Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (388)  

Feedback:   All (1984)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (126)  |   Replies (1696)

Other:   Replies Received (1078)  |   Trust Ratings (73)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 2019 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've been an avid girl watcher for a long time and likely don't ever see that changing. I don't ogle or make it seem crude, but if there's a beautiful woman nearby I'll definitely sneak a peek.

08-28-15  11:42am

Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
Reply of blueron's Comment

I have to confess that like others here I figured blueron had made a mistake. Maybe there was a problem with a cookie that could be solved by clearing his history or some other simple fix. It simply didn't occur to me that this could be accurate. So Holy Crap this is bad news. I've joined Mofos many times over the past few years but I think it's safe to say that with this news I won't be joining again.

I have no idea how Mindgeek plans to keep the site going with only streaming. Yes, I realize that there is lots of software available to capture a streaming video but for the company to just stop downloads is a big deal.

But here's a thought: maybe we're a lot different from the usual member. I think it's fair to say that most of us here are porn collectors rather than just porn users. A porn user may be just looking for a quick release whereas a porn collector may be compiling scenes with a certain theme or model. Streaming may be okay for a porn user, but as a porn collector I want to download it and keep it in my collection.

I'll be watching to see if other Mindgeek sites have done this too. (And I should add that until I know for sure there is virtually no chance that I'll join any Mindgeek sites since they really haven't been all that open about this huge change.)

08-25-15  05:31pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

As long as the model is Amirah Adara, then bring it on! :-)

08-25-15  05:22pm

Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure

Update on Amateur Allure

For those who are Amateur Allure fans I thought Iíd mention that starting a few months back they changed the scene formula that they use. Some people see any formula as a negative but Iím okay with a formula if it works and in this case it did (and still does).

The old formula was the girl arrives, there is a brief chat, she drops to her knees while dressed and gives head, there is usually head in a few positions, there is sex on the couch while sheís clothed, then the guy pops in her mouth for a swallow. After that she usually got naked, there was more head, more sex and a second pop and swallow.

The new formula seems to be that there are two scenes per update now with different models. Instead of having a second scene with the same model while sheís undressed there is an entire second scene with a different model. The formula with each scene is essentially the same with head and sex while clothed followed by a pop and swallow and then on to a scene with a different model. Complete nudity is far less frequent now.

I donít dislike the new formula because it really does give a lot more value in getting two distinct scenes per weekly update but I do prefer the old formula. I have a thing for clothed male/nude female scenes and Amateur Allure had been a good site for seeing this but is less so now. Itís still a favourite site of mine, but now just a little bit less so.

In a recent update the male talent (and site owner) noted that they were filming in 4K but that hasnít translated to uploads yet.

If I have one complaint about the site itís that they donít offer a discount to recurring members. The site is expensive at $40USD per month for four updates (and more so for us Canadians at $50CDN since our petro-dollar is tanking on low crude prices) so I join a few times a year when it is a fair value. But if the site offered a discount for a continuing membership Iíd likely just stay forever.

08-16-15  05:50am

Replies (0)
N/A Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

Oh yeah!

08-15-15  10:49am

N/A Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

Glad to do it. If you're into first anals like I am then this Monday will be a big day. Riley Reid's first anal will be uploaded on Tushy.com on Monday.

08-15-15  08:45am

N/A Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

Iím not sure what you mean by your next two questions. They seem to be asking the same thing. My all-time favorites? Three??? Man, thatís cruel to ask me that! Youíll notice that these three scenes date back quite far. Since weíre roughly the same age Iíll presume that you were into porn back then too and may know some of these videos and models.

ē Inari Vachs in Whack attack: Butt Fucking Frenzy. This video dates from 1998 and it still ranks as my favorite scene of all time. Inari is amazing here: she looks stunning and has a playful attitude.

ē Tammi Ann in The Hitchhiker (the Max Hardcore one). This was before Max started doing all sorts of crazy crap so itís pretty normal. This was the first Tammi Ann scene I ever saw and it immediately started an obsession. She looks incredible here.

ē The third might be Aurora Snow and Gauge in Trained Teens 1. Both of these porn superstars were at their prime and brought their A-games to this scene.

Now that I think of it, I started a thread in the forum a while back with favorite scenes that I hoped might generate some discussion. It didnít. Not all the scenes in that list (there are two parts to the post) are anal, but given my tastes most of them are. Check it out if you want: http://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...d.html?threadid=4166

Thanks for asking. I could talk about favorite anal scenes for daysÖ

08-10-15  05:40pm

N/A Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

Interesting questions. But Iíll have to warn you, asking me questions about anal scenes may cause me to drone on and onÖ

And apologies to the new mods, but Iíll have to answer this over two posts since I canít fit it all in one.

