given the extensive history of content available.

Videos: About 1900 solo scenes, 950 HC scenes and 250 lez scenes available. As noted, the new stuff clocks in at 1280 sized and is very impressive in terms of quality. However, most of the stuff is 480x360. Once you go back more than about 18 months, you don't even get vid caps to see what the scenes contain (pain in the but). The oldest vids only come in clips, not full length scene. DL's available in WMV, MOV or pointless "phone" sized.

The model directory is excellent although, like most sites, sometimes models mysteriously pick up new names. The search has numerous variations available to sift through the content. Mostly, the tags seem pretty thorough but they are a bit weak on the oldest content in my opinion.

While they do have some exclusive content, most of the stuff is nonexclusive and can be found at other megasite / pornstar sites. Not necessarily bad, especially considering the trial price, but quality is sometimes downgraded in my comparisons to other sites when it comes to pic size, pic count per set, and video DL options.

The forum seems to be inhabited by people who are usually successful in getting their point across and they have lots of useful topics there. One of the better forums I've seen in pornland (excluding PU naturally).

I'm giving my score of 85 based solely on the Twistys content. Bump it up to about an 87 or 88 when you factor in the other sites (Annette Dawn, Bluefantasies and Naughtystaff are the only ones worth visiting).

Basically, you're not getting the cream of the crop of here in terms of quality or exclusivity. However, you are getting a ton of pretty good to very good content that keeps updating regularly and can keep you occupied for a while. This site should be rocking in a few more years when they get a lot more HD vids and if they bump the pic sizes to 3000 pixels outside of the zip only function.

01-26-10  07:49pm

Replies (0)
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Freakin' huge amount of content
+ Good $20 TBP monthly membership
+ 30 updates per week (6 per day, M - F)
+ Good customer interaction with model ratings, personal favorites section, set/scene comments and a forum
+ No DRM
+ Supports download managers
+ Large photos (newest at 2500x1660) and all sets have zips and slideshow option and many have no or very small watermarks
+ Newer material appears to be mostly exclusive
+ Full tour available before joining
Cons: - Search function leaves a real nasty after taste
- More of a pic site than a video site
- Model names are strange here and model info is few and far between
- Quality varies
- "Teen" concept loosely defined, lots of 21 to 25 year olds.
- Older material is mostly nonexclusive
Bottom Line: I had high hopes when I joined this baby but was only moderately entertained: sort of like dating someone who you know ain't quite right but running with it anyways just for the sex ;) This site features a lot of Euro babes with the emphasis on photography.

Photos: 1280 HC sets, 1600 lez, 6000 solo and a smattering of other categories. As mentioned the newest stuff clocks in at 1660x2500 with older stuff at 2000x1300 or 1020x715 and a few 800x600. All have zip and many have a slideshow feature. Be wary if you're joining for the HC. 75% of this is leased content added a few years ago that's on all the megasites as is some newer stuff. Most of the newer solo stuff is exclusive but, again, a lot of the stuff past a couple of years ago is not. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics; oldest sets are smaller.

Vids = 560 HC, 180 Lez, and 800 solo. You get only get a couple of vid updates a week. Newest stuff is 720x480 on WMV while older is 350x240. Stream rates were only OK. Like the pics, you've probably seen the older stuff around.

My biggest beef is with the search function. There is 9 function search engine so it looks promising. However, even when limiting yourself to 1 or 2 of options you either get a couple of results or a ton of results. The only real way to find out what's there is to use the model directory or search by lez, HC or solo categories. With this much content that spells "p-a-i-n".

The pain goes deeper when you look at the categories. They use a magazine cover to show the girl but often times it's the same used for every shoot the girl does. You don't know what the content of the shoot is unless you dig into it.

There is very little if any info on most of the models. A lot of models, even known ones, somehow get stuck with different names so it's hard to find exactly what you're looking for.

Most of the emphasis here is on the youngish gals doing photo solo sets. For the most part, they were only OK. Not much eroticism or tease factor here. Part of this is due to the fact that they get a lot of their stuff from outside sources. This factor also explains why the quality can vary from set to set. Some are great, others are poorly cropped and shot.

