Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (346)  

Feedback:   All (1837)  |   Reviews (142)  |   Comments (120)  |   Replies (1575)

Other:   Replies Received (1026)  |   Trust Ratings (70)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 1871 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

It sounds like we have a lot in common... But you really should consider a membership here. At least check out the tour pages.

12-06-14  08:14am

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I like as much naturalness as possible.

12-04-14  04:50pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

Pornusers for me...

12-03-14  02:29pm

Review
54
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(1)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful models
- Solo, lesbian
- Great site for people both video and photo collectors
- Photos are zipped
- Videos and photos are excellent quality
- Options for videos and photos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Not sure if the site is updating
- Some photo sets are zipped into multiple files
- Often a wide size difference between HD and mid-level videos
- Music can be obtrusive in videos
Bottom Line: I donít normally subscribe to soft sites like this but with a chance to expand my collection of Maryjane Johnson and Claire material I couldnít pass up the opportunity. It should be obvious with the word ĎTeení in the title that the site features beautiful and youthful models. Most of them are quite petite and there arenít many tattoos and there are no fake breasts. If you like petite and natural teen models you should consider taking a look at this site.

The site is quite soft with the scenes being solo and girl/girl. There is some toy play and some scenes are shot outdoors. I donít normally collect a lot of solo and girl/girl stuff and I found that a lot of the girl/girl stuff was even softer than Iím used to. It seems that a lot of these models might be just Ďgay for payí as there wasnít a lot of interaction. I have to confess that this increased the heat for me though.

One advantage this site has is that it really offers good value for both video and photo collectors. The site doesnít trade off one for the other as is usually the case for sites. Iím not normally a photo collector but with the beautiful models and the high quality photos I downloaded a lot.

There are currently 121 videos ranging from 5 to 40 minutes long. Videos are offered in 3 choices Ė HD, mid-range and Ďportable device.í Iíd normally download the HD but there was often a wide chasm in size between HD and medium. There are some HD files here that top out at over 10GB. Thatís too much hard drive space for something that is only a peripheral interest so in some cases I opted for the mid-range.

The HD files are 1920x1080 with bitrates from 8,000 to 25,000. They look great Ė crisp and sharp. The mid-range files are 1228x690 3000kb/s. They look good too so theyíre worth the reduced file size.

One (possibly subjective) flaw in the videos is that the music dubbed in can be loud enough to be obtrusive. Especially with a g/g scene the sounds the models make are often drowned out by the music.

There are 210 photo sets available with 70 to 400+ pics per set. The sets are zipped, though in some cases there are multiple zips. In one case there were 9 zipped files that had to be downloaded to get the full set. The photos are 5616x3744 and look good. There is a lower resolution available though I didnít download those. This may be nitpicking, but in sets requiring multiple downloads I encountered a few cases where the same file name was used twice. This is definitely nitpicking, but I found some sets to be out of sequence. A model may be reclining on a bed with panties on, followed by several with the panties off, followed by the panties on, followed by the panties being removed. Yes, Iím a bit anal that wayÖ

Thereís one important question that I canít answer: since the updates arenít dated I canít say if the site is updating or not. If I figure that out Iíll update that information.

There is no search function but one really isn't needed. There are tabs for sorting between videos and photos and there is a tab to sort by model.

The site supports download managers and I had no issues in queuing up downloads.

This was probably a one-time membership for me. I joined specifically to get video and photos for two models and one of those has left the industry so there is no hope of getting more of her. The site is quite good and the videos and photos they have are very high quality. If you like this type of model in solo and soft lesbian scenes then itís certainly worth looking at this site as a possible membership. I wouldnít hesitate to recommend it but I likely wonít be back.

11-30-14  07:34am

Replies (4)
Comment
55
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)

Maybe absence makes the heart grow fonder?

Some recent thoughts on VB so you donít have to endure another VB review from meÖ

The last time I had a VB membership I swore it was THE last time. I preferred the quality of niche sites over the all-you-can-eat-buffet approach offered at VB. But after 18 months without being a member there I opted to rejoin and see if anything had changed. I think they have (a bit) for the better.