Painful first anals isn't something that I actively scout out but when the model isn't an experienced anal queen thereís a good chance that she will experience some discomfort so my collection of first anals does have some with this attribute.

ē Iíd have to say that my favorite first anal where the models is less than comfortable is Maryjane Johnson (billed as Maggie here) on Exploited College Girls. She does two anal scenes here and as far as I know these are the only anal scenes sheís ever done. The first one is in a car and so we canít really see much. If the scene is truthful, even the guy filming the POV didnít expect anal. He told her to sit her ass down on his cock and she took that literally. The next scene she does on the site is a full-on anal and she isn't terribly happy.

ē The second would likely be Asphyxia Noir on the Pierre Woodman site called Wake Up Ďn Fuck. It isn't listed here at PU. Woodman has a reputation of being a bit rough and since this is Asphyxiaís first on-screen anal scene that roughness causes her some problems.

ē The third might be an obscure model who only did a handful of scenes. She goes by Missy Misfit and she did three scenes with Max Hardcore. Two of those scenes are anal (the third is a peeing only scene) and in one of them the scene is shot in the back seat of Maxís Suburban in a parking garage and Missy seems to be doubting her career choice. She only did six scenes in total and I wonder if she had worked with anyone other than Max if she would have stuck around longer. She was really petite and hot.

ē Hereís a bonus scene but Iím not sure if this counts since she has gone on to be an anal queen. Gina Gerson has an early scene with Pierre Woodman on either Woodman Casting or Wake Up Ďn Fuck. Iím 90% sure itís on WUNF. She really doesnít look to be having a good time in this scene. But Iím glad she stuck it out because she is definitely one of my favorite Russian models.

08-10-15  05:40pm

Visit Drone Hunter

Drone Hunter

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnít updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnít added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnít know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the Ďdrone hunterí to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyíre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnít updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that itís part of the Mofos network so youíll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnít add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youíd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24Ē monitor and a 50Ē TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnít have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I canít say that Iíd recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because itís just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youíre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.

08-10-15  11:10am

Replies (0)
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm sorry, but don't understand the question. is 'too much anal' actually a phrase in the English language? ;-)

08-10-15  10:59am

Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn
Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

This isn't a big improvement, but at least now you can pay double the price right upfront and get full access immediately. I didn't pay double upfront but did quickly to get access to the BTS stuff but that turned out to be a dud. I'm glad I joined but likely won't join again.

08-08-15  08:03am

Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.

08-03-15  06:00am

Replies (2)
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

I tag my favorite scenes and go back to them frequently.

08-03-15  04:57am

N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

A petite body is always the hook for me.

08-02-15  10:45am

Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
Reply of Pyrenees's Comment

One of the reasons I like Pornusers so much is that it's an opportunity to share information like this. This might make the difference from someone liking or not liking the site. I've joined several sites that had major flaws but thanks to other PU members I knew about them beforehand so I went in with that knowledge. Devil's Film is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin but the update schedule is such that it only merits a rejoin once a year.

07-24-15  03:50am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with Pyrenees that is usually isn't worth giving feedback because it's ignored. I can see how this would happen with a mega site, and especially one where the site managers don't speak English very well, but it annoys me a bit when it is a small niche site. Every time I join my favourite site I send them some feedback and ask that they consider a reduced rate for recurring memberships. They always ignore that question.

07-19-15  08:31am

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

100% agree...

07-14-15  01:31pm

Visit Swallow Salon

Swallow Salon
Reply of Cum Play John's Reply

Thanks for your comments. I understand you wanting to maintain the camera on the girl's face, but I'm okay with the ass shots - I just wish they'd get naked!

07-13-15  11:15am

Visit Tushy.com

Reply of elephant's Reply

I agree with you on both counts: I'll rejoin when there are more scenes and I really wish they'd bundle Blacked and Tushy. Or at least offer a decent discount to the other site if you have a membership to one.

07-10-15  09:32am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They do in Canada after a woman challenged the constitutionality of the law banning it. That was over a decade ago and every day you see hundreds of beautiful women walking around topless up here.

Okay, I made up that last bit! I've never seen a woman go topless even with the law changed.

On a related note, it really pisses me off when some fucking prude complains of a woman breastfeeding her baby in public. Fuck the fuck off!