The girls are generally fairly attractive. Not top shelf but not off the street either. Thankfully there was not a lot of silicon here, at least in the solo content and newer HC stuff.

This site gets an 85 for sheer volume, good pic sizes and good newer vids. You also get acccess to the Vivthomas bonus site. Not as big as his "real" site but not bad. It's definitely one of the better bonus sites you can get. It loses ground on it's half ass search function, varying quality and the fact that the older stuff has been around the block a few times.

If you like solo girls and pics this is a pretty good place for the value; just plan on spending some time digging through it all.

02-24-09  09:33pm

Replies (4)
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy
++ Very good tags and cross site search functions
++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p
+ Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie
+ Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff
+ Good monthly price through TBP
+ Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form.
+ Lots of American girls
+ Professional lighting and production value
+ Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue.
+ All the content besides the live shows is hardcore
Cons: -- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics)
-- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes
-- Slow site at times (they need more servers)
- Cross sales on signup
- Stupid social networking keeps popping up
Bottom Line: I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve.

PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help.

VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though.

OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes).

There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics.

The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen).

The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6.

So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again.

07-11-11  03:42pm

Replies (3)
Visit Nakedby


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Excellent photography featuring natural French girls
+ About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content)
+ High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics
+ Good 7 day full access trial of $10
+ Some model information provided and nice clean site design
+ Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week)
+ No DRM
Cons: - Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options
- Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set)
- Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone)
- Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book
- Zip feature only available in medium size
Bottom Line: Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here.

Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here.

There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites.

For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either.

Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side.

08-14-08  03:48pm

Replies (0)
Visit Suze Video

Suze Video

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Expanded libary now (100s of videos each in several different categories)
- Lots of attractive models
- No DRM
- Good customer support
- Good unrestricted trial offer (when available)
- Professional camera work
Cons: - Download speeds a little slow
- Video quality is average at best
- Navigation could be better
Bottom Line: I recently did a review of suze.net (photos site only) and recently reupped for the combined suze.net and suzevideo.net. I'm limiting my review here to the videos.

I'm primarily into photos and didn't spend a lot of time with the videos. You have several download options in WMV format. I did note that the speeds were a little slow and you don't get hi res, just average video quality at best. For the most part, the women are attractive and the scenes are hot so that is the trade off.

Navigation is a but of a bummer for both sites. When you have years worth of material but can only jump 2 pages at time you think they would make paging easier.

In a nutshell, the videos arent' bad, the most recent videos are best. However, Suze and company started in the photography era and the photos are probably the best part of the site. Maybe this will change. I would probably stick to the trial offer when they advertise for one -- in my other review I noted that you have to hunt for their trials but they are out there.

04-17-08  04:25pm

Replies (0)
Visit Suze Randall

Suze Randall

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Full access 7 day trial for $10 through TBP
+ Almost all original content. Some shared DDF and Holly Randall content.
+ Lots of content: About 650 hardcore photo sets and 4800 pic sets overall and all sets have zip function. About 1500 videos.
+ Membership includes Suze Classics for those looking to fill their 80's and 90's porn fix (that site factors into all the stats mentioned here).
+ Newest pics have 2400x1600 resolution and newest vids are HD with 1080 resolution. Newest vids have a stream option and multiple download options including wmv and mp4 files.
+ Good consistent download speeds of between 1MB - 2 MB/sec up to 6 channels.
+ Starting to remaster some of the old content
+ If you like glamor porn this is probably one of the best sites to visit. Has porn star from today back to the 80's.
+ Multiple weekly updates and all updates are dated for future reference.
Cons: - Search function and tags are a mess and not real helpful.
- There is a model directory but no model info.
- No screen caps or ability to preview vids. I couldn't make the stream function jump ahead, I had to wait for the movie to buffer in order to jump while watching on line.
- Quality takes a nose diver prior to 2010 with no HD vids and pic sets maxing out at 1000x1600 with most sets having smaller pics. Older vids don't have stream capability so you have to download them to know what they're like and the quality can be almost unwatchable by today's standards.
- Fairly generic porn with mostly known porn stars.
- Some advertising on each page.
- There is a forum and FAQ section but it looks to be pretty much dead.
Bottom Line: I last joined this about 5 years ago and dug it since it had a lot of content, decent pic sizes and decent videos for the time. However, time is not always kind and this site has been left a bit in the dust and it's caused me knock 8 points off of my original score. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: I still this site primarily as a photo site. There are more vids now but pix are what Suze got started doing back in the 70's and this is what Holly Randall, who does the shoots today, mostly focuses on. Tons of pics but most sets have less than 50 pics which is a bit skimpy. The sets, at least the older ones, also have jumbled material so when you look at them online or unzip the folders the content doesn't progress smoothly from beginning to end. This was the case 5 years ago and is so today. The oldest material (probably half) has pic sizes that work only if you view porn on your phone. They are slowly (I mean slowly) remastering some old stuff into larger sizes but only by scanning the original pics which results in some graininess. Everything has zips.

