Ebony Girls Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Bootylicious Mag (2)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Download managers supported.
-The most recent videos can be downloaded WMV 640x360, 2000 kbps or MP4 640x360.
-Videos can streamed or downloaded, in parts or as a whole video.
-No DRM or download restrictions. I did get the message a few times that I was exceeding their bandwidth restrictions while downloading.
-Nice mix of masturbation, softcore and hardcore videos. Most picture sets were not hardcore.
-Photos can be zipdownloaded.
-Photos are 1600x1063. |
| Cons: |
-No access to other websites in the network. Discounts available for multiple signups though.
-Full archive available only by scrolling through the list of models. The video and picture sections were dreadfully incomplete. The archives contain nothing before October 2007, although the site started in December 2005.
-I suspect that some of the material is no longer on the site. I counted 85 models, 70 videos, and 147 photo sets. Compare this to the TBP facts update as of 8/24/8 which has 73 videos and 263 picture sets. I see that new material has been added, yet the site is smaller. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site specializes in big asses and generally has larger women as a result. As such it can be compared to other sites such as XLGirls and Roundandbrown. I found the videos generally more interesting here than on either of these sites. The others focus more exclusively on body parts such as breasts in XLgirls and ass in roundandbrown. This site is more whole girl with an emphasis on the part as a secondary matter. I prefer whole girl to parts. XLgirls is mostly white girls. In contrast, roundandbrown and this site have mostly black and latina girls. More than half are black, probably two thirds. What I also preferred here was that there is some anal, which was sadly lacking in roundandbrown. Overall I liked the sex, but it was not greatly different from what you could find on a site featuring ordinary gonzo style porn. There were many well known pornstars, but some of the models were strippers and not the most common names and faces you could find anywhere. I did not appreciate the lack of any easy way to find the content or the fact that apparently some of the material is no longer on the site. Good value for a discounted site, but I would feel disappointed at full price. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Raw Black Amateurs (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Low price
Various download quality types (low, med, hi)
Streaming option
Lots of screens for each video
Easy to navigate |
| Cons: |
No new content in over a year
All videos and images are water-marked
A lot of the girls are not too attractive
Nothing to set them apart from any other sites
Not all download links works |
| Bottom Line: |
The videos are of high quality, but the images really aren't. As it was mentioned earlier, the site has not seen anything new in over a year. You'll often find yourself clicking on dead links and trying to view things that aren't available. It's really irritating.
On top of that, the majority of the girls aren't too attractive.
The price is a fair price for the pros, but the cons practically kill any further desire to subscribe even for a second. It's honestly not worth it for the 57 videos.
My final assessment is to save your money and pass on this one, trust me it's not worth much if anything.
If you are interested i recommend you subscribe to Download Pass, this comes as a bonus site with almost full access. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Real Black Lesbians (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill.
-64 half hour long videos, WMV 720x540 2550kbps. Streaming and download options, but only whole clip.
-Has 960x540 screenshots available for almost every video.
-No DRM or download restrictions.
-Can use Download Acclerator Plus, but not Flashget or Free Download Manager.
-Simple navigation. Videos are listed by date with a screenshot, or you can click on a different link to search by star.
-Updates once a week.
-Part of a small network of three lesbian sites. |
| Cons: |
-Only two download options, high and medium quality. Only WMV available.
-Screenshots are not zipdownloadable.
-Many of the videos are gonzo style with either no plot or it is minimal.
-Well known black pornstars which means most of the girls have too much makeup, many have fake boobs, too much artificial moaning that simply sounds fake. Most are not really into the sex.
-Probably not much exclusive material. Some I have seen before, or I have seen the set used in similar videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
In spite of the fact that the sex was mostly uninspired, by the numbers gonzo with well known stars, I enjoyed the videos. Scenes like this are not easy to find in any quantity, let alone a whole site. I believe it may even be unique on the net, as I don't know of another site that focuses on black women. In all fairness though, there are similar DVD's. Much of the sex is somewhat interesting and holds your attention. Further, many scenes have three or more girls. The photography is mostly done in an erotic way, focusing on the pussy. There is a minimum of diagonal shots and there are very few cases where the focus is on the face or the background when it is inappropriate. The sex is a good mix of soft and hard, with a lot of pussy and breast licking, as well as the use of toys. There is even a little variety within the genre, such as footplay and toe licking. Overall an enjoyable site with not much competition on the net. |
| Respond: |
5 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
