Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LPee23 (13)  

Feedback:   All (87)  |   Reviews (8)  |   Comments (3)  |   Replies (76)

Other:   Replies Received (30)  |   Trust Ratings (6)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 30 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
REPLY TO #3 from DDFNetwork: (LPee23's Reply)

Hi LPee23,

I see your problem here. We are not yet at the point to start remastering of the house of taboo sets you are mentioning, but they will be re-captured within a few months. It's a huge job to remaster all these archive videos, so I hope you'll have the patience for our team, and I hope you understand that we are following a specific structure in the remastering of our archives, where we cannot change the order, otherwise - with a huge archive like ours - it would lead to total chaos.

Anyways, I forwarded your request to our reproduction team, so they'll let me know when they start the processing of the taboo sets, so I can update you. As soon as any of those done, I'll say a word for you at the updates planning. If you have any spoecific sets in mind, please don't hesitate to send it to support@ddfnetwork.com, addressing your email to Kris.

Kind Regards

Kris


07-28-14  04:22am

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

What's a floppy? Are you talking about my schlong after about 2 minutes or so of serious boinking?

Seriously, the last floppies that were truly floppies were the old 5-1/4" deals. The 3-1/2 devices were far better because they weren't really "floppy." I still have some photos on the good old 5-1/4" guys just because I can't find any way to transfer them to a flash drive or anything else.


07-26-14  02:15pm

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

Id love to read it cool

07-24-14  10:56am

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #9 from pat362: (LPee23's Reply)

I think it's great when sites remaster their older stuff because it gives newer members the chance to see those videos but a site should only use 30% remastered content as new updates and that's only if they update multiple times per week. Otherwise remastered content should bea bonus above truly new stuff.

The other important thing should be that older content should never be sold as HD if the site had to crop the older video to a small size so that they can actually make it HD.


07-22-14  02:03pm

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (LPee23's Reply)

My review of their site recently was very hard due to what I viewed as mismanaged older content.

07-22-14  09:12am

Reply
6
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

With regard to the subject of 'older material', DFF would not be the only studio that has older material. But I would think it has to do with one's desire for specific older material that one desires. If you follow a retired performers work and want to collect it, you're going to have to suffer crappy video quality. (Think one of the more famous porn movies - Deep Throat.)

I once asked Jonni Darkko if he would redo any of his older work - He seriously doubted it due to lack of time & the cost constraints.

There is nothing amiss when a producer's catalog includes poor quality video, & while I'd love it remastered, better to have it available than not. Besides, it is content that already exists and has no continuing expense except the device on which it's stored. But then, isn't that one of the issues facing the end user own concerns with space in dealing with a collection?

I look at it like going to a library and finding an out of print book and then complaining that it's on the library's shelves because of the condition of the book.


07-22-14  06:36am

Reply
7
N/A REPLY TO #8 from jberryl69: (LPee23's Reply)

lol - I knew it really wasn't a trick question, it just turned into one. But look at the conflict of 1 & 2 - how can it be bad if you make more money with that strategy? One would be remiss if a survey of customers isn't done first.

I once worked for an trust attorney who's price for a trust was constantly keeping us in the weeds. My suggestion was to raise the price by 50% and if we lost 50% of the business (which was not going to happen - we lost 1/3 of the number we normally did) we'd break even but work less. In the actual case we got more money for less work. Now I know it's not the same thing exactly but if you putting a strategy in place (and true it might not work unless you tried it) to make more money let the suckers leave.

Netflix did this when they broke out their DVD & Streaming business into the same cost for each as the cost for both was. They lost my business but obviously their business has grown.


06-11-14  04:36pm

Reply
8
Visit Homegrown Video

Homegrown Video
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from grakkie: (LPee23's Reply)

Yeah, it's completely pissing me off. I'm considering a chargeback! I've been locked out now for almost 30 hours. I've sent a half dozen messages and had no response so far. No idea when they'll get around to unlocking it but I considering this stealing from me - they're not holding up their end of the deal!

