Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (402)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (360)

Other:   Replies Received (159)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 407 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
Reply of Laptopbs's Comment

I'm amazed PU still want to do business with a site that has ripped off several users here now. Thanks for the warning. I'm definitely going to avoid this site.

10-08-13  10:49pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yep, too much in my opinion. I'm really not a fan, so it's sad that so many great scenes seem to have anal. Leaves slim pickings for people who don't like it.

10-04-13  08:54am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Sarah Peachez reminds me in many ways of a past girlfriend, coincidentally called Sarah and who also gave great blowjobs.

09-27-13  11:10am

Visit Immoral Live

Immoral Live
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Yep. I always star/flag my active subscriptions in my inbox so I remember to cancel. Cancelling is easy enough, but it's a bit cumbersome with the capcha codes, having to retype bits of the credit card number etc. CCBill really spoils us!

09-23-13  01:48pm

Visit Immoral Live

Immoral Live
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Superb review, as normal! Completely agree with your comments about their biller, too.

09-23-13  01:23pm

Visit Bryci

Reply of JamesDavid's Reply

Only just read this, but great news about the regional billing - I don't have as much of a problem with it as some members here (despite being in the UK), but this is a great move.

09-22-13  12:29pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Three times:

Chica's Place, who very quickly resolved it*
Bryci, who didn't initially resolve, but sorted out in the end*
KT-So who never resolved

(* both these happened when I was having problems with my router, which I think meant I kept getting new IP numbers)

09-22-13  12:25pm

Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
Reply of bettercallsaul's Review

You're not the first person here to have this problem. I agree that PU shouldn't have anything to do with this site as they've ripped off several members here and would continue to do so if it weren't for warnings like yours. Definitely adding the site to my blacklist.

09-20-13  11:55pm

N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

Black or white I guess, or maybe red. Something classic. A lot depends on the model's skin colour/skin tone where I think paler models look better in black and vice versa.

09-20-13  03:10am

N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I'm not fussy at all really. Whether it's the Fame Girls teasing or Tia Ling leaving nothing to the imagination, both can be sexy in their own individual ways.

09-14-13  04:54am

Visit Femanic

Reply of Incovide's Comment

Haha brilliant, thank you for such a great overview of this site. I'm still laughing at point 8 where you explain the clear, simple, clever cancellation process.

Sounds like the site has been just chucked together with little or no regard for users. The download limit also sounds particularly annoying, and the quality of content doesn't make it sound like all the other problems are even worth the hassle.

09-10-13  05:22am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Somewhat likely.

I've done this in the past with several sites, and I'll do it again at some point I'm sure, but at the moment I'm trying different sites before settling on 'the one'

09-10-13  03:24am

Visit Elegant Angel

Elegant Angel
Reply of pat362's Comment

Wow, hope you do manage to do a review. Your experience definitely sounds different to other reviewers, so I'd definitely like to read your expanded thoughts and always think it's important things like this are reflected in the site's overall score.

09-08-13  12:10am

Visit My XXX Pass

My XXX Pass
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Great review, sir; really good job. Completely agree with everything you've written from my time at Throated which really grew on me the longer I stayed a member and the more I explored the other sites.

09-07-13  08:14am

Visit Kiara Mia

Kiara Mia
Reply of bebelover's Review

I wish you gave more information in your review such as what sizes the images are, what way the adverts were deceiving etc. But thanks for the warning.

09-06-13  02:52pm

Visit Nubiles.net

Reply of Thedebilman666's Reply

Good to know! Riley is bit of a new discovery for me (how I've not seen her before god only knows) - absolutely loved her at first sight, so really happy to hear she features here too. Thanks again!

09-05-13  01:45pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind them, but they're not the most sexual, sensual act a porn star can perform really. Far prefer blowjobs or even titjobs.

09-04-13  03:37pm

Visit Nubiles.net

Reply of Thedebilman666's Review

Great review, and well done on justifying the perfect score. I've definitely added the site to my shortlist now, particularly with you saying that it doesn't centre around anal content - I'm getting pretty sick of everything either being a BJ or anal with nothing in between, so it's refreshing that there's something to cater for my tastes.

09-01-13  08:49am

Visit Fame Girls.net

Fame Girls.net
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.

It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.

I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.

Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.

08-30-13  01:44pm

Visit Fame Girls.net

Fame Girls.net
Reply of graymane's Comment

My Fame Girls.net review explains this, but...

Fame Girls.net (which I've reviewed) is the new site with Ella and Katie
Fame Girls (that you reviewed) is the archive site with Ella and Virgina

08-30-13  12:54pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think so, yes. When you consider the amount of time given up by webmasters and models, the equipment they need to use (cameras, lighting, computers etc), web hosting, paying for the payment processor etc etc...

I wish when sites become archive sites (eg, Karla Spice) they'd drop the membership fee, though. But generally for active websites, I think $20-30 is very good value.

08-29-13  10:50am

Visit Lethal Hardcore

Lethal Hardcore
Reply of SFguy's Comment

$174?! That's insane. Thanks for the warning, I'll make sure I add this site to my blacklist.

08-28-13  10:30pm

N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

For me it was a coin toss between 'how they perform' and their 'body shape/size'. I voted for how they perform in the end, though, as I'm more open-minded body-wise as I like slim, nubile models to fuller, curvier (albeit not fat), whereas if they're not very good performers or good in front of the camera, then it's hard to find any enthusiasm for them.

