| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I join sites for video not pix so for me I need to see that the quality (not necessarily resolution) will be there.
|
04-11-13 02:38pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Nah those damn 'bot may take my job; but damn it no body beat me at schnookering!
|
04-10-13 04:40pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly take price into account. If two sites have fill a similar niche, with similar quality doesn't the less expensive site deserve to have that noted and their score bumped? Conversely if a site is gauging shouldn't that also be noted?
To me I think it's all part of writing a fair review. Fair to the webmaster and to the potential customers.
|
04-10-13 04:39pm
|
Comment
54
|
Used White Wives
(1)
|
|
04-07-13 06:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
There's such a variety in reviews that it's hard to answer; like RustyJ said, some do it well others not so much. I think another site that does a good job with previews in manojob and naughtyamerica.com
I'm not looking for them to give away the farm - just want to know if what you have is what I want
|
04-06-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
56
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What's wrong with Zombaio? I've never had a problem with them, but I think this is the only site I've ever used them with.
|
04-05-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I leave my asleep rebooting once a week.
|
04-03-13 04:11pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used a manager years ago in the dial-up days but haven't thought too once broadband and modern browsers took hold.
What are the best ones for a mac, maybe I should look again?
|
04-02-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
That's the right attitude and mine too. Never be afraid to try something. How's that for philosophy?
|
04-02-13 05:06pm
|
Reply
60
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
How's this for an easy answer - on the newer videos there is no watermark.
I looked back over 800 videos and only found watermarks on her blog content - not the member videos. That took me to March 2011. When I look at the oldest content I can see a watermark but I found it unobtrusive, it's a light pink (almost white) watermark in the corner. (That video was dated Feb 14 2011)
I hope that fully answers the question. I have to confess I really like Lelu and highly recommend her site. I think any solo content girl that updates everyday and gives her fans personal attention is deserving of all the success in the world.
If you decide to join please do a review, I ranked it at 100 which I know is awfully high, but like I said in my review; when you accomplish what you set out to do, and fulfill your marketing, what else could we customers want?
|
04-01-13 01:25pm
|
Reply
61
|
Cuckold My Husband
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I hate being so negative on a site, but there was just nothing good about this one. :(
|
04-01-13 08:16am
|
Review
62
|
Cuckold My Husband
(1)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Candy is a hot MILF who seems to be videoing her playtime. In other words this is a woman who loves sex; not a model who's trying to maximize profit.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- Each scene has a small description with it.
- Screen shots available for videos (I like this because it helps determining if something is worth downloading).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what. I can tell the model for this site (Candy Christopher) is also the talent in at least one of the other sites. So it's very confusing what exactly are you getting
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year. |
| Cons: |
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- Most videos are under 10 minutes (only 2 are long; one 20 minutes, one 30 minutes)
- pictures are not available as .zip
- Broken links. All of the dildo shoots were inaccessible. Clicking on them would ask for password, only to have password rejected.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- only 6 dildo videos (which I could get to), and 13 hardcore. For a site that's been up since at least 2000, that's really poor.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
- Cinematography is hurting. For example in the longest running video there's a pillow block most of the action - despite the fact that her husband is camera man - this doesn't get fixed |
| Bottom Line: |
I've never given such a low score. But between the small number of updates, the password problems, and the abysmal quality I feel there's no choice.
Scenes start in the middle of the action, there are times when the audio cuts out.
Candy is an attractive MILF, there's no doubt about that. I'm really hoping that some of the other sites on this network that feature her are better than this one.
To be fair I have not contact the webmaster about my issues (then again the fact that I will have to speaks about the sites upkeep as well). For $30 for a year's subscription I figure I have time to mess with it if the mood ever strikes me. Right now I'm not impressed enough with the content to be bothered. |
|
04-01-13 07:27am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
63
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
|
04-01-13 06:44am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
64
|
VNA Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
VNA itself focuses more on a cam network, and a good number of girls include anal in their shows.
That said- the individual sites also include anal (most of them anyway). If this is what you're looking for, you should check out filthycuteonline.com (Shanda Fay). She has a lot of content and there's plenty of anal.
|
03-30-13 04:56am
|
Reply
65
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Excellent points. Like I said in my opening remarks. I surprised they do this. I don't think I'm that savvy of a customer (lord knows I've maid plenty of mistakes in my time). It seems to me they'll lose more in bad reputation then they'll ever gain with these practices.
|
03-29-13 08:47am
|
Reply
66
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I guess my ignorance is showing. See that Bangbros is a big and long lasting company I thought their long tenure meant integrity.
As you're comments point out - I seem to be mistaken.
Thanks for your help and thoughts.
|
03-29-13 08:45am
|
Reply
67
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
that's even stranger. the exact url I was directed to is: http://www.assparade.com/t7/?prg=pps&...&cmp=warningpage
I thought it was rather strange that access from the main site had different behavior then the direct url.
Do you see the same thing when you go to the above url?
|
03-29-13 07:10am
|
Comment
68
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
|
03-29-13 04:46am
Replies (11)
|
Reply
69
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Oh, cool. I always get worried when I see "euro models". Thanks for replying!
|
03-29-13 04:28am
|
Reply
70
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Thanks Pat for mentioning their are some British Models. I myself don't go for porn I can't understand so English speakers is important to me. Glad to know some of that is available here.
|
03-28-13 07:20am
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Cable connection for me. I worry about US's future competitiveness with our increasing lag in broadband competitiveness.
|
03-28-13 07:18am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think Drooler says it best. Between the vague definitions of what will be virtual sex the fact that nothing replaces the real thing, I wonder if we'll ever be there.
To my the relevant movie reference comes from a 90s Sly Stallone film (I think it was Demolition Man), in the movie he has virtual sex with a future woman, then they have non-virtual sex and of course there's no comparison.
|
03-28-13 05:09am
|
Review
73
|
Mature Sex Heaven
(1)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Billed as the "Swinging Granny" she is still an attractive woman for her age. There was one reference to 62, but I'm not sure when that was.
- Weekly updates to pix and videos
- nearly 75 videos (most are segments that run between 3-7 minutes)
- About 175 picture sets with about 100 pix in each set.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures) |
| Cons: |
- videos are segmented so you waiting each week to get it all. Each video is between a 2 minutes and 5 minutes long.
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv |
| Bottom Line: |
Lady D says she is in this for the fun not the money. And it is certainly true. You can see she is enjoying ever minute of this.
While nothing is hotter than a woman into her sexuality - the poor quality and constant waiting for the full video made me crazy. I myself am not into GILFs, but that's my problem not hers she is certainly a hot lady.
I have to rank this one as a skip. While I like the mix of content and the regular updates, There are so many other sites in this niche that have higher quality and more content. If this is you're kinda thing check out LadySonia.com (plenty of reviews of her here on PU too) |
|
03-26-13 06:56am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not to dodge the question but - sexy girls are sexy. If she's standing next to a car is she more or less sexy?
To me it doesn't excite me more if she's next to a gun, but the gun is also not the focus of my attention. ;)
|
03-25-13 10:04am
|
Comment
75
|
Amateur Key Club
(1)
|
|
03-23-13 07:26pm
Replies (0)
|