05-24-14  06:45pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

Ditto LPee23's comments.

Make 'em obvious ads so they cannot be confused as content links and I'm perfectly fine with them.

Don't overdo it like Naughty America has done. I did not renew my NA membership because the entire log in page was all ads and no content.


05-06-14  09:34am

Reply
10
Visit Extreme Holly

Extreme Holly
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from badandy400: (LPee23's Reply)

I sent you an email as well. My listed email here is still correct and I do use it a lot. I will do what I can to help out a fellow yellow fan. Ha (actually I prefer clear)

04-29-14  03:41pm

Reply
11
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
REPLY TO #2 from badandy400: (LPee23's Reply)

Oh wow. That was six years ago. I really do not remember now. Glimpseit was a recent find for me though that might just be what you are looking for.

04-27-14  09:56am

Reply
12
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the info. I'll definitely be rejoining soon.

04-27-14  07:00am

Reply
13
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from turboshaft:

Great review, LPee23!

I'm not sure 100 would be appropriate for any site, but if you can fit your viewing habits into ALS' particular niche and how they capture it then why not go all the way? I just know that since giving it a score of 97 way back when that I've grown bored over their approach and really disappointed over their use of boy-girl content, no matter how limited.

Oh, how the mighty (and shaven) have fallen! :-(


04-26-14  07:08pm

Reply
14
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from rearadmiral:

Ordinarily I'd challenge someone who gave a score of 100 but I won't do that here for two reasons: 1) I know how great a site it is since I scored it at 97, and 2) you gave more than enough reasons to justify the perfect score. I agree with you that ALS Scan does EVERYTHING well. The porn is incredible, the site is logical, the downloads are easy and fast, the resolutions are better than usual in the industry and they provide all of this for a low price. I'm a big fan of their location shoots in the Caribbean. Those are hot and playful at the same time.

Have they ever shot more European public nudity stuff? The last time I was a member there were no new scenes like that. I'd love to see more of that since high quality public nudity is hard to find and this was some of the best I've ever seen.

Did you watch any of the b/g hardcore videos? If so, how are they? Are they artcore/glamcore or harder? Are there many b/g hardcore videos?

Finally, your account of the level of customer service that you got is inspiring. In a business where getting any response is unusual to get this level of service is amazing.

I really need to join this site again soon...


04-22-14  04:20pm

Reply
15
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from LPee23:

As a footnote to my review, please read this from ALS about their remastering process:

"The majority of our remastered sets were originally shot in digital format. We have always kept copies our raw / camera images untouched. So a typical set involves simply loading up the set in our camera program, reselecting and applying color correction to the raw images, then extracting them to a TIF format. In the early 2000s, sets were much smaller due in picture size and quantity due to the limited availability of broadband internet, so we are now able to include several, often hundreds of images from the set that were never before released, making the sets more "new" than old, and include them in the full size they were shot in by the camera. From there, we follow the same basic processing as any new set with today's quality standards. For instance, we all used to use the big tube CRT monitors when we color corrected images. Now that flatscreen and LCD monitors are more commonplace, those images tend to look a bit brighter and overexposed, so the remastered releases come out looking a bit more rich and vibrant color-wise.

There are some cases where we have even gone back to models who were shot in print. In these cases, we do have to digitally scan in the original print. We have a huge storage container filled with these albums. The main trick is using a very high DPI scanner to help blow up the images without sacrificing their quality. Once they are in a lossless TIF format, we again apply the same basic processing steps using Photoshop mostly to help balance the color, resize and sharpen the images, and try to reduce any graininess."


04-21-14  06:44pm

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (LPee23's Reply)

I have to commend you, LPee ......It certainly can't be said you don't go all-out defending your stance on matters about which you comment...... in this case your recent poll entry.
This is a welcome discovery. Keep up the good work!


04-20-14  03:40am

Reply
17
Visit Crazy Babe

Crazy Babe
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from tangub:

I've never come across this site before but from your review the content sounds quite intriguing. After checking out the review on TBP though it sounds too much like hard work for me with no zip files and poor organisation. Great review nonetheless.

