Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (370)  

Feedback:   All (1930)  |   Reviews (153)  |   Comments (125)  |   Replies (1652)

Other:   Replies Received (1059)  |   Trust Ratings (72)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 1965 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Pinup Files

Pinup Files
(0)
Reply of runnoft's Review

Welcome to the site. I hope you stick around and continue to contribute.

Great username... If you ever run into Mrs. Hogwallup please tell her I said hello.


05-02-15  05:28am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love A cups but I'm fine with a small B too.

04-29-15  02:18pm

Reply
28
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(1)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

Thanks!

04-29-15  02:14pm

Reply
29
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(2)
Reply of hardog's Comment

Thanks for posting this information. This is a great site and dropping the price makes it a much better value. I'll definitely be rejoining now.

04-26-15  08:36am

Reply
30
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(1)
Reply of HardRide's Reply

That would be amazing and would provide the site with a lot of good updates. Maybe they'll read your suggestion and give it a try...

04-20-15  04:41pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

I can't really say, but I can say that since the Canadian dollar has lost a lot of value relative to the U.S. dollar it has affected my porn buying habits - of European sites that use the U.S. dollar and of American porn site.

04-20-15  01:50pm

Reply
32
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks once again for the kind words, Sir!

04-18-15  05:12am

Reply
33
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(1)
Reply of HardRide's Reply

We're definitely on the same page when it come to glory hole sites.

When I first joined GH Secrets the previews made it look exactly like GH Swallow (I was worried it might even be a clone) but I was only slightly disappointed to learn that they use a mock GH. But it sound like you and I share a trait: the fact that GH Swallow is recorded in an actual adult theatre adds a whole different layer of heat to the scenes.


04-18-15  05:07am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I can recall two models I liked who had it done (I won't name them) and they looked like circus clowns after that. So while I chose 'never' as my option, I only did so because 'never, never, never, never!' wasn't listed!

04-18-15  05:04am

Reply
35
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(1)
Reply of HardRide's Reply

Definitely one of the advantages that Glory Hole Swallow has is the realism from using a real glory hole in a real adult theatre. For me, and it sound like for you too, that adds a lot to the scene. Obviously there are a lot less risks going with a staged setting, and the staged booth here is better than the fake bathrooms that most other sites use.

You're likely right about the male talent too. At Glory Hole Swallow they have a forum where the members can sign up to be one of the guys getting a blowjob. Glory Hole Secrets has an FAQ page and I expected to see something to that effect too but didn't. The absence of that tells me that they use known talent.

Still, it's a good site even if they are trying to copy Glory Hole Swallow - at least they've chosen a great site to emulate.


04-13-15  02:14pm

Review
36
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 1400+ scenes in an under-served niche
- Updates daily
- Lots of A-list models
- Good ability to sort scenes
- Downloads and streaming available
- Photos are available
Cons: - Download speeds range from average to abysmal but tend to be lower than average
- Download managers are a little problematic
- Scene resolution is lower than average
Bottom Line: I suspect that most porn buyers are like me and wish that this niche didnít need to exist. But in a world where so many porn money shots are the guy jerking off on the girl this site is needed. The whole premise of the site is that the girls finish the guys off in every scene. (Thatís the premise, but there are scenes where the usual happens.)

Iíll start with what this site does well Ė its good porn. The scenes feature top porn models and the scenes are all fairly hot and fun to watch. And there aren't many jerk-off sessions either Ė most of these girls do finish the job.

This site is really made up of three distinct sub-sites: Mano Job, which features handjobs, The Dick Suckers, which features blowjobs, and Mr. POV which features hardcore b/g sex. Itís a great idea to break the scenes down into those sub-genres because many people may prefer one niche over the others. I find handjobs boring to watch, for example, so I could filter those out if I wanted to.

The site currently has 1400+ scenes available with a new one added every day, making it a good value. In case anyone is interested, Mano Job has 850+ scenes, The Dick Sucker has 300+ scenes and Mr. POV has 280+ scenes.)

