Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (346)  

Feedback:   All (1840)  |   Reviews (142)  |   Comments (120)  |   Replies (1578)

Other:   Replies Received (1026)  |   Trust Ratings (70)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 1874 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Thanks for the comment. I said it earlier, but it bears mentioning again: when your site takes three experienced porn buyers to figure out you may be doing it wrong. I'm sure their porn is expensive to make - many scenes have multiple models and most feature some extreme acts - but I agree that if they simplified their business model they could improve sales. I first heard about LP on another forum and it was raised by someone who asked a legitimate question as to whether the site even took memberships from outside Europe. That may be a silly question for any other site, but this one is so complex to join and use it was a valid question.

12-30-14  07:55am

Reply
27
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

I think you're right that the 90 day membership is likely the best value. I've made a note that if I rejoin I'll follow your advice. The problem I have is a lack of patience and that's needed with this site.

12-30-14  07:51am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I connect my laptop directly with a 20' HDMI cable.

12-30-14  07:45am

Reply
29
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(4)
Reply of mike11w's Comment

I think your comment pretty much sums up how most of us here feel about this network. What bugs me is that they don't need to do it. They have a great product at a decent price and I'm sure they'd have a lot of long-term and recurring members if they treated customers with more respect. I've joined several times in the past and likely will again, but I tip-toe through the site as if it was a minefield to avoid triggering an extra cost.

12-29-14  07:21pm

Reply
30
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Your comment here makes me almost certain that I'll not ever rejoin. The evidence suggests that your theory is correct and if that's the case this will be a really expensive rejoin if there is nothing more 'free' being added.

What a strange business model...


12-28-14  01:18pm

Reply
31
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Thanks for the comment again pat. And I can say that the trailers reflect the actual scenes.

12-28-14  01:14pm

Reply
32
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

Thanks for that. You know a site is confusing when it takes three of us to figure it out!

12-28-14  01:13pm

Reply
33
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

There are definitely three different types of scenes: those that are free to members, those that cost 'free' tickets and those that cost 'premium' tickets. But the 1500+ videos listed in the free section are definitely free for members. No tickets need to change hands. I only encountered three scenes in the many I downloaded that cost free tickets. I don't even know how a member earns those.

You might be exactly right about the LP scenes being in the free section but still needing a free ticket. That might also be the answer to your earlier question about actual LP scenes being in the free section. Since I only encountered three that required free tickets maybe that's an indication of how few are available without premium tickets.

The ticket prices are (in USD):

10 tickets - $10.32
20 tickets - $19.12
30 tickets - $30.32
50 tickets - $47.92
100 tickets - $79.92
250 tickets - $175.92


12-27-14  12:46pm

Reply
34
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of EverNight's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to comment.

You may be right that nothing has been added to the free section since August. Even inside the site I have no way to sort but the latest video there does appear to be that old.

I really don't have much experience with Russian and Eastern European porn so I wasn't aware of the possibility that the free stuff might be licenced from somewhere else. I'm fairly sure that I've downloaded some free videos shot in that white room but I could be wrong.

I was surprised that the videos weren't available in 1080p too. For a site that charges a premium price the quality is lower than it should be. At least the option should be available.


12-27-14  12:38pm

Reply
35
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Thanks for the comments pat. Your original comment was a big help to me. I know I'd have been pissed off if I had joined this site without having the information you provided. I'll answer your questions in the order you asked them:

1) A lot of is like that. There are extreme gapes, large toys, hard anal, pee play, stuff like that. DAP seems to be something they pride themselves in. There are even a few TAP scenes with models like Proxy Paige who are known for extreme acts. This isn't normal hardcore porn. You're certainly right that the focus is not usually on the woman's pleasure.

2) Hard to say. They're less 'medical exam' and more 'endurance test.' I'm not sure how to quantify sterile, but the scenes have none of the sexual tension that I like. But I knew that going in.

3) That's really subjective. It does push the boundaries but it isn't unpleasant to look at. Certainly anyone who prefers artcore wouldn't be happy with this kind of porn.

4) I think there is an element of that. I don't find the makeup is often overdone, but the clothes tend to the garish. My preference would be for a more natural look. You can't go wrong with natural.