The biggest difference now is that of the five daily updates two of them are in HD where before only one update per day was HD. You need to keep in mind that this is VBís idea of HD and they use the term differently from others. The VB HD videos are 1280x720 and usually around 3500kb/s. That isn't bad, and I suppose it does meet the literal definition of HD but it isn't up to industry standards. Still, they have doubled the HD upload which means there is less SD uploaded. The SD stuff is 656x480 and 1200kb/s. That a standard not widely used for many years at niche sites but itís important to note that VB has always been more about quantity than quality.

The bad news is that VB still relies heavily on repackaged compilations. Some scenes may appear on the site several times. Iíve seen the same scene uploaded twice in a few days on different DVDs. Usually the DVD titles will indicate that this is a compilation, and there are whole studios dedicated to it. Finally, there are several VB members who have an encyclopedic knowledge of both porn and VB and those members will often flag where and when that scene appears elsewhere on the site Ė and which version is better.

VB is good at what it does and it doesnít pretend to be something that it isn't. It has a huge collection of DVDs (now almost 19,000) and at such a low price I canít see why anyone would use tube sites instead of VB. VB has always offered a good way to get access to a broad range of porn. They still upload Ďclassicsí from the 1980s and 1990s.

So VB and I are friends again, just not BFFsÖ

11-30-14  07:33am

Replies (2)
Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with LPee. I'll do that too.

11-22-14  05:57am

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

BDSM done right is still all about the woman's pleasure. BDSM porn makes up a very small percentage of my collection but it is hot when done right.

11-18-14  04:36pm

Reply
58
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Ugh... I guess I'm going to look like a real pervert when I say that I have between 20 and 25 TB in my collection. And that's on the primary drives. I have it all backed up too. I am a bit of a hoarder but for me the collecting is as much fun as the having. I did a major cull last year of all the low resolution stuff I had (except for the scenes that I will never part with no matter how low the resolution is).

With a collection of this size I need a good method of cataloguing it. This may not be the best method, but when I started this it worked great, but now I have a 250+ page MS Word table listing the DVD or site name in the first column, the female talent in the second column and the drive number in the third column. It's alphabetized using column one but I generally use it more for word searches now.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some porn to download...


11-17-14  04:32pm

Reply
59
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What porn collection, dear?

11-12-14  02:53pm

Comment
60
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(1)

WARNING!!!!! SITE HACK

I joined Mofos almost two weeks ago and everything seemed fine.

Today I received two email confirmations and receipts from the biller showing that I had joined MofosCams and that I then racked up $120 in charges. I did no such thing. I contacted both Mofos and the biller and to my pleasant surprise they emailed me with a phone number, which I promptly called.

They reviewed the account and saw evidence that it had been hacked and they closed the account and credited me back the charges.

This is the first time this has ever happened to me. If you're a Mofos member, check your email and watch your credit card statement.

11-11-14  04:52pm

Replies (0)
Reply
61
Visit Sex Underwater

Sex Underwater
(1)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Thanks for commenting. Almost all the later scenes are shot in a pool so the safety issues would be less I think. If anything goes wrong the models are no more than a few feet from the surface. The ocean SCUBA scenes are a different matter though.

On a related note, some of these stars can hold their breath for a loooong time. It gets hard to watch it they can stay under so long.


11-10-14  02:49pm

Review
62
Visit Sex Underwater

Sex Underwater
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique theme
- Four additional sites included
- Many A-list models
- Photos and videos available
- Updates
Cons: - MP4 files come in as m4a rather than m4v so there can be playback issues.
- Scene resolutions arenít great
- Basic site design
- Some problems with download managers
Bottom Line: I have a thing for porn shot anywhere near or in water so I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was a site that seemed to cater to that niche. While this review will focus on Sex Underwater Iíll give some details on the other sites that come bundled with the network.

The premise of the site is fairly simple, and the title really sums it up: think of this as standard boy/girl sex that youíd see on other sites, but these scenes are all shot underwater. The majority of the scenes feature the talent simply holding their breath in a pool but there are scenes with SCUBA and supplied air. In the scenes with no air source but the surface the site edits out all the bobbing to the surface for air that the talent has to do. Some of the scenes are shot in the ocean. One thing to note is that these scenes are really quite normal apart from the unique location: this isnít rough sex and bondage Ė the water isnít used as part of some D/s play.

One thing that did surprise me when I saw it was how different the human body looks underwater. I canít really describe it in detail, but the female form looks amazing when you add buoyancy.