04-12-14  02:51pm

Reply
18
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)
REPLY TO #3 from biker: (LPee23's Reply)

I know I have downloaded scenes I already own from previous subscriptions, but I'm doing a little better at giving them file names that will help me find them and placing them in folders that separate them into categories. Those old shoots stand up, both models and photography.

04-06-14  09:31am

Reply
19
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from RagingBuddhist: (LPee23's Reply)

Thanks for the feedback, LPee. It certainly does look like they've finally spiced things up a bit.

04-05-14  03:49pm

Reply
20
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from greg909:

I might add that for those of us more into the still pictures, they are mediocre quality at best on this site, and usually miss the best action. As for the videos, great quality, but far too much other stuff like dildos and glasses for my liking.

03-19-14  11:01am

Reply
21
Visit Piss Bank

Piss Bank
(1)
REPLY TO #1 from Monahan: (LPee23's Reply)

The price is actually $34.90 for one month and $39.90 for two months ($19.95 per month). Still, not a terrible price to check out the site.

03-05-14  09:00am

Reply
22
Visit Wet And Pissy

Wet And Pissy
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from turboshaft:

Nice review, LPee23.

I joined PuffyNetwork myself a couple months ago and was quite happy with the sites...well, W&P was really my only interest. I would say that this site is pleasurably unique in shooting well--lighting, resolution, longer scenes--in a genre that too often doesn't get this treatment, instead relegating it to shitty, creepy, sites that have seemed to think that simply shooting "fetish" content makes up for a measurable amount of quality.

And to top it all off they have the crazy idea to depict the performers actually enjoying it, instead of the fetish=sadistic treatment angle that too many sites have gone for over the years. Who would have thought to make the content in porn appear to be pleasurable?

My main complaint would be, like RagingBuddhist raged in his review of PuffyNetowrk, that the download speeds were inconsistent and all too frequently slow, at least for the larger 1GB+ size files they have so many of. A growing problem, as the site builds up its lecherous library and you really want to get the most for your money. (But if you're into it, you damn sure will wait on every single file!)


03-05-14  12:39am

Reply
23
Visit Piss Bank

Piss Bank
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from blahman2:

cool!

03-04-14  06:04pm

Reply
24
Visit Wetscape

Wetscape
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from graymane:

My apologies ..... but because I was forbidden to return and correct (edit) a crucial mistake on the last line in my initial message (Exceeded time lapse of ten minutes) .... the effect of which would reverse the entire meaning of what I meant to convey, thereby confusing the entire train of thought that was to convey my intentions.
Hereunder is the single word (in quotation) which I failed to include in it's proper order ....."elsewhere."

Below is the repeated paragraph which includes the intended word in question --appearing in (bold) and the order it was supposed to have been in .......

I predict and enthusiastically hope you meld right in with our busy but happy group, wherein you'll discover an unmatched, unique, and special camaraderie that "ELSEWHERE" doesn't even come close to what we enjoy here.


01-20-14  05:00pm

Reply
25
Visit Wetscape

Wetscape
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Review from graymane:

I gotta say, Lpee, you certainly haven't let any grass grow under your feet inso-far as the short time you've been with us. That is to say you wasted little time jumping right onto contributing to all segments of PU's worthy projects, and done so admirably .
It is this kind of enthusiasm, loyalty, and partaking interest that we here hope to see in our newcomers.
Because I think, from what I've seen, that your presence and potential capabilities can, and will only improve on why this site is the best of it's genre.
Here one finds he needn't be reticent about particularly unpopular niches, (save those which are clearly outlined in written creed and bylaws) because the kind of support he finds here from PU's membership so overshadows that worry that it mindfully slips away.
I predict and enthusiastically hope you meld right in with our busy but happy group, wherein you'll discover an unmatched, unique, and special camaraderie that doesn't even come close to what we enjoy here.


01-20-14  03:56pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 30 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3.11 seconds.