I'm fairly sure I've missed the mark in some of these answers so feel free to ask anything else. I'll try to be objective in any answers I give you.


12-27-14  12:33pm

Review
36
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-03-15  01:36pm  (Update History)
Reason: One paragraph in the original was incorrect based on comments from other PU members. The paragraph provides accurate information now.
Pros: - 1500+ Ďfreeí scenes
- Some unique porn Ė if what they shoot is what youíre interested in
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Unique business model that wonít attract any fans
- Can get VERY expensive
- Website is poorly organized
- Many scenes donít have female talent listed
- Search function isn't effective
Bottom Line: Let me get one thing out of the way first: my opinion on this site is vastly different from pat362ís and I want to explain why. Patís comments are true, accurate and valid and if he hadnít posted those I would have not known that this site was VERY different from everything else Iíve ever joined. If I hadnít had the information that pat posted I would have written the same thing as he did. BUTÖ having been forewarned by pat that this site uses a completely different business model I was prepared for that and willing to join anyway. Iím grateful for patís comment since I went in with the full knowledge of what I was getting.

Further to the above, I think it is more accurate to think of this site as a store rather than a normal porn site. You pay your membership fee and that gets you access to 1500+ free scenes but if you want the newest stuff (less than a year old) you have to pay an additional amount. The flaw is that this can be an expensive way to get porn. But if this is the kind of porn you like then youíll like it a lot.

One aspect that pat commented on was the Ďattestationí requirement. After you buy a membership you have to prove that you own the credit card you used. The process is simple: the site deducts a small amount from your card. You log on to your bank, confirm the amount and report that back to the LP site. The amount is refunded. The process took me less than five minutes. The process is an attempt to limit piracy.

The second thing I should mention before I get into details is that this isn't mainstream porn that will interest everyone. Most of the scenes here push the limits of hardcore. Most of the scenes are at least threeways and scenes that donít feature anal sex are rare. Youíll also find milk and cream enema and pee play. The scenes are definitely NOT artcore.

You can choose different levels of membership with the difference being how many premium tickets you want to buy upfront. Once youíre a member there are three different Ďclassesí of videos Ė the premium ones that you buy with the tickets you get with a membership, the ex-premium ones that you buy with free tickets (you get one free ticket per day when youíre a member) and the free videos you have access to through your membership that you need no tickets for. It appears that videos that require paid tickets move to requiring free tickets after a year. It doesnít appear that the premium videos ever become completely free with a membership.

The site itself is a giant clusterfuck that needs to made more intuitive. I got used to it but it can be improved. Scene a model naming are a constant problem with generic meaningless names being given to scenes. Since Russian and Eastern European models change their names more than their socks I canít entirely blame the site for that, but itís still annoying.

Newer videos are available in two resolutions Ė 640x480 and 1280x720. Both are MP4. Older videos are only available in the lower resolution. I downloaded the higher resolution and those have a bitrate of 4500/kb/s so they look decent. The older scenes have a 2500 bitrate and they look okay too. Trailers are available, as are photos.

Many of the older Ďfreeí scenes are available elsewhere (like Videobox) but the resolutions here are usually higher than at other sites.

I used a download manager and had no issues with it. Download speeds varied and there were some times when the speeds were slow but most of the time they were okay. Sometimes they were fast.

You can buy scenes individually without a membership. One piece of advice is that if you do want to buy a few scenes work out the cost and compare it to a membership. Buying scenes individually is VERY expensive with that cost being about 3 times the cost of the tickets for the same scenes.

I found scoring the site to be difficult and I finally settled on a fairly low score mostly for objective reasons. The biggest of those is that the site isn't easy to use: it could use a major overhaul. If I factored in my subjective opinion on the quality of the porn the score would have been higher. If you like your porn with a harder edge youíll love the porn even if you donít like the process to get it. I know the biggest criticism of the site will be having to pay for newer scenes, but think of the membership fee as giving access to 1500+ scenes and you can buy the newest scenes.

Iíd recommend the site with four caveats: go in knowing that the porn is a lot harder than whatís available at most other sites, that the site itself is illogical, that unless youíre willing to spend a lot of money youíll be leaving the newest scenes behind and finally that business model is unlike any other porn site. If you do decide to join go in with your eyes open. Iím glad I joined and Iíll probably rejoin again.

