This network was not worthy of the time it would take to write a full review.
I would describe the content as Euroglam.
When I cancelled my subscription to Tainster, they responded with an offer of a discount-too bad I paid less than their offer when I first signed up. Not exactly inspiring my confidence. I paid 9.95 GBP through TBP. They offered me a deal I could not refuse at 14.95 GBP. I refused.
Continuing with my Tainster experience, the videos were nearly all well below HD quality as well as having very poor camera work. It was just boring, even though they had the type of content that I usually like.
The site design has changed, and I cannot think of a single modification that's been done for the good.
Formerly, it had a very clear and easy navigation; now, it's a lot messier.
Lots of marketing.
Videos are hard to stream, if at all, some pictures just do not load...
All in all, a pain in the ass.
The stuff is as good as always, but is much less attractive if you cannot really enjoy it.
Why have they been so silly to change a very good site for the worse?
BTW, they have now a "Tainster Portal", something along the lines of the PORNPORTAL (Reality Kings, Mofos, Wicked, etc.), where you can buy a for life suscription to other sites. BUT: they are streaming only, no images... And, again, does not stream very well. A good idea, a bad implementation.
This people should learn that good things sell, bad things not. Change? By itself, it sells nothing, only change for the good does.
Some movies comes in many parts and you can find yourself wait for months to get the whole movie with all parts. This is probably done to keep members continue their membership while they wait for the movie to update with a new part.
In Feb., Vito commented that this site has a 300 zip file per 24hr limit.
Certainly not my experience. I've been a recurring subscriber to this site for years, and what thanks do I get? If I try to catch up and download more than THREE ZIP files (of just photos), Chicken Little wakes up in a panic and throws this "Security Alert!" bullshit page in my face, and I'm left having to plan my downloads in more detail as to when, what, and how many.
Update 072715: This has been resolved. See replies.
I could go ahead and write a review that goes over what everyone else says about the site... tons of content, lots of pretty women, etc. But the one thing that stands out as I go through the hundreds and hundreds of models is how many pictures look blurry, upscaled (as in pixelated) or otherwise distorted. I'm only interested in downloading the highest resolution pictures and it really amazes me just how many aren't worth saving. I tried to nail it down to particular photographers or shoot settings where the problem shows up but there's nothing constant to nail it down - it's just throughout the site. Touting how many megapixels your pictures are doesn't mean much to me unless they're clean and clear.
Don't get me wrong - there's still a lot of great content here. But, at the same time, it'll be a long time before I re-up here, if ever.
I'm not a member of fedorovhd, but the photo set dated 2015-06-26, model Julia, titled "Orchid", with 139 images, appears to be the same set that was posted on 2010-02-26. That 2010 set model was Julia, also titled "Orchid", also with 139 images. Both sets have the same cover.
The 2010-02-26 set is no longer listed at fedorovhd as a separate set.
I'd really appreciate feedback from existing members of MetArt.
I've often been tempted to join the site, but one thing puts me off: all the sample images I see from the site are what I'd call "end of photoshoot" shots; the model is either completely nude or close to completely nude, showing everything.
To me a whole gallery of nude shots isn't that appealing: far better is a gallery where the model starts off fully-clothed (or at least partially-clothed, and then progresses to nudity and the kind of poses I see in the Metart samples.
Would I find this kind of gallery at Metart? It's hard to tell because all the available samples are the nude shots: but I'm hoping this might just be because the nude shots have more "pulling power" to get people to join. It's just my thing that when I look at one of those shots, my first thought is "I wish I could see you fully-clothed, and THEN see this shot...".
Thanks in advance for any comments about whether MetArt would provide this, or whether I should look elsewhere!
So I'm back. Go to the site through PU and the monthly price is now $38.95!!!! I open Chrome and go direct to the site and get a $29.95 option. I tried to purchase that repeatedly but the option will not load the Epoch pay site (the $99 annual option will, though.) (Yes, I cleared the cache, etc.) Tried Mozilla and it is $38.95. Three months in a row I've tried to join this site. Three months in a row I've gotten something that bothers me enough to pass. Off to Joymii, I guess!