The volume of great porn is enough for me to recommend the site, but to allow prospective members to make an informed decision you should know that the site has some flaws. These are, in no particular order:
ē The download speeds vary wildly. I could download a scene and see 15MB/s and then download immediately after and see less than 1MB/s. I could understand if I was downloading at peak times and consistently got slow speeds but that wasnít the case. I tried different times and would get different speeds regularly. Most downloads came in at the slower end of things at about 2MB/s. In my opinion, the download speeds are the greatest flaw here. While I could hit average speeds, in most cases the downloads were well below average speeds expected in 2015.
ē Scene quality varied. The scenes had multiple download options but most offered 1080p. The 1080p quality wasnít consistent: on some scenes it was true 1080 and on others it was lower.
ē Video quality isn't the best. Iím not a tech guy but most of the scenes were a little fuzzy with some pixilation Ė and this is with downloading the best resolution available. I also found that there was a narrow band at the bottom of many of the scenes that was badly pixilated.
ē Download managers are supported but may cause issues. Iíd normally queue up scenes but since the site doesnít allow downloads to be stopped and resume I played it safe and downloaded individually.

Scene resolution varies too, but some of that is to be expected since the site has been around for 10 years. Most of the newer scenes are good with 1920x1080 at 6200kb/s and 1280x720 at 2800kb/s being common. Some scenes are lower at 1024x768 at 2500kb/s. There are even some really low resolution scene tossed into the mix but thankfully these seem rare. These are 320x240. Some older scenes are remastered and uploaded as a new scene. While I donít have a problem with that, these remastered scenes are often fuzzy and pixilated. A problem that the site seems to have is the bitrate they use which is only half of that used by many other sites. I suspect the low bitrate is the culprit for the reduced quality. The file types aren't listed but I always chose one of the two best resolutions depending on file size and those were all in MP4 format.

Streaming is also available in multiple resolutions.

The site also offers some interesting options: apart from the full scene you could stream or download just the money shot (sometimes also offered in slow-motion) and an interview with the model.

The site has a list of tags for all the common niches so itís easy to sort for anything youíre looking for. You can also sort by models.

Photos are also available, as singles or as a zip. The photos are 1500x1000 which wonít impress any serious collector, but it is fair to say that this is more of a video site than a photo site.

The TBP review says the Terms of Reference mentions a download limit but doesnít put a number on it. I canít confirm this, but if there is a limit it has to be fairly high. I downloaded close to 50GB in one day trying to find the limit but was never locked out or prevented from downloading.

Overall I still recommend the site because the good outweighs the bad. This is an under-served niche (which only shows how crappy a lot of porn is these days) and has more than 1400 scenes available on a well-organized site. The download speeds are well below average and the resolution quality could be better, but the site is worth checking out if you can put up with those flaws. I canít however, give it my highest rating which is to say that this is a site Iíll rejoin. I donít regret joining once, but the speeds and video quality issues are enough to make it unlikely that Iíll rejoin.

04-12-15  07:07am

Replies (4)
Reply
37
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(3)
Reply of Pyrenees's Review

Another confirmation that this site is no longer worth joining. I kept a recurring membership there for several years but cancelled maybe five years ago. Back when I cancelled the recurring membership the site was starting to fall behind and they've done nothing to stop that gap from increasing. I'm convinced that they need to drop the five-DVDs-per-day and focus on quality DVDs and better file resolutions. I suspect that there are tube sites that have better quality.

04-12-15  07:01am

Review
38
Visit POV Wars

POV Wars
(1)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very rare niche (Iíve never seen another site that specializes in it)
- Lots of videos
- Amateur models
- Bundled with another good site (Glory Hole Secrets)
- Options for streaming and downloading
- Photos available
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Some of the models aren't typical porn models (which some may consider a good thing)
Bottom Line: I wouldnít normally write a full review for a site that is bundled with another site, but POV Wars merits an exception. For one, many may see this as the primary site and Glory Hole Secrets as the add-on. For another, itís in an unusual niche that people may have an interest in but not be aware that there is a site that caters to it.

