Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (316)  

Feedback:   All (1718)  |   Reviews (130)  |   Comments (112)  |   Replies (1476)

Other:   Replies Received (971)  |   Trust Ratings (71)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 1749 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

You are lucky about one thing - at least when you clicked the join page you found out that it lacked encryption. I had an email about a new site called XXX Pawn a few weeks back that looked interesting so I clicked the join button to see what the price was. What I didn't know was that it was a Bang Bros site and they had retained my credit card information so I didn't get any price information - I was signed up. At $20 for a site with six or seven scenes. And true to Bang Bros form with all of their add-on sites, cancelling was not easy. Since Haze Her and Dancing Bear are Bang Bros sites, if you join make sure to start the cancellation process well in advance of a rebill because you may need that time to get the membership cancelled.

Bang Bros has some great porn but the have the business ethics of the mob.


05-21-14  04:28pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer smaller rather than larger but I selected B rather than A. I'm not opposed to A though. Shape and firmness are really the deciding factors for me.

05-20-14  03:16pm

Reply
28
Visit POVD

POVD
(1)
Reply of skippy's Review

Great review. I like the level of detail you provided and the rationale behind some of your comments. Reviews like this make PornUsers a valuable tool.

05-19-14  01:10pm

Reply
29
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Graymane, I say this to you as a former Roman Catholic and one who studied to be a priest. The Catholic Church has the doctrine of Purgatory where an otherwise holy person gets sent to be purified before being allowed into Heaven. For the purposes of humor only, I'll deem that you may need a little while in Purgatory and I wonder if your punishment is having to watch anal sex for a few years before being allowed to enter the fullness of Heaven? If it is, please, please, please tell them that I too hated anal sex. And I hated Taylor Rain and Tanner Mayes especially. And the most fitting punishment for me would be a requirement to watch these women have anal sex.

Trust me, when we meet in Heaven, I'll buy you a drink!


05-16-14  02:12pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I'm old-fashioned, but my primary computer is a desktop. If I wasn't such a porn user that would be different, but it allows a hard connection to the internet and has more horsepower for the money than any other option. I do have other options, but by far my PC is the primary computer I use.

05-16-14  02:05pm

Reply
31
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Great story sir!

It reminds me of a joke I only partially remember so I won't dwell on it, but the gist of it is that a man dies and goes into the great beyond where things are better beyond all imagining. It's like a harem of beautiful women who look after all his sexual needs and submit to every depraved wish. He finally asks someone what he had done to earn such a high place in heaven. The reply was 'Heaven? You're not in Heaven! This is hell for all these women who did bad things on earth!"


05-15-14  05:21pm

Reply
32
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Give it some time, young man! You'll come around! ;-)

05-14-14  01:59pm

Reply
33
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of jook's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Sorry to answer your question with another question, but is it really possible to have too much porn featuring petite and gorgeous EE and Russian women doing anal? ;-)

Two of the bonus sites are pretty good. The biggest site on the network in First Anal Quest and that's pretty much self-explanatory. It has the same pros and cons of Double View Casting and it is fairly large too with 259 scenes available. (But it doesn't have the double-view camera gimmick.)

I also liked Fuck n Drive though it is fairly small. I like the whole cars-and-girls thing (I think it comes from my love of public sex porn). There are 38 scenes with a mix of solo, girl-girl and boy-girl. There is some anal here but not much. Since this is a favorite niche of mine I'm planning a full review in case anyone else shares my interest in it.

There's also Jizz on Teens. That site has 24 scenes and I can't really say anything else about it because I didn't download from it. For one thing all the scenes are b/g/g and I really prefer b/g. Also, none of the model's names are listed and that's something that bugs me.

The final site in the network is Wanted GFs. This is the weakest site on the network. It's touted as an amateur site and seems to have a lot more pictures than videos. And many of the photo sets I saw were of the American porn star Alyssa Hall. I quite like Ms. Hall, but she's no amateur girlfriend! The pic sets are available as zips.

Billing was through Epoch so I had no problems getting the membership or cancelling it.

I hope this helps.


05-13-14  02:08pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

By selecting other, I mean that "all of the above" apply in some way, and in different combinations at different times.

05-12-14  03:18pm

Reply
35
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of tribex's Reply

I'm glad I could help.

05-11-14  05:06pm

Review
36
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 93 scenes
- Russian / Eastern European models
- Several download options
- Innovative gimmick to have two views available
- In streaming you can switch between two cameras
- Two separate videos available for download
- Lots of anal
- Part of a small network (5 sites in total)
Cons: - Slow downloads
- Models names are frequently mixed up
- The male shooting POV needs more practice
- Selecting the ďremember meĒ button on log in doesnít work
- Hasnít updated since February 2014
- The two views are slightly out of sync
Bottom Line: Iím a fan of the casting niche and this was one of the few remaining reputable-looking sites that I hadnít joined. Iím glad I did but if youíre a fan of this niche this is likely one of the weakest sites available in the genre.