08-27-13  12:52am

Visit Fame Girls.net

Fame Girls.net

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extremely high-quality photography and HD videos
- Already plenty of content despite it being a relatively new site
- Exclusive content and exclusive models
- Regular updates, all dated (3 galleries and at least 1 vid a week)
- All content is downloadable, with ZIPs available for galleries
- Two super, super-sexy models who are both very confident
- No ugly tattoos, fake breasts, lots of piercings etc
- Great quality photography and slickly-edited video
- Lots of variety in terms of shooting locations, gallery themes etc
- Nice, clean (if basic) navigation and previews of future updates
- Well-used comment and gallery/video rating system
- Ability to bookmark your favourite photos/sets
- Both models are outstanding teases without showing too much
- Billing by CCBill with reduced cost rebills
- Simple login with ability to choose own username/password
Cons: Points marked with * don't bother me personally:

- Search system doesnít seem to work
- Previews are a bit too vague, particularly for video updates
- Videos are a bit too arty-farty and can be slow-moving
- Daily bonus photos arenít varied enough
- No interaction with/from the models (eg, blog)
- Currently only two models*
- Some might not be happy Katie/Ella arenít totally nude*
- Pricey compared to some sites*
Bottom Line: I nearly didnít review this as I know a lot of people donít Ďgetí non-nude sites, but for me a good tease site can definitely hold its own against even a lot of porn sites as for me the thrill of the chase, and the art of tease can be extremely sexy in my opinion.

A quick bit of history first: Famegirls.net replaces Fame-Girls which is now an archive site. Previously there were three models; the famous Sandra, Virginia and Ella. Sandra retired, and recently Virginia also retired. Vlad, Ellaís photographer, decided to start a new site on his own, and introduced Katie, who is new to modelling.

The site is only a few months old, but already it has 36 galleries (5,000 pictures), and 19 videos, and with three galleries (averaging 100-150 photos) and at least one video every week, itís growing fast.

Both Katie and Ella pose nude, with very little being left to the imagination apart from between the legs. They come very close to showing everything, though, particularly Ella. They are both supreme strip teases, though, and for me, little is sexier than a beautiful girl, slowly, sensually taking her clothes off and having fun as she does.

The galleries are set in number of locations; either in the studio, normally with a plain background and props, or often outside on a deserted road, beautiful meadow or idyllic river. Even on the outside shoots, the image quality and lighting is exceptional.

Itís a lot more sexual than the previous site in terms of poses, the style of photography, the detail and things like the Ella pouring milk over herself in one set, or Katie smothering herself in oil in another Ė itís more than just glamour now.

Although sets are generally the same format, each gallery brings something new to the table. Thereís always a strong narrative, the costumes vary from bikinis to dresses and everything in between, and both Ella and Katie seem to have a huge variety of poses so it somehow never gets repetitive.

Currently there are 35 galleries and around 4,500 images.

Images are 5760px on their longest side, and have a
translucent simple white logo in the corner. Each gallery is downloadable as a zip file. You can also choose to download the zip file with six different image dimensions from 640px on their longest side all the way up to their original size.

There are also 20 videos available. All are 1280x720, HD, MP4 and are around 5-10 minutes long. Theyíre beautifully shot, but generally a bit too arty-farty and slow-paced, although there are exceptions (eg, the latest Katie video where sheís in a sauna). At least one video is added every week.

Members can rate and comment on both videos and galleries. These seem like well-used features, and comments arenít censored or even moderated from what I can tell.

Navigation-wise, you can view Ellaís sets, Katieís sets, or videos. You can also add sets and photos to your favourites and view just those. There is also a search function, but Iím not sure it actually works Ė it would be nice if you could search for Ďlingerieí or Ďbikinií or some kind of tag, but every search term I tried didnít return any results. The navigation is fairly simple but definitely fit for purpose.

Another little criticism is the daily bonus photo, which is not included in normal sets, Ďsuch as pictures from real life, artistic shots, or working momentsí Ė since Iíve been a member, every day itís been a picture of Katie from the same shoot, albeit a different picture. It would be nice if these could be more mixed up so one day it might be (for example) Ella at the beach, then Katie on a shoot, then Ella shopping etc... at the moment itís just like being slowly drip-fed a gallery day-by-day.

At the moment it is only Katie and Ella modelling. I know the webmaster is looking for another model, though. Both Katie and Ella compliment each other with both being extremely svelte, with incredible figures. Ella is blonde, while Katie is raven-haired. Neither have lots of piercings or any tattoos which is good to see. So far, thereís only been one video with the pair in, so fingers crossed for more.

My last criticism, possibly my biggest, is that thereís no interaction from the models in terms of behind the scenes footage or candid photos. I know a lot of people donít care for this, but on a site like this I think itís important. I donít blame them for not getting involved with comments etc, but maybe Vlad (the photographer/webmaster) could consider a blog with more of a behind-the-scenes/off duty look at these gorgeous girls?

This is a great website with great photography and is incredibly sensual. The girls are both gorgeous, Ella is incredibly experienced and Katie is already confident and exciting in front of the camera. At the moment it is on the pricey side, but Vlad has a long history of being extremely reliable with updates, and content is continually being added and I definitely feel like Iíve got value for money compared to a lot of smaller amateur model sites.

08-26-13  07:14am

Replies (2)
Visit Foxes.com

Reply of Thedebilman666's Comment

Has it always been like this? I seem to remember Foxes was one of the first sites I encountered when I got into porn many, many, MANY years ago - I don't recall ever joining it though, definitely not if it was a PPV site. Surely people must be insane to spent that much on four sets!

08-25-13  12:32am

Shown : 76-100 of 407 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.9 seconds.