12-27-14  09:03am

Replies (24)
Reply
37
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I don't think there's a worst place for all porn. If done well any setting can work well. A shower or a bedroom can work great if the context is right. So can a dingy old warehouse. My favorite setting is usually outdoors and those can be done well if the technical people have the right skills.

12-27-14  06:31am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I tend to take time off during the Christmas season and since I have more free time I watch (and buy) more porn.

12-22-14  02:24pm

Reply
39
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I'm with you. I purged my collection last year but couldn't part with some classics even though they're low resolution. I'm always on the hunt for more.

12-17-14  06:02pm

Reply
40
Visit Club Sweethearts

Club Sweethearts
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

I'm glad you posted this comment. This is a site I've thought about joining a few times but the name put me off a bit. Now that they have a clone with a less conspicuous name I'll definitely join soon.

12-16-14  03:39pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I chose 'other' as I really don't have an opinion. It isn't an interest I have at all so I don't look for it, but if it happens in a scene I otherwise like I don't get freaked out about it either.

12-16-14  03:37pm

Reply
42
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Good point. If VB, or any other site, followed your suggestion I'd sign up for a long-term membership to support them.

12-15-14  05:53pm

Reply
43
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
Reply of pat362's Reply

While I agree with you that it would be great if VB would licence and upload some older titles I don't know that they'd be better served overall. I'd love to have access to a wider catalogue of titles from good studios from the 1990s and 2000s.

But the problem with that is that's when guys our age started to get access to good porn and it means something to us. And guys like us are creeping into 'old man' category but some standards. So the younger members might not appreciate these older titles like we would.

I would definitely support a site that gave me decent quality old Anabolic/Diabolic stuff. And many other studios. Maybe I could fulfil my dream of owning every scene Tammi Ann or Inari Vachs did.


12-15-14  04:17pm

Reply
44
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(5)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

I just finished a month membership there and saw this happen twice - where a scene gets uploaded twice in a week because it appears in two crappy compilations. I suspect that there are some scenes on the site six times. Maybe more.

I've said it many times that VB would do well to change their business model. Push quality over quantity. I'd be happy with two good uploads per day rather than four crappy ones and one decent one.


12-15-14  04:10pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Never any 'live' TV. The little I watch (maybe an hour or two per week) is always recorded on a PVR.

12-14-14  07:36am

Review
46
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(1)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large catalogue of DVDs and scenes
- Rarely served niches available here
- Huge range of tags for sorting scenes
- Access to many older titles
- TBP/PU discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Very little HD material offered
- Most scenes are low resolution
- Over-reliance on compilations
- Scenes aren't linked with the DVD where they appear
Bottom Line: The last time I reviewed this site I scored it fairly high and I saw it as more of a network with a collection of sites. Now, three years later, Iím rethinking both of those positions. Iíve scored it lower because it now does more wrong than right, and when a Ďnetworkí also offers one main site where all their material is available I now view those niche Ďsitesí as being more like tags for sorting.

I really donít recall what the site looked like or how it was laid out three years ago when I was last a member but it now comes across as wanting to be a competitor to Videobox. If thatís true it misses the mark by a wide margin. MA has many of the weaknesses of VB without having any of its strengths.

The site currently has 7,475 DVDs uploaded. They also show 39,745 scenes as being available. For a DVD-based site they have a serious flaw in that if you open a scene it isnít linked in any way to the DVD where itís from and there is no information the DVD either. It appears that all the scenes are on DVDs but I canít say that for certain. I wouldnít join on the expectation that youíll get access to the DVDs AND get access to a lot of scenes too. I donít think the site works that way though it isn't obvious. (I also have to admit that while it appears that all the scenes offered in the niche sites are taken from DVDs on the main site I canít be certain that they all are. The way all the sites are structured makes that determination impossible. The effect may be that the site looks much larger than it really is.)