So what is this unusual niche? Itís a bit hard to describe but may be best described as one girl and five guys. But it isn't a gangbang site; the guys have sex with the girl one after the other and each session forms a different scene. Each modelís Ďsessioní starts with her sitting on a couch and being interviewed. Then the first guy comes in and from then on most of the scene is shot POV style, with some shots from a camerman. The guy and girl chat a bit, she undresses, goes down on him, they have sex and he finishes, usually with an oral with swallow. Then the next guy comes in and the process starts over again. If this happens to be important to anyone, the girl is dressed at the beginning each segment. So the best way to describe the niche is that itís Ďgirls pulling a trainí if such a niche exists.

Itís difficult to say precisely how many scenes are here because, for one thing, the set-up lends itself to at least two interpretations of what a scene is. Is a scene all five sessions with one model or is a scene one session and each model then has five scenes? The definition is further blurred because most of the Ďscenesí are broken down into five Ďsessionsí each downloaded or streamed separately while some scenes are downloaded or streamed as the full scene with all five Ďsessionsí in the same download. Confused? Hereís what I can say for sure: there are currently 167 videos available to upload featuring 42 models. Some of those are full-length scenes but most are broken down into separate sessions with each guy. It does appear that since the beginning of 2015 all of the new scenes added are full-length with all five Ďsessionsí in the download.

One new scene per week is uploaded.

The same models here are those found on the sister site, Glory Hole Secrets. Thatís good and bad because if you like true amateurs youíll like this site but many of the women donít fit the typical porn ideal. Thatís not good or bad, itís just a fact. There are different ages and body types represented.

Streaming is available in two different resolutions, one which is labelled as HD. I donít use streaming so I canít give an opinion on that. Downloads (all MP4) are available in 1920x1080 at 6000kb/s, 1280x720 at 3500kb/s, 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones and devices. While the bitrates are lower than Iíd expect for the screen resolutions they still look good.

I donít think anyone would consider this a photo site but they do offer photos for those who are interested. Currently there are 21 photo sets available (these appear to be of the full scene with all five guys). Photos sets had been uploaded weekly but stopped in December 2014 so if you join for photos there may not be any updates coming. Photos are available as singles or zips in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720.

The site uses a simple layout which is all that it needs. You can sort by scene, by model or by tag. With a niche this narrow you really donít need a lot more.

This site has a lot going for it: it has enough available to make it a decent value on a site that is simple to use with good download speeds and it supports download managers. It also comes bundled with Glory Hole Secrets which is a good glory hole site. But what makes the site stand out is the niche it offers. Iím not aware of any other site that focuses solely on this kind of scene and for that reason alone many people may consider joining. For all of these reasons Iíd recommend checking the site out.

04-09-15  04:28pm

Replies (0)
Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm not exactly sure what the question means, and that's probably more a refection of me pushing 50 and not that the question was unclear.

I certainly don't search porn on any device while I'm in a public space, but I have checked PU and TBP while staying in a hotel on a free wifi account. I'm not sure if that would be a yes or no to the question.


04-08-15  01:30pm

Review
40
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 192 videos
- 3 new scenes added per week
- Allows download managers
- Many scenes have two videos Ė one standard and one POV
- Mostly amateurs but a few known faces
Cons: - Some of the amateur models aren't up to usual porn expectations (though some may consider that a good thing)
Bottom Line: Glory Hole Secrets looks a lot like the other dedicated glory hole site, Glory Hole Swallow. Where Swallow goes into actual adult theatres Secrets appears to have a purpose-built room for taping. I prefer the added raunchiness of the actual theatre but this site is hot too.

Being a glory hole site means the scenes are all predictable: the model answers a few questions and then gets to work on the dicks that come through holes in the wall on either side of her. Most of the models get naked or nearly naked and in a few scenes the model bends over and gets fucked too. Most of the cumshots are oral and most of the models swallow. There is a Ďcumshot counterí that pops up briefly with every pop shot so you can keep track if youíre so inclined. (I like this, but GH Swallow does it better by leaving the counter up all the time from the first pop shot to the end of the scene. GH Secrets only leaves it up for a few seconds while the guy is coming.)

