Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
St. Mackenzie's
(1)
|
Reply of
Cryton's Reply
You're right, I think I'm being a little harsh in my assessment of the site and your review was very thorough and pretty spot on.
|
04-30-10 09:32pm
|
Reply
2
|
St. Mackenzie's
(1)
|
Reply of
Cryton's Review
Good review but I still think the grade it too high. The models are definitely hotter than I portrayed in my earlier post. My only ongoing disagreement is with the quality of the content. Pics were tolerable but C- at best (only if you understand that the site is MEGA soft-core - If you thought you were getting a site with nudity, the whole thing gets a HUGE F) Picture quality aside, Variety also get a big F and there is absolutely no reason I would have joined this site to experience the videos. I would have loved this site if it came even close to getting "school girl naughty"...isn't that the point of the genre? I might have even tolerated the girls taking turns using the camera not knowing how the "auto focus" worked and looking like they'd "never wanted to do this in the first place".
|
04-30-10 02:00am
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.29 seconds.
|
|