VIDS: The newest vids are great but there aren't a lot of them. As mentioned, the lack of a preview or screen caps isn't fun, especially when probably 2/3 of the vids don't have in browser stream options. The quality is all over the board to on the older vids, some are fine and others aren't worth it. Personally, I got frustrated because I'm not going to DL and watch a slew of vids just to see if I like the content.

NAV: Navigation, in a word, "bites". The navigation is the same system they've since they opened I think and it shows. You can search pix by tags but you can't search videos this way, you have to search all "hardcore" for example to find the vids mixed in with the pix. You only get 10 search results by page and you can only jump ahead or behind by a few pages. When you have 100's of scenes with the same tag this is a pain. Also, if you relied on the tag "hardcore" you would think they stopped shooting hardcore in 2010. Nope. You have to look under different tags to find the newer stuff. Some vid scenes of the same photo shoot also have different tags. A small minority of tagged scenes do not appear in the tag search results either. Basically this site is too big for this crap and it definitely hurt the final score. They need to scrap the status quo and start over on the layout and search/tag system.

I liked this site more before because I was more into glam sites since most amateur or gonzo sites didn't appeal to me. Now, when I look it and see the over saturated colors, small editors choice photo sets and porn stars past their prime doing generic scenes it doesn't do as much for me. DDF, 21stsextury, the WOW sites, teenmegaworld and others do a much better job of giving you fresh faces, quantity, quality and all in a more user friendly package.

Overall, I still recommend the site given the vast amount of original material it has and the ability to look at the "classic" porn of the last few decades. Also, a lot of the content is decent in quality and the stuff within the last 18 months or so is top notch in terms of HD vids and large pic sizes. So, it's worth a join but probably not for month, the 7 day trial is probably all you need unless you have limited time to hunt through the site to find all the goodies.

01-31-13  07:26pm

Replies (3)
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Decent price through TBP ($15 a month)
+ Decent amount of content (about 370 HD scenes as of this date)
+ Some exclusive content
+ Regular Updates, about 5 to 7 per week
+ Huge picture sets with zips and has multiple options for the size of the thumbnail galleries.
+ Good download speeds on vids (600-700 kbs, up to 6 channels using a broadband connection)
+ Multiple view options (stream, HD download in .wmv and iphone / regular formats in Quicktime)
+ 3 bonus video sites (note, most of the vids listed in the TBP facts section counts these vids)
+ Has a "My Favorites" where you can tag favorite scenes and you can leave comments on scenes and rate them.
+ Bills through Epoch
Cons: - A lot of this content is available through the teenmegaworld.com site. However, the quality of the content is better here.
- Navigation needs updating
- Search function needs a lot of work
- Not Firefox friendly (could only download vids using Internet Exploder browser)
- No screencaps but when looking at the flash movie you can jump ahead quickly through the scenes.
- No model info or real model directory
- No FAQs page or help page, all requests for help must be sent via email.
- More download options on the vids and pics would be nice.
- Cross sales on the signup page
Bottom Line: It's been a while since I sniffed (not snuffed) out some young Eastern Euro hotties and this site fit the bill and the budget. It's primarily a teen hardcore site with about 20% of the content being solo or lesbian. There's also a fair amount of anal action as well.