The site is fairly large with 192 scenes available and three new scenes being added each week. That update schedule is ambitious and will cause the site to grow fairly quickly and if you have an interest in this niche it might be worth a recurring membership.

The site relies mostly on unknown amateurs and that can be good or bad. Many of the models aren't A-list hot but if you like your porn with more natural women getting nasty then youíll like this. The looks, body types and ages of the models vary here so there is likely something for most tastes.

There are options for how you view a scene. There is HD and SD streaming and downloads are available in 1920x1080 (6000kb/s), 1280x720 (3500kb/s) 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones. All the downloads are in MP4 format. For having relatively low bitrates both the 1080p and 720p files look good.

I had no problem using a download manager.

One feature of the site that I quite like is the option to download more than one version of the same scene. This isn't an option with all scenes, it would be the minority that offer this, but you can get the standard view with the cameraman standing near the model and recording and you can get a POV view with a camera located about eye level above the glory hole.

The site layout is simple and effective and gives the option to sort the scenes in several ways. You can also sort by model too. No matter how you sort the scenes there is only one thumbnail on which to make a decision to check it out or not. With amateur models thatís important to me because the thumbnail may not be the best representation. The thumbnail may be a pretty face but she has triple-D breasts which Iím not interested in. This can be solved by clicking on the photo link for each scene to get a better look at the model. Iíd prefer to see a better thumbnail of the models though.

As I noted above, photos are available. I wouldnít call this a photo site but they do offer high quality photos for those who are interested. You can download a zip of photos in 1920x1080 resolution or view them as singles in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720.

Membership gives access to two sites, this and POV Wars (that site is unique and deserves its own review).

Iíd definitely recommend this site for fans of the niche. The site is well laid out, there is plenty of material here to make it a good value and the scenes look good and have some heat to them. Itís a decent value and if you like this kind of porn you should really check it out.

04-05-15  05:03pm

Replies (6)
Reply
41
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I have no idea how the clips4sale survives as a business. I've checked it out a few times and the prices are insane. It makes Legal Porno look cheap!

04-05-15  04:27pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Depends on the scene setup. I love feet so anything works for me in the right context.

04-05-15  04:33am

Reply
43
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Pat - good news or bad news, thanks for posting this. Anyone reading this should follow pat's advice and join through I Worship Anal. Jimmy Hooligan promises some improvements, but for now the DPD site doesn't have any older stuff up. It is a very small site and I suspect that he'll update with some of the older stuff. Pat is correct that the IWA site has everything, and for $5 cheaper.

I follow a ritual before joining most sites. I read any TBP review and then all the reviews and comments here at PU. I'm thinking that I need to email you first too!

Thanks for the tip on this.


04-05-15  04:32am

Comment
44
Visit Dirt Pipe Divas

Dirt Pipe Divas
(1)

Dirt Pipe Divas is Back!

FYI for all anal sex fans - I read that Dirt Pipe Divas was back in business and I can confirm that because I rejoined yesterday. The site is still small but the owner assures me in an email that the site will be growing. My review is still mostly valid. The best thing about the site is that it features models doing anal who don't often to that.

04-03-15  05:17am

Replies (5)
Reply
45
N/A Reply of Zaphodd42's Poll

I generally avoid any free sites because most of them rely on piracy. When I do go there it's only to see scenes from a pay site that I'm interested in and the tour pages are poorly done. If webmasters would put up tour pages that allowed a better look at what you're paying for then I wouldn't go to free (piracy) sites at all.

04-03-15  05:15am

Reply
46
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of stingerxxx's Comment

I wondered how long they could continue with this practice. While their porn isn't mainstream it isn't niche enough to make prospective members jump through so many hoops. The high price alone will deter buyers so why would they add to the impediments?

Thanks for this update.


04-01-15  03:59pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I never even give them a glance because they're just to subjective. You might like full-figured brunettes with large breasts and rate a model like that high but rate a petite redhead lower because of personal preferences. My choices would be the exact opposite.

