Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (334)  

Feedback:   All (1783)  |   Reviews (137)  |   Comments (118)  |   Replies (1528)

Other:   Replies Received (1003)  |   Trust Ratings (70)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 1816 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with LPee. I'll do that too.

11-22-14  05:57am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

BDSM done right is still all about the woman's pleasure. BDSM porn makes up a very small percentage of my collection but it is hot when done right.

11-18-14  04:36pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Ugh... I guess I'm going to look like a real pervert when I say that I have between 20 and 25 TB in my collection. And that's on the primary drives. I have it all backed up too. I am a bit of a hoarder but for me the collecting is as much fun as the having. I did a major cull last year of all the low resolution stuff I had (except for the scenes that I will never part with no matter how low the resolution is).

With a collection of this size I need a good method of cataloguing it. This may not be the best method, but when I started this it worked great, but now I have a 250+ page MS Word table listing the DVD or site name in the first column, the female talent in the second column and the drive number in the third column. It's alphabetized using column one but I generally use it more for word searches now.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some porn to download...


11-17-14  04:32pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What porn collection, dear?

11-12-14  02:53pm

Comment
5
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(1)

WARNING!!!!! SITE HACK

I joined Mofos almost two weeks ago and everything seemed fine.

Today I received two email confirmations and receipts from the biller showing that I had joined MofosCams and that I then racked up $120 in charges. I did no such thing. I contacted both Mofos and the biller and to my pleasant surprise they emailed me with a phone number, which I promptly called.

They reviewed the account and saw evidence that it had been hacked and they closed the account and credited me back the charges.

This is the first time this has ever happened to me. If you're a Mofos member, check your email and watch your credit card statement.

11-11-14  04:52pm

Replies (0)
Reply
6
Visit Sex Underwater

Sex Underwater
(1)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Thanks for commenting. Almost all the later scenes are shot in a pool so the safety issues would be less I think. If anything goes wrong the models are no more than a few feet from the surface. The ocean SCUBA scenes are a different matter though.

On a related note, some of these stars can hold their breath for a loooong time. It gets hard to watch it they can stay under so long.


11-10-14  02:49pm

Review
7
Visit Sex Underwater

Sex Underwater
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique theme
- Four additional sites included
- Many A-list models
- Photos and videos available
- Updates
Cons: - MP4 files come in as m4a rather than m4v so there can be playback issues.
- Scene resolutions arenít great
- Basic site design
- Some problems with download managers
Bottom Line: I have a thing for porn shot anywhere near or in water so I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was a site that seemed to cater to that niche. While this review will focus on Sex Underwater Iíll give some details on the other sites that come bundled with the network.

The premise of the site is fairly simple, and the title really sums it up: think of this as standard boy/girl sex that youíd see on other sites, but these scenes are all shot underwater. The majority of the scenes feature the talent simply holding their breath in a pool but there are scenes with SCUBA and supplied air. In the scenes with no air source but the surface the site edits out all the bobbing to the surface for air that the talent has to do. Some of the scenes are shot in the ocean. One thing to note is that these scenes are really quite normal apart from the unique location: this isnít rough sex and bondage Ė the water isnít used as part of some D/s play.

One thing that did surprise me when I saw it was how different the human body looks underwater. I canít really describe it in detail, but the female form looks amazing when you add buoyancy.

This isnít an amateur site since there are a lot of A-list models who appear here.

There are currently 300+ scenes. I canít give an exact number because the site layout is very basic and Iíd have to count all of them. The update schedule is a bit sporadic but it appears to add one scene every two weeks. The newest scenes offer some choices for file types and resolutions. The site lists MP4s as being available in 320x180, 640x360 and 1280x720. WMV is available in 960x540. Iíd normally download the 1280x720 MP4s but I had a problem with all of them. I will fully admit that this may be my issue since Iím not technologically inclined, but the 1280x720 MP4s all came in m4a format and that caused problems for me on playback. Because of that I downloaded the 960x540 WMVs. The resolution is accurate though the bitrate varies a lot with the file. Some are 1600kb/s while others are 6000. Frame rates vary too (23, 29, 59) and I have no idea why a site would have such variability. Subjectively the scenes look okay.

Unfortunately things change for the worse as the videos get older. Prior to July 2012 there is no option in file type or size and in most cases the scene is broken into two segments. Then, prior to 2008 things get almost unwatchable. Maybe underwater cameras are the limit, but it seems that if you were going to all the trouble to produce this unique content that youíd invest in a better camera.

While I was able to use a download manager I did encounter a few problems. When trying to queue scenes Iíd get an error message even though the queue would download.

