| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Melina.com
(1)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
Hi tangub - thanks for the tip here. This is a site on my list - the broad range of models they seem to have is quite appealing and some of the sets look fun. But it seems like the kind of site that would have somewhat dull videos anyway (?) so the lack thereof wouldn't be a deal-breaker. Either way, look forward to your review!
|
04-28-13 02:26pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
All of the above, I think! Had everything from quick and helpful to no response at all.
|
04-28-13 01:05pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Ooh - I really like the one where the guys/girls/transgendered hit the ball/puck/shuttlecock with their stick/foot/hand/bat, trying to score a goal/touchdown/try/wicket against the opposing team.
Not really much of a sports fan :|
|
04-24-13 05:08am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I would imagine much the same. On one hand, there does seem an increase in puritan ideals, in some parts of the US and elsewhere; but hopefully it is balanced by more sex-positive attitudes and that balance should be reflected in legislation.
The only thing that worries me is that they will use issues such as underage porn (and underage viewing of porn!) as ammunition to crack down on online civil liberties in general. It's easily to whip folk up into a mob mentality with that sort of thing.
|
04-22-13 02:29am
|
Reply
30
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree that Joymii has something that the others may be missing. I've been loosely tempted by Sex Art, especially as there are some tempting offers as I am currently a member of TLE... but it does strike me as slightly artsy nonsense :) Not that's necessarily a bad thing - but still, not always what one is after. Babes is OK - a little formulaic and very similar to Digital Desire, just with hardcore - a review will follow.
Interesting that you mention the jarring when seeing the same model with different partners - one one hand the whole porn thing is a suspension of disbelief, so it doesn't bother me quite as much. But on the other, one of my favourite models is Connie/Josephine - apart from her quite jaw-dropping figure, she only seems to do hardcore with the same guy; I guess they are partners and to me it shows, and makes the scenes considerably more believable.
|
04-22-13 01:38am
|
Reply
31
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
This is quite an interesting development. I find Met Art largely unerotic; this isn't specifically down to the lack of explicitness but more a lack of any lewd intent from either the models or the photographers.
Maybe they have taken a tip from their stablemate TLE - who manage to be significantly more erotic even with some of the same models and photographers. Anyway, worth keeping an eye on!
|
04-20-13 12:27am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sure. It is nice to know if they are updating or not - they should be up front about the update dates - but as long as there is a good archive of material, then I can't see why not. Given most of us join for just a month, we are there largely for the archive rather than whatever may turn up during that month anyway?
|
04-19-13 12:47am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I often like sites which are off the, er, beaten track, so many have not been reviewed yet. So I am happy to join an unreviewed site - as long as their tour is informative and gives a good idea as to what to expect!
|
04-18-13 06:16am
|
Reply
34
|
Joy Mii
(1)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
Glad you like it! I'm generally more into softcore, but the heartcore genre has won me over a little - this site remains by far my favourite so far.
I find it has a bit more personality than X Art, which is a bit too perfect-teens-dreamy for me; I especially like the camerawork at Joymii (although I find the photography lacking in atmosphere comparison to the video direction). For me it as the right balance - is a bit arty and sensual but not too seriously or at the expense of actual excitement or fun.
I'm currently a member at Babes.com - it's good, but still has half a foot planted in more typical porn. After that, my next one will be Dane Jones, perhaps?
|
04-15-13 03:37pm
|
Reply
35
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
No problem! A couple of replies: as regards the security, traffic through a VPN is encrypted by the VPN provider - so in theory an unscrupulous provider could track what you are doing - in just the same way your own ISP can. However, when you are at an https address, then your browser and the remote server are encrypting your card details etc over the VPN link - so it is no less or more secure than using a card over any other kind of link.
I've had good experience with TunnelBear so far - as well as being very easy to install (sign up, download, press the on switch) - every regional priced site has seen me as being in the US. Once I get to the payment page they don't seem to care that I put my country as UK - the price is the same.
But I've only used it to sign up for sites and thereafter turned it off to log in and access them - since the free account is limited to 0.5GB/month. If the site won't even let you log in as a member from the UK then you'd need to use the VPN for browsing/downloading also, so you'd need to subscribe.
HTH :)
|
04-15-13 12:00pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Any flaws only make it more realistic for me and are welcomed!
|
04-15-13 01:59am
|
Reply
37
|
Absolute Cruelty
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Hi gpl - TunnelBear is your friend here - it's a VERY easy to use VPN client which will let you pretend you are in the US. I use it for avoiding regional pricing; but note that if you joined and you had to still use it it for content downloads, you'd need to get a paid subscription.
|
04-14-13 11:09pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not really for me. I avoided choosing disgusting since each to their own, and if it works for some folk - consensually - then great. I'm not fond of it in porn since I suspect that in most cases it's not something the model would prefer to do if the material didn't demand it.
Anal fisting is definitely a bit much though - I'm pretty sure that's not good for you!
|
04-13-13 01:18am
|
Comment
39
|
Babes Network.com
(1)
|
|
04-11-13 01:01am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I said Other, since it's not specifically the photo or video size I'm interested in, but more that all their content is represented - ie their archive is browsable in at least thumbnail form, and ideally with previews. That gives a much better idea of what I will actually get, so is the best kind of tour.
|
04-11-13 12:48am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, it is a part of the value the site offers. A relatively expensive site that has very unique material still equates to good value. And I've certainly increased my score a bit for sites which are very cheap.
|
04-10-13 12:23am
|
Comment
42
|
St. Mackenzie's Mistresses
(0)
|
|
04-08-13 02:06am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think we are more than 10 years away on this one! But I guess it depends on how you define robot - perhaps simpler pleasure aids may be more refined... ask me again when they turn up as to whether I'll use them!
|
04-07-13 05:54am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Depends on the definition of tour. I'm very wary of - and don't think I've joined - any sites that don't let you see at least thumbnails of all sets/videos available. On the sites with just a few pages of tour, you have no idea of knowing how much content there is - other than, of course, their claims of being the largest on the net etc...
|
04-05-13 12:50am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I never turn mine off - but I do let it go to sleep automatically. That said, I have restarted it more often lately as I've switched OS and have been tinkering... but once settled, it will likely stay on for weeks, if not months, between reboots.
|
04-03-13 09:49am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
Sometimes, generally on Tuesdays. Unless it's a full moon; when I defer it to Friday.
|
04-01-13 01:08am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't for regular downloads - the built in downloader in Chrome is fine. I switch to FF + DTA in two cases: First I have a lot of large downloads I want to queue overnight (my connection is fast but my bandwidth is capped during the daytime). Then, when a site I join doesn't offer zip downloads - then DTA can generally be pressed into service to easily download an entire set.
|
03-30-13 12:57pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm really lucky to be in a FTTC area, so I got a considerable boost in my internet last year - in theory I get about 70MB. I don't usually see that speed since most sites can't keep up with it - but it does make big downloads pretty quick!
|
03-28-13 01:34am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I guess it depends what the definition of virtual sex is. I've done cybersex - via skype or just text chat - and with the right partner it can work very well. Not sure about other definitions of virtual sex... but it's always safer to never say never :)
|
03-26-13 01:15am
|
Reply
50
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
nipplestrech's Comment
This is a site that's always appealed to me in terms of content - they seem to have some nice looking sets from models I really like. But from past comments here, it seems they go out of their way to make life difficult - and your comment is another example of this.
Webmaster: if you dropped the paranoia, and adopted the more standard model that works for the vast majority of other sites, including your closest competitors, you would have at least one more customer, and I suspect many more :)
|
03-26-13 01:13am
|