04-01-15  01:37pm

Reply
48
Visit Punish Teens

Punish Teens
(1)
Reply of marvin's Reply

Thanks for the comment and I hope you do well. I'm sure it's a tough business to break into.

03-31-15  03:30pm

Reply
49
Visit Real Spankings

Real Spankings
(1)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

You need no further explanation. I understand what you mean completely.

03-31-15  01:41pm

Review
50
Visit Punish Teens

Punish Teens
(1)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality scenes
- Appears to be all exclusive
- Download options
- Supports download managers
- Updates weekly
- TBP discount
Cons: - Very small site
- Relatively tame for this niche
- Grossly misleading tour page
- Big gap between HD and hi res
Bottom Line: I know not everyone will agree with me on this, but I think that small porn sites can still offer good value. I regularly join mega sites and like those, but I also like joining new niche sites to see what they have and support the site owners who have taken a risk and opened a new site. This is a niche I like so it seemed like a good fit and the TBP discount coupled with a reputable biller took a lot of the risk out of the equation.

Iíll address the gorilla in the room that often occurs with new sites: this one is still very small with just seven scenes currently available. A new scene is added once a week so it will be a long time growing too. I realize that for many people having a site this small would be an instant deal breaker and Iíd agree with that if the site aimed at the middle of the porn market. But itís different, or at least should be, with niche sites. Unfortunately the site missed the target on the niche and created their Achilles heel.

The problem with the scenes is that they fall on the tame side for this niche. The reason I think that is a problem is that with a name like Punish Teens they are not likely to get artcore buyers interested and for fans of this niche these are about the most tame Iíve seen. This isn't Kink or Society SM (and I realize that this site doesnít market itself as a BDSM site) but it is likely that a prospective member would expect more than the light bondage and D/s play found here. These teens aren't really being punished as much as theyíre being mildly reprimanded.

The scenes themselves have high production values and appear to be exclusive. Six of the scenes have American models while one appears to be Russian or eastern European. The lighting and editing are top level.

The site itself is simple and effective, but with seven scenes why would be it be anything else? The main page has a large photo taken from the scenes and the options for streaming or downloading are all right there. There are several download options: MP4s are available in 1920x1080 at 10,000kb/s, 960x540 at 2500kb/s and 640x360 at 700kb/s. One WMV is available at 960x540 at 2500kb/s. This may be a bit nit-picky, but there is too big a gap between the highest resolution and the next highest. Iím not normally one to criticize having options, but it seems to me that they would do well to offer a 1280x720 option to bridge that wide gap.

Photos are also available (photos and screencaps) as singles or zips. The photos are 1350x900 and they look okay but photo collectors aren't likely to be overly impressed by those specs.

One thing that does deserve a comment is that the tour page is grossly misleading. A prospective member sees 42 thumbnails on the main page which would seem to indicate that there are 42 or more scenes inside. I read the TBP page so I was aware that this was misleading and didnít have a nasty surprise when I joined. Further, the site uses the annoying tactic of sending you to the join page wherever you click. There is no tour that might better reflect the true size of the site.

I used a download manager and had no problems with it. I didnít encounter any download limits but that isn't a conclusive answer since I downloaded all seven scenes in HD and that was only 15GB of data.

This is purely subjective and I wonít factor it into the score, but there is only one anal scene here. Anal sex is common in this niche (apparently itís an effective way to punish a teenÖ) but not here. This should be another indicator that this site leans to the softer side of this niche.

The biggest dilemma for me is whether or not Iíd recommend this site. On one hand I like to support new sites and they do have some high quality porn here. But on the other hand the site is still very small. Size alone wouldnít be an impediment to my recommending the site since it is a niche site, but the real deal-breaker is that the scenes miss their target. I think theyíre too hard to attract the artcore, couples-oriented buyer but they aren't hard enough to keep members like me coming back. As much as Iíd like to recommend the site I canít because they missed the target by a wide margin.

03-29-15  10:55am

Replies (2)

Shown : 26-50 of 1965 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.65 seconds.