This isnít an amateur site since there are a lot of A-list models who appear here.

There are currently 300+ scenes. I canít give an exact number because the site layout is very basic and Iíd have to count all of them. The update schedule is a bit sporadic but it appears to add one scene every two weeks. The newest scenes offer some choices for file types and resolutions. The site lists MP4s as being available in 320x180, 640x360 and 1280x720. WMV is available in 960x540. Iíd normally download the 1280x720 MP4s but I had a problem with all of them. I will fully admit that this may be my issue since Iím not technologically inclined, but the 1280x720 MP4s all came in m4a format and that caused problems for me on playback. Because of that I downloaded the 960x540 WMVs. The resolution is accurate though the bitrate varies a lot with the file. Some are 1600kb/s while others are 6000. Frame rates vary too (23, 29, 59) and I have no idea why a site would have such variability. Subjectively the scenes look okay.

Unfortunately things change for the worse as the videos get older. Prior to July 2012 there is no option in file type or size and in most cases the scene is broken into two segments. Then, prior to 2008 things get almost unwatchable. Maybe underwater cameras are the limit, but it seems that if you were going to all the trouble to produce this unique content that youíd invest in a better camera.

While I was able to use a download manager I did encounter a few problems. When trying to queue scenes Iíd get an error message even though the queue would download.

The network comes with four other water-themed sites:
ē Underwater Glamour Ė This site features mostly solo scenes with a focus on eroticism. There are some girl/girl scenes though. There are currently 70+ scenes here but as they arenít dated I canít tell if new ones are ever added. By the resolutions on the scenes (1200x640) Iím guessing that the scenes are at least a few years old.
ē Grope-Cam Ė This is a lot like Underwater Glamour but a little harder in that the female gets groped by an underwater male. There are some sex toys used and there are some BJ scenes. There are currently 250+ scenes and it looks like it updates with a new scene each week.
ē Underwater Bath Tub Girls Ė Another unique site where the premise is a model lying on her back, submerged, in a bathtub with water while masturbating. The theme is eroticism again, not domination. There are currently 24 scenes though the last update was seven months ago. Resolutions are 720x480.
ē Mist of Water Ė Iím not sure how to describe this site, so Iíll just quote their tag line: ďWater soaked women, clinging hair, sheer see-through clothes, underwater buoyancy.Ē That pretty much sums it up. There are five photo shoots and two videos (640x480).

I donít download photos but it seems that this site could be of interest to those who do. Most scenes offer both videos and photos but like the videos the photos are just average quality. There are some at 1600x2400 but you donít have to look too hard to find lower than that. Theyíre available as zips.

So would I recommend this site? Yes, but as long as you know what the siteís weaknesses are. For one, this is really just a hardcore boy/girl site and thereís no shortage of those around. The difference here is obviously that the scenes are shot underwater. If that interests you then you have very few choices and your choices may be as simple as take it or leave it. The biggest flaw in the site is the low resolution videos and photos. This is a site that offers a lot of unique content with some of the hottest stars in the business but their video and photo offerings arenít up to standard. So the site gets a qualified recommendation.

11-10-14  10:48am

Replies (2)
Reply
63
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No porn on the phone for me either. I agree with lk2fireone and Cybertoad: you've got a problem if you need to carry porn with you all the time.

11-10-14  10:43am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a big fan. While it can be repetitive, it is one niche where you can count on a slow build-up of sexual tension. That's the Holy Grail of porn for me.

11-06-14  02:13pm

Review
65
Visit VIP Members

VIP Members
(1)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 32 sites
- Covers broad range of niches
- Huge collection of videos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Site design is dated and not user-friendly
- Individual site layout is difficult to use
- Some videos appear on multiple sites
- Misleading number of sites
- Poor video quality
Bottom Line: Lately Iím much less of a fan of the all-you-can-eat-buffet approach that these large networks offer. Sure, they often offer a wide range of material so that most porn buyers can find something they like, but in most cases they do that at the expense of quality. With this site, the site itself and the videos they offer certainly lack the quality Iíve come to associate with smaller sites.