PICS: The pics are freakin' huge clocking in at over 5600 pixels and they have zips. Even the old pics are over 3000 pixels. While most sets have 100 - 200 pics I wish they had more as they are somewhat repetitive and the action doesn't cover a lot of positions. You get to chose your thumbnail size but, sadly, they only show 25 thumbs per page. There is a slideshow but it only works with the default low rez photos (about 900x600). To see the hi rez stuff you have to zip them or click on the low rez photo and have a new window open up that shows the high rez photo. The only zip option is high rez.

VIDEOS: As I said, good download speeds and the movies are about 20 - 30 minutes long. Again, the vids are good size (see TBP for all the specs, they seem accurate). Sadly, you can only download in HD using .wmv but thankfully they're not massive files (around 1 gig per movie). The iphone and regular movies are only available in Quicktime but they still look good. Each movie is available in a flash stream mode and you can jump around fairly quickly. No screen caps so watch the flash vid or scan the pics to see if you like it. Like I said, I couldn't get video downloads to work in Mozilla (old and new versions) so some of you might not dig that.

NAVIGATION: From what I've read, this site seems to have grown a lot in the last year and the growing pains have caught up with it. There is no model directory or model info. The scenes are poorly tagged so typing in a search request gives you spotty results at best. There are only a couple of general categories listed so that's no help either. You best bet is just to page through it all but that's a pain in the ass too. You get 12 scenes per page. After that you can either go "next page", "back page" or "last page" to jump to the end. They really need a page jump system and they need jump capabilities at both the top and bottom of each page, not just the bottom like they have now. Too much clicking and scrolling right now.

I also don't understand why they have a bunch of "tube video" stuff on each page and as a category. This is a pretty good quality site that I paid money for so why would I want to look at nonexclusive tube quality videos? Sometimes more is less though some may disagree with me on this one.

The bonus sites are nothing to write home about. Mostly second tier movies and amateur stuff (no HD here, just normal vid sizes) through some other service. Nothing exclusive or new about them as is typical with most bonus content. Like the tube video stuff, I'd say they've grown enough where they really don't all this extra stuff at this point to justify the price of admission.

Overall, the quality of their content is very good and the girls are mostly cute (no heavy set types here). If you've recently joined teenmegaworld then I'd pass on this site unless you want to upgrade the quality since it's far better here than at that site. Given the price and quality it's a good site. The nonexclusivity of a lot of their content, the navigation and the search issues hold this site back a few points but still worth it in my book.

02-23-12  04:53pm

Replies (3)
Visit Only 3X

Only 3X

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Daily updates back to July '06
+ No DRM
+ Good sized pics (most 1600x1065 or larger) and all have zips
+ Many HD vids (1280 wmv) and rest come in up to 512 or 640 wmv
+ Some exclusive content and a good content mix (about 2/3 HC and the rest is lez and solo)
+ Decent $15 month discount through TBP
Cons: - Navigation and technical issues caused unnecessary pain and suffering
- Lots of nonexclusive photo sets and partial sets
- Quality can vary from OK to very good
- Not DL manager friendly
- Issues with having to keep logging in
- Incomplete model directory
- Large-ish opaque watermark in lower right cornor on all pics and some vids
Bottom Line: The bottom line here is that this site initially comes across as being in the same general family as 1byday or Pixandvideo but it's really more the red headed step child as it ain't getting, or giving, enough love and is stuck with the second tier material.

When you log in you can view the material by model directory, some general categories or the monthly calendar layout. The model directory is incomplete so it's easiest to view by the calendar. You don't know if a certain day is a pic or vid unless you hold your browser pointer over it (files ending in F = photo, V = vid and A = both although there are very few pics to see in these). There were also a few other technical glitches I came across but nothing too bad.

Click on a day and new window pops up (must turn off pop-up blocker). Then you select the vid size or photo. Sometimes you get another window, sometimes not. This makes it ill sutied to DL managers. Don't open any other windows or make browser changes because you'll be logged out. Don't leave the site unattended for more than 10 minutes or you get logged out. After a few hours you'll get logged out. Each time you have to circle back to where you left off.