The network comes with four other water-themed sites:
ē Underwater Glamour Ė This site features mostly solo scenes with a focus on eroticism. There are some girl/girl scenes though. There are currently 70+ scenes here but as they arenít dated I canít tell if new ones are ever added. By the resolutions on the scenes (1200x640) Iím guessing that the scenes are at least a few years old.
ē Grope-Cam Ė This is a lot like Underwater Glamour but a little harder in that the female gets groped by an underwater male. There are some sex toys used and there are some BJ scenes. There are currently 250+ scenes and it looks like it updates with a new scene each week.
ē Underwater Bath Tub Girls Ė Another unique site where the premise is a model lying on her back, submerged, in a bathtub with water while masturbating. The theme is eroticism again, not domination. There are currently 24 scenes though the last update was seven months ago. Resolutions are 720x480.
ē Mist of Water Ė Iím not sure how to describe this site, so Iíll just quote their tag line: ďWater soaked women, clinging hair, sheer see-through clothes, underwater buoyancy.Ē That pretty much sums it up. There are five photo shoots and two videos (640x480).

I donít download photos but it seems that this site could be of interest to those who do. Most scenes offer both videos and photos but like the videos the photos are just average quality. There are some at 1600x2400 but you donít have to look too hard to find lower than that. Theyíre available as zips.

So would I recommend this site? Yes, but as long as you know what the siteís weaknesses are. For one, this is really just a hardcore boy/girl site and thereís no shortage of those around. The difference here is obviously that the scenes are shot underwater. If that interests you then you have very few choices and your choices may be as simple as take it or leave it. The biggest flaw in the site is the low resolution videos and photos. This is a site that offers a lot of unique content with some of the hottest stars in the business but their video and photo offerings arenít up to standard. So the site gets a qualified recommendation.

11-10-14  10:48am

Replies (2)
Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No porn on the phone for me either. I agree with lk2fireone and Cybertoad: you've got a problem if you need to carry porn with you all the time.

11-10-14  10:43am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a big fan. While it can be repetitive, it is one niche where you can count on a slow build-up of sexual tension. That's the Holy Grail of porn for me.

11-06-14  02:13pm

Review
10
Visit VIP Members

VIP Members
(1)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 32 sites
- Covers broad range of niches
- Huge collection of videos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Site design is dated and not user-friendly
- Individual site layout is difficult to use
- Some videos appear on multiple sites
- Misleading number of sites
- Poor video quality
Bottom Line: Lately Iím much less of a fan of the all-you-can-eat-buffet approach that these large networks offer. Sure, they often offer a wide range of material so that most porn buyers can find something they like, but in most cases they do that at the expense of quality. With this site, the site itself and the videos they offer certainly lack the quality Iíve come to associate with smaller sites.

Before I wade into the main review I need to explain that Iíll be missing some details. The network is large and the videos are often available on several sites within the network which makes it seem bigger than it really is. But it also makes it impossible to say how many videos are available. I think a fair estimate is at least 1000 and likely more. Quantity isnít a problem here. The other problem is that none of the scenes are dated so it isnít possible to determine anything about updates. More on that later.

As networks go this one seems to have a broader scope than many. The sites range from solo girl softcore to extreme pissing sites. In between there are standard hardcore sites, several that feature pregnant models and a lactation site. I wonít list the sites because that list is long and most of them (but not all) are listed at the TBP page. One thing to note is that while the network shows 49 sites 17 of those lead to a site called 4Real Amateurs. I didnít log into that site so I canít comment. That leaves 32 actual sites as part of the network.

The sites all open in their own page with a standard layout and that layout isnít user friendly. This is hard to describe, but the videos are each laid out on a Ďpanelí with a thumbnail and a brief description but the area each takes up is varied so the Ďpanelsí for each scene end up in disarray. It isnít bad, but for some who prefers order and logic it is a bit annoying.

As I noted above, I canít give a definitive answer on updates, but it looks like there are no new exclusive updates. In the sites that look like theyíve added something recently those updates have been licenced by other sites. VIPissy, for example, has the newer content on the peeing sites. Other sites donít seem to be updating at all.

Another indication that the sites may not be updating is the quality of the video available. This is probably the biggest flaw in the network. The video quality varies widely across the network but thatís to be expected given that some of the videos are likely more than a decade old. I did find some videos that were 1920x1080 which Iíd normally praise. But the bitrate and frames-per-second rate are low at 4200kb/s and 20fps. These videos donít look good on a 24Ē monitor. Object edges look pixilated. Itís fair to point out that you donít have to look too hard to find videos that are 320x240 and 200kb/s.

