Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Tom SawyerR (2)  

Feedback:   All (5)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Ass Hole Fetish

Ass Hole Fetish

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: High quality video resolution (1280x720)
HOT Models - Extreme and hot action
Good lighting and camera angles (closeups too)
Video qualities - Normal, Low, Widescreen, in clips (Normal is the best quality in clips)
Full-length downloadable (half quality 720x576)
Download speed average (avg 400KB/sec)
No DRM - Content Exclusive
VERY simple layout
Top rated scenes list (not really necessary with so few scenes to date)
Picture sets follow through video time-line
200-400 pics per scene
Zip pic sets
Cons: Very limited content (12 scenes accompanied with pic sets)
When the site opened it added 1 scene a day but looks like they are going to settle on 2 or 3 scenes per month
medium quality pics (1600x1660-1050x1600-avg500KB)
Watermark on pics gets in the way a bit (not bad in videos)
No download manager
No bonus/extra content
Bottom Line: If your niche is extreme anal, this site has 12 super hot scenes in high quality videos. Scenes include lots of extreme penetration and big gapes. It would have been smarter for them to launch the site with at least double the content, so the price is still pretty steep for what you get. The content was so extreme and hot that I would probably sign up again but I'm going to give the site some time to build up more content before checking back in.

11-12-09  05:15pm

Replies (1)
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack

Rated 88+

Awesome site! The girls are pretty high level hot. The asses are round and round. The camera (picture) work provides a super hot perspective that is slightly different than other sites. Usually I filter out pics that don't involve something showing (pussy/tit) however; I've kept tons of the pantie shots for the slide-show collection. The pixels aren't quite as high as something like MET but still pretty high resolution. They also throw in just enough kink (speculum, toys, urine). The movies are 1080 and look great. There's a little more kink in the videos and for me that's a good thing. I don't usually do softcore when it comes to the videos. download manager worked for me. Lots of bang for my buck. I was surprised at how diverse the pic sets are. They have plenty of the usual photo-set posing but here you get the "inthecrack" shots super close, clear, shots of butts, pussies, ass holes (none gaping but ass spreading) Scene locations are exotic and varied (some indoor some outdoor) Also the clothing seems really sexy and they use high contrast colors BRIGHT PINK!!!

11-20-09  01:44pm

Replies (2)
Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
Reply of Cryton's Reply

You're right, I think I'm being a little harsh in my assessment of the site and your review was very thorough and pretty spot on.

04-30-10  09:32pm

Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's
Reply of Cryton's Review

Good review but I still think the grade it too high. The models are definitely hotter than I portrayed in my earlier post. My only ongoing disagreement is with the quality of the content. Pics were tolerable but C- at best (only if you understand that the site is MEGA soft-core - If you thought you were getting a site with nudity, the whole thing gets a HUGE F) Picture quality aside, Variety also get a big F and there is absolutely no reason I would have joined this site to experience the videos. I would have loved this site if it came even close to getting "school girl naughty"...isn't that the point of the genre? I might have even tolerated the girls taking turns using the camera not knowing how the "auto focus" worked and looking like they'd "never wanted to do this in the first place".

04-30-10  02:00am

Visit St. Mackenzie's

St. Mackenzie's

I wouldn't recommend

I'd give this site a 60ish rating
It's a great concept, which is why I checked it out
Turns out it really is like a group of girls that got together bought a house and decorated a couple of rooms and one stairwell to look (loosely) like a schoolhouse.
The picture sets are 90% softcore (5-10% of the pics show tit/ass and less than 1% you see pussy (legs together)
Half the models are hot and half are mediocre at best with 1/3 of them "bigfords"/slightly chubz (one is huuuuuge lol)
It added (not in a good way) to the "authentic amateurness" that the photography seems like the girls bought a cheap cannon 6megapixel camera or something and took the pictures themselves
50% of the photos are blurry and the most frustrating part is for the latter 5-10% of the photo sets when the tits start showing up, the camera focus suddenly becomes its worst.
Checked out a couple of the videos...Garbage
It's a true amateur site.
I am/many of us are a little spoiled these days with pro sites like MET/DDG/etc. and their high resolutions but the picture quality and content of this site just killed me. I tried really hard to give a fair shake (in fact went through 75% of all photo sets but only kept less than 5% for my permanent collection. then I just got to frustrated/bored and deleted the rest)

04-06-10  02:45pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.59 seconds.