Photos. Most of the photos are nonexclusive except for the photos that have matching vid sets (most sets don't have pics and vids, just one or the other). The nonexclusive stuff ranges from the older and more obscure stuff not many have seen to the stuff on every megasite. Some of the nonexclusive stuff gets pixeled at the 1600 level. The exclusive sets can be incomplete in comparison to the vids and are smaller (most come in at around 60 to 80 pics). There are some HD pic sets (3500x2300) but you'll be pressed to find more than 20 per set and they download seperately and copy the the regular resolution pics of the set so it's more of a novelty than an attraction.

Videos. The vids are pretty good except for the first few months were quality is average. Pretty much all the vids come in up to 512 or 640 wmv and the download speeds are OK. The quality on the vids is generally better than the pics and there are more vids than photo sets on this site. There are more HD vids with the newer material (2008).

The updates (daily) vary. Some months you get a bunch of pics, others a bunch of vids. When the photo and vid sets match, the "mate" set can be weeks or months apart.

The actors are all euro models except for some of the nonexclusive stuff. Most of the women are attractive but not many total hotties like the more premium sites. It claims to be brutally HC but there's really nothing too brutal about it but there is some anal and dp action.

Overall, the site isn't bad considering the price and the amount of content. If you can get over the technical issues it's not bad but the quality does vary, especially on pics. I wanted to give a higher score when I first joined but for now an 83 seems appropriate in my book.

11-19-08  04:57pm

Replies (2)
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Excellent photography
- Mostly attractive girls from all over the world
- Good customer service
- No DRM
- Multiple photo download options
- Good customer support
Cons: - Video quality is average
- Most of the models are not very "livley"
- Wish there were more models to choose from
Bottom Line: As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice.

As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times.

I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative.

All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again.

04-08-08  09:56pm

Replies (4)
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Exclusive content that updates 5x a week.
+ Good $10, 30 day membership through TBP.
+ Great 2500 x 1700 pics with zips and true 1080 HD vids with good download speeds. 4 DL options for vids including mobile device sized. Also streaming available with good speeds and ability to jump within a scene.
+ Smallish watermarks
+ Attractive girls (18 - 30 range) with few "enhancements". A good mix between porn stars and more unknowns, at least to me.
+ A unique site in terms of the artistic and hardcore factors it tries to combine.
+ A good mix of content (about 40% HC, 40% solo, and 20% lez).
+ User ratings and comments sections and social media connections.
Cons: - Tags / search engine is poor.
- Navigation needs an overhaul.
- Some ads on main page and when logging in.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- The "artistic" feel the site is trying to convey gets lost with bad lighting, bad composition and iffy camera / cropping work.
- Very few positions shown for all scenes.
- Has a model directory but with very little info.
- You get timed out somewhat quickly and there are capcha's every time you log in.
- A fair amount of photoshopping and post production effects going on.
- More complicated than usual cancellation process. Web based cancel system doesn't seem to work (call or use email -- aka: don't wait until the end before trying to cancel). Also, must cancel at least 7 days before end of 30 days to keep from getting rebilled.
Bottom Line: This is my first voyage into the world of "heartcore" / "lovecore" figuring it looked like it had great quality and would be something different. True, it was different. You won't find anal, dp's, gagging and the like here which is fine by me. I'd like to think that years of overexposure to gonzo porn and too much degrading porn (sort of the default it seems) has made me so jaded to my inner sensitive new age guy. However, even using that standard of measure this site just didn't seem to add up for me. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: The setup looked good. Site has about 125 HC, 56 lez, and 106 solo sets (all have 100 or more pics) and the pics are quite large with zips. However, it quickly broke down. When viewing in browser, the default setting is for a slideshow but you can click to a thumbnail layout. If you click on a thumbnail and go back a page you get the slideshow again. Way too much clicking. You can only view the full sized pics by DL'ing the zips; the inbrowser view is only 800x550. Additionally, you can't even see all the thumbnails and the way the thumbnails are laid out (horizontal as opposed to the usual vertical) you have to use their in browser "forward arrow" which is clunky at best.

