Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : marcdc1 (174)  

Feedback:   All (663)  |   Reviews (104)  |   Comments (132)  |   Replies (427)

Other:   Replies Received (222)  |   Trust Ratings (38)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 665 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

IDK but am interested to hear from the women who are active.

05-09-13  06:35pm

Reply
77
N/A Reply of Lionheart's Poll

Like everything else I don't have one thing I'm looking for. Lots of different girls are sexy in lots of different ways.

05-08-13  06:41pm

Comment
78
Visit Interracial Video.net

Interracial Video.net
(0)

great price but lousy network

I'm working my way through this network and so far it is painful. While I like the girls (for the most part). And the sex is incredibly hot.

The quality, quantity, organization, and everything else are painful. In addition some of their practices are shady - I know see they're taking previous material and redating it so it looks "new". Is honesty that rare these days?

05-06-13  06:28pm

Replies (0)
Comment
79
Visit Ruby's Diary

Ruby's Diary
(0)

Anyone have feedback?

TBP rated Ruby an 80 (I usually find my satisfaction is 5-10 point higher than their reviews).

Before I join can anyone share their thoughts?

Thanks!

05-06-13  06:19pm

Replies (0)
Review
80
Visit Used White Wives

Used White Wives
(0)

55.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- network has about a dozen sites in it, but much of the content is shared between them.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons: - Small number of models.
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess. It seems to me they're taking content that was shoot 10 years ago and claiming it's new updates
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
Bottom Line: This whole network has been one long disappointment. I didn't have high hopes (with $30/year I wasn't expected the world't best website). That said they managed to fall below my low expectations.

The girls on the site are plenty hot, and the content itself is raunchy (I do so love raunchy porn). But the quality is poor, the updates are lacking, the organization is nearly non-existent. When I look for good things to say - I have a hard tie coming up with anything.

If interracial is your thing you should look somewhere else - there just isn't enough her to be bothered. Even with the ridiculously low price the frustrations don't make it worth it.

05-06-13  06:15pm

Replies (0)
Reply
81
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Models have feet?

Serious do like a girl in stockings


05-06-13  02:28pm

Reply
82
Visit My Horny Asians

My Horny Asians
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

Thanks for putting this out there lk2fireone

05-05-13  04:32am

Reply
83
N/A Reply of Jay G's Reply

I agree "the more you know..."

or as GI Joe taught us "knowing is half the battle"


05-05-13  04:29am

Reply
84
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like the one built into chrome.

05-03-13  01:04pm

Reply
85
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

While for deep reading (novels, non-fiction). I prefer to read print. For short reads (news articles etc) I read that content almost exclusively on a screen.

05-03-13  01:02pm

Reply
86
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)
Reply of marcdc1's Review

Those of you looking through the comments of this site you will see after my review I learned that there is in fact NOT new content still uploaded to this site.

Those of you paying extra close attention will see that I also lowered my score of this site from 60 to 55 to reflect the lack of new content and the attempt to trick their consumers.

Thank you again Pat362 for pointing out what they were doing.


04-28-13  01:38pm

Comment
87
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)

Needs fixing; my mistake

I believe in the old school newspaper ethic of fixing a mistake in the same headline that you made it in.

I was mistaken when I said flour was wrong. As My friend Pat362 points out in the replies to my comment, there is in fact no new content. Instead there is new content given new date stamps are re-organized to make it LOOK like there's new content.

Not the hallmarks of competent professionals

04-28-13  01:35pm

Replies (0)
Reply
88
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Oh. that is crappy. I assumed that since it was showing date of April 2013 that it was being uploaded for the 1st time on those date.

That just not right.


04-28-13  05:33am

Comment
89
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)

Not dead yet

The commentator below says the site is dead; it's not. However it does seem to be on life support. Even the rest of the network is a dud. Hopefully they make a come back but at the moment it's hardly worth the time; let alone the money

04-26-13  04:57pm

Replies (3)
Reply
90
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'm more of a MILF fan so i don't encounter this issue much

04-26-13  04:53pm

Reply
91
N/A Reply of plan b's Poll

Ah hackey sack, reminds me of high school.

04-24-13  01:43pm

Reply
92
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

Excellent thesis, friend

04-24-13  01:42pm

Reply
93
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Porn is big business no matter how you cut it. That means clout which will keep things about were they are maybe a little less strict.

04-24-13  01:42pm

Reply
94
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

You probably are right, and i've been too generous. Especially considering the few number of videos and the relative short length of them.

I think in general I am too generous with sites. I know that someone's work is important and personal to them (especially in this business) so I try to be respectful of that. Perhaps I give too much into that impulse.

I thank you for calling me out when I stray too far. You are one of the individuals I keep in mind when I'm reviewing (my friend graymane is another).


04-23-13  05:58pm

Review
95
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(0)

55.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures)
Cons: - Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.

The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.

Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :(

04-22-13  03:51pm

Replies (5)
Reply
96
Visit Candy Christopher

Candy Christopher
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

It kills me 'cause I try to focus on the positive, and as I've mentioned in other posts, I think I'm too easy as a reviewer.

But this site is awfully dated. Which is a shame cause I think the passion across the network is there and would make great porn, if only they would invest in it.

Here's hoping to seeing a lightyear's worth of improvement :)


04-20-13  09:59am

Reply
97
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with otoh. If there not trying to trick me and there's enough content sure. I'd be sure to mention the lack of updates in my review.

Honesty is my only requirement.


04-19-13  01:20pm

Review
98
Visit Candy Christopher

Candy Christopher
(0)

55.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Candy is a hot MILF who loves sex - that really comes across. She has an easy smile and laugh and is very charming. She is truly photogenic
- a lot of interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some). There are some shoots with her husband so it's not exclusively ir.
- Mix of content: fisting squirting, masterbation, cream pie, etc. it's anything but boring
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
Cons: - Much of the content is shared with Candy's other site cuckoldmyhusband.com. Since there isn't much content to begin with that's a serious problem. In addition both sites are part of the same network which in it's advertising counts them separately. Granted there are differences but these sites really should just be merged.
- just over 70 videos. Most are under 15 minutes
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is clean but basic. There's no search or tagging functions. However with such slim pickings there isn't much of a need :(
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
Bottom Line: This is a bear bones site, which is a shame cause there's certainly potential here. I have a hard time excusing only having such limited content when you've been in business so long. The poor quality and the lack of content are unforgivable.

When I joined there was a deal, 1 year for 30$. So my expectations were low. I certainly was not surprised with what I got.

Even at such a low price I wouldn't recommend. The convoluted organization makes doing these reviews a chore - but I figure if anyone searches for these sites they'll at least benefit from my experience

04-17-13  02:13pm

Replies (3)
Comment
99
Visit MistressT.net

MistressT.net
(0)

Now accepting Amazon Gift Cards?

I see on her twitter feed @mistressTdotnet you can now pay for a multi month pass with an amazon gift card. That interesting and cool. I've seen more amateur sites (specifically my favorite lelulove.com) do that but this is the 1st for an international site (she's based in Canada).

Maybe this is a partial solution to regional pricing?

04-17-13  11:29am

Replies (0)
Comment
100
Visit Puba

Puba
(0)

Recent experience?

I came across a discount for Puba the other day and touring the site it looks pretty good. Then when I check here at PU I see no recent activity and not exactly the most favorable comments.

Anyone have recent experience that they can weigh in with?

04-17-13  11:13am

Replies (0)

Shown : 76-100 of 665 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.06 seconds.