The site supports download managers. I had no problem with links timing out, but then with the small size of some of the files that should be a problem anyway.

This network provides quantity over quality. Unless there are specific scenes youíre looking for my advice is to find a good niche site elsewhere. This network has a lot more wrong than right.

11-05-14  04:14pm

Replies (0)
Reply
11
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I've never noticed this before. Thanks for pointing this out.

11-05-14  01:36pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

I agree with all the comments above. While I am one of those who collects for the sake of collecting, I have an established list of scenes that I watch regularly. Most of my collection rarely gets watched more than a few times.

And as LPee23 said, the best never gets old. Some of my favorites date back 20 years so the video quality is horrendous but I'll never part with them.


11-04-14  02:02pm

Reply
13
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Thanks for the comments Drooler.

I'm not sure what it is about Ryan Madison, but I don't find that he's obtrusive like some other male porn stars. I'll admit that there may be a subjective element to that because most of what he shoots in harder-edged stuff that I like so maybe I'm just turning a blind eye to his shortcomings.


11-02-14  01:40pm

Reply
14
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

Thanks for that. I've watched a few already and they don't seem to any less graphic than before.

11-02-14  01:16pm

Reply
15
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of LPee23's Reply

I did. And I joined immediately to download what I wanted. I wonder if the videos are edited differently now.

11-02-14  12:11pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I chose 'other' because for me the scene set up is often more important than the scene itself. I prefer scenes that build a sexual tension. Some may find massage scenes boring or repetitive, but one thing I like about them (when they're done right) is that build up of sexual tension.

11-01-14  04:36am

Reply
17
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

Wow! Thanks for the advice and offer. I was last a member eight months ago and when I looked at the site this morning I only had maybe a dozen scenes that were 'must haves.'

10-30-14  05:23pm

Reply
18
Visit Hardcore Gang Bang

Hardcore Gang Bang
(2)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

Thanks for this LPee. I had heard that some changes were coming (reputedly due to credit card companies wanting to be squeaky clean for the soccer mom crowd). I'm rejoining as soon as I hit 'add reply' on this.

Edit - Fuck! It looks like the site might be dead. The link from TBP and PU leads to nothing. Going into any other Kink site and selecting Hardcore Gang Bang brings a dead link and searching on Google gives the same dead link. Damn, there were some scenes I wanted to see there...


10-30-14  02:01pm

Reply
19
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of Cochin's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to write that. I think that the best thing about PU is being able to take advantage of other people's experience with sites. I know I rely on that all the time.

10-30-14  02:00pm

Reply
20
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Thanks for the compliment, Cybertoad.

10-29-14  03:57pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer to rely more on the text than the actual score. I'll use the score as a guide, but the best reviews clearly explain the pros and cons of a site.

10-29-14  03:53pm

Review
22
Visit Teen Fidelity

Teen Fidelity
(2)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 150 scenes
- Exclusive scenes
- Top models
- Updates weekly
- BTS available
- Photos available
- Support download managers
- Full trial
- Lower than average monthly fee
- Lots of options to view the videos
Cons: - Iíve worked on this review and honestly canít provide one negative
Bottom Line: Teen Fidelity is an off-shoot of the larger Porn Fidelity site run by porn couple Ryan and Kelly Madison. While Teen Fidelity is smaller than Porn Fidelity it really does deserve to be understood as a separate site and not just a mere throwaway add-on. I joined just to get access to Porn Fidelity and Iím a satisfied buyer.

The site isnít huge by what some may expect. It currently has 150 scenes available with a new scene being added per week. Sure, that doesnít sound like a lot to a jaded porn buyer, but what you get is some top quality porn with some of the hottest models in the business. The lighting, sound and editing are usually great and the site is well laid out, logical and easy to use. (There are some scenes where the lighting isnít great but it appears that this is intentional to give a more voyeuristic look to the scene.)

The site is run by Ryan and Kelly Madison. Kelly is a buxom MILF who appears in a lot of videos at Porn Fidelity. She appears in most of the earlier videos here at Teen Fidelity too (the first scene is dated September 2010) but by late 2011 she makes only rare appearances. Iím obviously speculating here, but the target buyer for teen porn is different than the target buyer for threeway scenes with a teen and a MILF. Since Porn Fidelity has the teen and MILF thing covered, it made sense for Teen Fidelity to go after the all-teen market.

Some may see this as a drawback but Ryan Madison is the male talent in almost all the videos. Excluding the fact that I hate this man on principle just out of pure jealousy he certainly is good at his job. While many of the scenes are rougher than more mainstream porn (this isnít couples porn or artcore) he doesnít try to upstage the female models. It appears that he realizes that the customers are paying to see the women, not him. I appreciate his understanding of that because the same canít be said for all male porn talent.