There are several photographers working here and most seem to be too damn artsy for their own good. Lots of scenes use natural lighting which results in dark pics and lots of shadows. Also the default seems to be to have the camera in a fixed position which limits the angles and views we're used to seeing.

For hardcore, there is a big focus on foreplay which results in only about 2 positions for actual sex. Given that the camera seems trapped in a fixed position for many scenes the result is that it often feels like your watching a scene from some 1980's Hustler where they couldn't show actual penetration, you just sorta know they're doing it. The lack of positions comes across in the lez and solo stuff too. I guess I like more variety as opposed to just soaking in what's in front of me.

While you get about a lot of pics per set, most of it seems to be a mosaic masterclass - here's a pose but in one frame you get a head, another the torso, another a leg, here's another with some artistic blurriness, etc. The vids are better in this respect but it does gets frustrating regarding the pics. I guess when I think artsy I think of some originality and professional output. A lot of these scenes feel more like someone who knows photography but hasn't shot porn before and isn't quite up to it.

VIDS: About 130 HC, 120 solo, and 60 lez. In browser stream works great and the HD is real HD which looks great ... meaning it's only as great as the way the scene was shot. My main complaint with the vids is their composition and artsy feel which is mostly identical to the issues I outlined in the "pics" section above. A lot of the vids have music in the beginning, some music go throughout.

NAV: Yet another site that built a navigation system when they were small and it no longer works for beans once they've grown. I already groused about the in browser pic issues. The scenes have tags but they are limited. If you search under tags, say "brunette", you'll get a result saying there are 182 scenes. However, it will only bring up 30: there is no way I can see to show them all. The tags are too few (some scenes are mistagged too) and too generic given the number of scenes they have.

If you poke around under their 3 general categories of HC, solo, and lez you'll find that recent updates aren't included. The only way to look at everything is to go through every page of updates - which only lets you jump back or ahead a few pages at a time.

I give this site an 82 because of the quality, the amount of content and the hot girls. However, for me they missed the boat on what they were trying to achieve. This is not porn for women since the focus seems mostly centered on the girls and there is no real talking or kissing-centric theme and the HC ends with a body or facial cumshot. The softer artistic side of porn put forth here seems to get washed over by the crop / framing jobs, low lighting and one position camera angles in many scenes. Those who like artsy porn may be interested in this but I think that for most the HC isn't the hardcore we're used to seeing (and not just the gonzo / rough sex stuff, just the composition in general). The softcore / lez stuff with an artsy feel is done much better by places like HegreArt, MetArt and the like.

I guess I went into this with my hopes set a bit too high. I think this site would work best for someone who digs softcore and art photography and might be looking to try some hardcore. If, like me, you have more of a hardcore background then you're more likely to walk away disappointed.

06-06-13  04:03pm

Replies (1)
Visit Babelicious


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ++ $2.75 2 day full access trial through TBP
++ Newest pix go up 4,000 pixels though most stop at 3,000.
++ Daily updates for photo sets (about 1300 photo sets and 600 vids on main site)
++ Years of material on site(s)
+ Generally decent professional photo and lighting work
+ All photosets have zip functions and you can zip in 1k, 2k, or 3/4k mode
+ About 100 or so 1280x720 vids with decent download speeds
+ Access to 8 other sites
+ No DRM limits
+ Uses major billing companies
+ Small watermarks on pics and vids
+ Video options include full scene, clips and streaming
+ Has a detailed search function and a model directory with some bio material
+ Has a support and FAQ section
Cons: -- Nonexclusive content
-- Not a site for hardcore fans
-- The bonus sites no longer update
-- Quality really drops once you go back a few years in both pics and vids.
- Cross sales on sign-up page
- Navigation could use some work
- Only a couple of screen caps showing video contents (needs more)
- Have to type in password info for each site (and you get some long randomly generated password when you join)
- WMV only file option for downloading vids
- Vids only update once or twice a week
Bottom Line: I last joined this site about 5 years ago and decided to to the trial option to see what's changed. In short, not much and that's not necessarily a good thing. There really isn't anything to not like about it but it is a mostly softcore nonexclusive content site (if you like your action hardcore, skip this network) that mostly left me feeling "meh".

