| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I like to work my way through a new site, downloading only the bits I like. Depending on the site, and how much of it I like, that may be a couple of days, or most of the month I join for! Then I'll just keep an eye on updates.
|
03-18-13 04:04am
|
Reply
52
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(3)
|
Reply of
Zoltan's Reply
I subscribed to this site a while ago - although I didn't find it quite as superlative as you, I enjoyed it. But re the largest picture size - although there are no zips, with a download manager - I used downThemAll - it is fairly trivial to fetch a full set of full-size pics.
|
03-16-13 11:57am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said 10% because I'm on the web much of most days for work. But if I only count out of work hours - I'm still doing quite a bit of other stuff but I'd say maybe 20%.
|
03-16-13 11:55am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Depends on the girl and the accent! Some accents are pretty hard to find attractive (mentioning no names) - Russian is fairly sexy, but not as much as Scottish, which makes me weak at the knees.
|
03-14-13 01:45am
|
Reply
55
|
Massage Rooms
(1)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Many thanks for this great review! I've never joined a massage site, but I have been tempted - I like the idea of the tenderness in the sex. This certainly looks like one of the better ones too - but as you suggest, may be worth waiting a little while for more content.
|
03-12-13 06:07am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the above for me - but I'd say between the second two, girls in 20s-30s. For me, the 18-21 models don't quite have the allure/sexiness that, say, a 27-30 model does. But there are, of course, exceptions - in both directions!
|
03-12-13 05:43am
|
Comment
57
|
Smut Makers
(0)
|
|
03-08-13 12:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I find it really handy for sites - I use it to keep a list of all the sites I'm potentially interested in. I scan it quite often when deciding what to go for next. Top marks to PU for providing it!
|
03-04-13 06:45pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Haven't needed it so far - but I never say never! I keep a fairly open mind about such things so if things stopped working as intended, I'd give it a try...
|
03-02-13 11:40pm
|
Reply
60
|
Eva's Garden
(2)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Looks like an interesting addition to the genre - as you say, a bit sparse, so babes.com is likely to be my next heartcore join - but this is worth keeping an eye on.
|
02-28-13 04:58am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1920x1080 which is a fairly standard size now... they are pretty cheap so a good addition to a laptop.
|
02-28-13 12:08am
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not at all for me!
Natural pale skin = sexy
Natural dark skin = sexy
Visible evidence of having deliberately burned one to look like the other... not sexy
|
02-26-13 03:48pm
|
Reply
63
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
The photography in this site looks quite interesting, although it perhaps leans toward the 18-21s a bit more than I'd like - I prefer a broader range.
What baffles me a bit, though, are its stablemates - it seems to share the same billing/partners as Hegre Art and Richard Kern's New Nude City - two photographers who couldn't be more different... I'm curious as to what links them, and this site.
|
02-25-13 02:12am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Poll
I've never really bothered to look - I am loosely interest in such things, but that interest tends to be outweighed when the photo is of a naked lady.
Anyway, I figure pics we download are unlikely to contain EXIF data - it is usually stripped when the image is processed - resized, colour corrected, etc.
|
02-24-13 01:16am
|
Reply
65
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
I've not joined Sex Art, but have been a member both at X Art and at Joymii. They are very, very similar sites, so if you liked X Art, you should like this. But for my money, I prefer Joymii - the difference is subtle, but the photography just seems better - the sets, colours, angles are a bit different, a bit more interesting.
|
02-24-13 01:12am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I use my computer for work also, so anything remotely racy stays on an external drive - and is therefore gone when I unplug my laptop to take it with me somewhere. Also disabled recent items and the like, for the same reason!
|
02-22-13 12:02am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I said random login and password - but very close is sites that log you out quickly. IIRC, Watch4Beauty is guilty of both those sins, it was very annowing!
|
02-20-13 02:25am
|
Comment
68
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
|
02-19-13 11:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
69
|
The Life Erotic
(2)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I wish you had something similar too, GPL... but now that you mention it, I kind of wish you hadn't - thinking to the phone scenario I mentioned, I'm now picturing one of those unfortunate 'accidental' X-ray images with a mobile... sorry :P
|
02-19-13 12:01am
|
Reply
70
|
The Life Erotic
(2)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree that the shoots are often too subtly lit - I don't mind the atmosphere it brings - entirely different from eg Joymii which I also like but is very light - but some pics here are too dark even for my liking. Concur that Natasha Schon is the worst offender! She has some good pics and scenarios, but too often we can't see anything...
|
02-19-13 12:00am
|
Comment
71
|
The Life Erotic
(2)
|
|
02-18-13 09:45am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
72
|
Petites Parisiennes
(4)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Great, in-depth review, with a lot of good points. You are selling it a bit short on the numbers though; a quick look at the list of sets shows > 700 sets; and don't forget the approx 500 videos.
If you go back a year ago, you'll also find they did experiment with some slightly more explicit stuff - see Emma/Emmanuella's sets (they also have quite a few late 20s models, of which she is one), where there is some masturbation, which worked well.
This was one of my favourite sites - I had a continuous membership for 2 years, but have recently stopped; partly because I have less time to spend on porn of late; but also, if I were to review it again now, I'd score it a bit lower than the very high score in my review, since:
* Updates are no longer daily - that's fine for the price of the site, but I'd need daily updates to subscribe for a year;
* The forum is gone - had some good chats on there with fellow members
* Most importantly - recent updates seem to be more studio-based; whereas what I love about the site is the voyeuristic nature of the locations - outdoor/bedroom/hotel/apartment etc
Oh and you are right it's a bit glitchy! It went through a couple of redesigns while I was a member, but never quite right.
But with all that, I'd still score it in the high 80s, especially for all the great archive material - and lots featuring models dressing and undressing from great lingerie and nylons.
|
02-18-13 09:36am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
I tend to watch porn on my computer rather than TV - so download rather than stream. I do use my PS3 to stream TV and other stuff, though.
|
02-18-13 03:28am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
Another WTF - call me old-fashioned, blinkered and unworldly but I always figured them - and experienced them to be - one and the same...
|
02-16-13 08:11am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Just this one - even if I were to find another good one, there's only so much time!
|
02-14-13 12:11am
|