To be fair to the site, I think that part of the problem is a language barrier in many of the scenes. Not many of the models speak English well, if at all, and the casting niche relies on a lot of conversation to set the scene up and create some heat. In this case that heat isnít developed well because of the language barrier. Of more importance though is the fact that the site puts less effort into creating the myth of a casting video. When comparing the scenes here to one of the best, Casting Couch X, for example, language is only part of the issue. A site like CCX puts a lot of effort into creating the feel of a real casting that turns into a porn tryout. DVC doesnít put that effort in.

The siteís main claim is that it offers a double view of all the scenes. There is a camera being operated by a cameraman and the male talent has a handheld camera that shoots the same scene at the same time in POV. If you use streaming the video plays within the site and there is a narrow band at the top where you have a picture-in-picture of the second camera. Hitting your space bar toggles between the two views. I donít normally stream but I can see that this might be a good feature for those who do stream. But it might also be an answer to a question that no one ever asked. Iíll let you be the judge of that. A minor glitch is that the two views are slightly out of sync Ė only by a second or so but enough to notice. The bigger problem lies with the quality of the POV camerawork. I understand that it must be hard to do, but others have mastered the skill and the male talent/POV cameraman here hasnít.

The models are all Eastern European or Russian and many of them are well-known in the industry. Theyíre all between 18 and 22 and all are petite and attractive. There arenít a lot of fake breasts and tattoos. (Maybe those trends arenít as popular in EE/Russia?) One issue with all sites that use EE/Russian models is that they seem to change their names on a weekly basis. Itís apparent here because the link to the scene will have one name and then when you watch the scene there is text of the model name and that is often different from what is listed on the site.

The site uses a simple layout with 15 medium-sized thumbnails per page that open into a page for the scene. There is no search function and I found that using the model search page didnít work well but that may be due to the frequent model name changes even within the site.

There are some download options though they are limited and I donít really understand why these are offered. The scenes are available in ďWindows,Ē ďAppleĒ and ďAndroidĒ but in some cases all of them are MP4. There is only one file resolution in each type. Older videos have WMV available, sometimes as the only option. For each scene there are two downloads available: the main camera and the POV camera. One significant flaw in downloading is that the download speeds are about one-third of what I usually get. I used a download manager and had no problems with that.

Regardless of what file type is offered they all come in at 1280x720 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look crisp and have no pixilation issues.

The site shows 93 scenes but the oldest four arenít available for streaming. I canít say for certain that the site is now dead, but it used to update by adding one scene per month but the last upload was in February 2014.

The site is part of a small network of five sites in total. (One of them, Wanted GFs, isnít worth joining for so avoid a membership if thatís all you want.)

One thing that I listed as a good thing though others will disagree and see it as a negative is that there are a lot of anal scenes on the site. I didnít count them, but Iíd say between two-thirds and three-quarters of the scenes have anal.

One minor glitch that was nevertheless annoying is that while the login page had a box to check to remember your username and password that didnít work. Also, I couldnít enter the other sites on the network through the links on the site. My username and password werenít recognized. I had to do a Google search for the site and enter that way.

The bottom line is that unless you absolutely have to have all the casting scenes you can get your hands on, or if you really want to collect all the scenes you can from a specific model than itís probably best to pass on this site. Itís well done, the videos look good and they have their double-view gimmick, but other than that the site is just an average porn site that doesnít stand out from the crowd.

05-11-14  07:55am

Replies (9)
Reply
37
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I'm not really all that calm any longer. I went to the site and I see they have only a handful of videos. I'm pissed, but I suspect that the grief I'll go through to get a refund won't be worth it. I'll download what they have and chalk it up to experience.

05-10-14  01:41pm

Comment
38
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)

Warning about billing practices

I got an email on Thursday for a site called XXX Pawn. It wasn't listed here so I checked it out from the email. It looked interesting and I would definitely consider joining so I clicked the link to "Join Now" and I can't accuse them of lying. I wanted to see how much the site subscription was but instead a page popped up thanking me for joining. A bit of digging revealed that this is a new Bang Bros site and because I was a recent BB member they obviously retained my credit card information.

My advice is to make sure any "join" link you hit from an email isn't from BB or you might be in for a nasty surprise.