There isnít a search function exactly, but there are pull-down menus that allow you to sort by the scene date, ethnicity, bust type, participants (Kelly or not), where the cumshot lands and whether the scene has anal. (For those who care, as I do, there are only seven anal scenes here, though the one with Dakota Skye is so good it should count as ten on its own.) You can also sort by model. There are enough sorting options that the lack of a search function is of no consequence.

The page for each scene offers a huge number of options. Streaming is available in high or low res. There is a trailer available for streaming or download. The main scene is available as an MP4 in 360, 480, 720 or 1080 resolution. I downloaded the 720 and those come in at 1280x720, 5100kb/s and 29fps. They look great. Prior to May 2012 there were also WMVs available in 540, 720 and 1080.

One thing I really like is that most (and maybe all) videos have a stand-alone BTS video for streaming or download. These include some interviewing of the model and some actual BTS footage.

Photo lovers wonít feel left out (though this really is a video site). Photos are available as singles or zips (in two resolutions, 1728x1148 and 1175x781). BTS photos are also available.

I had no problems using a download manager and links were live for a long time.

The TBP review of the site says a user reported a 10GB daily download limit. That may have been the case at one time but I specifically went looking to hit a limit and didnít. If there is one, an average porn user isnít likely to hit it.

While I opted for the full membership this time, I have tried the trial membership and it had no restrictions. That was a while ago and may not be now.

The bottom line is that this site nails all three factors I look for in a good site: they offer great porn, they offer decent downloads and the site is well designed. Add in that these are exclusive scenes with top models and the site becomes hard to resist. When you factor in the below-average monthly cost of $25 the site represents a great value. (As someone who started buying porn on VHS, then DVD, a site that offers 150 scenes at sixteen cents per scenes is a great value!) I highly recommend joining this site. I know Iíll be a regular here.

10-28-14  05:55pm

Replies (8)
Reply
23
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

You raise an interesting point that I've never considered - that the site access as a bonus to the other sites is different than if you joined through NVG. I have nothing to go on but speculation, but I'm guessing that the site access is the same whether you get a membership as part of the ECG/BRCC/NVG or whether you join specifically through NVG and get access to the other two. Maybe someone else can weigh in on that point.

10-28-14  03:20pm

Reply
24
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

I was a member there up until about three weeks ago. I have to say that of the three sites that come with that membership (Exploited College Girls and Back Room Casting Couch being the other two) I think NVG is the weakest. Some of that is subjective so Iíll try to explain.

My primary reason for joining when I do (Iíve joined maybe five or six times now) is to get access to ECG. BRCC is a great added bonus that adds value to the membership but NVG is a take-it-or-leave-it part of the deal. The scenes are all fairly well done and many of the models are attractive (though some arenít) so on that scale the site does okay.

Where the site really falls flat is in site design and technical stuff. Iím a fan of simple site designs but NVG looks like it was designed in 1995 and not updated since then. Iíve never found a search mechanism though there may be one. The only way Iíve ever found to sort the videos is by a bar at the top of the screen that allows you to sort by year. I donít know how that date would work with a remastered video. Once youíre on a specific year page you have some very small thumbnails that really donít assist in deciding if you want to download the scene. I canít recall if there is any better way to see the model before downloading.

Speaking of downloading, if there are downloading options Iíll choose MP4s and look for 1280x720 if itís available. That depends on the bitrate too as Iím looking for the best compromise between video quality and file size. The files are MP$s but if there is an option for different resolutions I didnít see it. Even the most recent uploads are only 656x368, 2500kb/s and 29fps. That resolution is very low by todayís standards. If Iím incorrect and there are better options for downloading I hope that someone else will weigh in and let us know.

There is a big element of subjectivity here, but if this were a stand-alone site I wouldnít join unless the price was under $10. The site itself and the video quality are too far below industry standards. But (and this is subjective again) Exploited College Girls is a great site (though the attractiveness of the models is slipping a bit in the past eight months) and Back Room Casting Couch is a good site so if you have any interest in those Iíd recommend joining and you get NVG as a bonus so you can explore that.

As I said, I donít have an active membership there now but if you have any specific questions I can try to answer them. I hope this helped you a bit.


10-27-14  02:50pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Fully dressed in street clothes is definitely my preference. I love seeing how a model looks in real life before seeing her get naked.

10-27-14  02:26pm


Shown : 1-25 of 1816 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.31 seconds.