07-10-15  09:30am

Visit Brand New Amateurs

Brand New Amateurs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateur site
- Inexpensive full trial
- Fast downloads
- Many different ages and body types
- Broad range of scene types
- Simple layout
- Extensive use of niche tags
- No download limits
- Reputable biller
Cons: - Many different ages and body types
- No known update schedule
Bottom Line: Iíve had mixed experiences with amateur sites. This may sound hypocritical but my favorite amateur sites are often those that use models who are in some form of the adult business Ė like cam shows Ė and are getting into videos. These sites (like Exploited College Girls) tend to be less amateurish. Brand New Amateurs falls into the class of being more of a true amateur site. Iím still browsing through the scenes and the only recognizable model Iíve seen is Halle Von.

This can be a pro or a con depending on your personal tastes, but sites that fall closer to the true amateur site tend to have a broad range of model ages and body types. This is great if you have interests that run the range from petite models in their late teens though BBW models to MILFs. This isnít so great if youíre like me and have a narrow range of likes. But since the site many scenes there should be something for everyone.

I canít give a definitive answer on the update schedule as the scenes arenít dated but judging by the dates on the scene comments by members it looks like there is at least one new scene per week.

The site also offers a broad range of scene types which I think is a pro no matter how you slice it. There are solo scenes, some with toys, there are girl/girl scenes, there are boy/girl oral scenes, b/g/g scenes, some rimming scenes and even some anal scenes. And there are several scenes in the rare niche of white male/black female scenes too. Again, something for everyone.

The site has a very simple layout in that there is only one long page with a large thumbnail for each scene. Clicking on the thumbnail opens a new page where you can download the scene or get photos. The site has a limited search function but this is offset by being able to sort by model and the extensive use of niche tags.

Video downloads are only available as MP4s and only in one resolution per scene, but that resolution is high. Most of the scenes are 1920x1280 at around 6,000kb/s and 29fps. There are some lower at 1280x720 with bitrates ranging from 1,500-2,500kb/s and 29fps. The downside to having only one file size is that people with slower internet connections may wish for a smaller file size. The scenes look good with no pixilation but the downside is that since these are shot in someoneís home the production values are what youíd see in a more professional site. Lighting, for example, is sometimes a bit too dark. But it can also be argued that these Ďflawsí add to the amateur appeal.

The site supports download managers but I canít really say if there is a problem with links timing out. I use Internet Download Manager and have a relatively fast connection but the download speeds I saw here were probably the best Iíve ever seen. Iíd see a sustained 25MB/sec download most of the time. Iíve seen other sites only allow 20% of that speed.

One advantage to this site is that they offer a full trial. My worry was that Iíd trigger a download limit but I didnít find one. In one afternoon I downloaded all the scenes I wanted and never saw a limit or had my download speeds throttled. I downloaded 50GB of data in less than three hours so if there is a limit it is very generous.

The bottom line is that this is a good site in the true amateur niche. When you factor in the availability of a full trial at a low cost there is almost no risk to someone joining the site. Given that the site bills through CC Bill the only risk is the membership fee itself, and Iím confident that most new members could easily find lots of porn to make at least the trial membership a good value.

07-08-15  05:32pm

Replies (0)
Visit Rylsky Art

Rylsky Art
Reply of tangub's Review

Great review. I'm more of a video fan and I agree that Met Art videos are a bit dull. I thought it might just be me because I prefer harder-edged hardcore, but I guess not.

07-08-15  03:43pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

I 100% agree with your agreement with pat and your comments. These are great days for those of us who buy porn. Even a new site with just a handful of excellent scenes for a $30 monthly fee is still a good value when measured up with how you described life before the internet. I could rent three titles for $10 and if I was lucky there were four or five scenes on those tapes or DVDs that were worth watching.

And consider storage: I have what would likely fill an entire large porn shop and it's all discretely stashed in a locked briefcase.

07-08-15  03:33pm

Visit Tushy.com

Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

I had to give you credit for pointing out that connection. Both Blacked and Tushy are amazing sites. I hope they do really well.

07-07-15  04:49pm

Visit Tushy.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips
Cons: - New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site wonít remember username / password
Bottom Line: Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.

As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who donít know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)

Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though theyíre new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces Ė anal and expensive production costs Ė is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)

As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and Iíd recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.

Streaming is also available but I canít tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.

Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what Iíd expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.

The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasnít a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasnít recurred since.

Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche itís great that this site may be offering more of that.

While all the scenes look like theyíre exclusive to this site I canít say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ĎExclusiveí splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and Iíve never seen these scenes before.

I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and thatís a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. Iím only aware of one other anal scene sheís done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe sheís playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesnít look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.

The bottom line is that with the current size of the site itís hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of whatís offered here too, and itís fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. Itís also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site.

07-06-15  05:12pm

Replies (5)

Shown : 26-50 of 2019 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 3.07 seconds.