| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Those of you looking through the comments of this site you will see after my review I learned that there is in fact NOT new content still uploaded to this site.
Those of you paying extra close attention will see that I also lowered my score of this site from 60 to 55 to reflect the lack of new content and the attempt to trick their consumers.
Thank you again Pat362 for pointing out what they were doing.
|
04-28-13 01:38pm
|
Comment
27
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
|
|
04-28-13 01:35pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
28
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Oh. that is crappy. I assumed that since it was showing date of April 2013 that it was being uploaded for the 1st time on those date.
That just not right.
|
04-28-13 05:33am
|
Comment
29
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
|
|
04-26-13 04:57pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm more of a MILF fan so i don't encounter this issue much
|
04-26-13 04:53pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Ah hackey sack, reminds me of high school.
|
04-24-13 01:43pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Excellent thesis, friend
|
04-24-13 01:42pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Porn is big business no matter how you cut it. That means clout which will keep things about were they are maybe a little less strict.
|
04-24-13 01:42pm
|
Reply
34
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You probably are right, and i've been too generous. Especially considering the few number of videos and the relative short length of them.
I think in general I am too generous with sites. I know that someone's work is important and personal to them (especially in this business) so I try to be respectful of that. Perhaps I give too much into that impulse.
I thank you for calling me out when I stray too far. You are one of the individuals I keep in mind when I'm reviewing (my friend graymane is another).
|
04-23-13 05:58pm
|
Review
35
|
Mandingo Mama
(1)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures) |
| Cons: |
- Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.
The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.
Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :( |
|
04-22-13 03:51pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
36
|
Candy Christopher
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.
But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.
Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)
|
04-20-13 09:59am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with otoh. If there not trying to trick me and there's enough content sure. I'd be sure to mention the lack of updates in my review.
Honesty is my only requirement.
|
04-19-13 01:20pm
|
Review
38
|
Candy Christopher
(1)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Candy is a hot MILF who loves sex - that really comes across. She has an easy smile and laugh and is very charming. She is truly photogenic
- a lot of interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some). There are some shoots with her husband so it's not exclusively ir.
- Mix of content: fisting squirting, masterbation, cream pie, etc. it's anything but boring
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year. |
| Cons: |
- Much of the content is shared with Candy's other site cuckoldmyhusband.com. Since there isn't much content to begin with that's a serious problem. In addition both sites are part of the same network which in it's advertising counts them separately. Granted there are differences but these sites really should just be merged.
- just over 70 videos. Most are under 15 minutes
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is clean but basic. There's no search or tagging functions. However with such slim pickings there isn't much of a need :(
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a bear bones site, which is a shame cause there's certainly potential here. I have a hard time excusing only having such limited content when you've been in business so long. The poor quality and the lack of content are unforgivable.
When I joined there was a deal, 1 year for 30$. So my expectations were low. I certainly was not surprised with what I got.
Even at such a low price I wouldn't recommend. The convoluted organization makes doing these reviews a chore - but I figure if anyone searches for these sites they'll at least benefit from my experience |
|
04-17-13 02:13pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
39
|
MistressT.net
(1)
|
|
04-17-13 11:29am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
40
|
Puba
(0)
|
|
04-17-13 11:13am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I agree I'm more turned on by real women. It makes me crazy when a site has models that all look like "Barbie."
|
04-17-13 11:11am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to only join sites with member reviews. However over the last few month I've realized someone has to be the 1st so I've become more comfortable jumping in (if the preview section is good enough).
I've have once joined a site that did not have an adequate preview and regretted it.
|
04-17-13 11:09am
|
Reply
43
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Nice review and welcome to PU. I'm also a fan of NA and try to rejoin every year or so to check out the latest. I agree they are formulaic and vanilla - but sometimes that's just right.
|
04-17-13 05:40am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Perfectly said the hottest porn is always the stuff that gets the model off (the less acting the better). Fisting doesn't seem to be enjoyable. Amazing what the human body is capable of; but not pleasurable.
I too went with "not my cup of tea" (who I am I to judge what turns you on) - but like you not for me.
|
04-13-13 08:30am
|
Comment
45
|
Amateur Allure
(2)
|
|
04-12-13 06:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
46
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
Thanks hodaythink. I like checking out NA every few month, maybe I'll grab this while I can!
|
04-12-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I join sites for video not pix so for me I need to see that the quality (not necessarily resolution) will be there.
|
04-11-13 02:38pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Nah those damn 'bot may take my job; but damn it no body beat me at schnookering!
|
04-10-13 04:40pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly take price into account. If two sites have fill a similar niche, with similar quality doesn't the less expensive site deserve to have that noted and their score bumped? Conversely if a site is gauging shouldn't that also be noted?
To me I think it's all part of writing a fair review. Fair to the webmaster and to the potential customers.
|
04-10-13 04:39pm
|
Comment
50
|
Used White Wives
(1)
|
|
04-07-13 06:02pm
Replies (0)
|