05-10-14  09:50am

Replies (2)
Reply
39
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of tribex's Reply

I found the email address I used. They replied quickly and cancelled my membership with no issues.

help at bangbrossupport dot com


05-10-14  09:35am

Reply
40
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)
Reply of bibo's Reply

I'll always be opposed to download limits but at least in this case they aren't as bad as we originally thought. But that's like being grateful for syphilis because it could have been AIDS instead. 6GB is too low, even for an hourly limit. I'm using a manager but not to queue scenes at NS. But I also have a fiber op connection that runs fast so I can easily hit 6GB in an hour. The strange thing is that I get the same warning that you wrote about (2GB in 12 hours) but the email said differently and the email is accurate about the 6GB. I can't speak for the hour cut-off because I haven't tried at just past an hour.

This is another case of a studio site falling short of what they could be. They have some excellent porn but they don't make it easily accessible.

One thing that we definitely don't disagree about is the need for the site to be more open about the limit. I did find the Terms of Service and I couldn't find anything in there about the limit.


05-06-14  05:47pm

Reply
41
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of uscue's Reply

I don't think so. The reason I can't be sure is it looks like there were some scenes added while I was a member but I suspect they were re-posts of older scenes. They looked old.

05-06-14  05:39pm

Comment
42
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)

Update on the download limit

(Khan - I didn't want to edit my earlier comment because that would make the replies seem strange but if you want to delete that earlier comment and replies I'll understand.)

I emailed New Sensations earlier today and asked them about the download limit and told them that I thought 2GB in 12 hours was unreasonably low for a site that offers HD scenes. Here's the reply I got:

Hi

We are not limiting the 2gb per 12hours. It is 6gigs in an hour. And if you are "blocked" it is for only an hour. Or if you let us know, we usually can fix it even faster, but it resets in an hour. We had to do that as we found abusers with download managers that were hurting the streaming and downloading from legit members. Let us know if you are seeing things differently and we will help you. In the beginning (after we switched the site to offer all the new formats and sizes) we had to watch and see what was happening.

Thanks
The NS Team

I can confirm that my experience with the site tonight is completely different than last night. Last night I was using a download manager to queue up scenes and I triggered the limit. I'm certain that the warning I got was 2Gb in 12 hours (because that's pretty specific) but I'll concede that I may have been mistaken.

Tonight I'm downloading again and I'm well over 2GB but I'm taking things slower so as not to hit the limit. So far I haven't been locked out.

It appears that the site's intention is to reduce site rips and large data transfers by download managers and I can live with that.

I think it's important to set the record straight. I apologize for any confusion and I'll update this as necessary in a review later.

05-05-14  05:22pm

Replies (4)
Reply
43
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

Please do. I suspect that PU members not joining won't hurt them all that much, but maybe the lack of subscribers from here might cause them to rethink this. At the very least I hope this will save other PU members from getting sucked in like I did.

05-04-14  05:47pm

Reply
44
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)
Reply of bibo's Reply

I agree that this site is definitely on the 'do not rejoin' list.

While I can understand why a site MIGHT want to impose a limit having one so low doesn't make any sense. The site offers 1080p videos and downloading just one of those might eat up well over half of your capacity. So what I've got a membership to is a site where I'll only be able to download fewer than 60 scenes. That doesn't seem like a good value.

While it won't do any good I'm planning to email them to express my displeasure. The TBP review says that there are no terms of service on the site so I'm planning to point out that it is unethical to have such a restrictive limit without giving a warning of that. I'll also point out that when I find a site I like I tend to rejoin often. Theoretically I could spend a few hundred dollars on their site over the next few years but with this low limit they've got the only money from me that they will ever get. I hope they see a drop from people joining their site from TBP/PU.

One thing that I'm also confused about is that over at TBP Maggie posted a review on May 3 and only mentions that other users reported a download limit. That makes me wonder if New Sensations gave Maggie a special access and didn't tell her that regular members had a limit imposed. I wonder if the site falsified the access that they gave Maggie and hid this important fact from her. Had I known that the limit was on the full membership too I definitely wouldn't have joined.


05-04-14  11:54am

Comment
45
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)

Download Limit applies to Full Memberships too

I just joined this network an hour ago with the full-price monthly membership and can confirm that the same (ridiculously low) 2GB limit per 12 hours applies to the full membership too.

I figured that since both bibo and audrina69 had trial memberships that the limit may be applied there. I admit that this was just an assumption on my part and I didn't check the terms of service. (A fool and his money are soon parted...)

Because I've exceeded the bandwidth limit I'm not even allowed to log in so that I can check the Terms of Service to ensure that the limit is CLEARLY spelled out there.

Download limits piss me off. Unnecessarily low download limits mean I'll spend the month with them and that's the last dime I'll ever spend there.

05-04-14  10:26am

Replies (7)
Reply
46
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

I have no idea why the site owners continue to offer only one (low) resolution. This really is a case of some good porn let down by a poor site. The site and the downloads may have been state-of-the-art back when they started, but it really needs a modernization now.