So I am sitting here looking for another site to join and again came back to DDF. This time, when I followed the link from PU, the sign up link only shows 2 options. Sign up for 3-MONTHS at $89.99 or sign up for a year at $99.99. Wow, that is just ballsy. On a whim, I went direct to the site in another browser and there is a one month sign-up for $29.95 but it renews at $44.95! So they are randomly changing their pricing and options and might even be thumbing their noses at PU. I'm going to pass...again...
Well, I just tried to sign up and see two things that are a little frustrating.
First, the discounted price is up to $33.95. That is not a cache or related issue but is a revised discount from their new regular price of $44.95 a month. Wow...that has to be the most expensive monthly porn site price I have ever seen. Good luck with that.
And perhaps more annoying is that when I first went to the discounted sign-up page, I entered my site-unique username and password for this site into the form. Then I saw that the credit card handler is somebody I haven't heard of before (DDFsupport), NOT one of the ones listed on the charge page (like ccbill), so I backed out. After a few minutes, I decided to sign up anyway and came back to the sign up page. This time, the site said my username was already in use....because I typed it in 5 minutes earlier! This was unfortunate and was enough to make me decide to spend my money elsewhere. I hate getting jerked around before I even sign up for a site. Sorry, DDF, FTVgrls.com (and ccbill) gets my money today.
Met-Art posted a new video, 2015-03-22, with model Adiba, titled: Viola Bailey.
What's new is this is a solo masturbation video.
A few years ago, Met-Art was strictly soft softcore. A girl would almost never touch herself. Or if there was a two-girl gallery, the two girls might kiss on the lips, but that was usually as far as the overt sex would show.
I'm thinking that Met-Art might show a boy and girl together, in the next few years.
Being a member of the stiffia network, you are granted access to one site of the network for free after each month of consecutive membership. However, I could not find an option to unlock another site, so I decided to send an email to the customer service to check.
Their (more or less instant) reply was, that you need to send them an email and tell them which site to unlock, which I did in reply.
A couple of days after that, I'm still stuck to the first website. No unlocking of the site I wanted, no further reaction what so ever.
Looks as if this is just a dodgy way to get your customers to renew their membership for another month after the first one.
Seriously .. every site i have been to had the decency to name their videos for organizational purposes....
while this may mean nothing to many users...
to me its a key aspect in a porn site....
seriously ? I have to rename every video I download because the lazy bastards in charge of the site couldnt pay someone 2$ an hour to do it?
not to mention that there is absolutely ZERO uniqueness... no license id or anything of the sort so if you download ... EVERY movie will be named 1080p_fullcomplete.mp4 or 720p_fullcomplete.mp4
Atleast have the decency to put some sort of unique id so its
Until this is changed or unless you dont givbe a poop abnout downloading lots of videos or love paying people to make yourself do more work than i not reccomend this site.
also just an fyi mr. whoever is in charge of the vidoes of that site..
1080p = 1920 x 1080 (you had this correct)
720p = 1280 x 720 (You advertised your 576p downloads (the ones that didnt have 1080p available as 720p)
576p = 720 x 576 (if this was your 720p im scared to find out the resolution of your 480p .. hahaha
your little 720 x 576 trick was easily noticeable and only a moron wouldnt have caught that.
shady site imo. not worth the minor amount of 1080p and completely fake 720p
Czech casting has something I haven't seen before, but absolutely love... the model stands and moves about in a room that takes pictures from every side in a complete circle giving the viewer a model he can turn around like an action figure and see from every angle on one plane (if you remember geometry). It offers a new model every day and though it is not very sexy I still find viewing a new woman from all sides wonderful.
The possibilities of what could be done with a system like this are mind boggling for me, even though now we only get to see the naked and semi-naked bodies of the models.
Club17 advertises purchases may be made by gift card. For your money you get the normally free access, but no ability to download or stream. If you ask about this? The runaround starts for several emails over several days, then Club !7 refuses to answer any more email. This gift card deal is a gimmick to get you in the door, and then offer your credit card.
Occasionally, Met-Art deletes the photo sets of some models.
I assume this is probably done at the request of the model.
But I found that one photo set of the model named Anita C at Met-Art has been deleted.
The photo set is named "Chariye", originally posted 2014-04-26.
Anita C has plenty of other sets at Met-Art (and Femjoy and MPL Studios and many other sites), so I don't know what the reason would be for deleting this particular set.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.