PICS: It's nice to see a site that lets you zip in multiple sizes. As noted above, the newest stuff goes up to 4000 pixels however some pixelation occurs at this level on a few sets. The downside is that the quality drops to about 2k sizes when you get to early 2009 and rapidly drops to 1k sizes thereafter. All pics come up in a separate screen. Most of this is stuff that you've seen before and not necessarily a models best offerings.

VIDS: Good download speeds and about 100 newer HD vids. Bad news is that once you get past the HD sizes, the vids fairly quickly drop to 480x320 and the quality of the older stuff is average at best. If you like HC there are only about 40 HC vids in total (1 in HD). Even though I have high speed, the streaming stuff was only OK I had problems jumping forward on some of the streams.

OTHER: It does have a good and mostly complete search engine but it's not entirely intuitive (it took me a few minutes to figure out how to find all the HC vids). Jumping around to different pages requires some clicking too. It's not bad (better than some other good sites) but it does need a few tweaks like adding "softcore", "lez" and "HC" categories, etc.

All the bonus sites stopped updating at least a year ago so they don't really have anything to offer assuming you've been around the porn block a time or two. The pic size and video quality on those sites is mostly second rate by today's standards.

TBP gave this site a "87" score which I can't justify. It's nonexclusive content and once you go back to early 2009 the quality starts to rapidly drop off. It is mostly softcore and, as I noted, these aren't what I would consider the models best work. For me, Twistys, VivThomas, Teendreams and others do a better job with this genre of site than Babelicious does. When I was last a member here I thought the site held up pretty well in comparison to what was going on at the time. Not so much any more. It's not a rip-off by any means but others do it better now.

12-28-10  05:10pm

Replies (1)
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Great $10, 7 day full access trial through TBP
+ Full access preview before joining (can't view individual sets but can view all model and category content)
+ Very professional production
+ 17 categories of photoshoots, all sets have zips
+ No DRM
+ Top quality models for the most part
Cons: - Updates only every other day
- Videos are in short clips only
- You've probably already seen the older content
- Pics max out at 1280 pixels
- Limited model info
Bottom Line: Vivthomas is a top notch photographer who's stuff you've probably already seen on sites like Teendreams, ATKgalleria, and others. His focus on Euro glam porn. This is my second time joining and I only hopped on for the trial.

For those interested in vids, forget this site and consider Vivthomasvideo. All you get are short clips and access to some streaming vids. I didn't really mess around with this but I note that the clips played at 640x480 in wmv. Most of this stuff is only a few minutes long.

The pics are the real reason to go here. He does a very professional job in terms of production value and overall quality. Very few blurry shots or bad lighting. He also uses a variety of sets so it's not overly reptitive. Most sets have fewer than 100 pics which I tend to like since you don't get 10 shots of the same thing. There is a small watermark in the cornor of the pics.

The hardcore was good but it doesn't update that often. Viv is probably at his best when shooting solo models. He does a good job of shooting lingerie and seems to bring out some sexiness in the models which a lot of sites seem to lack. There's 17 categories to choose from and you get about 650 models and there's about 165k pics. Some models have bios and bits about them but most don't have anything. The model directory appears to be complete and accurate.

There is also a forum which has a fair amount of activity and you can buy his dvds from the site too.

I'm only scoring this site an 82 because so much of his older content is leased out that I've seen most of it before. The new stuff is exclusive but it too will eventually start cropping up elsewhere. I certainly had no problem getting what I wanted during the trial period and if you've been around porn for a while you shouldn't have any problem getting by on a trial either.

I'm also scoring the site an 82 because of the lack of video content. Granted, he has a video site which costs more but I think I'd rather see him merge the two sites together and charge a bit more to get all the content.

My last reason for the score is that his photos sometimes appear in larger sizes on other sites. I just joined Teendreams and their Vivthomas pics are much larger. You get a little graininess but it's minimal. So all I have to say is "Viv, grow 'em bigger!".

So, if you like pics, like hot euro babes and want a cheap distraction, then I suggest checking it out.

02-24-09  08:58pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 784 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.54 seconds.