Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (20)  

Feedback:   All (176)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (153)

Other:   Replies Received (60)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 176 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Don't really care about bukkake. Once Mrs. LPee showed me a video where a Japanese porn model tried to give a news cast, while at the same time guy after guy came and blew their load in her face. It was kind of absurd, but not erotic.

There was once a site called SquirtBukkake.com, where they reversed the roles. A man or woman would be squirted all over by a group of anywhere from 5 to 20 women. It's not really bukkake, even though they called it that, but it was damn hot. The site is dead, but all their content lives on in my collection ;-).

04-23-15  04:40pm

N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

The exchange rate is just one factor among many. It might mean a slight uptick in profits for Euro sites from US sales and a slight increase in the volume of sales. Tubes, piracy, and concerns about privacy are probably all more important factors though.

04-19-15  11:22am

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

They don't add anything to what's already in the video for me. Definitely not a stand in for photos. I rarely download them.

04-14-15  02:29pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Why crop a thumbnail?

No one gets enough out of looking at a thumbnail that there is a need to further degrade the image.

04-11-15  11:13am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not at all, HD is amazing. Minor skin flaws like moles and skin lines are not a turn off. Actually, I love the realism of HD, especially in close ups.

I can not wait for the next level up in resolution. As good as today's HD is, it is still far from reproducing the detail we see in reality.

04-09-15  06:24pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Not really.

There may be a small niche for smart sex toys though, and that raises the question of what really is a robot. Vibrators are one thing, but imagine how women would like a vibrator that is also an autonomous pleasure machine capable of learning and adaptation. Just a thought.

03-24-15  06:03pm

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

"I can be mildly disappointed when I find that some content from the site was removed. It's hard to determine if the removal was done at the request of the model, If done at the model's request, that shows a respect for the model."

Most of the time you don't know, and model's request is far from the most common reason. I can think of a few sites that have told me they did this at their request though. AbbyWinters.com is one well known example, where models can buy back their shoots if they want them down. It does show respect for the models, in keeping with the AW brand of being a model friendly site. I guess I can't blame them for it.

Then again, there are massive sites like 21sextury.com that have never taken anything down, despite certainly having received requests, and I can say I am definitely glad they have kept it all.

"On the other hand, there are so many past and future models, we should still appreciate the content that is available to us."

So true. Enough cannot be said for the models and producers still creating and distributing great content.

03-22-15  06:29pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Okay, so I heard back from the owner in this case, and they think it was an error on the C4S server, because they did not want to take that clip down. They're going to try to get me a copy, which is great.

Back to the original topic of the poll, I think it detracts from the entire site when you remove content, even if it's just a handful of models. Joining a site only to find content missing is like buying a book and finding that certain pages are gone.

03-22-15  12:48pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Something like this just happened to me the other day, although I'm not sure if it was at the model's request or not. I purchased a number of clips from a clips4sale.com store. They all downloaded fine except for one. So I contacted C4S support, and they told me the clip had been deleted by the store owner. I went back to check the store, and sure enough, the clip was no longer listed.

I could not believe it that in the seconds between me paying for a clip and downloading it, the store owner deleted it. I emailed them about it, and I'll let you know if I get a reply.

03-22-15  10:31am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Many people unfortunately don't pay for their porn. Of the minority that pay for it, fewer still go one step further after getting their fix and actually review it online. I think we're in the minority.

03-15-15  05:24pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They almost always come with restrictions, so I don't bother anymore.

02-28-15  09:48am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

You may be surprised, but my answer is no to new fetishes. I've had my fetish for my entire life, long before I ever saw porn.

As I read this question more, it is difficult to answer because fetishes are very different from interests. Sure, I've developed new interests from watching porn.

Have I talked with people who discovered a pee fetish through porn? Sure. But in my case, I didn't have to be exposed to it, it was just the way I was. Most guys got turned on by tits and pussy. I got turned on by tits, pussy, and women's piss.

02-27-15  10:35am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I like anything that adds a bit of authenticity to a scene, including clowning around.

02-25-15  10:49am

N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I've come across the best in tech support, the worst, and everything in between. You can't expect much from half the sites out there, the rest will usually try to help, and some rare sites will really go the extra mile.

02-19-15  01:20pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope, not a turn on for me. I think there are a small number of guys really into it though.

02-19-15  01:16pm

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I know a guy who specializes in pre-1995 and vintage, VHS, mags, reels, whatever, so hit me up if you are interested.

02-08-15  06:59pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I usually focus on the peeing content, but I get it all. I can't imagine the size of my collection if I downloaded literally everything from every site I joined.

02-08-15  06:36am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Playback dimensions should be 720 horizontal pixels for HD and 1080 horizontal pixels for 1080P or "True HD." The only caveat is that you can't sample raw video shot at a lower resolution of 720 or 1980P and still call it HD.

02-06-15  09:06am

N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

I may rephrase this poll in the future, because I didn't mean DRM in the traditional sense, I just meant a hidden watermark to identify each downloader.

02-01-15  06:31am

N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

If you do this right, they can't be removed. You place a watermark that is unique to each user, and it consists of very subtle color alterations of the pixels comprising the watermark, which can be off to the corner somewhere. You would never be able to see the effect of this.

If the webmaster wants to identify the downloader of a given image, all they have to do is subtract the pixels of their un-watermarked master copy from the watermarked image.

This cannot be decoded or removed without the master file, so there would be no way to defeat it.

Again, I would be fine with this. I once saw it implemented really badly though, with a semi-translucent alphanumeric code watermark right in the middle of the field of view. Ugh!

01-31-15  02:19pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Just to clarify, I don't mean DRM in the sense that you can't copy or view it without any restrictions. I just mean they added an invisible watermark or some other means of identifying each downloader on a master list.

I have joined a few sites that did this, and it doesn't bother me. You've got nothing to worry about as long as you don't pirate the content. As long as you are not pirating the content, then the only way anyone could use the codes to identify you is if they found the porn on your hard drive, but in that case I think they would know its yours anyways.

I'm surprised more sites haven't done this. I've seen sites close, with the owners complaining about the usual, no money in porn, piracy, etc, yet they never tried anything like this.

01-31-15  10:05am

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Sad but true about the drop off in new content. There were years when there were over a hundred new sites featuring peeing, now last year I don't think I could name ten new ones, and many more closed than opened.

01-27-15  08:20pm

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

None of the above, although girls getting cosmetic surgery when they don't really need it is kind of a shame.

01-27-15  02:09pm

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

The taboo nature is part of the fun too. If it weren't for people opposed to it, and you are entitled to your own opinion, then it wouldn't have quite the same thrill.

01-26-15  07:01pm

N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

If only people could keep a more open mind. Anything that can be enjoyed between consenting adults should be able to be portrayed.

01-25-15  06:06pm

Shown : 1-25 of 176 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.08 seconds.