05-04-14  09:05am

Reply
47
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks for your kind words Sir. It's nice to know that some folks find my reviews useful.

05-04-14  09:03am

Review
48
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Beautiful models
- Mostly quasi-amateurs
- Some models have gone on to big porn careers
- Supports download managers
- Good download speeds
- Appears to update weekly
Cons: - Good porn let down by a weak website
- No preview pictures (though many scenes have a short preview video)
- No options for file types or resolutions
- Low resolution for 2014
- No photos
Bottom Line: Iíve often written that for a site to be great there needs to be three things happening: the porn has to be good, the site has to be good and the scenes need to be easily accessible in a way that members can use. This site is a case of only getting one out of three right, and thatís having good porn. But since thatís subjective your opinion might be different. Iím fairly confident that no one will disagree with my objective assessment that the site needs some work.

The genre that the site fits into is the quasi-amateur site where fresh-faced models come to perform a rare scene. The models are all relatively young (18-22), almost all are Caucasian, body types can vary a bit but most of them are petite. Some of the models have gone on to become big porn stars, but most are more obscure than that. While many of the models have other scenes (often on similar sites), most have little exposure if thatís something that you like.

This is a large site that started in 2000. There are currently 570 videos available and it appears that there is a new one added weekly. I say that it Ďappearsí that it updates weekly because I canít be certain since none of the scenes are dated. All of the scenes follow a formula, which some will take issue with. Iím indifferent to sites that offer formulaic porn as long as the formula works, and in this case it does. The formula is simple: the POV camera pans up a bed to the model and she is introduced and interviewed. There are some poses with clothes, the clothes come off, there is oral on the male cameraman, there is usually (but not always) vaginal sex, and the scene always concludes with the POV cameraman jerking off on the modelís face. Iím no fan of watching a guy jerk off on a womanís face (the jerking part, Iím fine with facials) but itís so common in porn now that thereís really no point in complaining.

The cameraman (and presumably the site owner) is good at POV work but not the best Iíve seen. One thing he does right is recognize that the scene isnít about him so he doesnít try to upstage the models. Some will complain that he talks too much, but I find that doesnít detract from the scene and probably helps it by keeping a connection between the performers.

As with many similar site, the main strength is the models who appear. Many are really good looking and worth watching.

One thing that I really like is that the models begin the scene in street clothes. I really prefer this over a sleazy porn outfit. The site made the right choice in this.

Apart from the good porn this site really has little else going for it. The site design is less than simple: itís outdated. And apart from being outdated, some of the choices the designers made are just bad. For one thing, the site is backwards. When you enter the first page with scenes youíre on the page with the oldest videos. Once youíre on a page you want the only way you can decide if you want to download a scene is from a small thumbnail. If you like a particular body type you may be disappointed with what you download. There is no search function, there are no tags and there are no links if a model has more than one scene on the site.

The downloads themselves are well below industry specs. There are no options for file types or resolutions. WMV is the only type available. The two most common resolutions are 640x480 and 704x396. There are a few at 720x480. Bitrates are 3200kb/s. Iím willing to accept that older scenes wonít be available in better resolutions, but in 2014 these resolutions donít cut it. At a minimum the scenes should be 1280x720. They donít look bad, but they still need to improve.

Download managers are allowed and I had no problem with links timing out. Download speeds were the same as I get elsewhere.

When I joined many of the scenes (maybe a year and half of them) provided no model name at all. The site explained this choice as an attempt to reduce piracy since a search for the site name a model name would bring up tub-site links. While this is better than streaming-only or DRM, I found it annoying since I prefer to sort the scenes by model name and if I like the model I might be able to find more her elsewhere. Sometime in the past two weeks the site has reversed this policy and now includes the modelís name on page, though the download still has a generic name. I can live with that now that I know the modelís name and can change the file name.

So would I recommend this site? Yes, with some caveats and reservations. If you like this kind of porn (quasi-amateur, casting style) then itís worth joining as long as you recognize that the site needs a lot of work and even the newest downloads arenít up to standards. What baffles me is that the site owner obviously puts a lot of work into shooting the scenes and then drops the ball by having a website that has been past its Ďbest beforeí date for several years.

04-27-14  12:55pm

Replies (7)
Reply
49
Visit Jim Slip

Jim Slip
(2)
Reply of pinkerton's Review

This looks like a really good site. Based on what you wrote I think I'll join this. Thanks for the review.

04-27-14  07:03am

Reply
50
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

Thanks for the info. I'll definitely be rejoining soon.

04-27-14  07:00am


Shown : 26-50 of 1749 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.04 seconds.