Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit St. Mackenzie\'s

St. Mackenzie's (0)

Tom SawyerR (2) 04-06-10  02:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)

I wouldn't recommend

I'd give this site a 60ish rating
It's a great concept, which is why I checked it out
Turns out it really is like a group of girls that got together bought a house and decorated a couple of rooms and one stairwell to look (loosely) like a schoolhouse.
The picture sets are 90% softcore (5-10% of the pics show tit/ass and less than 1% you see pussy (legs together)
Half the models are hot and half are mediocre at best with 1/3 of them "bigfords"/slightly chubz (one is huuuuuge lol)
It added (not in a good way) to the "authentic amateurness" that the photography seems like the girls bought a cheap cannon 6megapixel camera or something and took the pictures themselves
50% of the photos are blurry and the most frustrating part is for the latter 5-10% of the photo sets when the tits start showing up, the camera focus suddenly becomes its worst.
Checked out a couple of the videos...Garbage
It's a true amateur site.
I am/many of us are a little spoiled these days with pro sites like MET/DDG/etc. and their high resolutions but the picture quality and content of this site just killed me. I tried really hard to give a fair shake (in fact went through 75% of all photo sets but only kept less than 5% for my permanent collection. then I just got to frustrated/bored and deleted the rest)

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (1)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Cryton (10) I've looked at every model and none of them could even be remotely described as "huge" (no idea what "bigfords" means). One, Matron Jenny, could be described as curvy, but all the others are seriously in shape.

I tend to agree with the remainder of your comments however.

04-30-10  12:44am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.