Before I wade into the main review I need to explain that Iíll be missing some details. The network is large and the videos are often available on several sites within the network which makes it seem bigger than it really is. But it also makes it impossible to say how many videos are available. I think a fair estimate is at least 1000 and likely more. Quantity isnít a problem here. The other problem is that none of the scenes are dated so it isnít possible to determine anything about updates. More on that later.

As networks go this one seems to have a broader scope than many. The sites range from solo girl softcore to extreme pissing sites. In between there are standard hardcore sites, several that feature pregnant models and a lactation site. I wonít list the sites because that list is long and most of them (but not all) are listed at the TBP page. One thing to note is that while the network shows 49 sites 17 of those lead to a site called 4Real Amateurs. I didnít log into that site so I canít comment. That leaves 32 actual sites as part of the network.

The sites all open in their own page with a standard layout and that layout isnít user friendly. This is hard to describe, but the videos are each laid out on a Ďpanelí with a thumbnail and a brief description but the area each takes up is varied so the Ďpanelsí for each scene end up in disarray. It isnít bad, but for some who prefers order and logic it is a bit annoying.

As I noted above, I canít give a definitive answer on updates, but it looks like there are no new exclusive updates. In the sites that look like theyíve added something recently those updates have been licenced by other sites. VIPissy, for example, has the newer content on the peeing sites. Other sites donít seem to be updating at all.

Another indication that the sites may not be updating is the quality of the video available. This is probably the biggest flaw in the network. The video quality varies widely across the network but thatís to be expected given that some of the videos are likely more than a decade old. I did find some videos that were 1920x1080 which Iíd normally praise. But the bitrate and frames-per-second rate are low at 4200kb/s and 20fps. These videos donít look good on a 24Ē monitor. Object edges look pixilated. Itís fair to point out that you donít have to look too hard to find videos that are 320x240 and 200kb/s.

The site supports download managers. I had no problem with links timing out, but then with the small size of some of the files that should be a problem anyway.

This network provides quantity over quality. Unless there are specific scenes youíre looking for my advice is to find a good niche site elsewhere. This network has a lot more wrong than right.

11-05-14  04:14pm

Replies (0)
Reply
66
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I've never noticed this before. Thanks for pointing this out.

11-05-14  01:36pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

I agree with all the comments above. While I am one of those who collects for the sake of collecting, I have an established list of scenes that I watch regularly. Most of my collection rarely gets watched more than a few times.

And as LPee23 said, the best never gets old. Some of my favorites date back 20 years so the video quality is horrendous but I'll never part with them.


11-04-14  02:02pm

Reply
68
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Thanks for the comments Drooler.

I'm not sure what it is about Ryan Madison, but I don't find that he's obtrusive like some other male porn stars. I'll admit that there may be a subjective element to that because most of what he shoots in harder-edged stuff that I like so maybe I'm just turning a blind eye to his shortcomings.


11-02-14  01:40pm

Reply
69
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

Thanks for that. I've watched a few already and they don't seem to any less graphic than before.

11-02-14  01:16pm

Reply
70
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

I did. And I joined immediately to download what I wanted. I wonder if the videos are edited differently now.

11-02-14  12:11pm

Reply
71
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I chose 'other' because for me the scene set up is often more important than the scene itself. I prefer scenes that build a sexual tension. Some may find massage scenes boring or repetitive, but one thing I like about them (when they're done right) is that build up of sexual tension.

11-01-14  04:36am

Reply
72
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

Wow! Thanks for the advice and offer. I was last a member eight months ago and when I looked at the site this morning I only had maybe a dozen scenes that were 'must haves.'

10-30-14  05:23pm

Reply
73
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

Thanks for this LPee. I had heard that some changes were coming (reputedly due to credit card companies wanting to be squeaky clean for the soccer mom crowd). I'm rejoining as soon as I hit 'add reply' on this.

Edit - Fuck! It looks like the site might be dead. The link from TBP and PU leads to nothing. Going into any other Kink site and selecting Hardcore Gang Bang brings a dead link and searching on Google gives the same dead link. Damn, there were some scenes I wanted to see there...


10-30-14  02:01pm

Reply
74
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of rooka's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to write that. I think that the best thing about PU is being able to take advantage of other people's experience with sites. I know I rely on that all the time.

10-30-14  02:00pm

Reply
75
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Thanks for the compliment, Cybertoad.

10-29-14  03:57pm


Shown : 51-75 of 1871 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.28 seconds.