While the numbers of DVDs (and/or scenes) is impressive they only have 140 DVDs in HD. Where no HD is offered there are four resolutions of MPEG4 files available and listed as bitrates: 2000, 750, 500 and Ďportable.í For the few HD scenes here those are offered as 1080 and 720 (1920x1080 6000kb/s and 1080x720 4000kb/s, respectively). The highest bitrate scenes in SD come in at 640x480 and 2000kb/s. To be fair MA has access to a lot of older porn from the 1990s and 2000s (which I see as a great asset for the site) so I canít expect a lot better, but when VB uploads two HD DVDs per day MA looks to be lacking. Donít join here expecting a lot of quality because you wonít find it. (Of the scenes 39,745 only 2020 are in HD.)

Updates are another area where MA is lacking. But with the way the site doesnít link scene selections with the DVDs theyíre from it can be a little hard to tell. If sorting by DVD it appears that a DVD hasnít been added in almost three months but when sorting by scene the update schedule is better. There doesnít appear to be a regular update schedule but it appears that at least one scene is added per week and in some cases two scenes may be added per week. When you contrast that with VBís upload of five DVDs per day MA comes up short.

One weakness that this site and VB share is an over-reliance on compilations. Itís less acute here at MA but it is still obvious.

MA has a broad tag system for selecting scenes with approximately 115 niches tagged.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links timing out, though with the file sizes being so small that shouldnít be an issue anyway. I also found no download limits were imposed.

One advantage that MA has over its competition is that they offer porn in a lot of niches that aren't widely available on other similar sites. For example, they offer a lot of black-themed titles. Not interracial, but actually black-themed. Also, there is what I would call Ďsenior porn.í Not old men fucking young women or vice versa, but actually titles where all the talent is older. Finally, the site offers some gay material too, which seems odd on a straight-oriented site.

The bottom line is that Iíd only recommend this site to get access to some specific titles or studios that aren't offered elsewhere. Other than that this site comes up short in more ways than it succeeds. While it offers a low price through TBP/PU that low price isn't enough to offset the low resolutions for most of the videos. If youíre looking for an all-you-can-eat-buffet approach to porn youíre better off joining Videobox. VB is a much better value for your porn dollars.

12-13-14  01:20pm

Replies (0)
Reply
47
Visit Burning Angel

Burning Angel
(1)
Reply of SFguy's Comment

I started a thread in the forum on this very thing (http://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_thr...d.html?threadid=4131). Burning Angel is a Fame site and while they make it easy to join they certainly make it a thorough pain in the ass to cancel. You can do it online but they make that hard, and the fact that you couldn't find out how demonstrates that. I always retain the confirmation email because that will direct you to one of several site that the company uses for cancellation purposes. Once you go to the right site then you start a complex process. Fame has some great site so I really don't understand why they need to make is so hard for members to come and go.

12-13-14  06:30am

Reply
48
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(2)
Reply of Parsnip's Reply

It's sad that porn, or maybe erotica is a better term for this kind of material, has to chase a dollar and go to the lowest common denominator. I like a fairly wide range of porn and my collection has a lot of this 'softer' stuff. I like the more natural feel and timing to it. It has a sensuality to it that the hard stuff (purposely) lacks. There's more than enough hard stuff out there; I hope those of us who appreciate the artcore sites can persuade them to go back to their original purpose.

12-13-14  06:25am

Reply
49
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(2)
Reply of Parsnip's Review

I'm a fan of artcore/glamcore sites too but I haven't joined any in several months. I wasn't aware that Sex Art even existed. I also wasn't aware that a lot of sites I like have been shifting to a 'harder' model. What I like about these kinds of sites is the connection between the models that adds so much sensuality. I also like that the scenes aren't hour-long endurance tests. I hope existing members challenge the site owners and cause them to go back to the softer stuff.

One question - when you say the scenes are 'dark' do you mean the actual lighting or the mood? Or both?


12-10-14  02:01pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

It's rare that I read a site's Terms unless the site has no TBP or PU reviews. If there is a TBP review and several PU reviews I can usually get the information I want there. Mostly I'm looking for unusual limitations like download limits or streaming only. Those get flagged well at TBP/PU. But even in those cases where I do read the Terms they can sometimes be vague and I still have to take a chance.

12-10-14  01:51pm


Shown : 26-50 of 1874 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.46 seconds.